ALBERT

Notes: It has been shown that it is possible to produce near diffraction limited images with soft x rays of wavelength 13.8 nm using normal incidence Si/Mo-multilayered coated optics. Initial experiments with a 20X reduction Schwarzschild optic produced features as small as 50 nm. It is considered that soft x-ray projection lithography may be a likely candidate for the future generation of lithographic tools needed to produce 0.1-μm features for integrated circuits around the turn of the century.

Notes: Standard lithographic techniques have been utilized to fabricate quantum wells which are confined on both sides by vacuum. These "naked'' quantum wells are fabricated from spatially and compositionally modulated III-V superlattices in which alternate layers of the structures are sacrificed by selective etching. These structures are patterned such that the quantum wells are suspended between support posts.

Notes: A projection optical system with 20:1 reduction has been used with radiation at ∼36 nm to evaluate resists for use in soft-x-ray projection lithography. The high absorption of soft x rays by carbon-based polymers requires that an imaging resist layer be very thin. The sensitivities and contrasts of several such resists are reported. By incorporating a thin imaging layer into a trilayer resist scheme, we have exposed, developed, and transferred features as small as 0.2 μm into silicon.

Notes: Summary The distribution of a crop rooting system can be defined by root length density (RD), root length (RL) per soil layer of depth Δz, sum of root length (SRL) in the soil profile (total root length) or rooting depth (z r . The combined influence of these root system parameters on water uptake is not well understood. In the present study, field data are evaluated and an attempt is made to relate a daily “maximum water uptake rate” (WUmax) per unit soil volume as measured in different soil layers of the profile to relevant parameters of the root system. We hypothesize that local uptake rate is at its maximum when neither soil nor root characteristics limit water flow to, and uptake by, roots. Leaf area index and the potential evapotranspiration rate (ET p ) are also important in determining WUmax, since these quantities influence transpiration and hence total crop water uptake rate. Field studies in Germany and in Western Australia showed that WUmax depends on RD. In general, there was a strong correlation between the maximum water uptake rate of a soil layer (LWUmax) normalized by ET p and RL normalized by SRL. The quantity LWUmax · ET p -1 was linearly related to (RL/SRL)1/2. The data show that the single root model will not predict the influence of RD on WUmax correctly under field conditions when water-extracting neighboring roots may cause non-steady-state conditions within the time span of sequential observations. Since the rooting depth z r was linearly related to (SRL)1/2, the relation: LWUmax · ET p -1 = f (RL1/2/z r ) holds. Furthermore it was found that the maximum “specific” uptake rate per cm root length URmax was inversely related to RD1/2 and to SRL1/2 or z r of the profile. Observed high specific uptake rates of shallow rooted crops might be explained not only by their lower RD-values but also by the additional effect of a low z r . The relations found in this paper are helpful for realistically describing the “sink term” of dynamic water uptake models. Growing plants extract water from the soil to meet transpiration needs. Rates of transpiration and of water uptake are set by evaporative demand and by plant and soil factors which influence capacity to meet that demand. These factors include crop canopy size and leaf characteristics, root system characteristics and hydraulic properties of the soil and the soil-root interface. Soil and root system properties vary with depth and all factors vary in time, so that parameters related to them require constant updating over a crop season. Dynamic simulation models describe water uptake by root systems under field conditions as a function of soil depth and time. Many of these simulation approaches are based on Gardner's (1960) single root model (Feddes 1981). These simulation procedures follow the assumption that water uptake is proportional to a difference in water potential between the bulk soil and the root surface or the plant interior, to the hydraulic conductivity of the soil-plant system and to the “effectiveness” of competing roots in water uptake. The effectiveness factor accounts more or less empirically for the influence of various root system parameters on water uptake such as percentage of “active” roots absorbing water, root surface permeability, root length density determining the distance between neighbouring roots, or total root length and depth of the root system. Such models however, will not always reflect correctly the influence of root system characteristics on water uptake since these assumptions have rarely been tested under field conditions. In many instances, there is better agreement between simulated and measured total water use of plants than between predicted and observed water depletion by roots within individual layers of the soil profile (Alaerts et al. 1985). Water uptake by an expanding root system as a function of depth and time has been studied under field conditions for several crops (listed in Herkelrath et al. 1977a; Feddes 1981; Hamblin 1985). They show that the dynamics of water uptake depend on root length density and the “availability” of soil water. However, the combined influence of root length density, total root length and rooting depth on the water uptake pattern has not been assessed. An evaluation of root system parameters with respect to soil water extraction should aid our understanding of how roots perform under field conditions and may assist our efforts to formulate the water uptake function of roots in dynamic simulation studies more realistically. The aim of the present investigation is to develop an approach that relates measured water uptake rates to relevant parameters of the root systems. This approach will be confined to situations where water uptake in a soil layer is not restricted by unfavorable soil conditions, such as in wet soil, by insufficient aeration and, in dry soil, by reduced water flow towards roots or by increased contact resistance (Herkelrath et al. 1977b). We will define a maximum water uptake rate WUmax that is neither soil-limited nor appreciably limited by the decreasing permeability of aging roots. This WUmax will be related to relevant root system parameters as they exist when WUmax is observed. Hence, water uptake by roots in a very wet, as well as in a dry soil, has been excluded from consideration.

