ISSN:
0032-3888
Keywords:
Chemistry
;
Chemical Engineering
Source:
Wiley InterScience Backfile Collection 1832-2000
Topics:
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Mechanical Engineering, Materials Science, Production Engineering, Mining and Metallurgy, Traffic Engineering, Precision Mechanics
,
Physics
Notes:
This paper addresses the apparent controversy surrounding the role of the solid bed mechanics in the Maddock melting mechanism. It is demonstrated that the inability of the melting models based on the freely deformable solid bed concept to predict accurately the pressure gradients in the melting zone is not exclusively due to the highly simplified isothermal Newtonian treatment of the melt pool as presumed previously. This study has shown that when using a non isothermal non-Newtonian flow model for the melt pool, the freely deformable solid bed concept still results in unrealistically low pressure gradients while it may give good predictions of the melting rates. To the contrary, when a rigid solid bed is assumed, the pressure predictions tend to represent the experimental data more closely, whereas the theoretical melting rates seems to become less realistic. In view of the fact that both the freely deformable and the rigid solid bed concepts show such inconsistencies, it has been concluded that the mechanics governing the solids and melt transport in the melting zone require some additional examination, most notably, the influence of the constitutive behavior of the solid bed and of the cross-channel melt circulation around the solid bed, and possibly of the melting kinetics for semicrystalline polymers.
Additional Material:
14 Ill.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pen.760241208
Permalink
