ISSN:
1089-7690
Source:
AIP Digital Archive
Topics:
Physics
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
Notes:
X−⋅(H2O)n=1–4 [X=F, Cl, Br, I] have been studied using high level ab initio calculations. This extensive work compares the structures of the different halide water clusters and has found that the predicted minimum energy geometries for different cluster are accompanied by several other structures close to these global minima. Hence the most highly populated structures can change depending on temperature due to the entropy effect. As the potential surfaces are flat, the wide-ranging zero point vibrational effects are important at 0 K, and not only a number of low-lying energy conformers but also large amplitude motions can be important in determining structures, energies, and spectra at finite temperatures. The binding energies, ionization potentials, charge-transfer-to-solvent (CTTS) energies, and the O–H stretching frequencies are reported, and compared with the experimental data available. A distinctive difference between F−⋅(H2O)n and X−⋅(H2O)n (X=Cl, Br, I) is noted, as the former tends to favor internal structures with negligible hydrogen bonding between water molecules, while the latter favors surface structures with significant hydrogen bonding between water molecules. These characteristics are well featured in their O–H spectra of the clusters. However, the spectra are forced to be very sensitive to the temperature, which explains some differences between different spectra. In case of F−⋅(H2O)n, a significant charge transfer is noted in the S0 ground state, which results in much less significant charge transfer in the S1 excited state compared with other hydrated halide clusters which show near full charge transfers in the S1 excited states. Finally, the nature of the stabilization interactions operative in these clusters has been explained in terms of many-body interaction energies. © 2000 American Institute of Physics.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1290016
Permalink
