ALBERT

Description: Rationale: Inotuzumab ozagomicin (IO) has been linked to an increased incidence of veno-occlusive disease (VOD) and liver alterations. Most VOD events occurred during hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) transplantation after IO therapy. We have previously described that the measurement of liver stiffness can anticipate the diagnosis of VOD in the context of HSCT. The mechanisms underlying the increased risk of VOD and liver damage in patients receiving IO are not well understood; in the pathogenesis endothelial damage, ozagomicin release and on-target off-tumor effects may be involved. Here, we aimed to assess the effects of IO on the changes of liver, vascular and biochemistry parameters. Methods: Intensive monitoring of the liver was incorporated into the standard of care of patients who received IO for relapsed or refractory (R / R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Upper abdomen ultrasound with Doppler was performed at baseline and at the end of therapy; liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by Fibroscan® (Echosens, Paris, France) at every IO course or at every IO infusion. With the exception of ursodeoxycholic acid, the patients did not receive prophylaxis for VOD. Data was collected after anonymous aggregation, in accordance with GCP and Helsinki declaration. Results are reported as median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Results: At data cut-off, 1st Apr 2019, 16 patient received baseline assessment and at least a post-IO assessment in our monitoring program. In our patent set, median age was 44.5 (IQR 30.7 - 64.0); 12/16 (75 %) patients relapsed after the last treatment and 4/16 (25 %) patients were refractory to the last treatment; patients received a median of 3 (IQR 2 - 3.7) lines before IO; 6/16 (37.5 %) patients undergone HSCT before IO, of which a patient had 1st and 2nd HSCT before IO; 5/16 (31.25 %) undergone HSCT after IO therapy (no patients had second HSCT after IO). Patients received a median of 2 (IQR 2.0 - 3.7) IO administration according to the schedule of the phase 3 trial. The median duration of the therapy was 61.5 days (IQR 43.2 - 114.0) and median progression-free survival in our population was 278.0 days (95% C.I. 264.0 - 292.0). In our patient set, we performed 113 biochemistry determination, 30 liver ultrasounds with Doppler and 116 LSM examination. One patient received a liver biopsy. Among the biochemical exams (AST, ALT, GGT and alkaline phosphatase) only the AST values significantly increased after 1st course of IO (from the median value of 21 U/L to 53 U/L after course 3). Liver ultrasound with Doppler revealed portal hypertension signs in half of the patients during IO monitoring program. Among these patients 7/16 (44%), 3/16 (17%), 5/16 (33.3%) and 3/16 (17%) showed splenomegaly, recanalization of the paraumbilical vein, dilatation of portal vein and ascites, respectively. Median LSM significantly increased from a baseline value of 6 kPa to 7.8 kPa after last post-IO assessment (p-value 7.1 kPa). With a median follow up of 387.5 days (IQR 182.8-524.5) we observed one VOD event (7%); the VOD was graded severe and occurred after HSCT post-IO. Conclusions: Our clinical experience represents the first step to better understand the IO-related liver alterations, as we described the frequency and relevance of quantitative markers. Most of the patients in our set developed ultrasound and/or elastography alteration during IO therapy. Furthermore, these alterations do not seem to correlate with biochemistry. Even if most of the patients had sub-clinical vascular and parenchymal alterations of the liver portal-hypertension related, VOD incidence in our set is comparable with literature. Long-term follow-up results are expected to test whether alterations return or evolve over time. Stratifying the tailored risk liver complications with prospective non-invasive and marker-driven strategies in term of IO dosing and HSCT timing could be a great benefit for patients. * FR and GM contributed to this manuscript equally # AC and CP contributed to this manuscript equally Figure Disclosures Martinelli: Roche: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy. Cavo:janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau. Papayannidis:Amgen: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction Relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients continue to be a formidable clinical challenge, mainly in consideration of associated very poor outcome, with a median overall survival (OS) of less than 12 months. SCT represents the only curative option for these patients. Although, there is no standard-of-care approach which may serve as a bridge to SCT. Our study aims to investigate the effectiveness of MEC regimen as a rescue therapy for