ALBERT

Description: Background Protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5) is the primary enzyme responsible for symmetric arginine dimethylation of multiple proteins that impact cell proliferation. Its substrates include proteins involved in mRNA splicing, signal transduction, gene transcription, and DNA repair. PRMT5 overexpression occurs in many cancers and correlates with poor prognosis. GSK3326595 is a potent, specific, and reversible inhibitor of PRMT5 that inhibits proliferation and induces cell death in a broad range of solid and hematologic tumor cell lines. It also exhibits potent anti-tumor activity in vivo in animal models, including in preclinical models of myeloid malignancies. One mechanism of action of GSK3326595 is via inhibition of cellular mRNA splicing and upregulation of tumor suppressor function. Mutations in splicing factors are frequent in myeloid malignancies (including approximately 40% of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome [MDS], and over 60% of patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia [CMML]), and further inhibition of mRNA splicing via GSK3326595 may lead to a synthetic lethal phenotype specifically in splicing mutant disease. Study 208809 is the first trial of a PRMT5 inhibitor in participants with myeloid malignancies. Methods Study 208809 is a Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of GSK3326595 monotherapy in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative acute myeloid leukemia (AML) that has evolved from an antecedent MDS. Part 1 will identify a tolerated dose and establish preliminary evidence of efficacy in this population. At the end of Part 1, if pre-specified criteria are met, then the study will be expanded with three additional Parts that will be opened in parallel. Part 2A is a Phase II randomized comparison of monotherapy GSK3326595 versus investigator's choice of best available care in participants with relapsed and refractory MDS, CMML, and hypoproliferative AML. Part 2B is a single-arm investigation of safety and efficacy of GSK3326595 plus 5-azacitidine in participants with newly diagnosed high-risk MDS. Part 2C is a single-arm investigation of the safety and efficacy of monotherapy GSK3326595 in participants with relapsed or refractory AML whose tumors harbor mutations in components of the pre-mRNA splicing machinery. All participants enrolled in this study have a diagnosis of MDS, CMML, or AML, with enrollment into each cohort as defined above. Participants are adults with adequate organ function as defined in the protocol. Prior allogeneic transplant is permitted. There are no required biomarkers for enrollment to Parts 1, 2A, and 2B, though central confirmation of pre-mRNA splicing factor mutations will be performed to stratify participants for overall analysis. Enrollment to Part 2C is limited to participants with splicing factor mutations. It is estimated that a maximum of 302 participants will be enrolled in the study, divided as follows: Approximately 41 participants in Part 1, approximately 192 participants in Part 2A, approximately 41 participants in Part 2B, and approximately 28 participants in Part 2C. In Part 1, the primary endpoint is clinical benefit rate, as defined as the percentage of participants achieving a complete remission, complete marrow remission, partial remission (PR), stable disease lasting at least 8 weeks, or hematologic improvement, as per standard criteria. In Part 2A, the primary endpoint is overall survival. In Part 2B and Part 2C, the primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR), defined as the percentage of participants achieving a PR or better. Samples are collected to evaluate symmetric dimethylated arginine (SDMA), the enzymatic product of PRMT5. This has been demonstrated to be a pharmacodynamic marker of PRMT5 inhibition in plasma and tumor tissue. In addition, participants will be stratified based on the presence or absence of spliceosome mutations and analyzed separately to evaluate the effect of these mutations on clinical activity. As of 1 August 2019, recruitment is ongoing across six centers in the United States and Canada; ten participants have been enrolled, all into Part 1. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03614728 Study is funded by GlaxoSmithKline Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Bradley:AbbVie: Other: Advisory Board. Brunner:Novartis: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Forty Seven Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Minden:Trillium Therapetuics: Other: licensing agreement. Papadantonakis:Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Abedin:Actinium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Helsinn Healthcare: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Baines:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Barbash:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Gorman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kremer:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment, Equity Ownership. Borthakur:Cantargia AB: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Tetralogic Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Argenx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; FTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioTheryX: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Xbiotech