ALBERT

Description: Introduction: PI3Kδ signaling is critical for the proliferation, survival and homing/tissue retention of malignant B cells. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, highly selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ recently approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL in combination with R. This report summarizes the long-term follow-up of the Phase 1 combination experience of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies. Methods: This Phase 1 study evaluated idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL continuously given at 100 mg BID (4 of the pts receiving R) or 150 mg BID (all other pts) in combination with a total of 8 infusions of rituximab (R, 375 mg/m2 weekly x 8), or a total of 12 infusions of ofatumumab (O, 300mg initial dose either on Day 1 or Day 2 relative to the first dose of idelalisib, then 1,000 mg weekly x 7, then 1,000 mg every 4 wks x 4). Pts on treatment after 48 weeks were eligible to continue idelalisib on an extension study. Clinical response was evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek 2008; Cheson 2012). Results: 40 pts (12F/28M) with a median (range) age of 66 (43-87) years and a WHO performance status of 0 (24, 60%) or 1 (16, 40%) were enrolled. 19 pts received idelalisib in combination with R and 21 with O. Adverse disease characteristics (n, %) included Rai Stage III/IV (20, 50%), bulky lymphadenopathy (23, 58%), refractory disease (15, 38%), multiple prior therapies (median 2, range: 1-9). Almost all pts (39, 98%) had at least 1 prior therapy containing R, and 3 of the 21 pts (14%) receiving idelalisib + O had received prior O. 63% of the pts receiving idelalisib + R, and 48% of the pts receiving idelalisib + O were refractory to R. Prior therapies also included alkylating agents (31, 78%, [bendamustine: 20, 50%]) and purine analogs (31, 78%, [fludarabine: 28, 70%]). Data available from 39 pts showed that 11 (28%) pts had evidence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations and 30 (75%) had unmutated IGHV. As of 7/15/2014, the median (range) treatment duration was 18 (0-44) months. 23 (58%) pts have completed the primary study and enrolled into the extension study. Primary reasons for study discontinuation (as reported by investigators) included disease progression (14, 35%), adverse events (AEs) (12, 30%), investigator request (3, 8%), withdrawal of consent (n=1), BMT (n=1). There were a total of 8 deaths on study: 2 deaths occurred after disease progression, and 6 pts died because of AEs (all assessed as unrelated/unlikely related to idelalisib by investigators). A total of 4 pts (10%) were continuing idelalisib treatment on the extension study at time of analysis. Selected treatment-emergent AEs (any Grade/≥Gr 3, regardless of causality) included diarrhea/colitis (55%/23%), cough (40%/3%), pyrexia (40%/3%), dyspnea (30%/3%), fatigue (25%/0%) nausea (25%/0%), rash (20%/0%), pneumonia (20%/18%), and pneumonitis (8%/5%). Elevation of liver transaminases (TA, any Grade/≥Gr 3) was seen in 30%/10%. Re-exposure to idelalisib after resolution of TA elevation generally was successful; only 1 patient discontinued the study because of (recurrent) TA elevation. Other AEs leading to study discontinuation and reported as possibly/probably related to idelalisib included diarrhea/colitis (4, 10%), pyrexia (n=1), interstitial lung disease (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), rash (n=1), psoriasis (n=1). Secondary malignancies leading to discontinuation (all reported as unrelated) were breast cancer (n=1), recurrent colon cancer (n=1), AML (n=1). There was no obvious overall difference in the toxicity reported for pts receiving idelalisib with rituximab compared to those with ofatumumab. The ORR (N=40) was 83% (33/40), with 2 CRs (5%) reported. Median PFS (N=40) and duration of response (DOR) (n=33) were 24 months. Median (range) time to response was 1.9 (range 1.7-16.9) months. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached with a KM estimate for OS of 80% at 24 months. For the 11 pts with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations, the response rate was 73%, and the median PFS and DOR were 20 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: Combinations of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies such as R or O represent non-cytotoxic regimens with acceptable safety profiles and considerable activity resulting in durable tumor control in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL, including those with high risk factors such as del(17p) or TP53 mutations. A Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy of idelalisib in combination with ofatumumab is ongoing (NCT01659021). Disclosures Furman: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Fowler:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viggiano:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jahn:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel chimeric mAb targeting