ISSN:
1432-119X
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Biology
,
Medicine
Notes:
Summary Methods are described for the direct cytochemical demonstration by light or electron microscopy of several mitochondrial dehydrogenase enzymes and monoamine oxidase using ferricyanide as an artificial electron acceptor. Hatchett's brown, cupric ferrocyanide, is the primary reaction product produced at the sites of mitochondrial oxidative enzymes in briefly fixed tissues by the histochemical incubation. After post-fixation, the cupric ferrocyanide is utilized as a catalyst to effect the oxidative polymerization of 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB), resulting in an amplification of the original deposits. Upon osmication an osmium black end-product, which is ideal for light or electron microscopy, is produced at the tissue sites of the flavoprotein enzyme. Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) in concentrations of approximately 14%, was found to mediate electron transfer from cysteine as well as from many reduced carriers to artificial acceptors. In these reactions DMSO, because of its basic oxygen, is an excellent acceptor for hydrogen bonding and can substitute for water in solvation phenomena. Because of its low dielectric constant, it acts to facilitate electron transfer. With these new procedures for monoamine oxidase (MAO), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH), NADH dehydrogenase, and NADPH dehydrogenase, a heterogeneity of mitochondria with respect to oxidative enzymes was noted. In addition, differential sensitivities of the enzymes to fixatives was noted. There appeared to be an inverse relationship of the localization of LDH and MAO in certain areas of gray and white matter of medulla oblongata, cerebellum and sensory ganglia. This could be due to the heterogeneity of mitochondrial populations noted with respect to these enzymes. The strong LDH activity exclusively in mitochondria in different types of fixed cells and its absence from unfixed tissues confirms a mitochondrial localization for the enzyme. These findings suggest that more caution is needed in the interpretation of results from cellfractionation cytochemical and biochemical studies; moreover, results with non-disruptive direct visual histochemical and cytochemical methods may be valid, even if they do not conform to results from use of the former indirect methods.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00274235
Permalink