ALBERT

Description: Fusion genes involving imatinib-sensitive (PDGFRA, PDGFRB) and imatinib-resistant (FGFR1 and JAK2) tyrosine kinases (TK) have been identified in a substantial proportion of patients with eosinophilia-associated myeloproliferative neoplasms (Eos-MPNs). They result in constitutive activation of the corresponding TK moiety by dimerization domains of the partner gene or loss of the autoinhibitory WW-like domain within the juxtamembrane region. We here present three new fusion genes with involvement of PDGFRB. Two male patients (51 and 42 years old) presented with chromosomal aberrations involving chromosome bands 5q31-33; t(5;17)(q33-35;q11.2) and t(5;20)(q33;p12). In patient #1, LDI-PCR (Walz et al., Haematologica2007:92,163) identified an in-frame fusion between myosin XVIIIA (MYO18A) exon 40 and PDGFRB exon 10. Activation is likely to occur through dimerization as the autoinhibitory WW-like domain of PDGFRB is fully retained in the fusion protein. In patient #2, 5′-RACE-PCR of mRNA identified an in-frame fusion between D-tyrosyl-tRNA deacylase 1 (DTD1) exon 4 and a truncated PDGFRB exon 12. DTD1 potentially lacks known dimerization motifs suggesting that the disruption of the autoinhibitory WW-like domain region solely contributes to enhanced TK activity. Male patient #3 (42 years old) had a dry tap due to marked myelofibrosis and cytogenetic analysis could only be performed after centrifugation of bone marrow biopsy cells. Four metaphases were obtained which all showed a normal karyotype. In Eos-MPN with normal, low quality or missing karyotype, we routinely perform quantitative RT-PCR for 3′-sequences of PDGFRA and PDGFRB which are retained in all known fusion genes. Overexpression of mRNA was shown in all samples with variable PDGFRA (5 different fusion genes in 50 samples) or PDGFRB (5 different fusion genes in 8 samples) fusion genes as compared to samples from HES or reactive eosinophilia (ratio PDGFRA/ABL1 0.73 vs. 0.0066 vs. 0.0064, p

Description: Abstract 3287 Poster Board III-1 Blast crisis (BC) in CML in the imatinib era is a rare event with 1–3% of newly diagnosed BC patients per year in the IRIS study, but prognosis, once BC has occurred, remains poor. Historical and recent studies with imatinib and second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) reported a median survival time of 7–10 months and two year survival probabilities of

Description: Abstract 783FN2 Introduction: The advent of second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the front line treatment setting of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has tightened the evaluation of imatinib response. Early assessment of response markers might identify slow responders harboring a BCR-ABL positive clone with an inferior susceptibility to tyrosine kinase inhibition. This group of patients could benefit from an early dose escalation or a change of treatment to a second generation TKI thus avoiding the risk of disease progression. Therefore we sought to evaluate the impact of molecular and cytogenetic response levels after 3 months of imatinib treatment on the further course of disease. Patients and methods: A total of 1,340 patients (median age 52 years, range 16–88, 40% female) were included into the randomized German CML study IV and treated with an imatinib based therapy consisting of imatinib 400 mg/d (n=381), imatinib 800 mg/d (n=399) and combinations of standard dose imatinib with interferon alpha (n=402) and low-dose cytarabine (n=158). Median follow-up was 4.7 years (range 0–9). Molecular response after 3 months was assessed in 743 patients, cytogenetic response in 498 patients. The BCR-ABL expression was determined by quantitative RT-PCR and standardized according to the international scale (BCR-ABL IS). Only patients expressing typical BCR-ABL transcripts (b2a2, b3a2, b2a2 and b3a2) were considered. Cytogenetic response was determined by conventional metaphase analysis. Disease progression was defined by the incidence of accelerated phase, blastic phase or death from any reason. A landmark analysis was performed for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: Disease progression was observed in 149 patients (11.1%), 127 patients died (9.5%). After 3 months of treatment the median BCR-ABL IS was 2.6% (0-100), the median proportion of Philadelphia chromosome positive metaphases (Ph+) was 8% (0-100). The BCR-ABL landmarks of 1% and 10% after 3 months of imatinib both proved to discriminate significantly for PFS and OS: BCR-ABL IS 65% (n=84), p=0.004 for PFS and p=0.011 for OS. A 