ALBERT

Description: Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known complications of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy. These clinical syndromes develop as a result of CAR-T activation, proliferation, and tumor lysis with resultant cytokine secretion. In prior reports of CD19 CAR-T therapy patients, those who developed ICANS showed evidence of endothelial activation and disruption of the blood-brain barrier as a result of cytokine release while only approximately one-third demonstrated changes on Brain MRI (Gust et al. Cancer Discov 2017). As such, further predictive markers and studies are needed to identify patients at risk for ICANS to allow for expedited management and improved outcomes. Herein we report a single-center analysis exploring glycolytic activity on PET/CT and the association with clinical outcomes for patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) after CAR-T therapy. Methods: An organ-based evaluation of uninvolved sites was conducted in R/R DLBCL patients (n=32) who underwent CD19 CAR-T therapy with evaluable PET/CT imaging at baseline immediately prior to CAR-T therapy and at 30 days post-infusion (D+30). All patients in this analysis were treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel as standard of care therapy after 2 or more lines of therapy. Tumor metabolic volume (TMV) and mean standard uptake value (SUVmean) of various organs were quantified using ROVER [Region of interest (ROI) visualization, evolution, and image registration] software (ABX advanced biochemical compounds GmbH, Radeberg, Germany). Statistical analysis was completed using STATA 14 (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). All tests were performed after testing the normality distribution assumption. Temporal changes were assessed using paired t-tests, and between-group analyses were completed with two-sample t-tests. Results: SUVmean increased significantly after CAR-T therapy in the following organs (D+30 v baseline pre-CAR-T PET/CT): cerebral cortex (8.23 v 7.09, p=0.036), cerebellum (6.26 v 5.56, p=0.024), basal ganglia (9.22 v 7.61, p=0.005), parotid gland (1.61 v 1.42, p=0.004), liver (2.47 v 2.17, p=0.002), spleen (2.08 v 1.84, p=0.043), and pancreas (1.76 v 1.48, p

Description: Introduction : With increased use of CAR-T for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL), CAR-T related complications including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and ICANS pose a significant clinical challenge. While CAR-T mediated inflammation leading to endothelial activation and blood-brain barrier disruption may play a key role in ICANS, the exact mechanism remains unclear. Prognostic or predictive biomarkers for ICANS are not well established. Recent reports (Karschnia et al, Blood 2019) suggested an association between ICANS and inferior overall survival (OS). To better understand ICANS, we herein report a single-center analysis of LBCL patients treated with CD19-directed CAR-T, exploring the associated clinical features, predictive biomarkers, and its prognostic significance. Methods: Patients (pts) with R/R LBCL treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (Axi-cel) between 4/2018-5/2019 were identified. Data regarding patient and disease characteristics, treatment course, and clinical outcomes was collected (Table 1). Laboratory variables were collected at time of mononuclear cell harvest, day of initiation of lymphodepletive therapy, and day of CAR-T infusion (D0). CRS and ICANS were graded per the Lee and CTCAE v4.03 criteria, respectively. Time to progression (TTP) and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and groups compared with the logrank test. Cox Proportional Hazard Model was applied for prognostic modeling. Binary logistic regression was used for multivariable analysis of patient characteristics at D0 associated with ICANS. Results: Forty-five pts with R/R LBCL (35 DLBCL, 7 TFL, 3 PMBCL) treated with Axi-cel were identified (Table 1). Twenty-five pts developed ICANS: n=7 with Grade (Gr) I-II, n=18 with Gr III-IV. Most common initial ICANS symptoms were dysgraphia, confusion, and somnolence; median time to ICANS was 5 days (range 3-11 days). Acute abnormalities were seen on brain MRI in 7 (28%) ICANS pts; EEG done in 10 ICANS pts showed diffuse slowing in all pts and focal slowing in 3 pts. All ICANS pts had preceding CRS, treated with tocilizumab (n=25, median 2.5 doses) and siltuximab (n=2). Twenty-three (92%) pts with ICANS required steroid therapy, with a median total dose equivalent to 221 mg of dexamethasone for a median duration of 12.5 days. Two pts exhibited protracted neurotoxicity manifested by short-term memory loss and profound weakness with immobility. Twenty-two (49%, 95% CI 34-64%) pts achieved CR, 16 PR, and 5 PD. At time of analysis, n=18 had disease relapse/progression and n=35 were alive. Censoring pts that progressed, the median observation time for TTP was 9.3 months. Censoring pts who died, the median observation time for OS was 7.9 months. At 9 months OS (±1 SE) was 76.1%±7.4%, and 56.0%±8.0% were progression-free. Logistic regression showed increasing fibrinogen level at D0 was associated with increasing risk of ICANS (p=0.003) and specifically, Gr III-IV ICANS [p

