ALBERT

Description: Abstract 3066 Introduction: Advanced stage III/IV or relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) can hardly be cured with conventional chemotherapy and patients, even after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), experience innumerable relapse events occurring at decreasing progression-free intervals. Important progress was made since the introduction of RITUXIMAB as part of frontline chemoimmunotherapy or as maintenance after frontline treatment with or without ASCT. But, whatever the policy applied, no plateau is observed regarding overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Disease relapse, even in patients with documented complete remission (CR), is thought to be induced both by resistant minimal residual tumor cells and the lack of immunocompetent mechanisms to contain or eliminate them. Thus, it has been postulated that post-ASCT consolidative immunotherapy might eradicate minimal residual disease, based on antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) mechanism, and have a favorable impact on relapse rate and even OS. This view has led to a considerable interest in immunotherapy as a promising therapeutic line to restore and enhance the impaired anti-tumor immune surveillance in the context of post-ASCT low tumor burden. Purpose: We conducted a phase II study to compare OS and PFS between patients with advanced or relapsed/refractory FL receiving consolidative immunotherapy combining recombinant interleukine-2 (rIL-2), recombinant interferon- α-2b (rINF- α-2b) and RITUXIMAB after ASCT, with the aim of controlling minimal residual disease, and other counterparts with FL receiving no further treatment after ASCT. Patients and Methods: From August, 1995, to October, 2009, 139 patients with FL were autografted in complete remission ≥1 or partial remission. Of these patients, 66 were considered eligible for immunotherapy. On adequate post-ASCT hematologic reconstitution, they received 4 weekly IV injections of RITUXIMAB administered on an outpatient fashion. This was followed by a home-based program of subcutaneous injections of rIL2 (6 million UI × 3 / week in 1st cycle; 9 million × 3 / week in 2d) and rINF- α-2b (1.5 million UI × 3 / week in 1st cycle; 3 million × 3 / week in 2d) administered over two 7-week cycles. These two cycles were separated by a two-week free interval. The other 73 patients did not receive any additional treatment after ASCT and served as controls. Results: The two groups were comparable regarding demographic characteristics, disease profile and treatment course, except that the control group had significantly less transformed FL (p =0.0156) and a higher mean treatment line number (p =0.018). Median OS and PFS were not reached in either the study group or the control group. OS, initially not different between the 2 groups (p =0.21), was found significantly higher in the study group after a cut-off follow-up time point of 86.6 months (p =0.017). A significantly higher PFS was also noted in favor of the study group over the control group (p =0.0131). With a median follow-up of 60 months (10 to 136) in the study group and of 82 months (0.7 to 174) in the control group, survival rate was 90.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p= 0.0034) and the overall relapse rate was 19.7% (13 patients) and 41.1% (30 patients), respectively (p= 0.0064). Adverse events were generally mild, consisting essentially of fever and chills with the rIL-2 and rINF- α-2b subcutaneous injections (rapidly controlled with PARACETAMOL), fatigue, grade 2 abnormal liver function tests in one third of patients and grade 2 or 3 cytopenias (anemia or neutropenia) in 40% of patients. Conclusion: These results confirm that post-ASCT immunotherapy with rIL2, rINF- α-2b and RITUXIMAB has a statistically significant impact on OS and PFS. In view of its tolerability, it appears to be quite feasible and safe and might be seen as a promising line of treatment designed for eradicating post-ASCT minimal residual disease and worth being tested within the frame of a randomized trial for validation as an essential step in the treatment algorithm of FL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Introduction Intensive treatments like autologous stem cells transplantations are final standard treatment in lymphoma and myeloma for young people (1,2). In the context of population’s ageing, those treatments should be eligible for older patients. One of the major causes which did not allowed these procedures in elderly patients is the reports of the impact of the age on the process of mobilisation of peripheral stem cell (3). We proceed a retrospective study to explore the feasibility of stem cells collection in patients older than 65 years, compared to younger people. Material and patients During the period of 1999–2006, we identified all the patients older than 65 years, with myeloma and lymphoma, who performed peripheral stem cells collection in Brest’s blood collection centre. We excluded patients for bone marrow collection. Patients were eligible if they achieved more than 2.106 CD34/kg. Then we compared the results obtained in older patients with the results obtained in younger people. Results We identified 100 patients older than 65 years between the 359 patients who underwent peripheral stem cell harvest in Brest’s harvest centre. We excluded 37 others patients for non-conformity. The elderly patients were significantly older (age 68.9 vs. 49.3 y, p0.05). The number of CD34/kg per patient was sufficient to realise more than one autologous transplantation in both groups of patients (5.3 vs. 6.67, p=0.004). Samples were sufficiently rich for CD34/kg (4.36 vs. 5.54, p=0.02). Patients were harvested in one (60), two (25) or more than 2 collections (15). Among the older patients, 71% achieved a sufficient collection of more than 2.106 CD34/kg in one sample only. Conclusion We identified one hundred patients older than 65 years, during a period of 8 years, who performed peripheral stem cells collection, with sufficient wealth (〉2.106 CD34/kg). The majority of patients, 60%, need only one stem cells harvesting. The study confirmed that old patients could be harvested like young people, and eligible for stem cells autologous transplantation.