R/R AML patients by specifically addressing the CR rate, including minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, the number of patients who subsequently underwent SCT and the presence of predictive factors of response. Methods Fifty-five consecutive adult AML patients were treated with MEC regimen in our Institution. In patients under 66 years old, we administered mitoxantrone 6 mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6, etoposide 100 mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6 and cytarabine 1000mg/sqm/die from day 1 to day 6, whereas in patients over 66 years old, the treatment schedule was reduced to 4 consecutive days. Data were retrospectively collected by using RedCap in accordance with Helsinki declaration and GCP. We used Kaplan-Meyer to estimate survival, and log rank to test differences in survival. Chi-squared, fisher's exact test and linear-by-linear correlation were used to test differences in proportions and distributions. Response was defined in accordance with 2017 ELN recommendations. CTCAE 4.03 was used to grade adverse events. MRD was assessed with WT1 or specific fusion transcripts. Results Fifty-five patients received MEC from 2008 to 2018. Age at diagnosis ranged from 17 to 72 years, with a median age of 51 years. Our set was enriched for high-risk patients. Interestingly, twenty percent of patients harbored FLT3-ITD at diagnosis (table 1). Two main groups were included: resistant AML, 28/55 patients (50,9%), and relapsed AML, 27/55 patients (49,1%). At induction, almost half of patients received "3+7" (n=25, 45,5%), while fludarabine-based regimens were administered to 14 patients (25,5%). In our set, after MEC median duration of hospitalization was 30 days (14-78); PMN 〉500/mm3 was reached after 26 days (range 18-67). Fever and febrile neutropenia was the most recurrent adverse events (AE). AEs were low in grade; out of 80 graded AEs, 38 (47,5%) were grade 2, 27 (33,8%) were grade 3, 9 (11,3%) were grade 4 and only 3 events resulted in death (3,8%). E. coli was the most recurrent cause of infection (10 cases). Overall, 25/55 patients (45,5%) achieved a complete remission (CR) after one course of MEC chemotherapy. Twelve patients (21.9%) achieved MRD negativity and 13 patients (23,6%) obtained an MRD+ CR or had no MRD test. Six patients (10,9%) had a partial response (PR) and 1 patient (1,8%)had hematological improvement (HI). Four patients (7.3%) died during post-MEC aplastic phase. Disease risk at diagnosis and R/R status did not influence the chance to obtain CR (figure 1 A). In 12 patients, a second MEC was administered. Four out of 12 patient improved their response with the 2nd MEC (2 patients obtained MRD - from MRD+ CR, 1 patient obtained PR and 1 patients obtained CR from hematological improvement). MEC was an effective bridge to SCT, 32/55 patients (58,2%, figure 1 B), received SCT; 15/32 patients (46,9%) received SCT directly after the 1st course of MEC, 9/32 patients (28,1%) after the 2nd course of MEC and 2 patients (6,3%) after an additional course of post-remission chemotherapy. Of note, only 6 patients (18,8%), who were not responsive to MEC, underwent SCT after an alternative rescue therapy. Median overall survival (OS) from MEC was 455 days (95% C.I. 307-602 days.); 1-year OS, 3-year OS and 5-years OS were 57,9%, 33,2% and 23,1%, respectively (std. error ± 0,067). Patients who responded to MEC (CR MRD+ or CR MRD- after 1 or 2 courses) had better OS than non-responders (median OS 1389 vs 160 days, p=.003). Stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis with COX-HR model established that pre-MEC R/R status, diagnosis class risk, response to one or two courses of MEC, and SCT were independent predictors of survival in the optimal model. Conclusions Taken together, our data indicate that MEC is an effective salvage regimen with affordable toxicity, and gives a high chance to obtain CR. MEC is particularly useful as a bridge to SCT, and has to be considered as a rescue therapy whenever a clinical trial is not available. *GM and AT equally contributed Disclosures Martinelli: Ariad/incyte: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Cavo:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GlaxoSmithKline: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Introduction Monosomy 7 (-7) and interstitial deletions of chromosome 7 (7q-) are among the most recurrent chromosomal aberrations found in myeloid neoplasms. Patients carrying these cytogenetical alterations present a poor overall survival (OS), mainly due to a low sensitivity to standard chemotherapy and a high incidence of relapse. In our study, we aimed to disentangle the biology of patients with -7/7q- and find new candidate therapeutic targets for a disease with such a dismal prognosis, by integrating wide genomic