ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2016-01-30
    Description: 〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Phalan, Ben -- Green, Rhys E -- Dicks, Lynn V -- Dotta, Graziela -- Feniuk, Claire -- Lamb, Anthony -- Strassburg, Bernardo B N -- Williams, David R -- zu Ermgassen, Erasmus K H J -- Balmford, Andrew -- BB/J014540/1/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council/United Kingdom -- New York, N.Y. -- Science. 2016 Jan 29;351(6272):450-1. doi: 10.1126/science.aad0055.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. btp22@cam.ac.uk. ; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Prote"〉 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, Sandy SG19 2DL, UK. ; Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. ; Laboratorio de Ornitologia, Museu de Ciencias e Tecnologia, PUC-RS, 6681, Porto Alegre, Brazil. ; International Institute for Sustainability, 22460-320 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rio Conservation and Sustainability Science Centre, Department of Geography and the Environment, Pontificia Universidade Catolica, 22453-900 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823413" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
    Keywords: *Agriculture ; Animals ; Cattle ; Ecosystem ; *Environmental Restoration and Remediation ; Equidae ; Felidae ; Livestock ; Sheep
    Print ISSN: 0036-8075
    Electronic ISSN: 1095-9203
    Topics: Biology , Chemistry and Pharmacology , Computer Science , Medicine , Natural Sciences in General , Physics
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2019
    Description: 〈p〉Over 140 Mha of restoration commitments have been pledged across the global tropics, yet guidance is needed to identify those landscapes where implementation is likely to provide the greatest potential benefits and cost-effective outcomes. By overlaying seven recent, peer-reviewed spatial datasets as proxies for socioenvironmental benefits and feasibility of restoration, we identified restoration opportunities (areas with higher potential return of benefits and feasibility) in lowland tropical rainforest landscapes. We found restoration opportunities throughout the tropics. Areas scoring in the top 10% (i.e., restoration hotspots) are located largely within conservation hotspots (88%) and in countries committed to the Bonn Challenge (73%), a global effort to restore 350 Mha by 2030. However, restoration hotspots represented only a small portion (19.1%) of the Key Biodiversity Area network. Concentrating restoration investments in landscapes with high benefits and feasibility would maximize the potential to mitigate anthropogenic impacts and improve human well-being.〈/p〉
    Electronic ISSN: 2375-2548
    Topics: Natural Sciences in General
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2017-11-09
    Description: Is active restoration the best approach to achieve ecological restoration success (the return to a reference condition, that is, old-growth forest) when compared to natural regeneration in tropical forests? Our meta-analysis of 133 studies demonstrated that natural regeneration surpasses active restoration in achieving tropical forest restoration success for all three biodiversity groups (plants, birds, and invertebrates) and five measures of vegetation structure (cover, density, litter, biomass, and height) tested. Restoration success for biodiversity and vegetation structure was 34 to 56% and 19 to 56% higher in natural regeneration than in active restoration systems, respectively, after controlling for key biotic and abiotic factors (forest cover, precipitation, time elapsed since restoration started, and past disturbance). Biodiversity responses were based primarily on ecological metrics of abundance and species richness (74%), both of which take far less time to achieve restoration success than similarity and composition. This finding challenges the widely held notion that natural forest regeneration has limited conservation value and that active restoration should be the default ecological restoration strategy. The proposition that active restoration achieves greater restoration success than natural regeneration may have arisen because previous comparisons lacked controls for biotic and abiotic factors; we also did not find any difference between active restoration and natural regeneration outcomes for vegetation structure when we did not control for these factors. Future policy priorities should align the identified patterns of biophysical and ecological conditions where each or both restoration approaches are more successful, cost-effective, and compatible with socioeconomic incentives for tropical forest restoration.
    Electronic ISSN: 2375-2548
    Topics: Natural Sciences in General
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...