Description: Introduction: Secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is an aggressive life-threatening activation of the immune system triggered by an underlying condition. Use of chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T) to treat relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) is associated with cytokine release syndrome (CRS), Immune Effector Cell Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS) and development of secondary HLH. Application of HLH scoring systems such as the H-score or HLH-2004 criteria to identify CAR-T triggered HLH is not validated in this setting. Inability to promptly recognize the development of secondary HLH in CAR-T patients and to distinguish it from CRS may lead to delay in HLH specific therapy and increased mortality. We analyzed the utility of applying the H-score and the HLH-2004 criteria to identify possible patients with HLH post-CAR-T for R/R DLBCL. Methods: A single center retrospective analysis of 75 patients with R/R DLBCL following CAR-T was performed. Using a peak ferritin of 500 mcg/L or higher within 30 days of CAR-T administration, 43 out of 75 patients were identified at risk for HLH. The H-score and HLH-2004 criteria were applied retrospectively. Measurement of NK activity was not available for any patients and soluble IL2 was collected intermittently. The mean H-score was calculated, and two sample t-test performed to evaluate for a difference in the mean H-score between low versus high grade CRS, low versus high grade ICANS, as well as presence versus absence of cytopenias at days 30, 90 and 180. Low grade CRS/ICANS was defined as 1, and high grade as 2 or higher. CRS was graded per Lee 2014 criteria and ICANS per CTCAEv.4. The 43 patients were then subdivided by H-score threshold of 169 into H-score Low (〈 169) and H-score High (≥ 169). The threshold of 169 was used given a prior validation study showing optimal sensitivity and specificity for identifying acquired HLH in adult patients with an H-score equal to or higher than 169. Both Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) were defined as time from CAR-T infusion until an event of last follow up. Kaplan-Meier curves were produced to describe the distribution of PFS and OS between two subpopulations of low and high H-Score. Results: Median peak ferritin was 1571.8 mcg/L (range: 375 mcg/L - 〉50,000 mcg/L, table 1). Median H-score was 135 (range 61 -250). Four patients were treated with HLH directed therapy receiving steroids with either tocilizumab, siltuximab and/or anakinra. Of these 4 patients, only 2 met five HLH-2004 criteria. All 4 patients had H-scores above 169 (209, 211, 228 and 250). Of these 4 patients, one died from complications thought secondary to HLH. Fourteen patients (14/43, 32%) had an H-score 〉169. Ten patients did not require any HLH directed therapy and had no clinical evidence of HLH. The mean H-score was not different between patients with low vs high grade CRS (148.2 vs 141.8, p=0.7) or low vs high grade ICANS (145.9 vs 142.6, p=0.8). No statistical correlation was seen between H-score and cytopenias at any time point. There was no significant difference in PFS or OS between the H-score low vs high subgroups (p=0.7, p=0.1 respectively, figure 1 and 2). Patients with higher H-score tended to have longer length of hospitalization for CAR-T (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.289). Conclusions: In patients with R/R DLBCL post CAR-T, the use of either the H-score or application of HLH-2004 criteria had low utility in identifying possible HLH in patients who screened in based on peak ferritin within 30 days of CAR-T administration. While apparent differences between the H-score high and low categories may not reach statistical significance due to the small number of patients, our exploratory analysis does not support the use of H-Score to evaluate for HLH post-CAR-T. The immediate post-CAR-T period is characterized by a high inflammatory state, which likely results in high H-scores. Results from our study suggest a need for further characterization of HLH following CAR-T and the role for a CAR-T specific HLH scoring system to distinguish secondary HLH from CAR-T related inflammation in this specific patient population. Disclosures Hardy: American Gene Technologies: Other: DSMB Member; Kite/Gilead: Other: Advisory Board Member; Incyte Corporation: Other: Advisory Board Member.

