ALBERT

Notes: When white light irradiation inhibits shoot growth in derooted pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) cuttings, it decreases tissue tension, a driving force for shoot growth, by making the cell wall of the inner tissues mechanically rigid. To elucidate the mechanism by which light affects the mechanical properties of the cell wall in the inner tissues, its effect on the chemical properties of the cell walls was studied by analyzing qualitatively and quantitatively cell wall polysaccharides in the epdidermis and inner tissue of pea epicotyls grown in both dark and light. The amount of polysaccharides per subhook in the cell walls of both tissues increased during a 4-h dark incubation. Light suppressed the increase in hemicellulosic (HC)-II and cellulosic polysaccharides in the inner tissues, while it did not affect the increase in other wall fractions in either the epidermal or subepidermal tissues. No light effect was observed on the neutral sugar compositions of pectin, HC-I or HC-II fractions in either of the tissues. Light increased the mass-average molecular mass of xyloglucan and rhamnoarabinogalactan in HC-II fractions in the inner tissues, while such an effect was not observed in the epidermis. These facts suggest that the light-induced decrease in the tissue tension in pea epicotyls is caused by an increase in the molecular size of xyloglucan, rhamnoarabinogalactan in the HC-II fraction and/or the suppression of the synthesis of HC-II and cellulosic polysaccharides in the inner tissues.

Notes: Etiolated pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) seedlings grown under microgravity conditions in space show automorphosis: bending of epicotyls, inhibition of hook formation and changes in root growth direction. In order to determine the mechanisms of microgravity conditions that induce automorphosis, we used a three-dimensional clinostat and obtained the successful induction of automorphosis-like growth of etiolated pea seedlings. Kinetic studies revealed that epicotyls bent at their basal region towards the clockwise direction far from the cotyledons from the vertical line (0°) (see legend for Fig. 6) at approximately 40° in seedlings grown both at 1 g and in the clinostat within 48 h after watering. Thereafter, epicotyls retained this orientation during growth in the clinostat, whereas those at 1 g changed their growth direction against the gravity vector and exhibited a negative gravitropic response. On the other hand, the plumular hook that had already formed in the embryo axis tended to open continuously by growth at the inner basal portion of the elbow; thus, the plumular hook angle initially increased; this was followed by equal growth on the convex and concave sides at 1 g, resulting in normal hook formation; in contrast, hook formation was inhibited on the clinostat. The automorphosis-like growth and development of etiolated pea seedlings was induced by auxin polar transport inhibitors (9-hydroxyfluorene-9-carboxylic acid, N-(1-naphthyl)phthalamic acid and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid), but not by anti-auxin (p-chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid) at 1 g. An ethylene biosynthesis inhibitor, 1-aminooxyacetic acid, inhibited hook formation at 1 g, and ethylene production of etiolated seedlings was suppressed on the clinostat. Clinorotation on the clinostat strongly reduced the activity of auxin polar transport of epicotyls in etiolated pea seedlings, similar to that observed in space experiments (Ueda J, Miyamoto K, Yuda T, Hoshino T, Fujii S, Mukai C, Kamigaichi S, Aizawa S, Yoshizaki I, Shimazu T, Fukui K (1999) Growth and development, and auxin polar transport in higher plants under microgravity conditions in space: BRIC-AUX on STS-95 space experiment. J Plant Res 112: 487–492). These results suggest that clinorotation on a three-dimensional clinostat is a valuable tool for simulating microgravity conditions, and that automorphosis of etiolated pea seedlings is induced by the inhibition of auxin polar transport and ethylene biosynthesis.

