Publication Date:
1985-05-01
Description:
Although models of the pressure-strain term explain many features of nearly uniform homogeneous shear flows, a discrepancy remains (Leslie 1980). It is suggested that the discrepancy is caused by use of an empirical expression for the fluctuation part of the pressure-strain term, the part usually denoted by ϕij, 1. The discrepancy is eliminated by replacement of the empirical ϕij1a recent theoretical expression. Relatedly, the Launder, Reece & Rodi (1975) model for the mean-field part ϕij2isshown to be a good approximation for both a strongly and weakly sheared flow. This model of ϕij2whencombined with the theoretical ϕij1is found to provide an explanation for experiments of both Champagne, Harris & Corrsin (1970) and Harris, Graham & Corrsin (1977). Full correction requires that deviations from local isotropy be accounted for. Special emphasis is given to a theoretical demonstration that the pressure-strain term does not cause a retun to isotropy but, rather, it resists large anisotropy-a weaker effect. © 1985, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
Print ISSN:
0022-1120
Electronic ISSN:
1469-7645
Topics:
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Production Engineering, Mining and Metallurgy, Traffic Engineering, Precision Mechanics
,
Physics
Permalink