ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Collection
Years
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2019-11-13
    Description: The molecular mechanisms underlying lineage commitment of stem and progenitor cells have implications for deriving specific cell types in vitro for regenerative medicine purposes and elucidating the aberrant pathways responsible for pathological conditions. We investigated Megakaryocytic-Erythroid Progenitors (MEP) commitment to the megakaryocytic (Mk) and erythroid (E) lineages as a model of cell fate decisions. Colony forming unit (CFU) assays are used to test the functional output, or lineage potential, of progenitor cell populations. As single progenitor cells proliferate, their progeny remain near each other to form a colony. This potential is deduced from the mature cell types comprising the colony. However, this assay has several limitations: 1) there is an assumption that each colony arose from a single progenitor cell based on the low probability that individual progenitors would form overlapping colonies when plated sparsely; 2) there is a surfeit of kinetic data about the colony forming cells that is not collected with a single end-point; and 3) the outcome may be misleading if there is selective loss of specific cell types of early committed progeny prior to the endpoint. To overcome these limitations, we developed a time-lapse microscopy and lineage tracing approach to visualize single sorted MEP, as well as committed Megakaryocytic progenitors (MkP) and Erythroid progenitors (ErP), as they proliferate, specify and progress down either the Mk or E lineages. We plated primary adult human MEP (Sanada and Xavier-Ferrucio, et al. Blood, 2016) at low density in semisolid media supplemented with cytokines in a MatTek plate under a coverslip to minimize focal range and support colony formation for up to 14 days. The plated cells were imaged with an Olympus VivaView. Fluorescently conjugated anti-CD41 (a marker of Mk) and anti-CD235a (a marker of E) were added to the culture dishes at the end to confirm the lineage of each cell in the colonies. The average time from plating to the first division was 38 h, and not significantly different between MEP, ErP, and MkP. We optimized the image acquisition settings to permit accurate tracking of the plated cells and their progeny for up to 11 days. Average colony forming efficiency was 75%, which was equal to unimaged CFU assays, indicating minimal phototoxicity. Acquired images were stacked into time-lapse videos and automatically tracked with the Baxter Algorithm (Magnusson et al. IEEE Trans Med Imaging, 2015). After manual segmentation and track correction, lineage trees were generated for each colony (Figure 1). We exported quantifiable features of the cells including the time between cell divisions and velocity of each cell from the algorithm. We defined cells that give rise to only CD41-labeled cells as committed MkP, cells that give rise to only CD235-labeled cells as ErP, and cells that give rise to at least one progeny of both as MEP. However, these progenitor definitions are based on an inaccurate assumption that fate reflects potential, since a bipotent cell may stochastically give rise to progeny that are committed to a single lineage. To convert fate to potential, we first need to identify the precise period of commitment to more accurately define MEP, MkP, and ErP in our culture system. To achieve this, we are developing a mathematical model that can predict the potential of cells based on quantifiable features that are measured form the time-lapse images and are significantly different between MEP, MkP, and ErP. Utilizing statistical tools, we have identified that the duration of the cell cycle and the velocity of single progenitor cells along with their lineage history, permit predictions of progenitor potential and provide several novel insights into the process of lineage commitment. We found that ErP have a significantly shortened cell cycle duration and slower velocity compared to MkP, while MEP have the longest cell cycle and an intermediate velocity until undergoing their fate decisions (Figures 2 and 3). With this time-lapse imaging approach, we hope to better investigate molecular mechanisms that direct fate decisions of multipotent progenitor cells. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2020-11-05
    Description: Human Megakaryocytic-Erythroid Progenitors (MEP) produce megakaryocytic progenitors (MkP) and erythroid progenitors (ErP). Though some of the players have been identified, the molecular mechanisms underlying the MEP fate decision have not yet been determined. Using a functional single cell CFU-Mk/E assay, and single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq), we have revealed that MEP cell cycling regulates MEP fate decisions with decreased cycling promoting Mk fate commitment and increased cycling promoting E fate commitment (Lu et al, Cell Reports, 2018). Our data point to RUNX1 (aka AML1), already known to be important for both Mk and E maturation, as playing a key role in MEP fate determination. RUNX1 target genes vary significantly between Common Myeloid Progenitors (CMP), MEP, MkP, and ErP. For example, the RUNX1 targets MPL, FLI1, and THBS1 are higher in MkP than in MEP and lowest in CMP and ErP. Analysis of scRNAseq data indicates that 11.8% and 9.3% of differentially (adj.p 〈 0.05, fold change 〉 2) expressed genes are predicted RUNX1 targets when comparing MEP to MkP and MEP to ErP, respectively (p=2.9e-8 and 5.6e-16). However, RUNX1 mRNA levels do not change significantly between CMP, MEP, MkP and ErP. We therefore assessed whether total RUNX1 protein levels and post-translational modifications change with Mk and E lineage commitment. Intracellular staining normalized to levels in CMP revealed that total RUNX1 protein is elevated 1.34-fold from CMP to MEP, is highest (1.65-fold) in MkP, and is intermediate in ErP (1.5-fold) consistent with RUNX1 perhaps promoting Mk over E fate. RUNX1 can be phosphorylated by cyclin dependent serine/threonine kinases (CDKs) as well as Src tyrosine kinases. Significant differences in RUNX1 phosphoprotein levels were revealed by intracellular FACS assays for differential phosphorylation of RUNX1. Phosphoserine modified RUNX1 (Ser21, Ser276, and Ser 397) levels, which likely reflect active RUNX1, are highest in MkP (1.28-fold over MEP), and diminished in ErP (-1.32-fold over MEP). To determine whether RUNX1 and phosphor-RUNX1 variants affect MEP commitment, we overexpressed wildtype (WT) RUNX1 or RUNX1-S4D (phospho-mimetic on S249, S277, T273, S276 residues). WT RUNX1 overexpression affected fate specification of primary MEP (p
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...