Notes: Abstract A field study tested the hypothesis that modern wheat varieties invest a lesser proportion of the total dry matter (root plus shoot) in the root system compared to old varieties. The study was carried out on a duplex soil (sand over clay) at Merredin, Western Australia in a Mediterranean type environment. We also compared the root:shoot dry matter ratios of near-isogenic lines forRht dwarfing genes. Root:shoot ratios decreased with crop growth stage and were closely related to the developmental pattern of a variety. All varieties appeared to accumulate more dry matter into shoots after the terminal spikelet stage. For the modern variety Kulin this occurred as early as 55 days after sowing (DAS), but did not occur until 90 DAS in the old variety Purple Straw. For all varieties, root dry matter reached its maximum at anthesis, while shoot dry matter continued to increase till maturity. At anthesis there were no significant differences in shoot dry matter between varieties, but from Purple Straw to Kulin root dry matter and thus root:shoot ratio decreased. The tall and dwarf isogenic lines had similar developmental and root:shoot dry matter accumulation patterns. At anthesis, the old variety Purple Straw had significantly higher root dry matter and root length density in the top 40-cm of the profile than modern variety Kulin. There were no varietal differences in rooting depth, water extraction or water use. At maturity about 30% of the total dry matter was invested in the roots among wheat varieties. Grain yield, harvest index (HI) and water use efficiency of grain (WUEgr) increased from old to modern varieties. The reduced investment of dry matter in the root system and thus the lower root:shoot ratio from early in the growing season may partly explain the increased HI and WUEgr of modern compared to old varieties.

Notes: Abstract A field study tested the hypothesis that modern wheat varieties invest a lesser proportion of the total dry matter (root plus shoot) in the root system compared to old varieties. The study was carried out on a duplex soil (sand over clay) at Merredin, Western Australia in a Mediterranean type environment. We also compared the root:shoot dry matter ratios of near-isogenic lines for Rht dwarfing genes. Root:shoot ratios decreased with crop growth stage and were closely related to the developmental pattern of a variety. All varieties appeared to accumulate more dry matter into shoots after the terminal spikelet stage. For the modern variety Kulin this occurred as early as 55 days after sowing (DAS), but did not occur until 90 DAS in the old variety Purple Straw. For all varieties, root dry matter reached its maximum at anthesis, while shoot dry matter continued to increase till maturity. At anthesis there were no significant differences in shoot dry matter between varieties, but from Purple Straw to Kulin root dry matter and thus root:shoot ratio decreased. The tall and dwarf isogenic lines had similar developmental and root:shoot dry matter accumulation patterns. At anthesis, the old variety Purple Straw had significantly higher root dry matter and root length density in the top 40-cm of the profile than modern variety Kulin. There were no varietal differences in rooting depth, water extraction or water use. At maturity about 30% of the total dry matter was invested in the roots among wheat varieties. Grain yield, harvest index (HI) and water use efficiency of grain (WUEgr) increased from old to modern varieties. The reduced investment of dry matter in the root system and thus the lower root:shoot ratio from early in the growing season may partly explain the increased HI and WUEgr of modern compared to old varieties.