approaches. Methods We collected bone marrow samples from 487 adult patients at diagnosis, treated in 3 institutions: Institute L. & A. Seragnoli (Italy, n = 213), CEMM (Austria, n = 160), University of Michigan (US, n = 114, GSE23452). Three hundred ninety-five samples were analyzed by SNP arrays (Affymetrix™), 51 samples by mass spectrometry (Metabolon™) and 57 samples by GEP (Affymetrix™) approaches. Chi-squared, fisher's exact test and ANOVA were used to test differences in proportion and distributions. False discovery rate, Bonferroni correction, and Welch's correction were calculated whenever appropriate. Results Among the 474 patients with evaluable karyotype, 65 (13.7%) had -7/7q-; 47 (9.9%) had -7, while 18 (3.8%) had 7q-. In our sets, the median age at AML diagnosis was 64 years (21-86) and most of the subjects had a de novo AML (65.1%). WBC count at diagnosis was significantly lower in -7/7q- patients (10.4 vs 35.2 k/mm3 p

Description: Networks-on-chip are being regarded as a promising solution to meet the on-going requirement for higher and higher computation capacity. In view of future kilo-cores architectures, electrical wired connections are likely to become inefficient and alternative technologies are being widely investigated. Wireless communications on chip may be therefore leveraged to overcome the bottleneck of physical interconnections. This work deals with wireless networks-on-chip at optical frequencies, which can simplify the network layout and reduce the communication latency, easing the antenna on-chip integration process at the same time. On the other end, optical wireless communication on-chip can be limited by the heavy propagation losses and the possible cross-link interference. Assessment of the optical wireless network in terms of bit error probability and maximum communication range is here investigated through a multi-level approach. Manifold aspects, concurring to the final system performance, are simultaneously taken into account, like the antenna radiation properties, the data-rate of the core-to core communication, the geometrical and electromagnetic layout of the chip and the noise and interference level. Simulations results suggest that communication up to some hundreds of μm can be pursued provided that the antenna design and/or the target data-rate are carefully tailored to the actual layout of the chip.

Description: Background Although much efforts have been made to precisely define fitness of AML patients, in patients who are not candidate to chemotherapy, there is no prognostic model and the respective weight of AML biology and patient fitness are not well established. Here we test AML-CM score (Sorror, JAMA 2018), that is validated in fit population, in a set of old AML patients who received HMAs. Methods We retrospectively collected data of consecutive patients who received HMAs in our institution from 1st Jan 2008 with an age 〉 65 years at AML diagnosis. AML-CM score was applied to all the patients. Patients were divided in 4 groups (score 1-4: group 1, score 5-6: group 2; score 7-9: group 3, score 〉 9: group 4) and in 2 macro-groups (score 1-6: group A and score 〉 6 group B) for the analyses. Descriptive data are presented as median with interquartile ranges (IQR). Adverse events are graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Survival analysis was conducted with Kaplan-Meyer and are presented as 95% confidence intervals (C.I.) and differences in overall survival (OS) were tested with 2-side log rank test. Fisher exact test and Person's chi squared test were used whenever appropriate. Results At data cut-off, 1st Jan 2019, 60 consecutive patients received decitabine or azacytidine as 1st line therapy for AML. Median age of the population was 75.94 years (IQR 72.53-80.38). Most of the patients (37/62, 59.7%) had de novo AML, 19/62 (30.6%) had AML secondary to previous myeloid disorders and 6/62 (9.7%) had AML secondary to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Most of the patients were smokers (19/33, 57.57%, 29 no data), and few were usual drinkers (4/16, 25.00%, 46 no data). In our set, out of 62 patients, 2 patients (3.2%) had inv(3), 1 (1.6%) a translocation involving 11q23, 1 (1.6%) del(5q), 4 (6.4%) mon(7) or del (7q), 1 (1.6%) del(17p), 15 (24.2%) complex karyotype, 27 (43.5%) normal karyotype, 4 (6.5%) other alterations and 5 were not evaluable; 3/17 (17.65%, 45 no data) harbored IDH2 mutation, 1/16 (6.25%) IDH2 mutation, 2/33 FLT3 mutation (6.06%, 29 no data), 1/24 (4.17%, 38 no data), 2/15 (13.33%, 47 no data) TP53 mutation. According to ELN 2017, 3/62 patients (4.83%) had low risk, 34/62 (54.84%) intermediate risk and 23/62 (37.10%) high risk AML. According to AML-CM score, 13/62 patients (20.97%) were in group A, 20/62 (32.36%) in group B, 21/62 (33.87%) in group C, 6/62 (9.68%) in group D, 2/62 (3.23%) were not allocated for incomplete AML-CM score. There was no difference in term of age, ELN risk, secondary AML prevalence, HMA administered, or response to HMA according to ELN criteria between group 1, 2, 3, 4 or between macro-group A and B. Cardiovascular comorbidity, diabetes mellitus, obesity, previous tumor, hypoalbuminemia, elevated LDH were prevalent in higher risk AML-CM groups (3-4) and in macro-group B. Median OS was 658 days (95% C.I. 316-1000) in group 1, 556 days (95% C.I. 463-649 in group 2, 243 days (95% C.I. 153-353) in group 3, 107 days (95% C.I. 47-167) in group 4 (p=.021, figure 1A). Furthermore, we observed a median OS of 589 days (95% C.I. 328-850) in macro-group A and 219 days (95% C.I. 96-342) in macro-group B (p=.003, figure 1B). Reduced survival was correlated with a non-statistical trend toward augmented incidence of infections and adverse events in higher risk AML-CM groups (3-4). Conclusions AML-CM is a useful indicator of prognosis in old patients that receive HMAs. Prognosis in our set is influenced by comorbidity (measured with AML-CM, a quantitative score) more than by disease biology. We identified a group of patients (macro-group A) that has median OS after HMAs outlying OS reported in literature. This brilliant result can be due to lower comorbidity. AML-CM could help in defining candidate patients for therapy intensification and care utilization or for team comorbidity management. GM and RDN equally contributed Figure 1 Disclosures Martinelli: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; ARIAD: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy. Baccarani:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy. Papayannidis:Pfizer: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria; Shire: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria. Cavo:janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Description: Introduction: ELN intermediate-risk AML poses considerable challenges to clinicians both in terms of accurate prognostication and optimal treatment. Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) plays a central role as a mediator of immune tolerance in AML through the increase of Treg cells. IDO1 activity is negatively regulated by the BIN1 proto-oncogene. Herein, we analyzed the correlation between BIN1 and IDO1 expression in AML, also focusing on IDO1-interacting genes, with the aim to identify a predictive gene signature for OS. Methods: Biological and clinical data of 732 patients with de novo AML were retrieved from public TCGA and HOVON datasets. Since details on chemotherapy regimens were not available in the HOVON dataset, we decided to exclude patients 〉= 65 years from survival analyses. IDO1-interacting genes were selected through a co-expression analysis performed on TCGA RNA-sequencing data accessed through cBioPortal. The best genes combination predicting overall survival was plotted in a gene expression score. Patients were split in three different groups using score quartiles as cut-off. Results: In the HOVON dataset, IDO1 and BIN1 mRNA expression were negatively correlated (r = -0.40, P

Description: Background The oral anti-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 protein inhibitor venetoclax has shown strong activity in R/R AML in controlled clinical trials, and recently impressive results in treatment-naïve AML elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia. However, limited data are available in the real-life setting. Methods This is a multi-center (n=4), retrospective study involving patients with treatment-naïve or Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) AML treated with Venetoclax in combination with HMAs. Data were collected after anonymous aggregation, in accordance with GCP and Helsinky declaration. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according CTCAE v4.03. Survival is estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method. Results Forty-four patients have been prescribed Venetoclax from March 2018 to June 2019 and completed at least 1 course of venetoclax (range 1-8, median 2, IQR 2.0 - 4.0), being evaluable in this analysis. Patients's characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Five/44 (11.4%) patients had a low risk AML, 21/44 (47.7%) had an intermediate risk AML and 14/44 (31.8%) patients had a high risk AML, according to ELN 2017 risk stratification (4 patients had no available ELN risk at baseline). Six out of 44 (13.6%) patients received Venetoclax in combination with HMAs as first line of therapy, whereas 14/44 (31%) as first line rescue for resistant AML, 15/44 (34.1%) at first relapse, 9/44 (20.5%) for second or further R/R AML. Among R/R patients who received Venetoclax, 17/38 (44.7%) and 21/38 (55.2 %) had received chemotherapy or HMAs as induction