Description: Abstract 1946 Poster Board I-969 STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric antibody targeting CD20, a membranous B-cell specific protein, currently used in the treatment of B-cell malignancies and various autoimmune diseases. Despite its clear efficacy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, clinical and biological responses are highly variable between patients. Therefore, predictive factors are necessary to adapt therapy to each individual as early as possible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a set of biomarkers in a cohort of 39 patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma (low grade follicular lymphoma or marginal zone lymphoma) and a low tumour burden, treated with single agent RTX as follows: 4 weekly 375 mg/m2 infusions, associated with short-course oral steroids. All patients benefited from FDG-PET analysis before treatment and 10 weeks later, allowing their classification into 3 early response groups: complete isotopic remission, partial response and no response. Dosage of rituximabemia, BAFF and Human Anti-Chimeric Antibodies (HACA) was performed with in-house ELISAs before each infusion and 2 months later. Polymorphisms of FcγRIIIa[158], FcγRIIa[131] and C1qA[276] genes were determined using allele-specific PCR or direct sequencing. Results were compared using Student's t-Test or two-tailed Fischer's exact test when appropriated. RESULTS: Referring to PET analysis, 18 patients were classified as complete isotopic remission, and 21 as partial or no response. Mean age was significantly lower in the first group (54 y+/-19 vs 66+/-13, p=0.022), as well as initial SUVmax (6.3+/-3.4 vs 10.8+/-6.8, p=0.024). Serum levels of RTX were highly variable between patients at each timepoint, but were not statistically different between the different response groups. Basal levels of BAFF were not statistically different between lymphoma patients and a control population, and did not vary after RTX-induced B cell depletion. No patient developed a HACA response during the study. Homozygous FcγRIIIa158V/V genotype was significantly associated with a complete response (p=0.037). Conversely, FcγRIIa[131] and C1qA[276] polymorphisms were not associated with the response. Genetic polymorphisms seemed to modify RTX pharmacokinetics, since homozygous FcγRIIa[131]H/H, FcγRIIIa[158]V/V and C1qA[276]G/G subjects displayed lower levels of RTX than others, without reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, lower initial SUVmax and FcγRIIIa[158]V/V genotype are associated with a better early response to RTX in indolent lymphoma patients, as assessed by PET analysis. FcγR polymorphisms affect RTX kinetics probably through a modification of the efficacy of antibody dependant cell cytotoxicity. Determination of these factors could help in adapting individually therapeutic protocols. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 4980 Background:: Myelodysplastic syndrome of 5q- type is generally considered to have a favorable course. But, even in the Lenalidomide era, it has been evidenced that it may be prone to transformation into more advanced disease, especially in patients who fail to reach transfusion independence or complete cytogenetic response or both. In this setting, it has been demonstrated that gain of chromosome 8 and loss of chromosome 7 are among the genetic cooperating events leading to clonal evolution. Treatment choices in such patients are not well codified and outcome is not predictable. Purpose: We combined 5′-Azacytidine to Lenalidomide as induction therapy to obtain the best response possible before reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for advanced disease developed from 5q- myelodysplastic syndrome. Methods: A female patient born in 1949 was diagnosed with myelodysplastic syndrome of the 5q- type in 1997. The disease remained stable and the patient free of transfusion requirement until 2004. From 2004 to 2007, due to symptomatic anemia, many treatment lines, based on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, have been attempted, but without success. Transfusion in red blood cells became necessary once every four weeks in 2006. In 2007, she has been started on Lenalidomide 10 mg daily. A prompt hematologic improvement was observed