3 group stratification did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: The achievement of molecular and cytogenetic response landmarks after 3 months of imatinib treatment is predictive for long term progression free and overall survival. At 3 months a BCR-ABL IS of 10% or more is associated with a 5-year overall survival of 87% suggesting an early change of treatment, whereas a BCR-ABL IS of 1% or less indicates a favorable 5-year overall survival of 97%. Disclosures: Schnittger: Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. Haferlach:Münchner Leukämie Labor: Equity Ownership. German CML Study Group:Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMBF: Research Funding; EU: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Description: Background Ponatinib is a potent oral pan–BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has demonstrated significant clinical activity in heavily pretreated CP-CML pts. A multivariate analysis of CP-CML pts in the PACE trial found significant associations between major cytogenetic response (MCyR) and higher dose intensity; however, dose reductions and/or interruptions (DR/I) of ponatinib occur often in pts who experience adverse events (AEs). The clinical significance of such DR/I are not well known. Objectives To assess the impact of DR/I and dose intensity of ponatinib on clinical outcomes in pts with CP-CML enrolled in the PACE trial. Methods A total of 270 CP-CML pts were enrolled in this ongoing, phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. The efficacy population (N=267) was included in this post hoc analysis. Dose reductions were defined as any reduction below the standard 45 mg daily dose; interruptions were defined as a period in which ponatinib was held for ≥3 consecutive days between non-missing doses. Up to 2 reductions (to 30 or 15 mg/day) were permitted for managing AEs. To assess the impact of dose modification on response, pts were grouped according to tertiles of average dose intensity (mg/day), calculated as the cumulative dose divided by treatment exposure. All variables were calculated within 12 mos of the first dose to correspond to the primary outcome measure of MCyR by 12 mos. Secondary efficacy endpoints included complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and major molecular response (MMR). Responses were assessed every 3 mos. The Cochran–Armitage trend test was used to assess whether response rates increased with higher average dose intensity tertiles; all P-values were 2-sided. Data are as of 01 Apr 2013, with a median follow-up of 20 (0.1–28) mos. Minimum follow-up for pts still on study was 18 mos. Results A total of 209 (78%) pts required DR/I at least once within 12 mos: 172 pts (64%) had at least 1 dose reduction (median time to first dose reduction was 64 days). In pts with 〉1 dose reduction (n=75, 28%), the median time between the first and second reduction was 91 days. Among pts with a dose reduction at any time, 35% re-escalated to 45 mg daily. Dose interruption was experienced by 199 (75%) pts (median total duration of 35 days). The most common reason for DR/I was thrombocytopenia (33%). For pts with average dose intensity ≤27 mg/day (N=89), 〉27 to ≤42 mg/day (N=88), and 〉42 mg/day (N=90), respectively, the median age was 62, 62, and 56 yrs; median time since initial diagnosis was 11, 7, and 6 yrs; each group had received a median of 3 prior TKIs. Among these tertiles, the best response to the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen was MCyR or better in 21%, 22%, and 35%; CCyR or better in 11%, 14%, and 23%; MMR or better in 1%, 2%, and 6%, respectively. Within 12 mos of the first dose, median duration of treatment exposure was 356 (26–366), 366 (51–366) and 366 (3–366) days, respectively. Twenty-nine pts had 27 to ≤42 mg/day and 〉42 mg/day. Response rates were lower in pts with average dose intensity ≤27 mg/day; however, these pts still achieved MCyR, CCyR, and MMR rates that substantially exceeded those reported with the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen. Conclusions Higher dose intensity of ponatinib was associated with higher response rates in this heavily pretreated CP-CML population, but lower dose intensity still led to positive clinical outcomes. It should be noted that higher responses to the most recent dasatinib- or nilotinib-containing regimen were also seen in pts with higher average dose intensity. In summary, these data indicate that although optimal responses were seen with average ponatinib dose intensity 〉42 mg/day, pts can be effectively