therapy, respectively. Overall, Venetoclax was combined with azacitidine in 19/44 patients (43.2%), with decitabine in 19/44 patients (43.2%), with Low-dose of Cytarabine in 5/44 (11.4%), and was performed in monotherapy in 1/44 (2.3%) patient. Three out of 44 patients (6.8%) received a maximum dosage of 100 mg daily, 2/44 (4.5%) received 200 mg, 37/44 (84.1%) received 400mg and 2/44 (4.5%) received 600 mg. Fifteen out of 44 (34.1%) patients reduced the dosage of venetoclax for concomitant Azole administration. The median follow-up is 75.5 (IQR 45.2 - 178.5) days for patients who received upfront venetoclax therapy, while 143 (IQR 49.2 - 235.7) days for R/R patients. In the first-line setting, no patients reduced venetoclax dosage for concomitant adverse events; two neutropenia grade IV and two thrombocytopenia grade III have been documented. In the R/R setting, 14/38 (36.6%) patients reduced venetoclax dosage for concomitant adverse events. Specifically, we reported 22 adverse events, of which 10 were grade III-IV (5 neutropenia grade IV, 2 pancytopenia grade IV, 1 neutropenia grade III and 2 febrile neutropenia grade III). The overall CR rate is 16.7 % in newly-onset AML patients and 28.9 % in R/R patients, respectively. Two out of 6 treatment-naive patients had an evaluable response at 2 months after the beginning of Venetoclax treatment, and 2/6 had an evaluable 4-months response: 1 stable disease (SD) and 1 disease progression (PD) at 2 months,1 SD e 1 complete remission (CR )at 4 months. Thirty-one out of 38 R/R patients had an evaluable response at 2 months and 21/38 had an evaluable 4-month response: 10 CR, 1 complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 14 SD and 6 PD at 2 months; 6 CR, 10 SD and 3 PD at 4 months have been documented. After a short follow-up period (75.5 days), no patients who received Venetoclax as upfront therapy underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). On the other hand, after a longer follow-up period (143 days), 5 out of 38 patients (13.2%) received a HSCT after Venetoclax therapy among R/R patients. Median Overall Survival was not reached in the newly-onset cohort. In R/R setting, median OS was 253 days (95% C.I. 157-349). Interpretation These data extend to the real-life setting some previous evidence obtained from trials. In particular, our data confirm that venetoclax plus HMAs or LDAC has an acceptable toxicity profile and is safe and manageable. However, especially in the R/R setting, hematological toxicity represents the most frequent adverse event, arising some concerns about the optimal drugs management. Although our data suggest a similar clinical activity of venetoclax combinations to that reported in clinical trials, further studies from the real-life setting are highly warranted to confirm venetoclax efficacy under normal clinical practice. GG and JN equally contributed CP and AC equally contributed Disclosures Boccadoro: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Cavo:celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: travel accommodations, Speakers Bureau; bms: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; novartis: Honoraria; takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Papayannidis:Shire: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Teva: Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: Venetoclax is not approved to treat Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Italy

Description: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an extremely heterogeneous group of hematological neoplasms, for which allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) still represents the only potentially curative option in the majority of cases. However, elderly age and clinically severe comorbidities may often exclude a wide amount of patients from this therapeutic approach, underlying the urgent need for alternative strategies. Thanks to the introduction of advanced high-throughput techniques, light is being shed on the pathogenesis of AML, identifying molecular recurrent mutations as responsible for the onset, as well as progression, of disease. As a consequence, and in parallel, many new compounds, including targeted therapies (FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1-2 (IDH1-2) inhibitors), have found a wide room of application in this setting, and are now available in daily practice, or in late phases of clinical development. Moreover, several further innovative molecules are currently under investigation, and promising results for many of them have already been reported. In this review, we will present an update on the most relevant molecular alterations of AML, focusing on the most frequent genomic mutations of the disease, for which compounds have been approved or are still currently under investigation.

