ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  Journal of Seismology, Leipzig, Birkhäuser Verlag, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 357-381, pp. L15S17, (ISBN: 0-12-018847-3)
    Publication Date: 1997
    Keywords: Seismology ; GRSN ; Seismic networks ; Broad-band ; Micro-tremor (seismic noise) ; Signal to noise ratio ; Seismic ; noise, ; signal-to-noise ; ratio, ; site ; selection, ; German ; Regional ; Seismic ; Network ; JOSE ; GFZ
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 1998-01-01
    Description: The main cause for mid-period seismic ground distortions are ocean waves generated by atmospheric disturbances. These act upon the earth through different mechanisms. The microseismic wavefield can be divided into primary (T=12-18 s) and secondary (T= 6-9 s) noise. Classical theory tells that the origin of these induced ground distortions depends on the location and the intensity of the low pressure region. A considerable part of the microseismic wave field reaches the GRF-array in southern Germany with high coherency and almost constant amplitudes. Thus it is possible to locate the generating areas using frequency-wavenumber analysis. Five discrete generating areas for secondary microseisms and three generating areas for primary microseisms could be determined in the Atlantic Ocean, the Arctic Sea and the Mediterranean Sea by investigating broadband continuous recordings over four months in winter 1995/96. An essential result is the long-time constancy of the backazimuths of the coherent part of the microseismic wavefield with respect to the origin areas, independent of the location of the moving low pressure zone. Results from a triangulation using additionally broadband data from the NORS AR-array and an independent estimation of the distance of the source region with water wave dispersion data indicate an origin of the secondary microseismic wavefield near the north-Norwegian coast for the strongest source. The array analysis of a temporary network of ten three-component broadband stations in south-east Germany shows that the ratio of energy between coherent Love and Rayleigh waves is much higher for the primary than for the secondary microseismic noise wavefield. This indicates differences in the source mechanisms.
    Print ISSN: 1383-4649
    Electronic ISSN: 1573-157X
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Published by Springer
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 1997-01-01
    Description: The German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) comprizes now 16 digital broadband stations equipped with Wieland-Streckeisen STS-2 seismometers, 24-bit dataloggers and a seismological data center at Erlangen. It covers the whole territory of Germany with station-spacings between 80 km to 240 km. The stations are sited in very different environments ranging from near shore at the Baltic Sea coast up to distances of about 700 km from the coast, both within cities and up to about 10 km away from any major settlement, industry or traffic roads. The underground varies from outcropping hard rocks in Hercynian mountain areas, sedimentary rocks in areas of Mesozoic platform cover to up to 1.5 km unconsolidated Quarternary and Tertiary subsoil. Accordingly, seismic background noise varies in a wide range between the upper and lower bounds of the new global noise model. The noise conditions at the GRSN have been investigated systematically by means of displacement power spectral analysis within the frequency range 10-2〈f〈40 Hz. Smoothed power spectra have been calculated by applying the 'average segment method' using record intervals between 4 and 45 min long and between 6 and 25 overlapping segments. Representative samples were taken at different times of the day and the year in order to quantify for all sites the level and degree of variability of seismic background noise. The worst stations of the original GRSN were Berlin (BRLN), Hamburg (HAM) and Liddow (LID), all placed on unconsolidated soft-soil cover, between 50 m (at LID) and about 1.5 km thick (at HAM). But no spectral noise peaks due to wave resonance in this soft-soil cover could be identified because the noise spectra at all these sites are clearly dominated by strong ambient noise sources (traffic, industry and/or coastal surf sea-noise). For all three sites better locations had to be found at not too large distance from the original sites so as to preserve the good overall GRSN network configuration. Suitable alternatives were found at Rüdersdorf (RUE), Bad Segeberg (BSEG) and west of the village of Neunkirchen, Island of Rügen (RGN). RUE and BSEG were placed on locally outcropping sedimentary rock on top of a salt dome and within the cap