ALBERT

Description: Introduction:Patients undergoing cardiac surgery are among the most common recipients of allogenic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. However, whether restrictive RBC transfusion strategies for cardiac surgery achieve a similar clinical outcome in comparison with liberal strategies remains unclear. Methods:We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings from inception to December 2017 for all randomized trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were stroke, respiratory morbidity, renal morbidity, infections, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrhythmia, gut morbidity, reoperation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (hours), and hospital length of stay (days). We calculated the risk ratios (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) for the clinical outcomes using a random-effects model. Results:We included 9 RCTs with a total of 9,005 patients. There was no significant difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.74-1.45; P=0.86). In addition, there were no significant differences between groups in the clinical outcomes of infections (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.94-1.26; P=0.26), stroke (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.72-1.35; P=0.91), respiratory morbidity (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.89-1.24; P=0.58), renal morbidity (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.09; P=0.68), myocardial infarction (RR 1.00; 95% CI 0.80-1.24; P=0.99), cardiac arrhythmia (RR 1.05; 95% CI 0.88-1.26; P=0.56), gastrointestinal morbidity (RR 1.93; 95% CI 0.81-4.63; P=0.14), or reoperation (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.67-1.20; P=0.46). There was a significant difference in the intensive care unit length of stay (hours) (MD 4.29; 95% CI: 2.19-6.39, P

Description: Background: Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty are at high risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), such as deep-vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism. Various thromboprophylactic strategies have been studied for the prevention of VTE in this population with different outcomes. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of aspirin prophylaxis when compared with a placebo or anticoagulants in reducing such risk. Methods: A comprehensive electronic database search in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Collaboration Central Register of Controlled Trials, and conference proceedings, was conducted for all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the clinical outcomes of aspirin versus anticoagulants or placebo for the prevention of VTE after hip or knee arthroplasty. The primary outcome was VTE. Secondary outcomes were mortality, major bleeding, and any bleeding. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model at the longest follow-up. Results: We included 13 RCTs with 20115 total patients, mean age of 67.15±9.54 and a male percentage of 24.39%. Aspirin was associated with a non-significantly reduced VTE risk compared with other thromboprophylactic strategies (RR 0.87; 95% CI: 0.61-1.23; P=0.43). Compared with a placebo, aspirin was associated with significant reduction of VTE (RR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P=0.008). There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between all groups with regard to mortality (RR 0.98; 95% CI: 0.86-1.11; P=0.72), major bleeding (RR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.50-1.84; P=0.91), or any bleeding (RR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.82-1.44; P=0.56). Conclusion: Among patients who underwent hip or knee arthroplasty, aspirin prophylaxis was associated with similar efficacy and safety outcomes when compared with anticoagulants. Compared with a placebo, aspirin prophylaxis was associated with significantly reduced VTE risk and a similar safety profile. Table Table. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.