ALBERT

Description: Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (GCSF) at 10 microg/kg (with or without chemotherapy) is the standard dose commonly administered to patients undergoing Peripheral Blood Stem Cell (PBSC) mobilization and collection. Due to various host and disease factors, 10–20% of our patients failed to mobilize sufficient PBSC at this standard dose. At our institution it is common practice to increase GCSF from 10 microg/kg to 16–20 microg/kg during the initial or second mobilization attempt if the patient is able to tolerate the increased dose. To assess the clinical efficacy of increased GCSF administration among patients who fail to mobilize at the standard dose, we performed a retrospective chart review of 112 patients who underwent stem cell mobilization and collection between 01/31/2000 and 11/6/2003. The median age at the start of collection was 51.2 (range: 1.3–72.2); the case-series was made up of 52 men and 60 women. The majority of the cases were Lymphoma patients (Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma=52; Hodgkins Disease=15) with the remaining patients classified as Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML=12), Multiple Myeloma (MM=13), or ‘Other’ (N=20). Initially all 112 patients received 4–10 days of GCSF at 10 microg/kg per day before the first day of PBSC collection. Because these patients failed to collect sufficient daily CD34 cells, the GCSF dose was increased to 16–20 microg/kg. Before increasing the GCSF dose, the median CD34 daily yield was 0.19 (range: 0.03–0.90), and the median peripheral WBC was 27.6 (range: 1.3–61.8). The median number of collection at 10 microg/kg was 4 (range 2–15), and the median number of days from the end of collection at 10 microg/kg to the start of 16–20 microg/kg was 1 (range: 0–53). After increasing the GCSF dose the median peripheral WBC was 37.1 (range: 3.1–70.2), and the median CD34 daily yield was 0.28 (range: 0.03–3.43). The median CD34 total yield was 3.1 (range 0.6–12.3). Ultimately 90 patients (80%) reached a CD34 cell target of 2*10–6/kg (range: 2.0–12.3), and 22 patients (20%) did not reach this target. The overall difference in CD34 counts pre-post increased GCSF administration was statistically significant (Wilcoxon p

Description: Abstract 606 Background: alloHCT is offered with curative intent to patients with hematologic malignancies, and conventionally-computed survival estimates are offered for prognosticating outcomes. However, conventionally-computed survival estimates do not take into account elapsed time (and changing hazards with time survived); conditional survival overcomes these limitations, by calculating the probability of survival after having already survived a certain period of time – such data are unavailable for alloHCT recipients. We describe cause-specific (relapse-, GvHD-, treatment-related) conditional survival after alloHCT, providing clinically relevant information for patients who have survived 6 mos, 1, 2, and 5y after alloHCT. Methods: From 1976 to 2006, 2,427 consecutive patients received alloHCT for a hematologic malignancy at a single institution (median age: 34.7y [0.6–72.5]). Vital status and cause of death were determined using National Death Index, Social Security Death Index and medical records. Results: As of 12/31/2007, a total of 1413 deaths (58% of the cohort) were observed; 39% attributed to recurrent disease; 34% to GvHD; 12% to infection; 5% to cardiopulmonary disease; 2% to subsequent malignant neoplasm (SMNs); and 8% to other causes. Conventionally-computed probability of survival was 44.6% at 5y and 41.2% at 10y from alloHCT. On the other hand, conditional on survival for 6 mo, 1, 2, and 5y after alloHCT, 5-y survival rates were 62%, 75%, 83%, and 93%, respectively (Figure A). The cohort was at a 40-fold increased risk of any death compared with the general population (95%CI=38.2–42.4); at a 25.6-fold increased risk of death due to pulmonary complications, 3.3-fold risk due to SMNs, and 2.3-fold risk due to cardiovascular complications. Among patients followed for 15+y after HCT, the risk of all-cause mortality was 2.6-fold that of the general population (95%CI=1.8–3.7). Standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and cause-specific conditional mortality rates by primary diagnosis are summarized in the Table. Individuals who survived the first 5y had negligible (≤5%) risk of relapse- and GvHD-related mortality over the subsequent 5y. Treatment-related mortality increased over time; among those who survived 5y, treatment-related mortality rates exceeded relapse-related mortality (Figure B). After adjustment for demographics, underlying diagnosis and treatment era, individuals with chronic GVHD (cGVHD) had a significantly lower risk of relapse-related mortality (RR=0.43, 95%CI=0.4–0.5) compared to those without cGVHD. Conclusions: The projected 5-y survival rates improve conditional on time survived from alloHCT; 5-y survival exceeds 93% for those who have already survived 5y. However, alloHCT recipients who have survived 15+y continue to remain at increased risk of death compared to the general population. cGVHD is associated with decreased risk of relapse-related mortality. Both relapse-related and GvHD-related mortality rates decline with time, such that, among those who have survived 5y, treatment-related mortality exceeds relapse-related mortality. Conditional survival estimates provide clinically relevant prognostic information, helping inform preventive and interventional strategies. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.