ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    ISSN: 1573-739X
    Keywords: Anticonvulsants ; Clinimetrics ; Defined daily dose ; Dose-response relationship, drug ; Drug therapy, combination ; Epilepsy ; Serum concentration
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract In order to assess whether doses or serum levels are predictive for the efficacy and adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), measures for exposure to drug combinations have to be used. For doses, the ratio of the observed prescribed daily dose (PDD) and the average defined daily dose (DDD) considered effective for the main indication of the drug was used. In analogy for serum levels, the OSL/ATL ratio,i.e. the ratio of the observed serum level and the average therapeutic level was used. In polypharmacy these ratios can be summed as they are normalized measures of strength. The correlations of these ratios with outcome measures were studied in 200 patients attending out-patient clinics of special centres for epilepsy; half of these patients were treated with monopharmacy and half with polypharmacy. As outcome measures the following indices were used: the index of seizures, which quantifies seizure type and frequency, the seizure activity index, the neurotoxicity score, the systemic toxicity score, and the composite index of impairments, which is the sum of the seizure activity index and the neurotoxicity score and the systemic toxicity score. When all data were pooled, the correlation coefficient between the PDD/DDD ratio and the OSL/ATL ratio was 0.77. However, when the data were examined separately for the monopharmacy and polypharmacy groups, the correlation was 0.31 for the monopharmacy group and 0.50 for the polypharmacy group. Neither the PDD/DDD ratio nor the OSL/ATL ratio correlated with the composite index of impairments or with any of the individual indices. Factors such as the difficulty of titrating the endpoint of seizure suppression and the development of tolerance to adverse drug effects may perhaps be responsible for these findings. This observational study signals the problem.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    ISSN: 1573-739X
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Electronic Resource
    Electronic Resource
    Springer
    Pharmacy world & science 13 (1991), S. 182-188 
    ISSN: 1573-739X
    Keywords: Anticonvulsants ; Classification ; Clinimetrics ; Drug therapy ; Drug therapy, combination ; Epidemiology ; Epilepsy ; Rating scales ; Seizures ; Side-effects
    Source: Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
    Topics: Chemistry and Pharmacology
    Notes: Abstract In order to study the practicability of rating scales in the regular care of people with epilepsy, indices have been developed and tested on their validity. These indices consist of the Index of Seizures, representing seizure activity, and the Composite Index of Impairment concerning the severity of impairment caused by the seizure type and frequency and the side-effects of anti-epileptic drug treatment. The indices have been applied in a retrospective quantitative evaluation of anti-epileptic drug therapy. The medical records of 250 randomly selected patients registered at an adult out-patient clinic have been reviewed. Their seizures have been classified as generalized tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial. The distribution of this population according to these indices has been studied, which leads us to the following conclusions: the global indices are valid for clinical application; in 18.6% of the patients studied there was severe impairment and unacceptable seizure control; combined types of seizure are difficult to control; no significant difference is demonstrated between monotherapy and polytherapy regarding the amount of neurotoxicity. The indices can be determined rapidly and therefore may become valuable aids for the physician in an out-patient clinic to support a decision whether or not to revise current anti-epileptic drug therapy.
    Type of Medium: Electronic Resource
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...