Description: Introduction FLT3 receptor gene has been reported to be mutated in about 30% of AML, with two different kinds of mutations identified: in-frame duplications within the juxtamembrane region (FLT3-ITD) and point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (FLT3-TKD). In term of prognosis, the proper role of these mutations is still debated. Moreover, FLT3 mutations are often subjected to clonal evolution, thus how to properly monitor FLT3 mutated clones, evaluate minimal residual disease, manage FLT3 inhibitors (FLT3i) are only some of the open issues. FLAM is an observational study involving FLT3 positive AMLs to gain clinical and molecular data useful to ameliorate real-life physicians' management of this disease. Here we report the results of a preliminary analysis of the retrospective phase of the study. Methods The retrospective phase of FLAM multi-center observational study enrolled each AML patient treated in 33 participating Italian centers detected to carry a FLT3 mutation since 2012. Clinical and molecular data were collected in accordance with GCP and Helsinki declaration in electronic case report forms. Results At data cut-off , 1st of July 2020, 289 patients with FLT3 mutation at diagnosis were enrolled in the retrospective phase of FLAM study, being evaluable in this analysis, with a median age at diagnosis of 62 years (min-max: 18-94) and a M:F ratio of 141/148 (Patients' characteristics are summarized in table 1). 29 out 289 (10 %) patients had a low risk AML, 190/289 (65,7 %) had an intermediate risk AML and 27/289 (9,3 %) patients had a high risk AML, according to ELN 2017 risk stratification or ELN 2010 in case of allelic ratio unavailability (43 patients had no available ELN risk at baseline). A more frequent association between FLT3-ITD and normal karyotype and between FLT3-TKD mutation and other cytogenetic alterations not conferring a favorable/adverse risk has been observed (p = 0.045). Among the study population, 255/289 (88 %) patients carried a FLT3-ITD, 32/289 (11 %) a FLT3-TKD point mutation and 2/289 (1 %) patients both mutations. Capillary electrophoresis has been the technical method used to investigate FLT3-ITD in 163 of 226 (72 %) patients with information on the method used, while Sanger Sequencing in 47 out of 226 (21 %) patients and Next generation sequencing (NGS) in 16 out of 226 (7 %) patients. Overall, NGS has been adopted to investigate FLT3 gene status in 18 out of 259 patients (7 %). FLT3-ITD allelic ratio was available in 62 of 257 (24 %) ITD patients and was greater than or equal to 0.5 in 35/62 (56 %) patients. During patients' follow-up, 19/289 (7 %) patients affected by a FLT3 positive AML at diagnosis underwent a disease clonal evolution with a FLT3 negative AML progression or relapse. Regarding treatment options in FLT3-AML, in our cohort FLT3i were administered as first-line of therapy in only 36/289 (13 %) patients, always in a combination, of which in 26/36 (72.2 %) with intensive chemotherapy. As expected, intensive chemotherapy represented the induction regimen in the majority of the patients (211/289, 73 %). On the other hand, FLT3i were administered as rescue therapy in 62/171 (36 %) cases (47/62 single-agent and in 15/62 in combination) and as re-induction therapy in 22/80 (28 %) cases (10/22 single-agent and 12/22 in combination). Overall, a FLT3i has been administered as single-agent 81 times, of which Gilteritinib was the most frequently used (56/81, 69,1 %), followed by quizartinib (18/81, 22,2 %). Among the 52 documented combinations of a FLT3i with other drugs, particularly noteworthy is the administration of Sorafenib, in 20/52 (39 %) cases in this real-life study. Lastly, nine out of 289 (3 %) patients received a FLT3i as maintenance therapy after HSCT. Data regarding the correlation among the different regimens, with a special focus on FLT3i, other molecular features and response/survival are currently under analysis. Conclusions These data coming from a preliminary analysis portray the state of a large multi-center retrospective cohort of FLT3-positive AML patients treated in Italy between 2012 and 2020, including interesting insights regarding technical methods used to characterize the disease and the therapeutic scenario in which FLT3 inhibitors have been developed. Further safety and effectiveness data may reveal beneficial to ameliorate physicians' real-life clinical practice. Acknowledgements: work supported by Daiichi-Sankyo. Disclosures Martelli: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rigolin:Abbvie: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Fracchiolla:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau; ABBVIE: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel, accommodations, expenses, Speakers Bureau. Bocchia:Incyte: Honoraria; CELGENE: Honoraria. Todisco:Jannsen, Abbvie, Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Papayannidis:Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. OffLabel Disclosure: Sorafenib is a registered drug for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Due to its multi-targeted tirosine kinase inhibitor effect it demonstrated efficacy in FLT3-AML when administered as an off-label prescription.