USA: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Oncoceutics, Inc.: Research Funding; PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy; BioLine Rx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Agensys: Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare AG: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Co.: Research Funding; NKarta: Consultancy; Cyclacel: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Arvinas: Research Funding; Polaris: Research Funding; Strategia Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Description: Background: The selective AURKA inhibitor alisertib (MLN8237) exhibits disease modifying activity in murine models of myelofibrosis by eradicating atypical megakaryocytes resulting in reduction of marrow fibrosis (Nat Med 2015). Here, we present long term follow-up results from the investigator initiated pilot study of alisertib in patients with myelofibrosis (clinical trials.gov Identifier NCT 02530619). Methods: 24 patients with DIPSS intermediate 1, intermediate-2, or high risk myelofibrosis who were in need of therapy, refractory/intolerant or unlikely to respond to JAK inhibitors with neutrophil count ≥ 1 x109/L, and platelet count ≥ 50 x109/L, received alisertib (provided by Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc) at a dose of 50 mg twice daily for one week every 21 days. Toxicity assessment was performed by the standard common terminology criteria (Version 4.0). Response was assessed by the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWGMRT) criteria. Correlative studies included assessments of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutant allele burden, degree of fibrosis and GATA1 expression in bone marrow samples obtained pre and post therapy. Results: We enrolled 17 patients with primary myelofibrosis, 4 with post essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis and 3 with post polycythemia vera myelofibrosis. Median age was 72 years with 66% males. 79% of patients were DIPSS intermediate risk, and the remainder were high risk with 15 patients (62.5%) having received prior JAK inhibitor therapy. Driver mutational status was as follows; 58% JAK2V617F, 29% CALR, and 13% MPL mutated. At study entry, 54% of patients demonstrated palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm below the left costal margin, 54% were transfusion dependent with all patients experiencing constitutional symptoms. At the time of data cut-off, patients received a median of 7.5 cycles (range; 1-29 cycles) of therapy. The 7 patients presently on study have received a median of 23 cycles (range; 8-29 cycles). Reasons for treatment discontinuation included progressive disease/lack of response in 11 (65%) patients, toxicity in 4 (24%) patients and refusal of further therapy in 2 (11%) patients.Safety and Efficacy assessments The most common treatment-emergent grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (42%), thrombocytopenia (29%) and anemia (21%), with 4% each experiencing neutropenic fever, diarrhea, vertigo, elevated creatinine and elevated alanine aminotransferase. 22 patients were considered for response evaluation with 4 of 14 patients (29%) with palpable splenomegaly ≥ 5 cm achieving a spleen response, 1 of 13 patients (8%) becoming transfusion independent, and 5 of 22 patients (23%) experiencing symptom response with ≥ 50% reduction in the MPN-SAF total symptom score. However, when response assessment was restricted to 13 patients who had received a minimum of 5 cycles of therapy, spleen responses were observed in 4 of 7 (57%) patients, 1 of 5 (20%) achieved transfusion independence and 5 of 13 (38%) achieved symptom response. All patients presenting with leukocytosis (n=4) and thrombocytosis (n=2) had resolution with therapy. Of the 7 patients presently on study, four patients continue to demonstrate symptom response, two patients with both spleen and symptom response, and another patient with sustained anemia response. Correlative assessments We compared the intensity of staining of GATA1, a factor that is required for maturation, in sequential bone marrow biopsies from six patients at baseline and after a minimum of five cycles and observed a striking increase in the numbers of GATA1-positive megakaryocytes in five of six cases (Figure 1a). In addition, we observed a one grade reduction in marrow fibrosis in 4 of 6 paired samples (Figure 1b). This reduction in fibrosis was accompanied by sustained responses to the drug. Finally, we compared JAK2, MPL or CALR mutant allele burden in eight paired baseline and cycle 5 or 6 samples and observed decreases in 4 of 8 patients (Figure 1c). Conclusions: Alisertib is safe and well tolerated in patients with myelofibrosis with prolonged administration up to 1.7 years. In addition to providing clinical benefit, alisertib restored normal morphology and GATA1 expression in atypical megakaryocytes and reduced marrow fibrosis and mutant allele burdens. These findings demonstrate that AURKA inhibition should be further explored as a therapeutic option in myelofibrosis. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Swords: AbbVie: Employment. Watts:Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding. Frankfurt:Celgene, Jazz, Agios: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Altman:Cyclacel: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Epizyme: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Ariad: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Bayer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celator: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; FujiFilm: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Agios: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct the trial ; Astellas Pharma: Other; Genetech: Other: Payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; GSK: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Immune Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Boeringer Ingelheim: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: payment to the institution to conduct clinical trial work. Rampal:Celgene: Honoraria; Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Constellation: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria. Giles:Actuate Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership. Crispino:Forma Therapeutics: Research Funding; Scholar Rock: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: Tranylcypromine (TCP) is an irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor, a potent antidepressant that has been in use since the 1960s. Additionally, TCP has been demonstrated to inhibit lysine-specific histone demethylase 1A (LSD1), which is highly expressed in AML (Lee 2006; Berglund 2008). Preclinical studies combining TCP and ATRA induced differentiation and impaired clonogenic survival in non-APL AML cell lines and primary patient samples. These findings were supported by mouse xenograft models (Schenk 2011). Based on this preclinical work, we pursued an investigator-initiated Phase 1 study of this combination at the University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (NCT02273102). Methods: A Phase 1 study was initiated to evaluate the safety, PK/PD, and preliminary clinical activity of TCP in combination with ATRA in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory AML and high-grade MDS. The study followed a traditional 3+3 dose escalation design. Safety for all pts and efficacy for all evaluable pts to date are reported. All adverse events were recorded per NCI CTCAE v4.03. All pts received continuous daily dosing of both ATRA (45 mg/m2 in divided doses) and TCP (3 escalating dose levels: 10mg BID, 20mg BID and 30mg BID), with a 3-day lead-in of TCP only during cycle 1. Cycles were 21 days and pts were allowed to remain on study until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: At the time of data cutoff, 15 pts had received therapy with combination TCP/ATRA (8 AML and 7 MDS). Median age was 74 years, 40% were female and 67% white/27% Hispanic/7% black. Overall, the combination was well tolerated, with the majority of treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) Grade 1 and 2. The most common TEAEs (all grades, ≥20%) included dry mouth (33%), dry skin (27%), febrile neutropenia (27%), dizziness (27%), fatigue (27%), headache (27%), rash (27%), increase in creatinine (27%); and vomiting, nausea, diarrhea, infection, urinary frequency and thrombocytopenia all with a frequency of 20%. The most common Grade 3/4 TEAEs included febrile neutropenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (20%), sepsis (13%), lung infection (13%) and anemia (13%). There was 1 DLT of dizziness at the TCP 20mg BID dose level (out of 8 pts) and 2 DLTs of generalized weakness and nausea/vomiting, respectively, at 30mg BID (out of 3 pts). All DLTs were grade 2, but persistent and poorly tolerated. Therefore, TCP 20mg BID was determined to be the MTD and selected as the RP2D. Best evaluable responses per modified IWG/ELN criteria included 5 pts with prolonged stable disease (all 3 months or more) (2 AML, 1 CMML, 2 MDS), 1 marrow CR (MDS) and 1 MLFS (AML). Three of the 4 MDS/CMML responders had hematologic improvement (HI) (2 HI-P and 1 HI-P and HI-E). One AML pt also recovered neutrophils (0.62 to 14.75) with a decrease in blasts but did not meet response criteria. The 2 pts with best response of marrow CR and MLFS continued on study for 7 and 10 months, respectively. Importantly, these 2 pts and a third pt who had prolonged SD (5 months) plus HI-P/HI-E were all taken off study for cumulative skin toxicity (not progression), and the marrow CR and MLFS pts are both still alive. Conclusions: TCP/ATRA combination therapy has demonstrated an acceptable safety profile in pts with R/R AML and MDS, and additionally has demonstrated clinical activity. TCP 20mg BID is the RP2D, and a phase 1 dose expansion at this dose level is ongoing. In responders, skin toxicity may be treatment duration-limiting due to continuous exposure to ATRA, and an intermittent ATRA schedule after cycle 4 may be pursued for the phase 2 study. Additional data will be presented at the meeting, including myeloid mutational analysis, RNA-seq and ATAC-seq, in order to delineate pre- and post-treatment molecular profiles and chromatin accessibility in these pts. Preliminary data (not shown) suggest that a baseline gene expression pattern may predict sensitivity or resistance to TCP/ATRA. Disclosures Watts: Takeda: Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Swords:AbbVie: Employment.