ISSN:
1573-7179
Keywords:
coalition proof
;
takeovers
;
free-rider problem
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Economics
Notes:
Abstract This paper determines the set of rational responses by shareholders to unconditional takeover offers at prices between the pre-acquisition and post-acquisition price of the firm. Two cases are considered. In the first case, coordination across shareholders is not presumed. In this case, the game is analyzed using the Rationalizability criteria (Bernheim, 1984). It is demonstrated that the Rationalizable strategy vectors include all pure strategy vectors. In the second case, the set of strategies consistent with coordination through preplay communication, the Coalition Proof Nash Equilibria (Bernheim, Peleg, and Whinston, 1987) are analyzed. It is shown that, given even a minimal degree of divisibility of shareholdings, the raider's per share profit is bounded from below by a positive constant independent of the number of shareholders. These results imply that preplay coordination between shareholders eliminates the “free-rider” problem.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008333916568
Permalink