at two months of treatment, inducing the disappearance of the macrocytic feature and freedom of transfusion requirement. However, cytogenetic control at twelve months on Lenalidomide showed the persistence of the 5q loss. In 2010, at 24 months on Lenalidomide, a recurrence of macrocytic and symptomatic anemia, with red blood cell transfusion dependence, along with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, was observed. Cytological evaluation of the bone marrow was consistent with transformation into RAEB-1 whereas cytogenetic control showed the occurrence of two 5q- subclones: one expressing trisomy 8, another one displaying monosomy 7. Lenalidomide has been continued on a daily basis, in combination with 5′-Azacytidine which was administered at 75 mg/m2/day as 7-day cycles every 28 days. Results: Platelet transfusions were necessary during the first two cycles and red blood cell transfusions until the fourth cycle. Neutropenia persisted throughout the treatment duration, with temporary recovery obtained under periodic courses of G-CSF. No infectious complication has been observed. At day 1 of the sixth cycle, bone marrow has been reevaluated. On cytological evaluation, the blast excess has disappeared, dropping from 8% to 1%, nuclei hypolobulation was still present in less than 10% of the megakaryocytic lineage and some dysplastic features were still evident in less than 10% of the erythroblastic and granulopoietic lineages. Conventional cytogenetic evaluation and FISH showed the complete disappearance of the 5q- clone and subclones. Conclusion: We found that combining Lenalidomide with 5′-Azacytidine may be an effective therapeutic choice in myelodysplastic syndrome of 5q- type previously treated with Lenalidomide alone and transformed into advanced disease. It may allow for inducing cytological and cytogenetic complete response prior to RIC allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in eligible patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 3558 Introduction: A minority of patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can really be cured and the early or late relapse rate remains a subject of major concern. The occurrence of disease relapse, even in patients with documented complete remission (CR), is thought to be induced both by resistant minimal residual tumor cells and the lack of immunocompetent mechanisms to eradicate them. Thus, it has been postulated that post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) consolidative immunotherapy might eradicate minimal residual disease and, therefore, reduce relapse rate and even improve overall survival (OS). This view has led to a considerable interest in immunotherapy as a promising therapeutic line to restore and enhance the impaired anti-tumor immune surveillance in the setting of post-ASCT low tumor burden. Purpose: We conducted a phase II study to compare OS, relapse-free survival (RFS), death rate and overall relapse rate between patients with poor-risk DLBCL receiving consolidative immunotherapy combining recombinant interleukine-2 (rIL-2), recombinant interferon-α-2b (rINF-α-2b) and Rituximab after ASCT, with the aim of controlling minimal residual disease, and other patients with poor-risk DLBCL treated with ASCT alone. Patients and Methods: On 180 patients, 27 with DLBCL from Brest, autografted in complete remission (CR) ≥ 1 or partial remission (PR), were considered eligible for the study. They received, on adequate post-ASCT hematologic reconstitution, 4 weekly IV injections of Rituximab administered on an outpatient fashion. This was followed by a home-based program of subcutaneous injections of rIL2 (6 million UI × 3/week in 1st cycle; 9 million × 3/week in 2d) and rINF-α-2b (1.5 million UI × 3/week in 1st cycle; 3 million × 3/week in 2d) administered over two 7-week cycles. These two cycles were separated by a two-week free interval. One hundred and fifty three patients from Brest, Lille and Tours did not receive any additional treatment after ASCT and served as controls. Results: The two groups were comparable, except for age, which was older in the study group (p=0.018) and for pre-ASCT response pattern, which was better in the control group. There was no influence of recruitment center, sex, disease Ann Arbor stage, IPI score, RITUXIMAB