Notes: White fluorescent light (5 W m−2) inhibited Avena coleoptile growth. Light caused in increase in minimum stress relaxation time and a decrease in extensibility (strain/load) of coleoptile cell walls. Light increased the contents of ferulic acid (FA) and diferulic acid (DFA) ester-linked to the hemicellulose I in cell walls. These changes in the phenolic contents correlated with those of the mechanical properties of cell walls, suggesting that light stimulates the formation of DFA in hemicellulose I, making cell walls rigid, and thus results in growth inhibition. The ratio of DFA to FA was almost constant in the dark, but decreased in light, although it was almost constant in Oryza coleoptiles either in the dark or in light (Tan et al. 1992). From this fact, it is speculated that in the light condition, the formation of DFA in cell walls is limited in the step of the peroxidase catalyzed coupling reaction to produce DFA, while in the dark it is limited in the step of the feruloylation of hemicellulose I.

Notes: The epicotyl of 5-day-old derooted cuttings of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) with and without cotyledons exuded sucrose and glucose in the presence of EDTA. The amount of sugars exuded was greatly affected by the position at which the epicotyl was cut. The largest amount of sugars was exuded when the epicotyl was cut 2 mm below the hook, leaving the growing subhook. Gibberellic acid (GA) substantially increased the amount of sugars exuded from the epicotyl in the presence of cotyledons but only slightly in their absence. GA stimulated sugar exudation from the cotyledonary node as well as from the epicotyl. In cuttings with cotyledons, GA enhanced invertase activity in the apoplast, and in the intraceUular soluble and bound fractions in the growing subhook. In decotylized cuttings, GA enhanced only soluble invertase activity. GA did not affect invertase activity in the epicotyl below the subhook. These results suggest that GA stimulates sugar accumulation in the growing subhook by stimulating not only phloem loading of sucrose in the cotyledons but also unloading in the subhook.

Notes: The possible involvement of invertase in the action of gibberellic acid (GA) on stimulating sugar accumulation in growing subhooks of Alaska pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) was studied. GA and indoleacetic acid (IAA) stimulated elongation growth to a similar extent. GA, in contrast to IAA, increased the amount of soluble sugars in the subhook. GA substantially increased invertase activity whereas IAA did not. These results suggest that the mode of action of GA and IAA differs, although both stimulate pea subhook growth.Cycloheximide (CH) inhibited the effect of GA on invertase activity, accumulation of soluble sugars, and elongation growth. Good correlations were found between invertase activity, the amount of soluble sugars and growth. The results suggest that GA-induced enhancement of sugar accumulation in the subhook cells is dependent on increased invertase activity. The sugar accumulated in the subhook may be involved in growth promotion by GA.

Notes: White fluorescent light (5 W m−2) inhibited subhook growth in derooted Alaska pea cuttings. In the inner tissue of the subhook, it inhibited the increase in osmotic potential during 18 h incubation. In the epidermis, on the other hand, light did not affect the osmotic potential. Light increased the minimum-stress relaxation time (T0) of the inner tissue cell walls, but did not change T0 of the epidermal cell wall. Light decreased tissue stress determined by the split test and the ability of the inner tissue to extend by water absorption. The short-term light effect on subhook growth. T0, and the tissue stress almost disappeared when pea cuttings were transferred to darkness. These facts suggest that light changes the mechanical properties of the cell wall in the inner tissue of shoots, and decreases tissue stress, which is considered to be the driving force of shoot growth.

Notes: The effect of gibberellic acid (GA) on subhook growth in derooted cuttings of pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) grown in the dark was studied in relation to the distribution of sugar-related compounds in the epicotyl and cotyledons. GA stimulated subhook growth of cuttings with or without cotyledons. In cuttings with cotyledons, the net inflow of sugar-related compounds (soluble sugars, starch, cell wall polysaccharides and sugars consumed by respiration) to the epicoiyl balanced with the net outflow from the cotyledons. GA stimulated the net inflow of sugar-related compounds to the epicotyl and the net outflow from cotyledons. Among these compounds, GA substantially increased the amount of soluble sugars, starch and cell wall polysaccharides in the subhook. In cuttings without cotyledons, on the other hand, the net inflow of sugar-related compounds to the subhook almost balanced with the net outflow from the epicotyl below the subhook. GA stimulated the net inflow of sugar-related compounds to the subhook and the net outflow from the epicotyl below the subhook. Among these compounds, GA substantially increased the amount of soluble sugars and cell wall polysaccharides in the subhook. These results suggest that GA stimulates an increase in the net inflow of sugar-related compounds to the subhook, thereby preventing an increase in osmotic potential and stimulating cell wall polysaccharide synthesis, when pea subhook growth is stimulated.