managed with dose reduction or interruption if clinically indicated. Disclosures: Pinilla-Ibarz: Novartis, Ariad: Research Funding; Novartis, Ariad, BMS and Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Cortes:Ariad, Pfizer, Teva: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Research Funding. Kim:BMS, Novartis, IL-Yang: Consultancy; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, ARIAD, IL-Yang: Research Funding; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, IL-Yang: Honoraria; BMS, Novartis, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau; BMS, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Le Coutre:Novartis: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Paquette:Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Honoraria; Ariad, BMS, Novartis: Speakers Bureau. Chuah:Novartis, BMS: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, ARIAD, Teva: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Teva, Pfizer, ARIAD: Honoraria; Novartis, BMS, TEva: Speakers Bureau; Novartis, ARIAD, Teva, Pfizer: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees. Apperley:Novartis: Research Funding; Ariad, Bristol Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria. DeAngelo:Araid, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy. Rea:BMS, Novartis, Pfizer, Ariad, Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS: Consultancy; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Honoraria; ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, Teva: Speakers Bureau. Muller:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Consultancy; Novartis, BMS: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria. Gambacorti-Passerini:Pfizer: Research Funding; Pfizer, BMS: Honoraria. Lustgarten:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Rivera:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Other, Employment. Clackson:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Turner:ARIAD: Employment. Haluska:ARIAD: employees of and own stock/stock options in ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc Other, Employment. Deininger:BMS, ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Consultancy; BMS, NOVARTIS, CELGENE, GILEAD: Research Funding; ARIAD, NOVARTIS: Advisory Boards, Advisory Boards Other. Hochhaus:Ariad, Novartis, BMS, MSD, Pfizer: Research Funding; Novartis, BMS, Pfizer: Honoraria. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:ARIAD: Honoraria. Shah:Ariad, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kantarjian:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Phizer: Research Funding. Talpaz:Ariad, BMS, Sanofi, INCYTE: Research Funding; Ariad, Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Ariad, Sanofi, Novartis: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Abstract 915 Background: Many patients (pts) with advanced Ph+ leukemias experience failure of all currently available tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR-ABL and have limited treatment options. Ponatinib is a potent pan-BCR-ABL inhibitor that is active against native and mutated forms of BCR-ABL, including the TKI resistant T315I mutant. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in pts with AP-CML, BP-CML, or Ph+ ALL were evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Methods: The PACE trial enrolled 449 pts, including 85 AP-CML, 62 BP-CML, and 32 Ph+ ALL. Pts were resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib, or had the T315I mutation at baseline. AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL pts were assigned to 1 of 4 cohorts: AP-CML R/I, AP-CML T315I, BP-CML/Ph+ ALL R/I, BP-CML/Ph+ ALL T315I. Two AP-CML pts were not assigned to a cohort (post-imatinib, did not have T315I at baseline) and were excluded from efficacy analyses and included in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 mos after treatment initiation. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported, with a minimum follow-up of 9 mos (median 13 [4 to 21], 6 [0.1 to 18], and 6 [0.1 to 16] mos for AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL, respectively). Results: The median age for AP-CML, BP-CML, and Ph+ ALL pts was 60, 53, and 62 yrs, respectively. Median time from initial disease diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 7, 4, and 1.5 yrs, respectively. Pts were heavily pretreated: 94% received prior imatinib, 88% dasatinib, 61% nilotinib; 8% received 1 prior approved TKI, 39% received 2, and 53% received 3. Sixteen percent had undergone prior stem cell transplant. In pts previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=171), 94% had a history of resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib, 6% were purely intolerant. Reported MaHR rates with the most recent dasatinib or nilotinib therapy were 35% AP-CML, 16% BP-CML, 43% Ph+ ALL. At the time of analysis, 59% of AP-CML, 8% of BP-CML, and 9% of Ph+ ALL pts remained on study. Overall, the most common reasons for discontinuation were progressive disease (19%, 50%, and 53%, respectively) and adverse events (AEs; 11%, 16%, and 6%, respectively). Hematologic and cytogenetic response rates are shown in the table; MaHR and MCyR were observed across cohorts. MMR was achieved by 14% of AP-CML pts (14% R/I, 17% T315I). There was a trend for higher response rates among pts who received fewer prior approved TKIs. In AP-CML pts, the differences in MaHR rates by number of prior approved TKIs (1: 3/4 [75%]; 2: 20/33 [61%]; 3: 24/46 [52%]) were not significant (Fisher's Exact); differences in MCyR rates (1: 4/4 [100%]); 2: 13/33 [39%]; 3: 15/46 [33%]) were significant for pts treated with 1 vs 2 (p=0.0360) and 1 vs 3 prior approved TKIs (p=0.0168). Of pts achieving MaHR, 42% of AP-CML and 35% of BP-CML/Ph+ ALL pts were projected (Kaplan-Meier) to remain in MaHR at 1 yr. In AP-CML, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) as 80 (range 6 to 88) wks; the probability of maintaining PFS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 80% and 57%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) had not yet been reached; the probability of OS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated (Kaplan-Meier) as 96% and 85%, respectively. In BP-CML/Ph+ ALL, median PFS was estimated as 18 (range 0.1 to 74) wks; the probability of maintaining PFS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 34% and 20%, respectively. Median OS was estimated as 30 (range 0.4 to 77) wks; the probability of OS at 6 mos and 1 yr was estimated as 54% and 34%, respectively. Ponatinib was generally well-tolerated; the most common treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (29%), rash (25%), and neutropenia (22%). The most common serious treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (3%) and pancreatitis (3%). Rash was generally grade 1 or 2 in severity. Thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and pancreatitis were typically reported early in treatment and were manageable with dose modification. Conclusions: Ponatinib was generally well-tolerated and had substantial activity in pts with AP-CML, BP-CML, or Ph+ ALL, regardless of mutation status or prior therapy. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 mos will be presented Disclosures: Kantarjian: Novartis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding. Off Label Use: ponatinib. Kim:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD, and Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis and Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Deciphera: Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, Pfizer, and MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Cortes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 862 Rapid relapse after discontinuation of imatinib, the need for indefinite therapy and residual disease in most patients are the major challenges in management of CML. Combinations of imatinib with IFN simultaneously, or consecutively preceding imatinib, or with araC may improve treatment outcome. The German CML Study Group therefore designed a randomized trial to compare standard imatinib vs. imatinib + interferon alpha (IFN) vs. imatinib + low dose araC vs. imatinib after IFN failure (for low- and intermediate-risk patients, high risk patients received imatinib 800 mg instead). The current evaluation represents the prefinal results of the pilot phase of the trial. Inclusion criteria were newly diagnosed BCR/ABL positive CML in chronic phase (CP). Primary aims are: prolongation of survival (overall, OS, and progression free, PFS), determination of rates of hematologic, cytogenetic and molecular remissions, adverse events (AE) and role of allografting. By the end of 2005, 670 patients were randomized, 13 had to be excluded (no CML (n=3), pregnancy, no CP (n=1 each), imatinib 800 mg (n=8)). Analysis was according to intention to treat. 657 patients were evaluable (174 with imatinib 400 mg, 196 with imatinib+IFN, 158 with imatinib+araC and 129 with imatinib after IFN-failure). 