of a diapir, respectively. The new station RGN was installed only 2.8 km away from the former LID in a huge soil-covered army bunker which provided much better thermal shielding and a more stable basement platform for long-period recordings. The noise power at RUE and BSEG as compared to BRLN and HAM is reduced by about 10 to 50 dB between 0.4Hz〈f〈50 Hz. This corresponds to 1 to 5 orders of magnitude in power spectral density or a factor of 3 to 300 in displacement amplitudes. For some selected, both near and teleseismic events improvements of the spectral signal-to-noise ratio 〉5 for RUE and 〉10 for BSEG have been confirmed for frequencies between about 0.6 Hz〈f〈5 Hz. Thus BSEG has become now a station only somewhat inferior to the good hard rock sites in the central and southern part of Germany while RUE near Berlin is almost comparable with FUR near Munich. RGN, still being inappropriate in the teleseismic detection window around 1 s, is now almost as good as other fine GRSN stations in the long-period range between about 10 s〈T〈50 s, comparable with FUR around f=2 Hz and even better for f〉3 Hz. Strong lateral velocity and impedance contrasts between the outcropping Triassic/Permian sedimentary rocks and the surrounding unconsolidated Quarternary/Tertiary sediments are shown to be the main cause for the strong noise reduction and signal-to-noise ratio improvement at RUE and can account for about 50% of the noise reduction at BSEG.
    Print ISSN: 1383-4649
    Electronic ISSN: 1573-157X
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Published by Springer
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    ISSN: 1420-9136
    Keywords: Key words: Anisotropy, shear-wave splitting, SKS waves.
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: Abstract —SKS phases observed at broadband stations in Germany show significant shear-wave splitting. We have analyzed SKS and SKKS phases for shear-wave splitting from 13 stations of the German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN), from 3 three-component stations of the Gräfenberg array (GRF) and from one Austrian station (SQTA). The data reveal strong differences in the splitting parameters (fast direction φ and delay time δt from a single event at various stations as well as variations at the individual stations for events with different backazimuths. The backazimuthal variations of the splitting parameters at some stations can be explained by two-layer anisotropy models with horizontal symmetry axes. The best resolved two-layer model is the GRA1 model (upper layer φ = 40°, δt = 1.15s; lower layer φ = 115°, δt = 1.95s). The upper layer can be attributed to the lithosphere. Because of the magnitude of the delay time of the upper layer, the lower layer must lie within the asthenosphere. At other stations splitting parameters are consistent with an anisotropic one-layer model for the upper mantle. Stations near the Bohemian Massif show fast directions near EW. Throughout NE Germany the directions are oriented NW/SE. The reason for this direction is probably the nearby Tornquist-Teisseyre line. The observed fast axes are subparallel to this prominent Transeuropean suture zone. At stations in southern Germany near the Alps we observed ENE/WSW directions. Below some stations we also found indications of inclined anisotropic layers.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Journal of seismology 2 (1998), S. 47-64 
    ISSN: 1573-157X
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: Abstract The main cause for mid-period seismic ground distortions are ocean waves generated by atmospheric disturbances. These act upon the earth through different mechanisms. The microseismic wavefield can be divided into primary (T =12–18 s) and secondary (T = 6–9 s) noise. Classical theory tells that the origin of these induced ground distortions depends on the location and the intensity of the low pressure region. A considerable part of the microseismic wave field reaches the GRF-array in southern Germany with high coherency and almost constant amplitudes. Thus it is possible to locate the generating areas using frequency-wavenumber analysis. Five discrete generating areas for secondary microseisms and three generating areas for primary microseisms could be determined in the Atlantic Ocean, the Arctic Sea and the Mediterranean Sea by investigating broadband continuous recordings over four months in winter 1995/96. An essential result is the long-time constancy of the backazimuths of the coherent part of the microseismic wavefield with respect to the origin areas, independent of the location of the moving low pressure zone. Results from a triangulation using additionally broadband data from the NORSAR-array and an independent estimation of the distance of the source region with water wave dispersion data indicate an origin of the secondary microseismic wavefield near the north-Norwegian coast for the strongest source. The array analysis of a temporary network of ten three-component broadband stations in south-east Germany shows that the ratio of energy between coherent Love and Rayleigh waves is much higher for the primary than for the secondary microseismic noise wavefield. This indicates differences in the source mechanisms.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 6