a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen, glycoengineered to enhance affinity to FcγRIIIa receptors, thereby demonstrating significantly greater ADCC than rituximab. UTX monotherapy in patients (pts) with rituximab relapsed/refractory NHL and CLL has reported a 43% ORR (ASCO 2014). TGR-1202 is a next generation, once daily, oral PI3Kδ inhibitor which notably lacks the hepatotoxicity associated with other PI3Kδ inhibitors, and is active in pts with relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies (EHA 2014). UTX and TGR-1202 have shown synergistic activity in-vitroin various lymphoid cell lines (Lugano 2013). This Phase 1 trial evaluates safety and efficacy of the combination of a glycoengineered anti-CD20 (UTX) and a PI3Kδ inhibitor (TGR-1202) in pts with heavily pre-treated relapsed or refractory CLL and NHL. Methods: Eligible pts have relapsed/refractory CLL or NHL with an ECOG PS ≤ 2. A 3+3 design evaluates cohorts of CLL and NHL pts independently with UTX dosed on Days 1, 8, 15 of Cycles 1 & 2 followed by maintenance therapy. UTX starts at 600 mg in Cohort 1 and increases to 900 mg for pts with CLL and is fixed at 900 mg for pts with NHL. TGR-1202 starts at 800 mg QD in Cohort 1 and is increased in subsequent cohorts. An amendment in July 2014 was introduced to include an improved micronized formulation of TGR-1202, starting at 400 mg once daily and increasing in subsequent cohorts. There are no limits on prior therapy, and patients with Richter’s Transformation or who are refractory to prior PI3Kδ inhibitors or BTK inhibitors are eligible. Primary endpoints: Safety and Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT). Secondary endpoints: Efficacy (ORR, CR rate). Results: As of August 2014, 21 pts have been enrolled: 8 CLL/SLL, 7 DLBCL, 5 Follicular Lymphoma, and 1 patient with Richter’s Transformation. Median age is 64 years (range 35-82); 12 male/9 female. Median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-9); median ECOG PS = 1. All pts are evaluable for safety. Adverse events have been manageable with no safety concerns noted. Day 1 infusion related reactions (IRR) were the most common treatment related adverse event (48%), with all but one event Grade 1 or 2 in severity, followed by neutropenia (38%), diarrhea (29%), and nausea (29%). Notably, no events of TGR-1202 related hepatotoxicity have been reported to date. All IRR and neutropenia events have been manageable with dose delays. One neutropenia related dose delay in a CLL patient at UTX 600 mg + TGR 800 mg met the criteria for a DLT, necessitating enrollment of additional pts into this cohort. No other DLTs have been reported, including at higher dose levels. Fifteen pts were evaluable for efficacy with 6 pts too early for response assessment. Among evaluable pts, 80% displayed a reduction in tumor burden at first efficacy assessment, despite pts exhibiting a number of high-risk characteristics, including 3/5 CLL pts having 17p/11q deletion and a median of 6 prior lines of therapy amongst pts with FL. Objective responses are summarized below: Table TypePts (n)PRn (%)ORRn (%)PD(n)% pts ≥ SD for 12 wksMedian Prior Rx CLL/SLL54 (80%)4 (80%)-5 (100%)2 (1 – 3) Richter’s1---1 (100%)1 FL4---4 (100%)6 (3 – 8) DLBCL52 (40%)2 (40%)14 (80%)3 (1 – 6) Total156 (40%)6 (40%)114 (93%)3 (1 – 8) Amongst pts with CLL, 2/2 pts with normal cytogenetics achieved a PR including a patient with prior treatment with a BTK inhibitor, while 2/3 pts with presence of 17p/11q deletion achieved a PR, with the remaining patient having SD with a 44% nodal reduction at first assessment. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggests the combination of UTX + TGR-1202 is well tolerated with early signs of clinical activity in heavily pre-treated and high-risk patient subsets. Enrollment is ongoing with at least 30 patients anticipated. Disclosures Lunning: Onyx: Consultancy; Alexion: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Pauli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vakkalanka:Rhizen: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viswanadha:Incozen: Employment. O'Brien:Amgen, Celgene, GSK: Consultancy; CLL Global Research Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Emergent, Genentech, Gilead, Infinity, Pharmacyclics, Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; MorphoSys, Acerta, TG Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 2832 Introduction: The class I phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3Ks) regulate a variety of cellular functions relevant to oncogenesis. Expression of the PI3K p110δ isoform (PI3Kδ) is restricted to cells of hematopoietic origin where it plays a key role in B cell proliferation and survival. CAL-101 is an isoform-selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ (EC50 of 8 nM in a cell-based assay with 〉200-fold selectivity relative to other PI3K isoforms). A Phase 1 study of single-agent CAL-101 demonstrated clinical activity in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), mantle cell lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL); a favorable safety profile suggested that CAL-101 might successfully be combined with other agents active against lymphoid malignancies. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and activity of CAL-101 in combination with rituximab and/or bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell indolent NHL and CLL. All patients received CAL-101 100 mg orally twice per day (BID) in 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles. Patients also received either rituximab 375 mg/m2 administered weekly for 8 weeks, starting on Day 1 of Cycle 1, or bendamustine 90 mg/m2 administered on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for 6 cycles. Tumor response was evaluated according to standard criteria. Results: At data cutoff, 12 patients were enrolled in the study, including 6 with NHL and 6 with CLL. Patients included: males/females n=8 (67%)/4 (33%) with median age [range] of 65 [55-80] years, and relapsed/refractory disease n=8 (67%)/4 (33%). The median [range] number of prior therapies was 3 [1-11]. The number (%) of patients with specific prior therapies included: rituximab n=12 (100%), alkylating agent n= 10 (83%), purine analog n=9 (75%), and anthracycline/anthracenedione n=6 (50%). All patients received CAL-101 100 mg BID; 6 patients received rituximab and 6 received bendamustine. One patient with NHL had a dose reduction of bendamustine due to hiccups and 1 patient with NHL had a dose reduction of CAL-101 due to increased ALT/AST; all other patients received the full-dose regimen with acceptable tolerability. Preliminary clinical response assessments were available for 6 patients who had completed 2 cycles of combination treatment; the results are shown in the table. Enrollment is ongoing and dose escalation of CAL-101 is planned. Updated data will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: Early results from this Phase 1 study of CAL-101, an oral PI3Kδ isoform-selective inhibitor, in combination with rituximab or bendamustine show acceptable safety and promising clinical activity in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell NHL and CLL. Disclosures: Flinn: calistoga: Research Funding. Off Label Use: CAL-101 for NHL. Leonard:Calistoga: Consultancy, Research Funding. Holes:Calistoga: Employment. Peterman:Calistoga: Employment. Yu:Calistoga: Employment.

Description: Introduction: Ublituximab (UTX) is a novel, chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) which targets a unique epitope on the CD20 antigen and has been glycoengineered to enhance affinity for all variants of FcγRIIIa receptors, demonstrating greater ADCC than rituximab and ofatumumab. In patients (pts) with rel/ref CLL, the combination of UTX with ibrutinib was well-tolerated and highly active demonstrating an 88% ORR (95% ORR in high-risk CLL) with responses attained rapidly (median time to iwCLL response of 8 weeks). Ibrutinib has demonstrated single agent activity in Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL), achieving a 68% ORR (21% CR) in a single arm trial in relapsed or refractory patients (Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Herein we report on the first combination of ibrutinib with a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, UTX, in patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL). Methods: Eligible patients had rel/ref MCL with an ECOG PS 〈 3. Prior ibrutinib treatment was permitted. UTX (900 mg) was administered on Days 1, 8, and 15 in Cycle 1 followed by Day 1 of Cycles 2 - 6. Ibrutinib was started on Day 1 and continued daily at 560 mg. Following Cycle 6, patients came off study but could remain on ibrutinib. Primary endpoints were safety and ORR with an emphasis on early activity with response assessments by CT scan scheduled prior to cycles 3 and 6 only (criteria per Cheson 2007). Results: 15 patients were enrolled: 13 M/2 F, median age 71 yr (range 55-80), ECOG 0/1: 9/6, median prior Tx = 3 (range 1-8), 53% with ≥ 2 prior anti-CD20 therapies, 40% prior bortezomib. Gr 3/4 AE's occurring in at least 5% of patients and at least possibly related to UTX and/or ibrutinib included: neutropenia (13%), fatigue (7%), rash (7%) and atrial fibrillation (7%). Ibrutinib was dose reduced due to an AE in 1 patient (rash) and discontinued in 1 patient due to atrial fibrillation. No UTX dose reductions occurred. All 15 pts are evaluable for response with best response to treatment as follows: 87% (13/15) ORR with 33% (5/15) Complete Response. Three of the CR's occurred at week 8. Of the two patients not achieving an objective response, one patient was stable at first scan and came off treatment prior to second efficacy assessment (ibrutinib related A-Fib) and one patient progressed at first assessment. Responses generally improved from first to second assessment with median tumor reduction of 64% by week 8 and 82% by week 20. Conclusions: Ublituximab, a glycoengineered anti-CD20 mAb, in combination