656 patients were evaluable for hematologic, 611 for cytogenetic, and 618 for molecular responses. Patient characteristics of treatment arms were similar for age (median 53 years), sex (40% female), median values for Hb (12.6 g/dl), WBC (66.2/μl), platelets (383/μl) and for Euro risk score (low 35%, intermediate 54%, high 10%). The median dose of imatinib was 400mg/die in all arms, of araC 10 mg per treatment day and of IFN 4.2 Mio I.U./die in the imatinib after IFN arm and 1.8 Mio I.U./die in the imatinib+IFN arm. Median observation time was 57.3 months. 55 patients died, 73 patients were transplanted in 1st CP, 81 patients progressed, 59 patients were switched to second generation TKIs. After 3 years 126 patients (72%) of the imatinib 400mg arm still received the initial therapy as well as 60 patients (30%) of the imatinib+IFN arm and 53 patients (34%) of the imatinib+araC arm. 9 patients (7%) of the imatinib after IFN arm are still on IFN. 5-year OS of all patients is 91%. 5-year PFS of all patients (no death, patient still in first chronic phase) is 87%. 5-year-OS and PFS according to treatment arm are shown in the Table. At 5 years, the cumulative incidences of achieving complete cytogenetic remission or major molecular remission (MMR) as determined by competing risks (death, progression) are not different (Table). Type and severity of adverse events (AE) over a 5-years period did not differ from those reported previously (Table). Hematologic AEs grade III/IV were similar in all therapy arms except leukopenia grade III/IV, which was more frequently observed in the imatinib after IFN arm (14%). Non hematologic AEs were mainly fluid retention, neurological and gastrointestinal symptoms and fatigue. Neurologic symptoms and fatigue were more often reported for the therapy arms with IFN. Imatinib 400mgImatinib+IFNImatinib+AraCImatinib after IFN5-Year Survival and Response RatesOS87%93%92%92% PFS84%91%88%84% CCR92%92 %89%83% MMR83%78%80%70% Adverse Events, WHO Grade III/IVAnemia7%1%3%3% Leukopenia4%5%2%14% Thrombocytopenia5%6%6%6% WHO Grade I-IVEdema15%13%5%0% Neurological5%15%5%22% Gastrointestinal17%27%21%15% Fatigue8%13%9%23% This analysis shows excellent survival and durable response rates in all arms. Currently, survival in all treatment arms is equal to, or better than in IRIS. To verify possible differences in survival, e.g. imatinib 400 mg vs. imatinib + IFN, longer observation is planned. Although cytogenetic and molecular responses in the imatinib after IFN failure arm at 5 years are inferior to that in the other treatment arms, the question of whether the consecutive therapy with IFN first and imatinib after IFN-failure provides a survival advantage requires long term follow-up. Imatinib in combination with, or after IFN, or with low dose araC are feasible and safe treatment modalities. We expect that the study will optimize and improve therapy outcome in CML. Disclosures: German CML Study Group: Deutsche Krebshilfe: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; German Competence Net : Research Funding; European LeukemiaNet: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Essex: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 163 Background: Despite progress in Ph+ leukemia therapy, patients who experience failure of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and those with the T315I BCR-ABL mutation have limited treatment options. Ponatinib is an oral TKI developed using computational and structure-based design with optimal binding to the BCR-ABL active site. At clinically achievable concentrations, ponatinib demonstrated potent in vitro activity against native BCR-ABL and all BCR-ABL mutants tested, including T315I. The efficacy and safety of ponatinib (45 mg orally once daily) in patients with Ph+ leukemia were evaluated in a phase 2, international, open-label clinical trial. Methods: 449 patients resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib or with the T315I mutation confirmed at entry were enrolled and assigned to 1 of 6 cohorts: chronic phase (CP)-CML R/I (N=203), CP-CML T315I (N=64), accelerated phase (AP)-CML R/I (N=65), AP-CML T315I (N=18), blast phase (BP)-CML/Ph+ALL R/I (N=48), BP-CML/Ph+ALL T315I (N=46). Five patients (3 CP-CML, 2 AP-CML) without confirmed T315I and not R/I to dasatinib or nilotinib were treated, but not assigned to a cohort; they were included in safety analyses. The primary endpoint was major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months for CP-CML and major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 months for advanced Ph+ leukemia. The trial is ongoing. Data as of 23 July 2012 are reported: median follow-up 11 (0.1 to 