administration before ASCT, graft source or ASCT conditioning regimen on the final results. Median OS and RFS were not reached in any group and are still under study. The median follow-up was 54.9 months in the study group and 48.8 months in the control group. In univariate analysis, the prevalence of death rate was 7.4% and 26.2% in the study group and the control group, respectively (OR = 0.23, 95%CI [0.05-0.99], p=0.03), and the overall relapse rate was 11.1% (3 patients) and 22.9% (35 patients), respectively (OR=0.42, 95%CI [0.12-1.48], p=0.17). In multivariate analysis, the risk of death was significantly decreased (OR 0.196; 95%CI [0.046-0.827] p=0.027) and there was a trend toward a decreased relapse rate (OR 0.348; 95%CI [0.104-1.168], p=0.088) in the study group compared to the control group. In addition, older age was independently associated with an increased risk of death (OR=1.053, 95%CI [1.02-1.09], p=0.002). Adverse events were generally mild, consisting essentially of fever and chills with the rIL-2 and rINF-α-2b subcutaneous injections responding well to PARACETAMOL, fatigue, grade 2 abnormal liver function tests in one third of patients, grade 3 neutropenia in 45% of patients and hypothyroidism in one patient. Conclusion: We found that post-ASCT immunotherapy with rIL2, rINF-α-2b and RITUXIMAB has a statistically significant favorable impact on death rate and a positive, although not statistically significant, effect relapse rate. In view of its toxicity profile, it appears to be quite feasible and safe and might be considered as a promising line of treatment designed for post-ASCT minimal residual disease and worth being evaluated within the frame of a prospective randomized trial. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: This prospective phase II trial (Nov 2011- Dec 2012), supported by the LYSA group, aimed to evaluate the impact on PFS of the RiBVD regimen in newly diagnosed, previously untreated, elderly MCL patients (〉65 years or not eligible for ASCT) (NCT01457144). Inclusion criteria were: WHO 2008 MCL not previously treated, CD20 positive, ECOG 0-2, AA stage II-IV, no CNS involvement or active HBV/HCV/HIV infection. Patients were scheduled to receive a total of 6 cycles of the RiBVD regimen, if they responded (IWG criteria) after 4 cycles. The regimen was administered every 4 weeks with Rituximab 375 mg/m² IV on day(D)1, Bendamustine 90 mg/m² IV on D1 and 2, Dexamethasone 40 mg/m² IV on D2 and bortezomib (Velcade®) 1.3 mg/m² subcutaneously on D1, 4, 8 and 11. Primary prophylaxis with acyclovir was mandatory for Herpes virus reactivation, but there was no recommendation for bacterial prevention. Herein we present preliminary analysis of the trial after 4 RiBVD cycles. Results: A total of 76 patients were included, one was excluded because of HBV active disease and 5 had insufficient data reported in the database. To date we analyzed 70 patients. Patients characteristics: sex ratio M/F 49/21, median age 72 years (y) [64-83] (2 patients were 64 y old), AAstage II/III-IV 5/65, ECOG 0-1/2 59/11, MIPI score low/intermediate/high 3/19/48. Response: 61 responded (ORR=87%), with 19 in PR (26%) and 42 in CR/CRu (60%). Four patients died from pneumonia (n=1), cardiac arrest (n=2) and one following Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy. Three patients have progressed after 3 cycles. Sixty one patients were analysed by PETscan after 4 cycles, 39 (64%) reached a CR (30 were in CR/CRu and 9 in PR) and 22 remained PET positive (11 patients were in CR/CRu, 10 in PR and 1 stable). RiBVD cycles: 271 cycles were administered out of 280 planned (97%). Twenty four (9%) were delayed, 10 for toxicity. All but one planned Bendamustine doses (n=542) were administered with dosing modified 17 times (3%), mostly for hematological toxicity (n=14). Regarding Bortezomib, 79% (1028/1084) of planned doses were administered, it was prematurely stopped (56, 4%) for neurotoxicity (10 instances) or hematological side effects (46). Rituximab was not administered in 4 instances. Hematologic toxicities: Over the 271 cycles administered, neutropenia was reported in 104 cycles [56 grade 3/4 (g3/4) (21%)], 2.5% with fever; thrombopenia in 181 cycles [41 g3/4 (15%)]; anemia in 210 cycles, [6 g3/4 (2%)]. Non-hematologic toxicities:Reported in 〉10% of the cycles were : allergic reactions (10.3%, g3/4

