ALBERT

Beschreibung: BACKGROUND: Congenital fibrinogen disorders are rare diseases affecting either the quantity (afibrinogenaemia and hypofibrinogenaemia) or the quality (dysfibrinogenaemia) or both (hypodysfibrinogenaemia) of fibrinogen. Afibrinogenemia is associated with mild-to-severe bleeding, whereas hypofibrinogenemia is most often asymptomatic. Previously, our group (Peyvandi et al, JTH 2006) showed that in a group of 100 patients with afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia, the mean annual incidence of bleeding episodes was 0.7 on on-demand therapy (range 0-16.5) and 0.5 on prophylactic replacement therapy (range 0-2.6). Dys- and hypodysfibrinogenemia are commonly associated with bleeding, thrombosis, or both; however, most individuals are asymptomatic. Treatment of fibrinogen deficiency is challenging because the minimum amount of fibrinogen to prevent bleeding is unknown and because thromboembolism may occur in association with fibrinogen substitution therapy. Therefore a guideline for optimal treatment is not available yet. AIMS: The 3-year observational prospective study on rare bleeding disorders (PRO-RBDD) aimed at evaluating the incidence of bleeding episodes in patients with fibrinogen deficiency and the benefits and complication of current treatment regimens. METHODS: 17 Hemophilia Treatment Centers worldwide collected data in a web-based database at baseline (patient history) and at pre-specified time-points (every 6 months, follow up study); 146 patients (86 females/60 males) were recorded. Analysis was carried out on patients with available data on both antigen and activity levels. Bleeding incidence was calculated to evaluate number of bleeding episodes in patients on on-demand therapy. A survival analysis was also made to evaluate the cumulative incidence of the first bleeding requiring replacement therapy. Analysis was done using R v.3.3.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). RESULTS: Data on activity and antigen level were available on 96 patients (54 females/42 males), of whom 81 are currently on follow up. Twenty-one (26%) patients were afibrinogenemic, 17 (21%) hypofibrinogenemic, 36 (44%) dysfibrinogenemic and 7 hypodysfibrinogenemic (9%), according to standard classification. Patients were followed up for a median of 810 days (IQR: 728-916, min-max: 221-1215). In on-demand therapy, the bleeding incidence was 0.86 patient-year-1 (95%CI 0.57-1.15) in afibrinogenemia, 0.30 (95%CI 0.15-0.52) in hypofibrinogenemia, 0.14 (95%CI 0.06-0.25) in dysfibrinogenemia and 0.06 (95%CI 0.-0.27) in hypodysfibrinogenemia. At 1200 days of follow up, the bleeding cumulative incidence of the first bleeding treated with replacement therapy was 0.43 (95%CI 0.11-0.64) in afibrinogenemia, 0.30 (95%CI 0.05-0.49) in hypofibrinogenemia, 0.06 (95%CI 0.0-0.14) in dysfibrinogenemia and 0.14 (95%CI 0.0-0.37) in hypodysfibrinogenemia. Prophylaxis regimen (dosage range 50 - 666 mg/Kg/month) with fibrinogen concentrate was used only in one third of patients (6/21) with afibrinogenemia and it seems to reduce the median number of bleeding events per year [from 1 (min-max: 1-3/year) to 0.4 (min-max: 0-1.25)]. Only one allergic reaction and no thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: The results of this prospective observational study on patients with fibrinogen deficiency showed that the bleeding incidence decreased accordingly to plasmatic fibrinogen levels. Preliminary data on a limited number of patients with afibrinogenemia showed a reduction of bleeding episodes even if a wide range of prophylaxis dosage has been used. A larger group of patients and a longer follow up period are required to evaluate the efficacy of prophylaxis and to find the optimal target level to prevent spontaneous major bleeding in afibrinogenemic patients. Disclosures Palla: Pfizer: Other: travel support . Menegatti:Pfizer: Other: travel support . Blatny:CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau. Halimeh:Bayer Healthcare GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta Innovations GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Biotest AG: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis Pharma GmbH: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk Pharma GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB GmbH: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer Pharma GmbH: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Siboni:LFB: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Speakers Bureau. Laros-Van Gorkom:Baxter: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sanquin: Speakers Bureau. Schutgens:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Baxalta: Research Funding; Novonordisk: Research Funding. De Moerloose:Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Speakers Bureau; Stago: Speakers Bureau; Novonordisk: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; LFB: Consultancy, Research Funding; Instrumentation Laboratory: Consultancy, Research Funding. Casini:CSL Berhing: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Other: Travel support. Makris:CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy; Freeline Therapeutics: Consultancy; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Biogen: Speakers Bureau; Grifols: Speakers Bureau. Chapin:Baxalta: Consultancy; CSL Behring: Consultancy; Novo Nordirsk: Consultancy; Alexion Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Apopharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy. Peyvandi:CSL Behring: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Other: research funding paid to Luigi Villa Foundation, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Ablynx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: research funding paid to Luigi Villa Foundation, Research Funding; Grifols: Speakers Bureau; SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Kedrion Biopharma: Consultancy, Other: research funding paid to Luigi Villa Foundation, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy; Alexion: Other: research funding paid to Luigi Villa Foundation, Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy; Bayer: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Other: research funding paid to Luigi Villa Foundation, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Beschreibung: The development of anti-FVIII antibodies (i.e., inhibitors) is the major side effect of severe hemophilia A treatment. Inhibitors mainly develop in children during the first 50 exposure days and are classified in low-and high-titer (i.e., peak titer 〈 or 〉 5 UB/ml). High-titer inhibitors have the major clinical impact. At diagnosis however, the real nature of the antibody is not clear in all patients, since some low-titer inhibitors may progress to high-titer. The determinants of the evolution from low- to high-titer inhibitors are still unclear and the aim of the present study was to investigate potential risk factors associated with the progression from low- to high-titer inhibitors. This study is a follow-up study of the PedNet Registry and includes 260 children with severe hemophilia A and clinically relevant inhibitors, born between 1990 and 2009 and consecutively recruited from 31 hemophilia centers in 16 countries. Clinical and laboratory data were collected from the date of first positive inhibitor test and covered a minimum of 3-years follow-up. Factors potentially associated with progression from low- to high-titer inhibitor development were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. F8 mutation type was known in 247 patients (95%), including 202 (82%) null mutations (i.e., large deletions, nonsense mutations and inversions). Positive family history of inhibitors was present in 37 of 99 (37%) with positive family history of hemophilia. At diagnosis 49% (n=127) had low-titer inhibitors, however, upon FVIII re-exposure, 50% of low-titer inhibitors progressed to high-titer and only 25% of patients (n=69) had persistent low-titer inhibitors. Within the first 3 years of follow-up, immune tolerance induction (ITI) was equally implemented in around 80% of low-and high-titer patients but it was started later in children with high-titers (median time to ITI start 4.5 vs 0.3 months; p