21) months; minimum follow-up 9 months. Results: Median age was 59 (18–94) yrs; 53% were male. Median time from diagnosis to ponatinib was 6 (0.3–28) yrs. Patients were heavily pretreated: 96% received prior imatinib, 84% dasatinib, 65% nilotinib; median number of prior TKIs was 3, with 53% exposed to all 3 approved TKIs. In patients previously treated with dasatinib or nilotinib (N=427), 88% had a history of resistance and 12% were purely intolerant to dasatinib or nilotinib. Best prior response to most recent dasatinib or nilotinib was 26% MCyR or better in CP-CML, and 23% MaHR or better in advanced Ph+ leukemia. Frequent BCR-ABL mutations confirmed at entry were: 29% T315I, 8% F317L, 4% E255K, 4% F359V, 3% G250E. No mutations were detected in 44%. The primary endpoint response rates (see Table) in each cohort exceeded the prespecified statistical criteria for success. In CP-CML and AP-CML R/I (the 3 largest cohorts), 95% CIs exceeded the prespecified response rate. Median time to response (for responders) was 84 days in CP-CML, 112 days in AP-CML, 55 days in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. Responses were durable; the estimated (Kaplan-Meier) probability of responders maintaining the primary endpoint at 1 yr was 91% in CP-CML, 42% in AP-CML, 35% in BP-CML/Ph+ALL. In CP-CML, 46% had complete cytogenetic response and molecular response rates were 32% MMR, 20% MR4, and 12% MR4.5. Response rates were higher in patients exposed to fewer prior TKIs and those with shorter disease duration. Similar response rates were observed in patients with and without BCR-ABL mutations. In CP-CML, response rates were higher in those with T315I; however, a post hoc analysis found that presence of T315I was not a predictor of response. Instead, the difference in response rate was explained by T315I patients' younger age, shorter duration of leukemia, and exposure to less prior therapy. At the time of analysis, 52% of patients remained on therapy (66% CP-CML). The most frequent reasons for discontinuation were progression (18%) and AEs (12%). The most common drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (36%), rash (33%), and dry skin (31%). Pancreatitis was the most common drug-related SAE (5%); however, it occurred early and was managed with dose modification (1 patient discontinued due to pancreatitis). Conclusions: Ponatinib has substantial activity and is generally well tolerated in these heavily pretreated Ph+ leukemia patients who have limited available treatment options. Data with a minimum follow-up of 12 months will be presented. Disclosures: Cortes: Novartis, BMS, ARIAD, Pfizer, and Chemgenex: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kim:Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, ARIAD, Il-Yang: Consultancy, Employment, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Pinilla-Ibarz:Novartis, BMS: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. le Coutre:Novartis and BMS: Honoraria. Paquette:ARIAD: Consultancy. Chuah:Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Nicolini:Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, ARIAD: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Apperley:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Talpaz:Deciphera: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Abruzzese:BMS, Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rea:Bristol Myers-Squibb, Novartis, and Teva: Honoraria. Baccarani:ARIAD, Novartis, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Muller:ARIAD: Consultancy. Wong:MolecularMD Corp: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lustgarten:ARIAD Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Rivera:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Clackson:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Turner:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Haluska:ARIAD: Employment, Equity Ownership. Guilhot:ARIAD: Honoraria. Hochhaus:ARIAD, Novartis, BMS, Pfizer, MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Hughes:Novartis, BMS, ARIAD: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goldman:Novartis, Bristol Myers-Squibb, and Amgen: Honoraria. Shah:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Briston-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy. Kantarjian:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; ARIAD: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 357 Treatment of CML with imatinib of 400 mg can be unsatisfactory. Treatment optimization is warranted. The German CML-Study group has therefore conducted a randomized study comparing imatinib 800 mg vs 400 mg vs 400 mg + IFN. A significantly faster achievement of MMR at 12 months has been observed with imatinib 800 mg in a tolerability adapted manner and MMR by 12 months has been found to translate into better overall survival. Since stable CMR has been associated with durable off-treatment remissions we sought to analyse the impact of tolerability-adapted imatinib 800 mg on CMR and survival. Standardized determinations of molecular response and evaluation of its impact on outcome are goals of CML-Study IV. CMR4 is defined as a BCR-ABL/ABL ratio of

