ALBERT

Description: SUMMARY This study images upper-mantle structure beneath different tectonic and geomorphological provinces in southern Scandinavia by P -wave traveltime tomography based on teleseismic events. We present results using integrated data from several individual projects (CALAS, MAGNUS, SCANLIPS, CENMOVE and Tor) with a total of 202 temporary seismological stations deployed in southern Norway, southern Sweden, Denmark and the northernmost part of Germany. These stations, together with 18 permanent stations, yield a high density data coverage and enable presentation of the first high resolution 3D seismic velocity model for the upper mantle for this region, which includes the entire northern part of the prominent Tornquist Zone and the Southern Scandes Mountains. P -wave arrival time residuals of up to ±1 s are observed indicating large seismic velocity contrasts at depths. Relative regional as well as absolute global tomographic inversion is carried out and consistently show upper-mantle velocity variations relative to the ak135 global reference model of up to ±2–3 per cent corresponding to P -wave velocity differences of 0.4–0.5 km s –1 from depths of about 100 km to more than 300 km. High upper-mantle velocities are observed to great depth to the east in Baltic Shield areas of southwestern Sweden suggesting the existence of a deep lithosphere keel. Lower velocities are found to the west and southwest beneath the Danish and North German sedimentary basins and in most of southern Norway. A well defined, generally narrow and deep boundary is observed between areas of contrasting upper-mantle seismic velocity. In the southern part of the study area, this boundary is localized along and east of the Sorgenfrei–Tornquist Zone. It seems to follow the eastern boundary of a zone of significant Late Carboniferous–Permian volcanic activity from southwestern Sweden to the Oslo Graben area. To the north, it crosses shield units, Caledonides as well as areas of high topography. Supported by independent results of surface wave studies, we interpret this velocity boundary as a first order lithosphere boundary representing the southwestern edge of thick shield lithosphere. In basin areas to the southwest, low upper-mantle velocities are associated with asthenosphere beneath thinned lithosphere and velocity contrasts are likely to arise mainly from temperature differences. To the north structural and geodynamic relations are more complex and both temperature and compositional differences may play a part. Reduced upper-mantle velocity beneath southern Norway also seems, despite relatively low heat flow, to be associated with areas of thinned lithosphere, pointing towards increased temperatures and reduced density in the upper mantle. This feature extends over large areas and seems not directly correlated to the shorter wavelength high topography of the Scandes Mountains, but may contribute with some isostatic buoyancy on a regional scale. For this northern area, there is no obvious geodynamic explanation to reduced upper-mantle velocity. A number of candidates are available including deep transient thermal influence from basin areas to the southwest.

Description: A Monte Carlo inverse method has been used on the temperature profiles measured down through the Greenland Ice Core Project (GRIP) borehole, at the summit of the Greenland Ice Sheet, and the Dye 3 borehole 865 kilometers farther south. The result is a 50, 000-year-long temperature history at GRIP and a 7000-year history at Dye 3. The Last Glacial Maximum, the Climatic Optimum, the Medieval Warmth, the Little Ice Age, and a warm period at 1930 A.D. are resolved from the GRIP reconstruction with the amplitudes -23 kelvin, +2.5 kelvin, +1 kelvin, -1 kelvin, and +0.5 kelvin, respectively. The Dye 3 temperature is similar to the GRIP history but has an amplitude 1.5 times larger, indicating higher climatic variability there. The calculated terrestrial heat flow density from the GRIP inversion is 51.3 milliwatts per square meter.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Dahl-Jensen -- Mosegaard -- Gundestrup -- Clow -- Johnsen -- Hansen -- Balling -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 1998 Oct 9;282(5387):268-71.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉D. Dahl-Jensen, K. Mosegaard, N. Gundestrup, S. J. Johnsen, A. W. Hansen, Niels Bohr Institute for Astronomy, Physics and Geophysics, Department of Geophysics, Juliane Maries Vej 30, DK-2100 Copenhagen OE, Denmark. G. D. Clow, USGS-Climate Program〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9765146" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉

Description: The Himalaya and the Tibetan Plateau are uplifted by the ongoing northward underthrusting of the Indian continental lithosphere below Tibet resulting in lithospheric stacking. The layered structure of the Tibetan upper mantle is imaged by seismic methods, most detailed with the receiver function method. Tibet is considered as a place where the development of a future craton is currently under way. Here we study the upper mantle from Germany to northern Sweden with seismic S receiver functions and compare the structure below Scandinavia with that below Tibet. Below Proterozoic Scandinavia, we found two low velocity zones on top of each other, separated by a high velocity zone. The top of the upper low velocity zone at about 100km depth extends from Germany to Archaean northern Sweden. It agrees with the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) below Germany and Denmark. Below Sweden it is known as the 8°discontinuity, or as a mid-lithospheric discontinuity (MLD), similar to observations in North America. Seismic tomography places the LAB near 200km in Scandinavia, which is close to the top of our deeper low velocity zone. We also observed the bottom of the asthenosphere (the Lehmann discontinuity) deepening from 180km in Germany to 260km below Sweden. Remnants of old subduction in the upper about 100km below Scandinavia and Finland are known from controlled source seismic experiments and local earthquake studies. Recent tomographic studies indicate delamination of the lithosphere below southern Scandinavia and northern Germany. We are suggesting that the large scale layered structure in the Scandinavian upper mantle may be caused by processes similar to the ongoing lithospheric stacking in Tibet.

Description: The timing of Cenozoic surface uplift in NW Europe relies on the assumption that the sedimentary response in basins is synchronous with tectonic processes in the source areas. However, many of the phenomena commonly used to infer recent uplift may as well be a consequence of climate change and sea-level fall. The timing of surface uplift therefore remains unconstrained from the sedimentary record alone, and it becomes necessary to consider the constraints imposed by physically and geologically plausible tectonic mechanisms, which have a causal relation to an initiating agent. The gradual reversal of the regional stress field following the break-up produced minor perturbations to the thermal subsidence on the Norwegian Shelf and in the North Sea. Pulses of increased compression cannot be the cause of Cenozoic land surface uplift and accelerated Neogene basin subsidence. Virtually deformation-free regional vertical movements could have been caused by changes in the density column of the lithosphere and asthenosphere following the emplacement of the Iceland plume. A transient uplift component was produced as the plume displaced denser asthenosphere at the base of the lithosphere. This component decayed as the plume material cooled. Permanent uplift as a result of igneous underplating occurred in areas of a thin lithosphere (some Palaeozoic and Mesozoic basins) or for lithosphere under extension at the time of plume emplacement (the ocean-continent boundary). In areas of a thicker lithosphere (East Greenland, Scotland and Norway) plume emplacement may have triggered a Rayleigh-Taylor instability, causing partial lithospheric delamination and associated transient surface uplift at a decreasing rate throughout Cenozoic time. A possible uplift history for the adjacent land areas hence reads: initial transient surface uplift around the break-up time at 53 Ma caused by plume emplacement, and permanent tectonic uplift caused by lithospheric delamination and associated lithospheric heating. The permanent tectonic uplift increased through Cenozoic time at a decreasing rate. Denudation acted on this evolving topography and reduced the average surface elevation, but significantly increased the elevation of the summit envelope. The marked variations in the sedimentary response in the basins were caused by climatic variations and the generally falling eustatic level. This scenario bridges the gap between the ideas of Paleocene-Eocene uplift versus repeated Cenozoic tectonic activity: the tectonic uplift history was initiated by the emplacement of the Iceland plume, but continued throughout Cenozoic time as a consequence of early plume emplacement, with climatic and eustatic control on denudation. The mechanism is consistent with topography, heat flow, crustal structure, and the Bouguer gravity of Norway, and may be applicable also to East Greenland.