Description: BACKGROUND Escalated BEACOPP (BEAesc) demonstrated a better disease control than ABVD but no overall survival (OS) improvement in patients with advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) (Federico et al , J Clin Oncol 2009, Viviani et al, N Engl J Med 2011, Mounier et al, Ann Oncol 2014). The superior efficiency of BEAesc is associated to a substantially higher immediate hematological toxicity, and an increased risk of secondary myelodysplasia/leukemia and infertility. So, to better manage HL treatment there is a need to identify early responding patients able to benefit from a strategy of dose intensity de-escalation after upfront BEAesc, without impairing the disease control. PET performed after 2 cycles of chemotherapy (PET2) might identify such a population suitable for receiving ABVD after 2 cycles of upfront BEAesc, and was implemented in the present study. METHODS The AHL 2011 trial (NCT01358747) was designed to evaluate in 16 to 60 years old HL patients with Ann Arbor stage III, IV or high risk IIB, a treatment strategy driven by PET after 2 BEAesc cycles (PET2), delivering 4 cycles of ABVD for PET2 negative patients and 4 cycles of BEAesc for PET2 positive patients. This PET-driven strategy was randomly compared to a standard treatment not monitored by PET and delivering 6 cycles of BEAesc. A baseline PET was mandatory before treatment and PET2 were centrally reviewed and interpreted according to Deauville criteria within 48 hours. The allocation of treatment in the experimental arm was based on the PET2 central review results. PFS was the primary endpoint of the study with a hypothesis of non-inferiority of the PET driven arm compared to the standard arm with a margin of 10% (85% 5y-PFS in the standard arm vs 〉75% in the PET driven arm). An interim analysis of the primary endpoint was planned after 50% (n = 49) of the 97 scheduled events needed for the final analysis. RESULTS From May 2011 to May 2014, 823 patients were registered and 782 were eligible for the interim analysis including 401 patients in the arm A, and 381 in arm B. Patients characteristics were well balanced in both arms: median age was 30 years (16 - 60), 64% were male, 81% had nodular sclerosis and 12% mixed cellularity HL, 12% had stage IIB, 28% stage III, 60% stage IV, and 58% had an international prognosis score ≥3. After 2 cycles of BEAesc PET was positive in 97 (12%) patients and PET2 positivity was similar in the standard and experimental arms (n = 48, 12% and n = 49, 13% respectively). Based on PET2 results, 319 (84%) patients received 4 cycles of ABVD and 49 (13%) 4 additional cycles of BEAesc in the experimental arm. Grade ≥3 toxicity was significantly higher in patients receiving 6 cycles of BEAesc compared to those who received 2 cycles of BEAesc + 4 cycles of ABVD with more frequent anemia (11% vs 2%), leukopenia (85% vs 72%), thrombocytopenia (44% vs 13%), febrile neutropenia (6% vs 3%), and sepsis (7% vs 4%). 182 serious adverse events (SAE) related to treatment occurred in 108 (24%) patients treated with 6 cycles of BEAesc (leading to death in 4 cases), compared to 72 SAE (leading to death in 1 case) in 50 (15%) patients treated with 2 x BEAesc + 4 x ABVD (p

Description: Background: Nivolumab demonstrated remarkable activity in patients with relapse or refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). However, long term efficacy and the need for a consolidation with allogenic stem cell transplantation remain unclear. Patient and method: We retrospectively analyzed 78 patients with R/R HL treated with nivolumab in the French Early Access Program and compared their outcome according to subsequent alloHSCT. Results: After a median follow-up of 31.5 months, the best overall response rate was 64%, including 37.3% complete response (CR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.1 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. At 3 years, PFS and OS rates were 35% and 65%, respectively. Patients reaching a CR upon nivolumab had a significantly longer PFS than those reaching a PR (median = not reached vs 10.1 months). In our cohort, 17 patients underwent consolidation with allogenic stem cells transplantation (alloHSCT) after nivolumab therapy (Figure 