Description: Dasatinib (BMS-354825) is a novel, oral, multi-targeted kinase inhibitor of BCR-ABL and SRC kinases with preclinical activity against 20/21 imatinib resistant BCR-ABL mutations and clinical phase I/II efficacy in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and BCR-ABL positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We sought to establish a relationship between type of preexisting BCR-ABL mutations associated with imatinib resistance and efficacy of dasatinib in patients (pts) with CML and ALL. We have investigated 872 peripheral blood samples from 394 pts (53% male, median age 60 yrs, range 17–85) who had been enrolled in international phase II studies investigating the activity of 70mg dasatinib BID after imatinib failure (chronic phase, CP, n=198; accelerated phase, AP, n=78; myeloid blast crisis, MyBC, n=53; lymphoid blast crisis, LyBC, or ALL, n=65). Screening for BCR-ABL mutations was performed by D-HPLC combined with DNA sequencing. During follow up, pts were monitored in 3-monthly intervals by RQ-PCR for BCR-ABL mRNA transcripts and by mutation analysis to determine the quantitative course of the preexisting mutation or the emergence of new mutations. Hematologic and cytogenetic response data have been collected sequentially for a median of 8 months (range, 2–11) after start of therapy. Prior to dasatinib, 46 different BCR-ABL mutations involving 36 amino acids were detected in 202/394 pts (51%). 162 pts showed one, 33 pts two, 6 pts three, and 1 pt four mutations. Mutations were observed in 84 pts in CP (42%), 47 pts in AP (60%), 23 pts in MyBC (43%), and 48 pts in LyBC and ALL (74%). In patients with mutations, hematologic response was 91% in CP, 62% in AP, 41% in MyBC, and 34% in LyBC/ALL (p

Description: BCR-ABL kinase domain (KD) mutations are the major mechanism of acquired imatinib resistance in patients (pts) with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Second generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) are effective against most imatinib resistance mutations but treatment can be hampered by the emergence of secondary drug-resistant clones over time. Furthermore, individual KD mutations differ according to their in vitro transforming potency and tyrosine kinase activity which in vivo upon presence of multiple mutations may result in competition between different clones. Using a novel sensitive and quantitative monitoring approach we systematically investigated the kinetics of drug-resistant mutants on second generation TKI in order to identify patterns of dynamics and to understand mechanisms of polyclonal drug resistance. Fourty CML pts (24 m; median age 64 years, range 39–74) with resistance to imatinib in chronic phase (n=31), accelerated phase (n=7), or blast crisis (n=2) were treated with dasatinib (D, n=20) or nilotinib (N, n=20). Peripheral blood samples taken at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months on second generation TKI therapy were subjected to standard genotyping performed by D-HPLC/sequencing and two high-sensitive allele-specific approaches (ligation PCR [L-PCR] and amplification refractory mutation system PCR [ARMS-PCR]) for a panel of 13 key mutations: G250E, Q252H, Y253F/H, E255K/V, V299L, T315I, F311I, F317L, M351T, E355G, F359V. All mutational findings obtained by at least two methods were subjected to quantitative monitoring of BCR-ABLmutant/GUS by ARMS-PCR allowing (i) a dynamical detection range of mutant BCR-ABL over 3 to 4 orders of magnitude and (ii) quantification of the mutant cell subset towards BCR-ABL/GUS ratio. We identified a total of 53 mutated clones in 28 imatinib resistant subjects, of which 46 were assessed quantitatively over time. The following patterns of kinetics were observed: I. A parallel decrease (〉2 orders of magnitude) of BCR-ABLmutant/GUS and BCR-ABL/GUS ratio without further mutations emerging (monoclonal resistance, good molecular response, n=11). II. Persistence of a single mutated clone (change