ALBERT

Description: Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) occur in ~3% of individuals with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and have been associated with increased transformation to acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an oral, potent, targeted inhibitor of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 enzyme (mIDH1) and is approved in the US for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation in patients ≥75 years of age or who have comorbidities that preclude the use of intensive induction chemotherapy, and in adult patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML. The first-in-human, phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study of ivosidenib (NCT02074839) enrolled adults with mIDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies, including R/R MDS, and the study is ongoing. In the initial phase of the study (DiNardo et al. N Engl J Med 2018), the 12 patients with R/R MDS received 500 mg ivosidenib once daily and were characterized as follows: 75% were male, median age was 72.5 years (range 52-78), and 42% were ≥75 years of age; median number of prior therapies was 1 (range 1-3). Adverse events (AEs) of any grade, irrespective of causality, occurring in ≥20% of the 12 patients were diarrhea, fatigue, back pain, rash (n=4 each, 33.3%), anemia, urinary tract infection, decreased appetite, hypokalemia, arthralgia, dyspnea, pruritus, and hypotension (n=3 each, 25.0%). No AEs led to permanent discontinuation of treatment. Response was assessed according to International Working Group 2006 criteria for MDS. According to investigators, five of 12 patients achieved complete remission (CR) (41.7%; 95% CI 15.2%, 72.3%); median duration of CR was not estimable for these patients (95% CI 2.8 months, not estimable). Nine of 12 patients were transfusion independent for at least 56 days during study treatment. Mutation clearance was observed in one of the 5 CR patients. Here we report the design of a new sub-study of this trial, which is being undertaken to further assess the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of treatment with ivosidenib in patients with R/R MDS. Methods: This sub-study is evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of ivosidenib. Adults with R/R MDS with an IDH1 mutation will be enrolled in the MDS sub-study. These individuals must have R/R disease after treatment with standard agents indicated for MDS. Eligible patients must have a platelet count of ≥20,000/μL, and adequate hepatic function (total bilirubin ≤1.5 × upper limit of normal [ULN]; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase ≤3.0 × ULN) and renal function (serum creatinine ≤2.0 × ULN or creatinine clearance 〉40 mL/min). Additional key inclusion criteria are bone marrow blasts 〉5% and/or transfusion dependence. Ivosidenib is to be administered at a dose of 500 mg once daily orally on Days 1 to 28 of 28-day cycles. The addition of the MDS sub-study to this phase 1 clinical study in patients with hematological malignancies will provide additional insights into the use of ivosidenib for the treatment of mIDH1 R/R MDS. Disclosures Foran: Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding. DiNardo:notable labs: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; medimmune: Honoraria; daiichi sankyo: Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria; agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; jazz: Honoraria; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; syros: Honoraria. Watts:Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Stein:Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas Pharma US, Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioline: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; PTC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. De Botton:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Syros: Consultancy; Forma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding. Fathi:Amphivena, Kite, Jazz, NewLink Genetics,: Honoraria; Agios, Astellas, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, Takeda, Amphivena, Kite, Forty Seven,Trovagene, NewLink genetics, Jazz, Abbvie, and PTC Therapeutics: Consultancy. Stein:Stemline: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Stone:AbbVie, Actinium, Agios, Argenx, Arog, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Biolinerx, Celgene, Cornerstone Biopharma, Fujifilm, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Ono, Orsenix, Otsuka, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Sumitomo, Trovagene: Consultancy; Argenx, Celgene, Takeda Oncology: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board/Committee: ; Novartis, Agios, Arog: Research Funding. Patel:France Foundation: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Tallman:UpToDate: Patents & Royalties; Daiichi-Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Rigel: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Cellerant: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Delta Fly Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Nohla: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Tetraphase: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Orsenix: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biosight: Research Funding; Oncolyze: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; KAHR: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fan:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Oluyadi:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Winkler:Agios: Employment. Hickman:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Agresta:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Liu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attar:Aprea Therapeutics: Employment; Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Astex: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; Actinium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immunogen: Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharma: Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Cyclacel: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ivosidenib (AG-120) is an IDH1 inhibitor indicated for the treatment of AML with a susceptible IDH1 mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test in: 1) adult patients with newly-diagnosed AML who are more than 75 years old or who have comorbidities that preclude use of intensive induction chemotherapy and 2) adult patients with relapsed or refractory AML. It is being evaluated in clinical trials for mutant IDH1 advanced hematologic malignancies.