1). At the time of transplantation, 8 patients were in CR, 5 in partial response (PR) and 4 had progressed of whom 3 received a salvage therapy before alloHSCT. Interestingly, 6 out of 7 patients who were not in CR at the time of transplantation (5 PR and 1 progressive disease) converted into a CR after alloHSCT. At the time of analysis, 14 patients were alive and 13 remained disease-free after a median follow-up of 30.4 months. One-year OS and PFS from alloHSCT were 82% and 76%, respectively. Among responding patients (i.e. in CR or PR) after nivolumab monotherapy, those who underwent subsequent alloHSCT (N=13) had a better outcome than those who were not consolidated with alloHSCT (N=35) (Figure 2). In the transplanted group, none of the patients relapsed whereas in the non-transplanted group 60% of the patients relapsed (p

Description: Introduction: CD38 is highly and uniformly expressed on myeloma cells (1). Daratumumab is a human anti-CD38 IgG1κ monoclonal antibody that has previously shown a favourable safety profile as a single agent in patients with relapsed and refractory (RR) multiple myeloma (MM) (2). This study further assesses the efficacy of Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone in heavily pre-treated myeloma patients that are refractory to Lenalidomide, Pomalidomide, and Bortezomib. Methods: This study is an ongoing, open-label phase II study of Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone (NCT02626481). Sixty-four, heavily pretreated Patients were recruited in thirty centres in France and Belgium from November 2015, to receive Daratumumab and Dexamethasone. Daratumumab 16 mg/kg was administered weekly during the first two 28-day cycles, every other week during Cycles three through six, and monthly in Cycle seven and beyond until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were all refractory to Lenalidomide (Len), Pomalidomide (Pom) (defined by a progression within 60 days from last drug dosing) and Bortezomib (Bz) (defined by a progression within 6 months from last drug dosing). The primary objective was overall response rate as per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A planned safety and efficacy interim analysis was performed after the first 19 patients were enrolled. The last patient was enrolled on the 1stof August 2016. Results: Sixty-four patients were recruited onto the study. The median age (range) at screening was 61 (30-80). The median number (range) of prior lines of therapy was 6 (2-9). Sixty-seven percent of patient had previously received an autologous stem-cell transplant. At the time of screening, 20% of patients (n=13) had a t(4;14) and 12.5% (n=8) a del(17p). Planned interim analysis after the first 19 patients were enrolled did not find any unexpected toxicity. Safety and efficacy results (data cut May 15, 2016) of Daratumumab 16 mg/kg are presented here. No patient discontinued treatment due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Event such as infusion related reactions. Ten (15%) patients discontinued treatment due to disease progression after a median of one-cycle. The most common non-haematological TEAEs included infusion related (IRR, n=5, 8%), and fatigue (n=6, 9.3%). All patients with IRRs recovered and continued to receive treatment. Only six (9.5%) patients experienced hyperthermia. Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were the most frequently reported grade 3 or 4 TEAE (11 and 5% respectively). Planned interim efficacy assessment showed a response rate (defined as a Partial Response (PR) or greater) in 3/19 patients at the end of the first cycle and 4/19 at the end of the second cycle, and a clinically relevant response (Stable Disease (SD) or greater) at the end of the second cycle for 11 of 19 patients, thus meeting the planed futility criteria and enabling the trial to go forward. As per the 15thof May, among the 40 evaluable patients (that had received at least 2 treatment cycles or progressed within the first) the overall response rate (3) was 25%, with eight (20%) partial responses (PR) and two (5%) very good partial responses (VGPRs) after a median of two cycles (range 1-5). An additional seven patients (17.5%) obtained a Minimal Response (MR) according to the EBMT criteria (4). This is consistent with prior results. Updated results will be presented at the time of ASH. Conclusions: Daratumumab in combination with Dexamethasone is a safe treatment option with a favourable benefit/risk profile for the treatment of triple relapsed or refractory (Len, Pom and Bz) myeloma patients. 