Description: Introduction:Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has become an important treatment modality for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, many of these patients have aggressive disease and require a form of bridging therapy (BT) for disease control during CAR-T manufacturing. There is limited data in the literature on the most appropriate form of BT and the impact of BT on clinical outcomes. Methods:We retrospectively analyzed data on 75 patients that received CAR-T therapy at our institution. BT was defined as therapy administered between apheresis and CAR-T infusion. 52 patients received bridging therapy (BT) and 23 did not receive BT (NBT). BT included 10 high dose (HD) steroids, 28 chemotherapy-based regimen (CT), and 14 radiation therapy (RT). CT included cytotoxic chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. IRB approval was obtained for this study. Statistical analysis was conducted with SAS v9.4. Univariate analysis Cox proportional hazard model was used and p-values for response rate were generated from Fisher's exact test. The methods of generalized linear model and logistic regression were used to associate the toxicity grades and cytopenias with BT, respectively. Results:Many patient and disease characteristics between BT and NBT groups were similar, with minor, non-statistically significant differences (See Fig. 1a). Although while the incidence of stage III/IV patients in the BT and NBT group was comparable (p=0.79), in subgroup analysis, there were significantly more stage III/IV patients in the CT subgroup and NBT than in the RT and HD steroids subgroups (p=0.03). There was a higher incidence of bulky disease (≥10cm) in the BT and all BT subgroups versus (vs) NBT, although this was not significant (p=0.58 and p=0.92). The number of prior lines of therapy was comparable between the BT and NBT groups (p=0.99). However, in subgroup analysis there were significantly more patients in the CT subgroup and NBT that received ≥4 lines of therapy compared with RT and HD steroids subgroups (p=0.02). There was no significant difference in overall response rate (ORR) at last follow up between BT vs NBT and BT subgroups vs NBT with approximately 50% being in complete remission in all cases (p=0.48 and p=0.54). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were similar in the BT vs NBT (one-year rates of 67% vs 64% and 83% vs 75%, respectively) and this was not statistically significant (p=0.52 and 0.89), see Fig. 1b and 1c. In subgroup analysis PFS was comparable in the BT subgroups (CT 69% and HD steroids 68%) vs NBT group (67%) while RT was lower (51%), although this was not statistically significant (p=0.54). In subgroup analysis OS was slightly worse in the BT subgroups (CT 77%, RT 76%, and HD steroids 72%) vs NBT group (83%) although was not statistically significant (p=0.93). The development of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was comparable in the BT vs NBT group and in BT subgroups vs NBT (p=0.18 and p=0.53). The median grade of immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was higher in BT than NBT (grade 2 vs 0) and trended towards statistical significance (p=0.09). The development of cytopenias at day +180 following CAR-T therapy was significantly higher in BT (50%) vs NBT (13.3%) and was statistically significant (p= 0.038). Subgroup analysis also showed significantly increased cytopenias at day +180 in CT (58.3%) and RT (57.1%) subgroups (p= 0.04). Conclusion:In our single-institution experience, BT prior to CAR-T therapy is feasible and may preserve CAR-T candidacy in patients with rapidly progressive LBCL. BT does not appear to significantly affect ORR, PFS, and OS. The incidence of CRS was comparable, although there was a higher incidence of ICANS in BT, which trended towards significance, and could be contributed to higher tumor bulk in the BT group. BT patients receiving CT and RT for BT were more likely to experience prolonged cytopenias, likely due to the myelosuppressive impact of BT and previous lines of chemo-immunotherapy agents. In conclusion, in high-risk patients with advanced and/or aggressive disease, BT may provide disease stabilization to CAR-T with a similar toxicity profile compared to NBT patients, although BT patients are more likely to experience prolonged cytopenias after CAR-T therapy. Disclosures Kansagra: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb /Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Pharmacyclics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Karyopharm Therpeutics:Other: Advisory Board.Hardy:Incyte Corporation:Other: Advisory Board Member;American Gene Technologies:Other: DSMB Member;Kite/Gilead:Other: Advisory Board Member.