Description: Background: Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) presenting with hyperleukocytosis have frequent complications and early mortality. Pulmonary, central nervous system, and cardiovascular complications are common. Attempts to improve outcomes in the 10% of AML patients arriving with hyperleukocytosis have included leukapheresis. No prospective randomized study has supported the use of leukapheresis, and retrospective reports have revealed persistently poor outcomes as well as emerging concerns of acquired coagulopathy and worsening hypoxemia after leukapheresis. While many centers use a leukapheresis protocol processing two blood volumes, Johns Hopkins protocol routinely processes three-five blood volumes. This study aimed to assess coagulopathy, hypoxemia, and mortality with large volume leukapheresis. Methods: 32 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with large volume leukapheresis for WBC depletion are included in this report. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and apheresis-related data were collected. Coagulopathy and hypoxemia-related metrics were evaluated within 6 hours before leukapheresis and within 6 hours of completion of leukapheresis. Descriptive and inferential statistics (chi square and Mann-Whitney U test) were used to compare pre and post-leukapheresis findings and assess clinical outcomes. Results: Twenty-nine of 32 (93.8%) patients presented with symptomatic leukostasis (with pulmonary and/or CNS symptoms in 26/29). Median blood volume processed was 14.8 liters (range 4-23.4L). Mean platelet count decreased from 60x109/L to 37x109/L after leukapheresis (p

Description: Background: Despite recent advances in the therapeutic armamentarium for AML, outcomes remain dismal for patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML. Response rates with high dose cytarabine (HiDAC) salvage chemotherapy are approximately 20%. Multiple immune aberrations in AML lead to immune suppression, exhaustion, and senescence. Programmed Death-1 (PD-1), a co-inhibitory receptor (IR) on immune cells, suppresses immune activation and is exploited by leukemic cells to evade immune surveillance. PD-1 and other IRs are up-regulated during disease progression. We hypothesized that pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1, after HiDAC would stimulate a T-cell mediated anti-leukemic immune response. Methods: Eligibility for this study included R/R AML 18-70 years, ECOG PS 0-1 and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of HiDAC (60 years: 1.5 gm/m2 IV Q12hours days 1-5) followed by pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 14. The primary objective of this study was to estimate the overall complete remission (CR + CRi) rate. Secondary objectives included assessment of safety, durability of CR, overall survival (OS) and biomarker correlates of response. Overall responders were eligible to receive maintenance phase pembrolizumab 200 mg IV Q3weeks for up to 2 years until progression. Allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) was permissible before or after maintenance phase. Results: Thirty-seven pts were enrolled and evaluable (Table 1). Sixteen (43%) pts had refractory disease and 16 (43%) pts had relapsed AML with CR1 duration 3: n=1), AST elevation (32%; Grade 〉3: n=1), fatigue (27%), alkaline phosphatase elevation (24%), and maculopapular rash (19%; Grade 〉3: n=2). Grade 〉3 immune-related adverse events (iRAE) were rare (maculopapular rash: n=2, AST/ALT increase: n=2, right upper quadrant pain with lymphocytic infiltrate in liver: n=1) and self-limiting. Five (14%) pts required steroid administration for grade 2 hyperbilirubinemia (n=1), grade 3 ALT elevation (n=1), grade 3 AST elevation with liver biopsy revealing no evidence of iRAE (n=1), grade 3 bilirubin subsequently deemed to be a delayed hemolytic transfusion reaction (n=1), and grade 3 systolic dysfunction without evidence of myocarditis by endomyocardial biopsy or cardiac MRI (n=1). Sixty-day mortality was 3% (1/37) due to progressive AML. Median time to full neutrophil (〉1x109/L) and platelet (〉100x109/L) recovery was 32 and 31 days, respectively. The overall response (ORR: CR+CRi+PR+MLFS) and composite CR (CR+CRi) rates were 46% [29%,63%] and 38% [22%,55%], respectively, meeting the primary endpoint of the study. Notably, 13/28 (46%) pts receiving HiDAC + pembrolizumab as their first salvage regimen achieved CR/CRi. Two pts refractory to HiDAC (administered within past 6 months) achieved CR including one pt who was refractory to HiDAC salvage 1 month prior to enrollment and ultimately achieved CR without evidence of minimal residual disease. Nine (24%) pts received an alloSCT. There were no instances of Grade 〉3 acute GVHD or veno-occlusive disease post-alloSCT. Nine (24%) pts received maintenance phase pembrolizumab (median # of cycles = 3; range: 1-12) for CR (n=8) or PR (n=1). Seven out of 9 pts relapsed/progressed after maintenance phase. Median follow-up among survivors, and median OS, event-free survival and disease-free survival was 7.8 months, 8.9 months [6.0,13.1], 6.9 months [4.2,11.5], and 5.7 months [1.9,7.3], respectively. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab can be safely administered after HiDAC salvage in R/R AML. Severe iRAE's were uncommon despite administration after cytotoxic chemotherapy. The addition of pembrolizumab to HiDAC led to an encouraging overall CR rate meeting the primary endpoint of the study. Immunogenomic biomarker analyses consisting of B cell receptor amplicon sequencing, RNA-seq of blasts and CD8+ T cells, CD8+ T cell receptor repertoire, whole exome sequencing and flow cytometry analyses are ongoing to determine predictors of response. These results warrant further investigation of IR blockade and other immunomodulatory therapeutic strategies after intensive cytotoxic chemotherapy in AML. Disclosures Zeidner: Takeda: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; AsystBio Laboratories: Consultancy; Pfizer: Honoraria; Tolero: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria. Vincent:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Foster:Bellicum Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy. Coombs:Dedham Group: Consultancy; Covance: Consultancy; Cowen & Co.: Consultancy; Octopharma: Honoraria; H3 Biomedicine: Honoraria; Loxo: Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria. Webster:Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Genentech: Research Funding. DeZern:Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Smith:Jazz: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy. Levis:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; FUJIFILM: Consultancy, Research Funding; Menarini: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luznik:Merck: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy; WindMiL Therapeutics: Patents & Royalties: Patent holder. Serody:Merck: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Gojo:Amphivena: Research Funding; Amgen Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Pembrolizumab is investigational for AML.

Description: Background: CD8+ T-cells in AML pts co-express multiple inhibitory receptors (IRs), including PD1, and IR expression increases with disease progression (Knaus et al, JCI Insight 2018). AZA upregulates pathways related to immunity and immune evasion in tumor cells, including PD-L1, (Wrangle et al, Oncotarget 2013) providing rationale for exploring AZA/Pembro combination in AML. Aims: To assess safety and response to AZA/Pembro after minimum 2 cycles of therapy in relapsed/refractory (R/R) (Cohort 1) and newly diagnosed (dx) older AML (Cohort 2). Methods: Cohort 1: Pts must have failed prior AML therapy. The first 6 pts (run in phase) received AZA 75 mg/m2 Days (D) 1-7 with Pembro 200 mg beginning on D8 and every (q)3 weeks (wks) thereafter. AZA cycles were repeated q4wks. No pts experienced dose limiting toxicity after minimum 3 cycles observation. After safety was established with the dosing schedule, patients with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) were included and Cohort 2 started enrollment. Cohort 2: Pts ≥65 years (yrs) with newly dx AML and not candidates, or unwilling to receive, intensive chemotherapy. Other eligibility criteria (Cohort 1 and 2): ECOG PS 0-2 (changed to PS 0-1), adequate organ function, and no autoimmune processes requiring systemic immunosuppression. Results: Efficacy: Cohort 1 : 37 R/R pts have been enrolled. Baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1A. 29 (78%) pts completed at least 2 cycles and are evaluable for response: 4 achieved complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) (2/2) (14%) (Table 1B), 1 partial remission (PR) (4%), 4 hematologic improvement (HI) (14%), and 7 stable disease (SD) for at least 6 cycles (24%). The median # of cycles to response was 4 (range, 2-6). The 4- and 8-week mortality were 8% [all with rapidly progressive disease (PD): 2 received AZA for 3 and 5 days only] and 13%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 14.9 months (mos), the median overall survival (OS) for the whole cohort, responders + SD, and CR/CRi/PR is 10.8 mos (40% 1-yr), 13.9 mos (51% 1-yr), and 17.2 mos (75% 1-yr). The median event-free survival (EFS) is 6 mos, for all responders + SD 8.7 mos versus 2.6 mos for others (P