Notes: Jasmonic acid (JA) and its related compounds (jasmonates) applied to plant tissues exert either inhibitory or promotive effects in growth and developmental processes, which in some ways are similar to abscisic acid. However, little is known about the mode of action of the jamonates at the tissue or organ levels. Here, we review partial evidence for the physiological action of the jasmonates on cell elongation and abscission.Jasmonates inhibit the IAA-induced cell elongation of oat coleoptile segments not by affecting energy production, osmoregulation and cell wall loosening, but by inhibiting the synthesis of cell wall polysaccharides. The inhibition is partially reversed by simultaneous application of sucrose. Inhibition of IAA-induced elongation by JA is only observed in monocotyledons, not in dicotyledons. These effects suggest that jasmonates exert their inhibitory effect on cell elongation by affecting the metabolism of the cell wall polysaccharides in monocotyledons.Jasmonates promote the abscission of bean petiole explants without enhancing ethylene production. Cells in the petiole adjacent to the abscission zone expand during abscission. In the abscission zone, jasmonates decrease the amount of cellulosic but not that of noncellulosic polysaccharides. Jasmonates increase the activities of cellulase and decrease the levels of UDP-sugars, which are important intermediates for the synthesis of cell wall polysaccharides in the abscission zone, probably resulting in the decreased level of cellulose and the mechanical weakness of cell walls.Thus, it is suggested that jasmonates exert their multiple physiological effects by affecting the metabolic processes of cell wall polysaccharides.

Notes: Growth stimulation by gibberellic acid (GA) of the Alaska pea (Pisum sativum L.) subhook was observed within 6 h after its application; the stimulation being larger in cuttings with cotyledons than in decotylized ones. The osmotic potential in the subhook increased as it grew, the rate of its increase being faster in cuttings without than in cuttings with cotyledons. GA had no effect on the change in the osmotic potential until 8 h after GA application, but afterwards it suppressed the increase in cuttings with cotyledons. This GA effect was not observed in decotylized cuttings. Changes in the osmotic potential were well correlated with changes in the concentration of soluble sugars, but not with changes in amino acids and K+, Soluble sugars accumulated in the subhook of cuttings with and without cotyledons in proportion to growth, irrespective of the presence or absence of GA. Cotyledon excision suppressed sugar accumulation, and GA promoted it in cuttings with cotyledons but not in decotylized ones. These results suggest that GA stimulates the translocation of sugars from the cotyledons to the subhook and, thereby, maintains the osmotic potential low, resulting in enhanced growth.

Notes: The possible involvement of auxin in the action of gibberellin in stimulating cell elongation was examined by comparing the effects of gibberellic acid (GA) and IAA on the growth, osmoregulation and cell wall properties of the Alaska pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) subhook. Both GA and IAA stimulated cell elongation in the subhook region of derooted cuttings. Cotyledon excision decreased the stimulating effect of GA on the growth of the subhook region, but did not affect that of IAA. As the subhook region elongated, the osmotic potential of the cell sap and the total amount of osmotic solutes increased. Cotyledon excision accelerated the increase in the osmotic potential and suppressed the accumulation of osmotic solutes. In cuttings with cotyledons. GA partly counteracted the increase in the osmotic potential and substantially promoted the accumulation of osmotic solutes. On the other hand, in cuttings without cotyledons. GA did not affect the change in the osmotic potential although it slightly promoted the accumulation of osmotic solutes. IAA accelerated the increase in the osmotic potential, but did not affect the accumulation of osmotic solutes. IAA enhanced the extensibility of the cell wall, while GA did not affect it. These results suggest that at least in the Alaksa pea subhook region. GA does not stimulate cell elongation by affecting the level of auxin.