Description: Background: Nonmyeloablative (NMA) and reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens are offered for patients with hematologic malignancies requiring allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) but are not candidates for myeloablative conditioning (MAC). The intensity of the conditioning regimen (CR) is important and contributes to the ability of HSCT to provide a cure. There is no consensus regarding the best RIC regimen and efficacy is not equal amongst RIC regimens. The combination of 2 days of intravenous Busulfan (total of 6.4 mg/Kg) and Fludarabine (total of 120-160 mg/m2) (Flu/Bu2) has been validated and widely adopted. While this regimen is well tolerated, relapses are common and remain the leading cause of death. Total body irradiation (TBI) has been widely used in the CR and provides the advantage of potent anti-cancer effect, immunosuppression and the ability to reach certain 'sanctuary sites' for chemotherapy (i.e. CNS). The 2 most commonly used TBI levels are 1200 cGy in MAC regimens and 200 cGy in NMA and RIC regimens. We hypothesize that the addition of 400 cGy (200 cGy two fractions per day, 6 hours apart) TBI to Flu/Bu2 will reduce the relapse rate without increasing its toxicity. In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of Flu/Bu2/TBI400 with Flu/Bu2 CR amongst a diverse group of hematologic diseases. Methods: From 2006 to 2018, 137 adult patients with different hematological diseases were treated using one of two RIC regimens, either Flu/Bu2/TBI400 or Flu/Bu2 followed by HSCT from HLA-matched related or unrelated donors. The primary endpoint was OS defined as the time from the date of transplant to death from any cause. The secondary endpoints included PFS, relapse rate, cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), non-relapse mortality (NRM), causes of death, aGVHD, cGVHD and engraftment. PFS was defined as the time from the date of transplant to disease progression as documented by the treating physician, based on pathological, imaging or clinical findings of the individual disease, or death from any cause. NRM was defined as time of death without evidence of progressive disease with relapse or progressive disease as a competing risk event (data not shown in the abstract). Relapse was defined as progression or disease relapse with NRM as a competing risk event. These endpoints were censored at the time of last follow-up. Results: A total of 137 patients were included in this study. 74 patients were treated with Flu/Bu2/TBI400 and 63 patients were treated with Flu/Bu2. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of patient-, disease- and transplant-related characteristics; however, Flu/Bu2/TBI400 patients had a higher HCT-CI score and a lower KPS. CNI-MTX GVHD prophylaxis was used in a higher proportion in Flu/Bu2/TBI400. Most of the Flu/Bu2 transplants occurred from 2006 to 2012. The median age was 62 in both groups and patients had comparable disease type distribution and DRI (Table 1). The median follow-up time was 4.62 years. Flu/Bu2/TBI400 showed improvement of PFS over Flu/Bu2; the 5-year PFS was 50% in the TBI arm vs. 34% in the no-TBI arm (p=0.06 of marginal statistical significance). There was a numerical improvement of OS in favor of the TBI arm but this was not statistically significant; The 5-year OS was 53% with TBI vs. 39% without TBI (p=0.13). Cumulative incidence of relapse was not different between the 2 groups (p=0.29), see figures 1, 2 and 3. There was no difference in aGVHD incidence between the 2 groups (p=0.21). The TBI arm had significantly lower incidence of cGVHD compared to no-TBI arm (29% vs. 54%, p=0.005). Advanced DRI, grade III-IV aGVHD, cGVHD, use of ATG and MUD were associated with worse OS (univariate analysis). The same factors, with the exception of cGVHD, were associated with worse PFS. Multivariable Cox regression model revealed that grade III-IV aGVHD was associated with worse OS (p=0.001) while advanced DRI was associated with marginally inferior OS (p=0.07) (Table 2). Conclusion: This is the largest retrospective study of RIC Flu/Bu2/TBI400 regimen for HSCT with a median follow-up approaching 5 years. Our data suggests that RIC Flu/Bu2/TBI400 is safe and efficacious for different hematological malignancies. When compared to Bu/Flu2 without TBI, Flu/Bu2/TBI400 had lower incidence of cGVHD and showed a strong trend towards improved PFS and OS though not statistically significant at this time. Grade III-IV aGVHD was associated with poor OS in both groups. Disclosures Hardy: Incyte Corporation: Other: Advisory Board Member; Kite/Gilead: Other: Advisory Board Member; American Gene Technologies: Other: DSMB Member.