with ibrutinib is both well-tolerated and highly active in pts with rel/ref MCL. Response rate, depth of response, and time to response compare favorably to historical data with ibrutinib alone. A randomized phase 3 trial with ibrutinib +/- ublituximab is currently ongoing in high-risk CLL pts and future studies using this combination in MCL are being evaluated. Disclosures Kolibaba: Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Cell Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding. Burke:Gilead: Consultancy; Millenium/Takeda: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; TG Therapeutics: Other: Travel expenses. Farber:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding. Fanning:Celgene and Millennium/Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Schreeder:TG Therapeutics, Inc: Research Funding. Boccia:Incyte Corporation: Honoraria. Sportelli:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Miskin:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Weiss:TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sharman:Roche: Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Calistoga: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Description: Introduction CC-292, an oral, highly selective, small-molecule irreversible-inhibitor of Btk is under investigation for the treatment of CLL and other B-cell malignancies. This phase 1 trial investigated the safety, dose limiting toxicities (DLT), and clinical activity of CC-292 monotherapy in subjects with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. This interim analysis focused on the safety and clinical activity in subjects with CLL and small cell lymphocytic leukemia (SLL). Methods Eligible subjects with R/R (≥ 1 prior therapy) CLL/SLL were treated with monotherapy CC-292 in a dose-escalation study with doses ranging from 125 mg to 1000 mg QD and BID dose levels of 375 mg and 500 mg. As a maximum tolerated dose was not established, CLL patients have been enrolled in an early dose expansion cohort of 750 mg QD and preliminary recommended phase 2 dose expansion cohort at 500 mg BID. All subjects received continuous dosing in 28-day cycles until progressive disease or intolerable toxicity. Clinical activity was investigator assessed per the 2008 iwCLL criteria. Results 83 subjects with R/R CLL/SLL have been enrolled as of June 30, 2013. Baseline characteristics include median age of 67 years (34-89), 52% Rai stage 3/4 disease, median 3 prior therapies (1-12), and 34% refractory to last treatment. Poor-risk factors were present in 67% of subjects, including del11q (22%), del17p (24%), and unmutated IgVH (54%). 67% of subjects remain on study. Subjects have received a median of 6 treatment cycles (0.2-21.6). The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia (21%), thrombocytopenia (15%), pneumonia (10%), and anemia (8%). Rates of febrile neutropenia were low (4%). The most common treatment-emergent AEs (≥ 10% of subjects) were diarrhea (59.7%), fatigue (37.5%), neutropenia (26.4%), thrombocytopenia (26.4%), nausea (26.4%), pyrexia (22.2%), headache (19.4%), cough (19.4%), upper respiratory infection (16.7%), peripheral edema (15.3%), abdominal pain (15.3%), dizziness (13.9%), muscle spasms (13.9%), contusion (13.9%), anemia (12.5%), pneumonia (12.5%), sinusitis (12.5%), and urinary tract infection (11.1%). One CLL patient at the 500 mg BID dose level has experienced a drug-related adverse event of grade 4 thrombocytopenia during Cycle 1 that was assessed as a DLT. The number of patients discontinuing study treatment due to AEs was low (2.4%). Results are summarized for efficacy-evaluable patients treated at the 4 dose levels where at least a partial response (PR) was achieved (750 mg, 1000 mg, 375 mg bid and 500 mg bid) (n = 55). During cycle 1, 89% experienced a ≥ 25% increase in absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), which usually resolved with continued treatment. The table below details the best responses achieved to date. In subjects with del11q, del17p, unmutated IgVH, and no high-risk genomic factors, the PR rate was 42% (5/12), 25% (3/12), 44% (7/16), and 47% (7/15), respectively. Importantly, nodal responses were induced in the majority of subjects receiving BID dosing (375 mg: 67%; 500 mg: 62%) with an overall PR rate of 40%. When achieved, nodal responses were typically observed by cycle 2 and were sustained with continued treatment. Although the sample size is small, subjects treated at 375 mg or 500 mg BID showed continued lymph node size reduction over time from cycle 2 (mean reduction of 42% and 45%, respectively) to cycle 7 (mean reduction of 60% and 71%, respectively). Conclusion CC-292 is well tolerated as an oral daily therapy. Single-agent therapy with CC-292 is sufficient to achieve high nodal and partial response rates in relapsed/refractory CLL subjects, including those with high-risk genomic features. These results support continued development of CC-292 for the treatment of patients with CLL/SLL. Disclosures: Brown: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Emergent: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Sanofi Aventis: Consultancy; Vertex: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Genzyme: Research Funding. Off Label Use: The abstract shows scientific information on CC292 which is an investigational product developed by Celgene. This investigational product is not approved by any health authority for any indication. Harb:Celgene: Research Funding. Hill:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sharman:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cylene Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Avila Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding. Barr:Celgene: Consultancy. Foran:Celgene: Research Funding. Burger:Pharmalytics: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Mahadevan:Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau. Ma:Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Barnett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Marine:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nava-Parada:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Azaryan:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mei:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kipps:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 2699 Introduction: PI3Kδ is expressed in cells of hematopoietic origin where it regulates survival and proliferation of normal and malignant B-cells. CAL-101 (GS-1101) is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor that selectively targets PI3Kδ. A prior Phase 1 study established 150 mg/dose BID as an appropriate single-agent starting dose for GS-1101 and demonstrated that GS-1101 monotherapy is associated with substantial clinical activity in patients with hematologic malignancies. Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 study has evaluated repeated 28-day cycles of GS-1101 in combination with rituximab and/or bendamustine in patients with previously treated iNHL. GS-1101 (G) was administered starting on Day 1 of Cycle 1 with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2 given weekly for 8 doses, GR regimen), with bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for 6 cycles, GB regimen), or in combination with R (375 mg/m2, on Day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles) and B (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for 6 cycles, GRB regimen). Initial cohorts of patients received GS-1101 at a dose of 100 mg/dose BID in the GR or GB regimens. Thereafter, all patients received GS-1101 at a dose of 150 mg/dose BID in the GR, GB, or GRB regimens. Chemokine/cytokine plasma levels were assessed at baseline and on Day 28 of therapy using multiplexed bead suspension arrays. Tumor response was evaluated according to standard criteria (Cheson et al. 2007). Results: At data cutoff, the study had enrolled 37 patients with iNHL. Patient characteristics, histological subtyping, safety, and efficacy results are depicted in the table. The majority of patients were 〉60 years of age and had undergone extensive prior therapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events were generally consistent with those expected with each of the single agents. All evaluable patients had reductions in lymphadenopathy, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 〉65% for all regimens. In 3 patients among the 24 patients receiving either GB or GRB, 3 complete responses were observed. Lymph node shrinkage was rapid; responses generally occurred within ≤2 cycles. Disease-associated chemokines/cytokines were commonly elevated at baseline and were reduced by GS-1101 treatment; in 20 evaluable patients, mean (±SEM) values declined from 302 (±68) to 62 (±14) pg/mL for CCL17 (p=0.001), from 2512 (±332) to 879 (± 88) pg/mL) for CCL22 (p=0.0001), from 517 (± 88) to 107 (± 34) pg/mL for CXCL13 (p=0.0001), and from 33 (± 5.4) to 18 (± 1.8) pg/mL for TNFα (p=0.007). Conclusions: A favorable safety profile and lack of overlapping toxicities allows the oral PI3Kδ inhibitor, CAL-101 (GS-1101), to be delivered at the full single-agent starting dose when coadministered with chemoimmunotherapies in heavily pretreated patients with iNHL. GS-1101-based combination therapy with rituximab and/or bendamustine offers major and rapid reductions in lymphadenopathy. The data from this trial will be used to design Phase 3 combination studies of GS-1101 in patients with iNHL. Disclosures: de Vos: Gilead Sciences Inc: Consultancy. Flinn:Gilead Sciences Inc: Research Funding. Coutre:Gilead Sciences Inc: Consultancy. Leonard:Gilead Sciences Inc: Consultancy. Fowler:Gilead Sciences Inc: Consultancy. Sharman:calistoga: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Rigel: Research Funding; Portola: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy. Holes:Gilead: Employment. Lannutti:Gilead: Employment. Johnson:Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Jahn:gILEAD: Employment. Miller:Gilead: Employment.

