Publication Date:
2010-03-15
Description:
We use an aftershock dataset of over 1500 events (M (sub L) 0.7-5.8) to study the relationship between magnitude and the predominant period calculated from the initial P-wave arrival. We calculate Formula (Nakamura, 1988; Allen and Kanamori, 2003) and find that there is a trend between Formula and magnitude, as reported by previous authors. However, the trend is weaker than expected. We calculate an alternative predominant period function, tau (sub c) (Kanamori, 2005), and find virtually no relationship to magnitude for these data. We therefore implement a modified, damped version of the T (super p) function, which we term T (super pd) . The T (super pd) function introduces an additional term, D (sub s) , aimed at stabilizing the predominant period function in the transition between noise and signal. We show that T (super pd) (sub Max) has an improved relationship to magnitude, with the average coefficient of determination (R (super 2) ) increasing from 0.15 for T (super pd) (sub Max) to 0.5 for T (super pd) (sub Max) . This improvement is consistent for all stations. We then apply the T (super pd) function to the displacement waveforms, calling the associated function T (super pd_D) . The trend in the T (super pd_D) (sub Max) versus magnitude relationship is superior to that of tau (sub c) . Analyzing the T (super pd) function, we conclude that improvements result from damping large values in the noise region, or reducing spikes during the noise-to-signal transition, thus preventing incorrect maxima from being selected. We attempt to optimize the T (super p) (sub Max) and tau (sub c) results, and find that although the results improve, they are still significantly worse than for T (super pd) (sub Max) . The T (super pd) (sub Max) performance is shown to be robust and less dependent on the choice of parameters than T (super p) (sub Max) . We then apply T (super p) (sub Max) and T (super pd) (sub Max) to estimating magnitudes. Average errors are 20% smaller for T (super pd) (sub Max) estimates compared with optimized T (super p) (sub Max) results, with greater improvement for unoptimized parameters. We conclude that the performance of T (super pd) (sub Max) is superior to T (super p) (sub Max) and tau (sub c) and should be considered for real-time magnitude estimation.
Print ISSN:
0037-1106
Electronic ISSN:
1943-3573
Topics:
Geosciences
,
Physics
Permalink