1. Stevenson GT. CD38 as a Therapeutic Target. Mol Med. 2006;12(11-12):345-6. 2. Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, Nahi H, Gimsing P, Hansson M, et al. Targeting CD38 with Daratumumab Monotherapy in Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 24;373(13):1207-19. 3. Kyle R, Rajkumar S. Criteria for diagnosis, staging, risk stratification and response assessment of multiple myeloma. Leuk Off J Leuk Soc Am Leuk Res Fund UK. 2009 Jan;23(1):3-9. 4. Bladé J,et al. Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. Br J Haematol. 1998 Sep;102(5):1115-23. Disclosures Boyle: Novartis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Leleu:Novartis: Honoraria; LeoPharma: Honoraria; Pierre Fabre: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; TEVA: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol: Honoraria; celgene: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria. Moreau:Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Fohrer:amgen: Consultancy; celgne: Consultancy. Decaux:SIEMENS: Honoraria, Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding; The Binding Site: Other: supply of free light chain assays , Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; janssen: Consultancy; sanofi: Consultancy. Attal:celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; sanofi: Consultancy. Facon:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel and expense, Speakers Bureau.

Description: Unavailability of Carmustine and its dramatically increased cost by nearly 10 fold has led to its replacement by bendamustine (Be) and an increase use of Bendamustine-based (BeEAM) conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the BeEAM regimen in the real life use in several French centers. Median age of the 386 patients (233 male, 153 female) was 55 years (17-72). The majority of patients had aggressive B-cell (40%), follicular (17%), Hodgkin's (17%) and mantle cell lymphoma (15%). Two hundred and forty six patients (64%) were transplanted after 2nd line chemotherapy and the median number of prior lines of chemotherapy of 2 (1-9). Two hundred and sixty patients (67%) had received prior platinum chemotherapy and only 4% had a history of prior chronic renal failure (Table 1). The median creatinine level at conditioning initiation was 71(36-206) µmol/l. Be was administered at a median dose of 191 mg/m2/day (50-250) on day -7 and -6. Thirty two percent received 100-160 mg/m²/d and 58% of patients received more than 160 mg/m²/d. Median 24h-hydration volume was 3 l (1-6) which began within median time of 18 h (1-72) prior to conditioning initiation. The median duration time of Be perfusion was 60 min (30-143). Grade 1-4 acute renal failure (ARF) was reported in 107 cases (28%) (G ≥2; 34%) and appeared after a median time of 2 days (1-18) after conditioning start. Melphalan dosage was reduced, due to renal failure, in 10% of patients (Table 2). 84% of patients normalized their creatinine level within a median time of 10 days (1-77). The most frequent reported Grade 1-4 toxicities were mucositis (84%), gastroenteritis (53%), skin toxicity (34%), colitis (29%), liver toxicity (19%), pneumonitis (5%) and cardiac rhythm disorders (4%). Opportunistic infection was documented in 9.5% of patients, HHV6 reactivation in 6% of patients. Ten percent of patients needed intensive care management and toxic death was estimated at 5% (Table 3). Patients received a median of 3 (0-34) packed red blood cells and 4 (0-56) platelets units. The median time to neutrophils 〉 0.5 G/L and platelets 〉 20 G/L were 10 (0-50) and 12 (0-210) days. The median time of hospital stay was 23 (12-85) days. In comparison with the group of patient without renal failure, the group of patients with ARF had older age (58 vs 54), higher rate of pre-transplant chronic renal failure (10% vs 1%), higher rate of platinum treatment (77% vs 64%), higher day1 creatinine level (81 vs 69) and received higher median bendamustine (199 vs 182). Colitis (p=0.039), pneumonitis (p=0.008), cardia arrhythmia (p=