Publication Date:
2015-05-08
Description:
The removal of forest logging residues for bioenergy production is projected to increase by several orders of magnitudes in the near future. Little is known about the environmental consequences of this practice, however, especially in freshwater ecosystems. Using data from 18 headwater streams in central Finland, we assessed the responses of four lotic (diatoms, bryophytes, dipterans and benthic macroinvertebrates) and two riparian (bryophytes and vascular plants) organism groups to logging residue removal (LRR). The streams were divided in three groups: unharvested, conventional logging (no LRR) or LRR (both conventional logging and LRR). We hypothesized that conventional logging would result in intermediate biodiversity and environmental responses, with LRR showing the strongest effects. Contrary to our expectation, conventional logging elicited the strongest responses, whereas LRR had little additional impact when compared with conventional logging. This likely reflects a stricter adherence by the LRR operators to forest management guidelines. Our approach of comparing both conventional logging and LRR to unharvested sites yielded important insights that would have been missed otherwise. Rigorous monitoring using multiple taxonomic groups of both terrestrial and freshwater origin is needed to detect the long-term effects of LRR activities.
Print ISSN:
0015-752X
Electronic ISSN:
1464-3626
Topics:
Agriculture, Forestry, Horticulture, Fishery, Domestic Science, Nutrition
Permalink