Description: Background: We recently showed that early lymphocyte recovery (ELR) following intensive induction chemotherapy in AML patients (pts) is characterized by complex immune system aberrations. (Blood 117(2):608, 2011) Full characterization of lymphoid T cell dynamics during this period can provide critical insights into their dysfunction and rationale for targeted therapeutic intervention to augment anti-leukemia immunity. Pomalidomide (POM), a small molecule immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), has direct effects on T cell co-stimulation by promoting the ubitiquitination of IL-2 transcriptional repressor Aiolos (IKZF3). (Br J Haematol 164(6):811, 2014) We hypothesized that administration of POM at the time of ELR may influence T cell differentiation and function in vivo. Methods: We serially collected peripheral blood (PB) samples at the time of ELR from 31 AML pts (median age 57, range 29-76 years; 26 de novo and 5 secondary AML) treated with intensive induction chemotherapy (18 with timed-sequential therapy (TST) and 13 with standard 7+3: cytarabine and idarubicin), 11 AML pts (median age 52, range 31-66 years; 6 de novo, and 5 secondary AML) treated on NCI/CTEP#9524 study of TST induction (AcDVP16: cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide) followed by POM given daily for 10 days at ELR at escalating doses: 2mg (3pts)-4mg (3pts)-8mg (5pts) (Figure 1) and 17 healthy controls (HC) (median age 40, range 25-71 years). ELR was defined as absolute white blood cell (lymphocyte) count 〉200/mm3 above nadir. Using multi-parameter flow cytometry we performed extensive phenotypic characterization of lymphocyte populations, focusing on T cell differentiation status (CD45RA, CCR7), activation/proliferation (Ki-67), expression of POM-target gene Aiolos (IKZF3), and cytokine secretion. Statistical significance was determined using multiple t-tests using GraphPad Prism software. All protocols were IRB approved. Results: Administration of POM at ELR did not affect absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) compared to control pts not receiving POM (P=〉0.5). ALC values ranges (both groups): pre-treatment 2538-3645/mm3, ELR 428-525/mm3, and 931-1360/mm3 at full count recovery (FR1), respectively. The percentages and total numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells behaved similarly; however, POM pts had increase in the frequency of CD4+ central memory subset (CD45RA- CCR7+) (P=0.001) at FR1 and decrease in the terminally differentiated effector memory subset (CD45RA+ CCR7-) of CD8+ T cells only for the duration of POM administration at ELR (P=0.04). Tregs (CD4+ FoxP3+ Tcells) increased in control pts during ELR (p=0.004; n=26) but not in POM-treated group (n=5). A dramatic but dose-dependent decrease of Aiolos expression in T cell subsets in vivo (P

Description: Background: Concerns have been raised whether immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in the alloBMT setting will result in graft versus host disease (GvHD) and transplant related mortality (TRM). We report our experience with a variety of checkpoint inhibitors used before or after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT). Our series comprises patients who received T cell-replete hematopoietic stem cells from HLA-haploidentical or -matched donors and is limited to those treated with post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as primary GvHD prophylaxis. Patient selection: We retrospectively reviewed the records of alloBMT recipients who received PTCy and received checkpoint inhibitor therapy before or after alloBMT. GvHD was assessed using the CIBMTR GVHD index. Results: Eleven patients received checkpoint inhibitor therapy prior to alloBMT: anti-PD-1: Nivolumab n=6, anti-CTLA4: Ipilimumab n=8 (3 patients received both nivolumab and ipilimumab). These patients received a median of 4 (range 1 - 18) cycles of therapy. The median interval from last checkpoint inhibitor treatment to day of transplant was 43 (range 18-302) days. All patients received nonmyeloablative conditioning; 6 received partially mismatched allografts (5 were HLA haploidentical). Four patients developed Grade II aGvHD: Three patients who had received partially mismatched allografts (haplo-2, 9/10 unrelated-1) experienced stage 3 cutaneous GvHD only; one patient who received a 10/10 unrelated donor allograft developed stage 3 cutaneous GvHD with stage 1 liver involvement. Three patients were on immunosuppression when GvHD developed, the fourth patient with cutaneous and liver GvHD had been taken off tacrolimus on day 68 due to concerns of graft failure. GvHD resolved with treatment in each case. None of these patients developed chronic GvHD and none have died [median follow-up of 0.66 (range 0.91 - 2.0) years post alloBMT]. Nine patients received checkpoint therapy following alloBMT: anti-PD-1: Pembrolizumab n = 1, Nivolumab n= 6, anti-CTLA4: Ipilimumab n= 3 (one patient received nivolumab and ipilimumab). Eight patients had received nonmyeloablative conditioning; 5 received haploidentical allografts. Six received treatment for relapse of their hematologic malignancy, 1 for relapsed pediatric sarcoma, and 2 for newly diagnosed lung cancer. The median time to initiation of checkpoint inhibitor therapy was 1.2 (range: 0.8 - 5.8) years post alloBMT. Patients received a median of 5 (range 1 - 24) cycles of therapy. There was 1 case of Grade II aGvHD; stage 3 cutaneous GvHD when DLI from a 10/10 matched unrelated donor was given for relapsed disease after ipilimumab. This resulted in GvHD which was not accompanied by the desired graft-vs-leukemia effect. There were no other cases of acute or chronic GvHD in this group. There were 4 tumor-related deaths: pediatric sarcoma (1), lung cancer (1), and AML (2). The median follow-up for this group is 2 years (range 0.85 - 8.0) post alloBMT. Conclusions: In this small series, the incidence and severity of GvHD seen in patients who received checkpoint inhibitors was similar to that seen in patients treated with PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis without checkpoint inhibitors. GvHD was seen in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors prior to alloBMT, but was generally mild and readily controlled and there were no associated deaths. In patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors after alloBMT, the only case of GvHD occurred after the patient received DLI. We caution that use of checkpoint inhibitors in closer temporal proximity to transplant might well be associated with increased risk of GvHD or severity of GvHD. Disclosures Borrello: WindMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wagner-Johnston:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Smith:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: member of DSMB.

Description: The immunotherapy of cancer is arguably the most promising therapy under development, and vaccination against cancer antigens is a promising strategy to stimulate adaptive immune responses against malignant clones. However, the ability of patients treated with chemotherapy to respond appropriately to immune challenge may be suboptimal. This study was designed to determine the functional capacity of the immune system in adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who have completed chemotherapy and are potential candidates for immunotherapy. We used the response to influenza vaccination as a surrogate for the health of the immune system in AML patients in a complete remission (CR) post-chemotherapy. Ten adult AML patients in CR after completion of intensive chemotherapy were recruited to the clinical protocol J1293. They were on average 37 weeks post-treatment (range 4-148) when receiving the 2012-2013 inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine. Peripheral blood samples were collected at baseline and 30 days post-vaccination. Ten age and sex matched healthy donors (HD) served as baseline controls. Serological response to vaccination was assessed via microneutralization assays; multi-parameter flow cytometry was used to characterize lymphocyte subsets. ELISPOT assays were used to evaluate lymphocyte function, microarrays were used to assess gene expression, and deep sequencing of the B-cell receptor heavy chain (IGH) was performed to determine expansion and clonality of B-cells. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to assess statistical significance. Only 2/10 (20%) patients seroconverted (AML responders, or AML-R) with a four-fold increase or greater in influenza-specific antibody. One responder was 148 weeks post-treatment; the other had acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) and was 4 weeks post-treatment. Deep immunophenotyping revealed no striking differences in T-cell compartments between AML at baseline and HD, indicating rapid T-cell recovery after chemotherapy. In contrast, we observed a highly atypical B-cell profile. AML non-responders (AML-NR) at day 0 versus HD had significantly reduced frequencies of mature IgA+ (4.5% vs. 11%) and IgG+ (2.4% vs. 5.9%) B-cells (as a percentage of CD19+CD20+). Further dissection exposed markedly higher frequencies of CD10+CD27- transitional B-cells (36% vs. 16%, p

Description: Background: Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager antibody construct, leads to improved outcomes in patients with R/R CD19+ ALL compared to standard chemotherapy. However, most adults fail to achieve complete remission (CR) with blinatumomab, and the median duration of remission is only 7.3 months. Preclinical studies have shown significantly increased PD-L1 expression on leukemic blasts in patients who are refractory to or relapse after response to blinatumomab. Additionally, expression of the exhaustion markers PD-1 and TIM-3 on bone marrow (BM) CD3+ T cells is significantly higher among ALL patients than controls. The addition of PD-1 blockade +/- CTLA-4 blockade to blinatumomab and ALL blasts in vitro leads to increased T cell proliferation and enhanced blinatumomab-mediated cytotoxicity (Feucht et al, Oncotarget 2016). Thus, blockade of co-inhibitory pathways represents a viable strategy to enhance blinatumomab efficacy. We describe early results of a multi-center phase I study combining blinatumomab with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 (nivolumab) +/- CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) in R/R CD19+ ALL. Methods: This phase I dose-escalation study evaluates the safety and tolerability (MTD) of blinatumomab in combination with nivolumab +/- ipilimumab using a 3+3 design. Patients ≥16 years-old with R/R CD19+ Pre-B ALL or MPAL are eligible including those with prior blinatumomab and/or prior allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT). Patients ≥60 years may be untreated and those 16-21 must be R/R to ³2 lines of therapy. The trial started at dose level (DL) A1 (Fig. 1). Upon determining the MTD for the combination of blinatumomab and nivolumab, dose escalation will add ipilimumab (DLB1). Patients may receive up to 5 cycles of blinatumomab and 1 year of nivolumab/ipilimumab. Patients achieving CR may proceed to allo-SCT. Patients removed from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (days 1-10) will be replaced. Results: As of July 31, 2018, 8 adults (4 males/4 females) had enrolled at DLA1. The median age was 55 (range, 25-75) and baseline BM blast percentage was 73% (range, 8-98%). Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 2. Seven patients received cytoreduction before treatment (6 steroids only and 1 steroids + Cytoxan). Two patients previously treated with blinatumomab were withdrawn from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (1 for G3 pericardial effusion 2/2 disease progression and 1 for G3 hyperbilirubinemia). Among the 5 patients who received nivolumab to date, drug-related non-hematologic AEs of grade ≥3 included elevated AST (20%), ALT (20%), amylase (20%), and lipase (G4, 20%); hypophosphatemia (20%); rash (20%); infusion-related reaction (G4, 20%); and hypotension (20%). The elevated AST, ALT, amylase and lipase occurred prior to nivolumab dosing and resolved. One patient was removed from the study for a G4 infusion-related reaction following the 2nd dose of nivolumab that was considered a DLT. One patient in CR developed G4 neutropenia in cycles 2 + 3 but recovered spontaneously. Among the 5 evaluable patients, 4 (80%) achieved CR without MRD (2 after 1 cycle and 2 after 2 cycles of blinatumomab) with 3 ongoing remissions (median f/u 5 months) and 1 extramedullary relapse at day 125. Data on biomarkers including changes in T cell subpopulations in both BM and PB, and co-signaling molecule expression will be presented. Conclusions: Combination therapy with blinatumomab and nivolumab in R/R ALL with is feasible with acceptable toxicity. The MRD-negative CR rate was (80%) despite heavily pre-treated patients with significant baseline disease burden. The last patient treated at DLA1 is undergoing treatment before dose escalation to include ipilimumab. Disclosures DeAngelo: Shire: Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luznik:WIndMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Gojo:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck inc: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Key Points Nonmyeloablative, related HLA-haploidentical BMT utilizing high-dose posttransplantation cyclophosphamide has a favorable safety profile. Risk-stratified relapse and survival outcomes with this approach are comparable to those of HLA-matched BMT.

Description: INTRODUCTION Recurrent somatic mutations in the metabolic enzymes isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2) confer gain-of-function activity in cancer cells, resulting in accumulation of the oncometabolite, D-2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). High levels of 2-HG result in epigenetic changes and impaired cellular differentiation. IDH mutations have been identified in multiple solid tumors and hematologic malignancies. Approximately 6-10% and 9-13% of adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) carry mutations in IDH1 (mIDH1) or IDH2 (mIDH2), respectively. AG-120 is a first-in-class, oral, potent, reversible, selective inhibitor of the IDH1 mutant enzyme under evaluation in multiple ongoing single agent and combination clinical trials [NCT02074839, NCT02073994, NCT02632708, NCT02677922]. This is the first report of IDH1 mutation clearance assessed by variant allele frequency (VAF) analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) in patients treated on the dose escalation portion of the first-in-human phase 1 study [NCT02074839]. METHODS Patients with advanced mIDH1-positive hematologic malignancies received AG-120 as a single agent orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) continuously in 28-day cycles. Primary objectives were determination of safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and selection of a dose schedule for expansion cohorts and future studies. Secondary objectives included clinical activity assessed by investigators using modified 2003 International Working Group Criteria in AML. Determination of mIDH1 VAF was performed using the FoundationOne® Heme test on mononuclear cells from the bone marrow or peripheral blood at screening and subsequent time points on study. This NGS assay reports IDH1 mutations for samples with VAF ≥1%, with median coverage 500X. Patients with IDH1 mutational clearance (IDH1-MC) were defined as having mIDH1 at baseline and at least one on-study sample with no reported mIDH1. RESULTS Seventy-eight patients were treated in the dose escalation portion, which is now closed to enrollment. As of the data cut-off of May 12, 2016, the median duration on treatment was 3.2 months and 9 (11.5%) patients remain on treatment, with