ALBERT

Description: Highlights • This study examined MP concentrations and PAE distribution in a semi-enclosed Sharm Obhur leading to the Red Sea. • DEP, DBP and DEHP are the predominant PAEs. • A positive relationship was found between PAE concentration and PDs abundance. • The ecological risk of PAEs and PDs was found from low to moderate. The abundance of plastic debris (PDs) and its correlation with phthalic acid esters (PAEs), a class of pollutants associated with plastics, is not well understood, although PDs have been reported in relation to the release and distribution of aquatic pollutants such as PAEs. Few studies have linked the distribution of these pollutants in seawater. The current study examined the abundance and relationship of PDs and PAEs in seawater from Sharm Obhur and the Red Sea. Estimates were also made of their ecological impacts. Sharm Obhur is a semi-enclosed bay on the eastern shore of the Red Sea, near Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, and is heavily impacted by human activities. Contaminants from Sharm Obhur may be transported into the deep waters of the Red Sea by the subsurface outflow. The PAEs concentrations in the study area ranged from 0.8 to 1224 ng/L. Among the six PAEs studied, diethyl phthalate (DEP) (22–1124 ng/L), di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) (9–346 ng/L) and di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) (62–640 ng/L) were the predominant additives detected across all the sampling sits. Whereas the other PAEs, dimethyl phthalate (DMP) (5–76 ng/L), benzyl butyl phthalate (BBP) (4–25 ng/L) and di-n-octyl phthalate DnOp (0.5–80 ng/L) were generally lower in most samples. The sum of the six analyzed PAEs (∑6 PAEs) was lower at Sharm Obhur (587 ± 82 ng/L) and in the Red Sea shelf (677 ± 182 ng/L) compared to the Red Sea shelf break (1266 ± 354 ng/L). This suggests that degradation and adsorption of PAEs were higher in Sharm Obhur and on the shelf than on the shelf break. In contrast, there was no difference in the abundance of PDs between Sharm Obhur (0.04 ± 0.02 PDs/m3), Red Sea shelf (0.05 ± 0.02 PDs/m3) and in the Red Sea shelf break (0.03 ± 0.1 PDs/m3). Polyethylene (32%) and polypropylene (8%) were dominant, mostly smaller than 5 mm2 (78%), with the majority consisting of white (52%) and black (24%) fragments (39%), fibers (35%) and films (24%). A positive correlation between PAE concentration and abundance of PDs, suggests either a common source or a causal link through leaching. The ecological risk of ∑4PAEs (DMP, DEP, DBP and DEHP) ranged from (0.20–0.78), indicating a low to moderate risk for the Red Sea. The pollution index of PDs ranged from (0.14–0.36), showing that the Sharm Obhur and both sites of Red Sea suffered relatively low pollution.

Description: Highlights • A high concentration BEP and DBP were detected from LDPE, HDPE and RP polymer films. • The impact salinity, temperature and UVR on leaching and re-adsorption of PaEs were investigated. • A mass balance approach was used to determine the adsorption loss of each target compounds during the leaching process. • Surface adsorption of PEs removed 40 to 80% of the leached PEs. Abstract In this study, the leaching of six phthalic acid esters (PAEs) from three common consumer plastics was investigated: low and high density polyethylene (LDPE, HDPE) and recycled polyethylene (RP). The effects of salinity, temperature, and ultraviolet irradiation (UVR) on leaching were investigated. The study of leaching of phthalates in aqueous environments in batch experiments is challenging due to their readsorption by the high hydrophobicity of PAEs, and there are no standard methods to study release processes. Here with the experiments, leaching (A) and spiking (B) using six PAEs to study the readsorption in the leaching process. PAEs were identified and quantified using GC–MS. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) and benzyl butyl phthalate (DEHP) showed considerable leaching during the 5-day incubation: 14 ± 1 to 128 ± 14 and 25 ± 2 to 79 ± 5 ng/cm2, respectively, under UVR, corresponding approximately to (1.9–13%) and (12.4–22.4%) of the solvent extracted mass. The highest Kd values were measured for RP polymers (0.3–9.4), followed by LDPE (0.5–5.4) and HDPE (0.2–2.2) polymers. Thus, readsorption of PAEs at the surface removed 30–80% of the leached PAEs in the dissolved phase. For example in LDPE, the calculated total release of DBP was up to 54 ± 4 ng/cm2, while the dissolved amount was 8.5 ± 1 ng/cm2 during the 5-day incubation under freshwater conditions. Increasing salinity negatively affected the leaching rate, which decreased for DBP from 54 ± 4 ng/cm2 in freshwater to 44 ± 3 and 38 ± 3 ng/cm2 at salinity of 20 and 40 g/L, respectively, from LDPE during the 5-day incubation. Temperature and UVR had a positive effect on the leaching rate, with the release of DBP from LDPE increasing from 44 ± 3 ng/cm2 at room temperature (25 °C) to 60 ± 6 and 128 ± 14 ng/cm2 at high temperature (40 °C) and UVR, respectively. Overall, this study highlights the positive relationship between temperatures, UVR on the extent of leaching and surface adsorption on the leaching measurements. Graphical abstract Schematic of the leaching process in experiment (A: polymer) and in Experiment B (Polymer + spikes), shows that part of leachate were re-adsorbed on the surface of the polymer were may affect the dissolution concentration. The total leached mass (adsorbed and dissolved) were estimation by compared to a treatment containing both polymer and PAEs spike (P + S; Experiment B). The influence of salinities (0.1, 20 and 40 g/L), temperature (10, 25, and 40 °C), and ultraviolet radiation (UVR 350 nm) on the leaching and re-adsorption of PEs was investigated.