Description: JN and CP equally contributed Introduction In the setting of clinical trials Venetoclax (VEN) combined with hypomethylating agents (HMAs) has shown fair activity in R/R AML and impressive results in treatment-naïve elderly AML patients. However, no clear guidelines are available on real-life management, especially in the outpatient setting. This study involving R/R AML patients treated with VEN combined with HMAs aims to amelioratate physicians' knowledge about the administration of these regimens. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study involving AML patients treated with Venetoclax combined with HMAs. Data were collected in accordance with GCP and Helsinky declaration. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to CTCAE v4.03. Survival is estimated with Kaplan-Meyer method. Results Thirty-one R/R AML patients have been treated with VEN plus HMAs from March 2018 to March 2020 and completed at least 1 therapy course (range 1-9, median 2, IQR 1.0 - 5.0) (Table 1: patients' characteristics). Seventeen out of 31 (54,8 %) had received intensive chemotherapy as induction therapy. Twenty-two patients (71 %) had already received HMAs therapy, of which 14/31 (45,2 %) as first and only previous line of therapy. VEN was combined with azacitidine in 13/31 (41,9%) and with decitabine in 18/31 patients (58.1 %). The majority of patients (22/31, 70,9%) received the first cycle as out-patients, special focus of our analysis. For clinical reasons, only 9 out of 31 (29,1 %) patients were hospitalized and were used as control. In the outpatients setting, VEN dose escalation was managed with at least a weekly laboratory and clinical monitoring and the drug was often increased more slowly to carefully prevent tumor lysis syndrome or other complications. Specifically, there has been a trend toward a ramp-up schedule different from that indicated in clinical trials in the outpatient setting in comparison with hospitalized patients (77,2 % vs 33,3 %). In term of safety, no cases of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) and only 2 AEs were documented during ramp-up phase, both experienced by hospitalized patients. Seventeen AEs were documented during cycle 1, affecting more frequently hospitalized patients (77,9% vs 31,8 %). In the outpatient setting, the early 30-days and 60-days mortalities were 4,5 % (1/22) and 13,6 % (3/22), respectively, comparable to percentages documented in hospitalized subgroup (0% and 11,1%). Overall, with a median follow-up of 138 days (IQR 69 - 285), we reported 48 AEs, of which 28 were grade III-IV and the most common were hematological (13/28, 48,1 %) or infective (14/28, 51,8 %). Twenty out of 31 (64,5 %) patients reduced VEN dosage during treatment, of which 12/20 (60 %) due to occurring AEs, and remaining patients for azole coadministration. Eleven out of 31 (35,5 %) patients required hospitalization, specifically 3 out of 9 hospitalized patients (33,3 %) during the subsequent outpatient phase of treatment, and 8/22 (36,3 %) patients who underwent VEN therapy outpatient, of which only 2 during the first 28 days of treatment. Twenty-four and 5 AEs were followed by a VEN temporary (median duration 14 days, range 5-120) and permanent withdrawn, respectively. As for the rate of response, the Overall Response Rate (ORR) by VEN plus HMAs therapy in our R/R study population, defined as CR + CRi + HI, was 41,9 % (13/31), with a CR/CRi rate of 22,6 % (7/31). The median time to first response was 67.0 days (IQR 37.0 - 133.5) and the median duration of response was 131.0 days (IQR 89.0 - 151.0). Four out of 31 (12,9 %) patients received subsequent HSCT. The median OS was 285 days (95% C.I. 178 - 392), with no difference in OS between patients who underwent VEN plus HMAs outpatient and patients who underwent the first cycle hospitalized (p = 0,38). Conclusions With the limitations of a single-center retrospective study, our real-life data indicate that VEN plus HMAs is feasible in an outpatient management, without TLS or other limiting toxicities and with comparable early-mortality and toxicity profiles, even in the ramp-up phase and first therapeutic cycle. There was no significant impact of the outpatient management on treatment effectiveness, with data in line with published R/R AML cohorts. Further studies evaluating the clinical, social and economic impact of outpatient VEN-based treatments are highly warranted. Disclosures Papayannidis: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer:Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties.Cavo:Jannsen, BMS, Celgene, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Amgen, Oncopeptides, AbbVie, Karyopharm, Adaptive:Consultancy, Honoraria. OffLabel Disclosure: In R/R AML, available data regarding the combination of VEN plus HMAs come only from retrospective studies where VEN is administered as an off-label prescription due to its widespread approval for chronic lymphocytic leukemia due to promising results obtained in treatment-naive elderly AML patients