    ISSN: 1573-157X
    Keywords: Seismic noise ; signal-to-noise ratio ; site selection ; German Regional Seismic Network
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Geosciences , Physics
    Notes: Abstract The German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) comprizes now 16 digital broadband stations equipped with Wieland-Streckeisen STS-2 seismometers, 24-bit dataloggers and a seismological data center at Erlangen. It covers the whole territory of Germany with station-spacings between 80 km to 240 km. The stations are sited in very different environments ranging from near shore at the Baltic Sea coast up to distances of about 700 km from the coast, both within cities and up to about 10 km away from any major settlement, industry or traffic roads. The underground varies from outcropping hard rocks in Hercynian mountain areas, sedimentary rocks in areas of Mesozoic platform cover to up to 1.5 km unconsolidated Quarternary and Tertiary subsoil. Accordingly, seismic background noise varies in a wide range between the upper and lower bounds of the new global noise model. The noise conditions at the GRSN have been investigated systematically by means of displacement power spectral analysis within the frequency range 10-2 〈f 〈 40 Hz. Smoothed power spectra have been calculated by applying the 'average segment method' using record intervals between 4 and 45 min long and between 6 and 25 overlapping segments. Representative samples were taken at different times of the day and the year in order to quantify for all sites the level and degree of variability of seismic background noise. The worst stations of the original GRSN were Berlin (BRLN), Hamburg (HAM) and Liddow (LID), all placed on unconsolidated soft-soil cover, between 50 m (at LID) and about 1.5 km thick (at HAM). But no spectral noise peaks due to wave resonance in this soft-soil cover could be identified because the noise spectra at all these sites are clearly dominated by strong ambient noise sources (traffic, industry and/or coastal surf sea-noise). For all three sites better locations had to be found at not too large distance from the original sites so as to preserve the good overall GRSN network configuration. Suitable alternatives were found at Rüdersdorf (RUE), Bad Segeberg (BSEG) and west of the village of Neunkirchen, Island of Rügen (RGN). RUE and BSEG were placed on locally outcropping sedimentary rock on top of a salt dome and within the cap of a diapir, respectively. The new station RGN was installed only 2.8 km away from the former LID in a huge soil-covered army bunker which provided much better thermal shielding and a more stable basement platform for long-period recordings. The noise power at RUE and BSEG as compared to BRLN and HAM is reduced by about 10 to 50 dB between 0.4 Hz 〈f 〈 50 Hz. This corresponds to 1 to 5 orders of magnitude in power spectral density or a factor of 3 to 300 in displacement amplitudes. For some selected, both near and teleseismic events improvements of the spectral signal-to-noise ratio 〉 5 for RUE and 〉 10 for BSEG have been confirmed for frequencies between about 0.6 Hz 〈f 〈 5 Hz. Thus BSEG has become now a station only somewhat inferior to the good hard rock sites in the central and southern part of Germany while RUE near Berlin is almost comparable with FUR near Munich. RGN, still being inappropriate in the teleseismic detection window around 1 s, is now almost as good as other fine GRSN stations in the long-period range between about 10 s 〈t 〈 50 s, comparable with FUR around f = 2 Hz and even better for f 〉 3 Hz. Strong lateral velocity and impedance contrasts between the outcropping Triassic/Permian sedimentary rocks and the surrounding unconsolidated Quarternary/Tertiary sediments are shown to be the main cause for the strong noise reduction and signal-to-noise ratio improvement at RUE and can account for about 50% of the noise reduction at BSEG.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 7
    facet.materialart.
    Unknown
    In:  EPIC3Workshop on Seismic Processes and Associated Phenomena in West Bohemia and in the Vogtland Tepla, October 13-15, 1999, abstracts, 8 p.