Description: Abstract 3645 Introduction: PI3Kδ drives proliferation and survival in malignant B-cells. GS-1101 is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor of PI3Kδ that has shown considerable monotherapy activity when given at dose levels of ≥100 mg BID in patients with heavily pretreated indolent non-Hodgkins lymphoma (iNHL). Methods and Patients: This Phase 1 combination study has evaluated repeated 28-day cycles of GS-1101 with rituximab and/or bendamustine in patients with previously treated iNHL. GS-1101 was administered starting on Day 1 of Cycle 1 with rituximab (R) (375 mg/m2 given weekly for 8 doses) (GS-1101/R regimen), with bendamustine (B) (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for 6 cycles) (GS-1101/B regimen), or in combination with R (375 mg/m2, on Day 1 of each cycle for 6 cycles) and B (90 mg/m2 given on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for 6 cycles (GS-1101/BR regimen). Initial cohorts received a GS-1101 dose of 100 mg/dose BID. Thereafter, all patients received a GS-1101 dose of 150 mg/dose BID. Tumor response was evaluated according to standard criteria (Cheson 2007). Chemokine/cytokine plasma levels were assessed at baseline and on Day 28 of therapy using multiplexed bead suspension arrays. Results: The study enrolled 76 patients with iNHL. Patient characteristics, histological sub-typing, safety, and efficacy results are depicted in the table. The majority of patients were 〉60 years of age and had undergone extensive prior therapy. Grade ≥3 adverse events and lab abnormalities were generally consistent with those expected with each of the single agents. Lymph node shrinkage was rapid and all evaluable patients had reductions in lymphadenopathy, resulting in overall response rates (ORR) of 77%, 85%, and 77% for the GS-1101/R, GS-1101/B, and GS-1101/BR regimens, respectively. Complete responses (with bone marrow confirmation) were observed in 13%, 16%, and 30% of patients. With median follow-up duration ranging from 28 to 48 weeks, 1-year progression- free survival (PFS) rates were 〉75% in all treatment groups. Disease-associated chemokines/cytokines were commonly elevated at baseline and were significantly reduced by GS-1101-based combination treatment. Conclusions: A lack of overlapping toxicities allows the oral PI3Kδ inhibitor, GS-1101, to be delivered at the full single-agent starting dose when coadministered with chemoimmunotherapies in heavily pretreated patients with iNHL. GS-1101-based combination therapy with rituximab and/or bendamustine offers major and rapid reductions in lymphadenopathy. All 3 regimens provide durable tumor control. The data from this trial support the development of Phase 3 combination trials of GS-1101 with rituximab- and/or bendamustine-containing regimens in patients with iNHL. Disclosures: Fowler: Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Off Label Use: Phase I trial of GS-1101, a PI3K delta inhibitor, in B cell malignancies. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Leonard:Gilead: Consultancy. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Sharman:Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boccia:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Holes:Gilead: Employment. Lannutti:Gilead Sciences Inc: Employment. Johnson:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Jahn:Gilead: Employment. Miller:Gilead: Employment. Godfrey:Gilead Sciences: Employment.

Description: Background PI3K-delta (δ) is critical for activation, proliferation and survival of B cells and plays a role in homing and retention in lymphoid tissues. PI3Kδ signaling is hyperactive in many B-cell malignancies. Idelalisib (IDELA) is a potent and selective orally administered inhibitor of PI3Kδ with demonstrated activity in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL either as a single agent (Brown, ASCO 2013) or in combination (Barrientos et al, ASCO 2013; Coutre et al, EHA 2013; Barrientos et al, EHA 2013), and in previously untreated patients in combination with rituximab (R) (O'Brien et al, ASCO 2013). This report describes the effect of established high risk prognostic markers on the clinical activity of idelalisib based therapy in CLL patients enrolled in 3 clinical trials. Methods Subjects were enrolled into one of three trials: 1) phase 1 monotherapy dose escalation, dosing from 50 mg bid to 350 mg bid (N=54, R/R); 2) phase 1 combination with either R, ofatumumab, bendamustine ± R, fludarabine or chlorambucil±R (N= 114, R/R) ; 3) phase 2 combination with R (N=64, age≥ 65 yrs, previously untreated). Response was assessed by investigators per IWCLL 2008. Genetic markers were assessed in a central lab using archived DNA obtained at study enrollment. Results ORR and CR results are shown in the table below, with data grouped per either R/R or previously untreated patients. Conclusion IDELA shows robust activity independent of the four genetic markers evaluated. Thus, patients can be considered for idelalisib-based treatment in clinical trials regardless of these high-risk features. Disclosures: Coutre: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Idelalisib is a PI3K-delta inhibitor currently in phase III trials for multiple hematologic malignancies. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. De Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Furman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Brown:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Benson:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Spurgeon:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Zelenetz:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Lamanna:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kipps:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kahl:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Bello:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Burger:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Dansey:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Holes:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Lazarov:Gilead Sciences: Employment. Dubowy:Gilead Sciences: Employment. O'Brien:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.