Publication Date:
2019
Description:
〈span〉〈div〉Summary〈/div〉Trend drift is an annoying background interference in induced polarization (IP) exploration, which has great influence on the final calculation of apparent complex resistivity spectrum at low frequency (〈 0.1 Hz). This paper proposed a modified empirical mode decomposition (EMD) detrending technique for multi-period induced polarization data. The method uses local extreme values of the rising edges and the falling edges to form multiple envelopes and then to fit and eliminate the trend term. Through Comparing with the traditional EMD methods using IP data with simulated trend drift, we find that, the modified method can be used to obtain a more accurate fitting trend, and the computational cost is only a fraction of that of the conventional one. Additionally, this detrending is little affected by other strong noise. We also used IP data with and without trend interferences to analysis this method respectively. The results show that, for data without trend drift, the signals remain almost unchanged; however, for data with strong trend drift, the data quality is greatly improved, and the calculation error is reduced. This technique is also applied to a large-scale multi-period full-waveform induced polarization (IP) data acquired in Zhegu Zn-Sb-Ag polymetallic deposit in southern Tibet, China. The apparent complex resistivity and phase of a survey line, a planar contour map and a pseudo-section with and without using the modified EMD were compared respectively. Overall, before EMD detrending, the apparent phase results are rough and full of outliers. After detrending, the profiles are smooth and reasonable, and the outliers disappear. Both the results demonstrated that our proposed method can be adopted to effectively suppress trend drift interference without additional deviation in distributed full-waveform induced polarization exploration.〈/span〉
Print ISSN:
2051-1965
Electronic ISSN:
1365-246X
Topics:
Geosciences
Published by
Oxford University Press
on behalf of
The Deutsche Geophysikalische Gesellschaft (DGG) and the Royal Astronomical Society (RAS).
Permalink