    Publication Date: 2019-07-17
    Repository Name: EPIC Alfred Wegener Institut
    Type: Conference , notRev
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 8
    Publication Date: 2020-02-12
    Description: Abstract: The German Regional Seismic Network (GRSN) comprises now 16 digital broadband stations equipped with Wieland-Streckeisen STS-2 seismometers, 24-bit data loggers and a seismological data centre at Erlanger. It covers the whole territory of Germany with station-spacing between 80 km to 240 km. The stations are sited in very different environments ranging from near shore at the Baltic Sea coast up to distances of about 700 km from the coast, both within cities and up to about 10 km away from any major settlement, industry or traffic roads. The underground varies from outcropping hard rocks in Hercynian mountain areas, sedimentary rocks in areas of Mesozoic platform cover to up to 1.5 km unconsolidated Quaternary and Tertiary subsoil. Accordingly, seismic background noise varies in a wide range between the upper and lower bounds of the new global noise model. The noise conditions at the GRSN have been investigated systematically by means of displacement power spectral analysis within the frequency range 10-2 〈 f 〈 40 Hz. Smoothed power spectra have been calculated by applying the "average segment method" using record intervals between 4 and 45 min long and between 6 and 25 overlapping segments. Representative samples were taken at different times of the day and the year in order to quantify for all sites the level and degree of variability of seismic background noise. The worst stations of the original GRSN were Berlin (BRLN), Hamburg (HAM) and Lido (LID), all placed on unconsolidated soft-soil cover, between 50 m (at LID) and about 1.5 km thick (at HAM). But no spectral noise peaks due to wave resonance in this soft-soil cover could be identified because the noise spectra at all these sites are clearly dominated by strong ambient noise sources (traffic, industry and/or coastal surf sea-noise). For all three sites better locations had to be found at not too large distance from the original sites so as to preserve the good overall GRSN network configuration. Suitable alternatives were found at Ruedersdorf (RUE), Bad Segeberg (BSEG) and west of the village of Neunkirchen, Island of Ruegen (RGN). RUE and BSEG were placed on locally outcropping sedimentary rock on top of a salt dome and within the cap of a diapir, respectively. The new station RGN was installed only 2.8 km away from the former LID in a huge soil-covered army bunker which provided much better thermal shielding and a more stable basement platform for long-period recordings. The noise power at RUE and BSEG as compared to BRLN and HAM is reduced by about 10 to 50 dB between 0.4 Hz 〈 f 〈 50 Hz. This corresponds to 1 to 5 orders of magnitude in power spectral density or a factor of 3 to 300 in displacement amplitudes. For some selected, both near and teleseismic events improvements of the spectral signal-to-noise ratio 〉 5 for RUE and 〉 10 for BSEG have been confirmed for frequencies between about 0.6 Hz 〈 f 〈 5 Hz. Thus BSEG has become now a station only somewhat inferior to the good hard rock sites in the central and southern part of Germany while RUE near Berlin is almost comparable with FUR near Munich. RGN, still being inappropriate in the teleseismic detection window around 1 s, is now almost as good as other fine GRSN stations in the long-period range between about 10 s 〈 T 〈 50 s, comparable with FUR around f = 2 Hz and even better for f 〉 3 Hz. Strong lateral velocity and impedance contrasts between the outcropping Triassic/Permian sedimentary rocks and the surrounding unconsolidated Quaternary/Tertiary sediments are shown to be the main cause for the strong noise reduction and signal-to-noise ratio improvement at RUE and can account for about 50% of the noise reduction at BSEG. Additional keywords: STS-2, salt diapir of Bad Segeberg, Triassic anticline of Ruedersdorf, impedance contrasts, Breitbandregistrierungen, Signal-Rausch-Verhaeltnis, Massnahmen zur Reduzierung, Suche nach alternativen Standorten, anomale geologische Koerper, Trias-Antiklinale Ruedersdorf, Salzdiapir von Bad Segeberg, Impedanzkontraste
    Keywords: 550 - Earth sciences
    Type: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...