Publication Date:
2022-07-20
Description:
© The Author(s), 2022. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. The definitive version was published in Light, C., Arbic, B., Martin, P., Brodeau, L., Farrar, J., Griffies, S., Kirtman, B., Laurindo, L., Menemenlis, D., Molod, A., Nelson, A., Nyadjro, E., O’Rourke, A., Shriver, J., Siqueira, L., Small, R., & Strobach, E. Effects of grid spacing on high-frequency precipitation variance in coupled high-resolution global ocean–atmosphere models. Climate Dynamics, (2022): 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-022-06257-6.
Description:
High-frequency precipitation variance is calculated in 12 different free-running (non-data-assimilative) coupled high resolution atmosphere–ocean model simulations, an assimilative coupled atmosphere–ocean weather forecast model, and an assimilative reanalysis. The results are compared with results from satellite estimates of precipitation and rain gauge observations. An analysis of irregular sub-daily fluctuations, which was applied by Covey et al. (Geophys Res Lett 45:12514–12522, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078926) to satellite products and low-resolution climate models, is applied here to rain gauges and higher-resolution models. In contrast to lower-resolution climate simulations, which Covey et al. (2018) found to be lacking with respect to variance in irregular sub-daily fluctuations, the highest-resolution simulations examined here display an irregular sub-daily fluctuation variance that lies closer to that found in satellite products. Most of the simulations used here cannot be analyzed via the Covey et al. (2018) technique, because they do not output precipitation at sub-daily intervals. Thus the remainder of the paper focuses on frequency power spectral density of precipitation and on cumulative distribution functions over time scales (2–100 days) that are still relatively “high-frequency” in the context of climate modeling. Refined atmospheric or oceanic model grid spacing is generally found to increase high-frequency precipitation variance in simulations, approaching the values derived from observations. Mesoscale-eddy-rich ocean simulations significantly increase precipitation variance only when the atmosphere grid spacing is sufficiently fine (〈 0.5°). Despite the improvements noted above, all of the simulations examined here suffer from the “drizzle effect”, in which precipitation is not temporally intermittent to the extent found in observations.
Description:
Support for CXL’s effort on this project was provided by a Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REU) supplement for National Science Foundation (NSF) grant OCE-1851164 to BKA, which also provided partial support for PEM. In addition, BKA acknowledges NSF grant OCE-1351837, which provided partial support for AKO, Office of Naval Research grant N00014-19-1-2712 and NASA grants NNX17AH55G, which also provided partial support for ADN, and 80NSSC20K1135. JTF’s participation, and the SPURS-II buoy data, were funded by NASA grants 80NSSC18K1494 and NNX15AG20G.
Keywords:
Precipitation
;
High-frequency precipitation
;
Numerical modeling
;
High-resolution models
;
Coupled ocean-atmosphere models
Repository Name:
Woods Hole Open Access Server
Type:
Article
Permalink
