ISSN:
1572-9893
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Geography
Notes:
Conclusions 1) There are several rural economic belts within the boundaries of Jiangsu province. Suzhou, Wuxi, and Changzhou regions of S Jiangsu form the developed belt; rural economic levels gradually decrease towards the W and N (except suburbs of big cities like Nanjing, Xuzhou and others). Xuzhou and Huaiyin regions of NW Jiangsu from an underdeveloped belt. 2) Areal differences of rural economic levels within Jiangsu are quite impressive. Gross product per head of rural labour in the developed belt is more than three times the national mean (1,835 yuans in 1986), and net income per capita is twice the national mean (442 yuans). However, both indexes in the underdeveloped belt are lower than the national mean. Consequently, no unified policies and measures should be adopted for the whole province without considering the real conditions of every region. 3) As shown in Fig 1, most countries in the developed belt possess not only fluorishing rural industry, but also a more diverse agriculture. The prosperous and diverse agriculture provided the capital accumulation and the raw materials for industrial development. After more than 20 years of growth rural industry has become more self-reliant, and is able to give financial, technical and other help to further agricultural development in turn. Therefore, the appropriate orientation of rural economic development lies in accelerated rural industrialisation, in turn promoting agricultural modernization. In contrast with developed belt, the underdeveloped belt has the specific characteristics of a less diverse agriculture and only the initial stage of rural industrial development. Currently, the improvement and diversification of agricultural production, particular commodity production, should be the basic orientation. Rural industrial development should rely on capital accumulation by agriculture, and be centered on those products, that are closely related to or serve agriculture. 4) The pros and cons of part-time farmers are now hotly debated among scholars. Unanimity cannot be reached without considering conditions of different regions. For example, the developed belt of Jiangsu fluorishing rural industry ensures employed part-time farmers a satisfactory non-agricultural income, and agriculture becomes their sideline occupation. Decrease of agricultural input and shortage of incentives for improving crops yield are manifest: agricultural extensification and decline will be inevitable. In such regions from a long-term point of view the disadvantages seem to outweigh the advantages of part-time farmers. The solution is to encourage job specialisation by the rural work force, and deacrease part-time farmers, to promote land agglomeration and create larger and more vigorous agricultural units. Up to now, rural industry in the underdeveloped belt has been mostly handicraft, and has not ensured stable and sizable income. Under such conditions the encouragement of job specialisation by the rural work force is unsuitable, but it is beneficial for farmers to devote part pf their time working as handicraftsmen in the sense of developing rural commodity production, increasing the farmers' cash earnings, improving their working and living conditions, accumulating capital and skills for further industrial development. 5) Another hotly argued problem concerns the local occupational transformation or the movement of surplus agricultural labour. This also requires solution in accordance with real conditions of different regions. As the concurrent two jobs of part-time farmers are beneficial in the underdeveloped belt, the large-scale movement of rural labour is unlikely to occur. Furthermore, the occupational transformation of surplus agricultural labour on the spot does not decrease part-time farming so preventing agricultural decline in the developed belt. Thus, it is rational to establish industrial parks with ideal locations or to develop existing towns, to concentrate rural industry, and then to promote spatial movement of surplus agricultural labour. 6) The rural economic type is a matter of complexity. Many problems, such as its formation, its inner structure and outer environment, mechanism of changes and ways of improvement still remain to be solved by further detailed studies.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00645313
Permalink