an additional 8 (10.3%) patients transitioned to stem cell transplant. Doses ranged from 300-1200 mg QD with 1 cohort at 100 mg BID. Though the MTD was not reached, the recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 500 mg QD. The majority of adverse events (AEs) were grade 1 and 2, the most common (≥30%) being diarrhea, fatigue, and nausea; the most common grade ≥3 AEs (≥15%) were febrile neutropenia, anemia, leukocytosis and pneumonia. The most common serious AEs were febrile neutropenia (16.7%) and pneumonia (12.8%). The overall response rate (ORR) was 38.5% (n=30), with 17.9% (n=14) achieving a complete remission (CR). Longitudinal mIDH1 VAF data were available for 51 patients; of these, 22% (n=11) achieved a CR. IDH1-MC was observed in 27.3% (3/11) patients who achieved CR (Figure 1). In contrast, only 1/40 patients who did not achieve CR experienced IDH1-MC. This occurred in a patient with an initially low mIDH1 VAF who had clinical progression despite IDH1-MC (Figure 1, bottom right). In all 3 patients with CR who achieved IDH1-MC, an initial increase in mIDH1 VAF, or early peak, was observed prior to IDH1-MC, suggesting that early clonal expansion might have occurred as part of the mechanism of action of AG-120. CONCLUSION This is the first demonstration that treatment with single agent AG-120 can result in mIDH1 clearance as determined by NGS. Further analysis of the mutational profiles is planned. AG-120, a potent, selective, oral inhibitor of mIDH1 continues to demonstrate a well-tolerated safety profile in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies, and induced objective single-agent durable responses. The data continue to support the efficacy and safety of single agent AG-120 and provide evidence that the underlying biology of the disease is altered by treatment. Figure 1. VAF analysis using FoundationOne® Heme NGS assay in 4 AML patients with IDH1-MC treated with AG-120 Figure subscript: Y-axis is mIDH1 VAF, x-axis is days on treatment. Text indicates investigator-assessed clinical response. CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; *post-transplant sample Figure 1. VAF analysis using FoundationOne® Heme NGS assay in 4 AML patients with IDH1-MC treated with AG-120. / Figure subscript: Y-axis is mIDH1 VAF, x-axis is days on treatment. Text indicates investigator-assessed clinical response. CR, complete remission; CRi, CR with incomplete neutrophil recovery; CRp, CR with incomplete platelet recovery; R/R, relapsed/refractory; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease; *post-transplant sample Disclosures DiNardo: Daiichi Sankyo: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Agios: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. de Botton:Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Pierre Fabre: Consultancy. Stein:Agios: Other: advisory board; Celgene: Other: advisory board; Novartis: Other: advisory board. Roboz:Cellectis: Research Funding; Agios, Amgen, Amphivena, Astex, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celator, Celgene, Genoptix, Janssen, Juno, MEI Pharma, MedImmune, Novartis, Onconova, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Sunesis, Teva: Consultancy. Pollyea:Alexion: Other: advisory board; Pfizer: Other: advisory board, Research Funding; Ariad: Other: advisory board; Glycomimetics: Other: DSMB member; Celgene: Other: advisory board, Research Funding. Fathi:Bexalata: Other: Advisory Board participation; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board participation; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Advisory Board participation, Research Funding; Merck: Other: Advisory Board participation; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Altman:Syros: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria. Flinn:Janssen: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; RainTree Oncology Services: Equity Ownership. Foran:novartis: Honoraria; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; karyopharm: Honoraria; medscape: Honoraria; pfizer: Honoraria; boehringer ingelheim: Research Funding; agios: Research Funding; Cellerant: Research Funding. Pigneux:Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kantarjian:ARIAD: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Research Funding; Delta-Fly Pharma: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding. Liu:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Attar:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sacolick:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yen:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hurov:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Choe:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wu:Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Stone:Amgen: Consultancy; Sunesis Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy; Celator: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Jansen: Consultancy; ONO: Consultancy; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Xenetic Biosciences: Consultancy.