Beschreibung: Introduction.In patients with hemophilia treated with factor VIII products, the development of inhibitory antibodies poses the largest safety risk. Especially during the first 50 exposure days (EDs), up to 37% of patients with severe hemophilia A have been reported to develop an inhibitor. To study neo-immunogenicity of products and new treatment strategies, patients have been distinguished into previously untreated (PUPs) and previously treated patients (PTPs); the latter defined as patients treated for more than 150 EDs. The number of 150 EDs was established in the eighties during a time when most patients received on-demand treatment and testing for inhibitors was not frequently performed. More recent studies on inhibitor incidence in PUPs with severe hemophilia A report that 50% of inhibitors develop within 14-15 EDs, however the cut-off number of EDs for a PUP to become a PTP is not well defined. The aim of this study was to define the number of EDs for PUPs to become PTPs based on long-term follow-up of patients with severe hemophilia A Methods.All patients with severe hemophilia A born after January 1, 2000, treated for at least 1 ED and followed prospectively until inhibitor development or the number of EDs at last follow-up, were included. The number of EDs at inhibitor development is the last exposure day before the first positive titer was reported. An inhibitor was defined as positive when at least two positive inhibitor titers were measured. Positivity was defined according to the cut-off level in each individual center's laboratory. Results.Of 1,038 PUPs with severe hemophilia A, 930 (89.6%) were followed until 75 EDs, 429 until 500 EDs and 212 until 1000 EDs. In total, 300 inhibitors developed, of which 298 (99.3%) within the first 75 EDs. Thereafter only two inhibitors developed, both low titer: after 249 and 264 EDs. Conclusion.Almost all inhibitors develop during the first 75 EDs. Patients with severe hemophilia A can be defined as PTP after 75 instead of 150 exposure days. A change of definition of PTP will increase the number of severe hemophilia A patients eligible for new therapies. Disclosures Santagostino: Bioverativ: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shire: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kedrion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Male:SOBI: Speakers Bureau; Shire: Speakers Bureau; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Octapharma: Speakers Bureau; Novo Nordisk: Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Oldenburg:Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biogen Idec: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Swedish Orphan Biovitrum: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Liesner:Baxalta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Sobi: Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Octapharma: Consultancy, Other: Clinical study investigator for NuProtect Study (Octapharma sponsored), Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Carcao:Shire: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Octapharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Grifols: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novo Nordisk: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL-Behring: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; LFB: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bioverativ/Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Biotest: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Nolan:CSL Behring: Research Funding; Sobi: Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding. Álvarez-Roman:Shire: Consultancy; NovoNordisk: Consultancy; SOBI: Consultancy. Koenigs:Gilead: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Intersero: Research Funding; Bioverativ: Consultancy; Roche/Chugai: Consultancy; EU (IMI, FP7): Research Funding; Sobi: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Shire: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biotest: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Jansen: Research Funding.

Beschreibung: The PRO-RBDD is a prospective study of fibrinogen and FXIII deficiency designed to collect data on demographics, laboratory phenotype, genotype, clinical manifestations, obstetric data, surgery, treatment type and its efficacy and safety. Central laboratory testing is also available for diagnosis confirmation and genotyping. The aims of the study are to evaluate the prevalence of bleeding episodes, establish the minimum coagulant activity level to prevent bleeding (spontaneous or post-traumatic), and to monitor patients’ therapeutic regimens (efficacy and complications). The PRO-RBDD network involved 52 Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) worldwide for a predicted 380 and 573 patients with fibrinogen and FXIII deficiency, respectively. Data collection started in February 2013 and will continue for 3 years (baseline and 6 follow-up visits are planned). Clinical bleeding episodes were classified into four categories of severity relying on the location and potential clinical impact as well as spontaneity of bleeding. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square. Linear regression analysis was used to explore the association between coagulation factor activity level and clinical bleeding severity, with the relationship between the two variables defined through the coefficient β. Currently, 26 HTCs have obtained local ethical committee approval and 15 have started data entry for 89 and 109 fibrinogen and FXIII deficient patients, respectively. Demographic data showed a similar distribution between males and females with a median age of 21 years (range: 1-84) and 19 years (range: 3-71) for fibrinogen and FXIII deficiency respectively; 38% and 22% of fibrinogen and FXIII deficient patients, respectively, were children (

Beschreibung: Key Points High-dose intensive factor VIII treatment increases the risk for inhibitor development in patients with severe hemophilia A. In patients with severe hemophilia A, factor VIII prophylaxis decreases inhibitor risk, especially in patients with low-risk F8 mutations.