ALBERT

Description: Abstract 1689 Poster Board I-715 Introduction The use of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has demonstrated activity in multiple myeloma and lymphomas. The HDAC inhibitor romidepsin is being evaluated in CTCL and PTCL, though its activity in B-cell lymphomas is less clear. We hypothesized that the combination of bortezomib and romidepsin would result in synergistic apoptosis in different B-cell NHL cell lines based upon the observed activity of this combination in more mature B-cell malignancies such as myeloma. Experimental Design Daudi, HT, Ramos and SUDHL-4 cell lines were exposed to different concentrations of bortezomib and romidepsin, separately, concurrently, and sequentially. Cell viability was assessed using MTT-assay, induced apoptosis was evaluated using Annexin V and PI staining from 24-48 hours. Apoptosis was also evaluated using western blot analysis of caspases and PARP cleavage. LC3 and HDAC6 level expressions were performed to determine if the effect of the combination was a result of the aggresome or autophagy pathway. Cell cycle studies were also performed to study if there were any changes after treating cells with the combination. Results The combination of bortezomib and romidepsin resulted in synergistic B-cell apoptosis as measured by MTT-assay with combination indices of 〈 0.5. This was associated with increased caspases and PARP cleavage as early as 24 hours after exposure. Order of addition experiments demonstrated definite sequence specificity. When romidepsin was added first, and 6 hours later followed by bortezomib, apoptosis was enhanced, compared to both agents being given concurrently or when bortezomib was administered first. Cell cycle analysis studies demonstrated that pretreatment of cells with romidepsin for 6 hours followed by the addition of bortezomib arrested the cells in G2M phase. HDAC6 expression was significantly reduced following combination therapy, and LC3-I was cleaved to LC3-II in treated cells suggesting that the combination affected aggresome formation and autophagy. Conclusion The combination of romidepsin and bortezomib at low nanomolar concentrations suggests that this may be an important clinical combination to test in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies. Sequence of administration data is currently being tested to determine if the effect is a result of autophagy inhibition as is seen in myeloma cell lines. Additional mechanistic studies will be presented with the goals of identifying predictors of response that can then be validated in prospective clinical trials. Disclosures Lechowicz: Gloucester: Consultancy. Kaufman:Millennium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Lonial:Gloucester: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy. Flowers:Millennium: Research Funding.

Description: Carfilzomib is a selective proteasome inhibitor that binds irreversibly to its target. In phase 1 studies, carfilzomib elicited promising responses and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). In the present phase 2, multicenter, open-label study, 129 bortezomib-naive patients with R/R MM (median of 2 prior therapies) were separated into Cohort 1, scheduled to receive intravenous carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 for all treatment cycles, and Cohort 2, scheduled to receive 20 mg/m2 for cycle 1 and then 27 mg/m2 for all subsequent cycles. The primary end point was an overall response rate (≥ partial response) of 42.4% in Cohort 1 and 52.2% in Cohort 2. The clinical benefit response (overall response rate + minimal response) was 59.3% and 64.2% in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. Median duration of response was 13.1 months and not reached, and median time to progression was 8.3 months and not reached, respectively. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were fatigue (62.0%) and nausea (48.8%). Single-agent carfilzomib elicited a low incidence of peripheral neuropathy—17.1% overall (1 grade 3; no grade 4)—in these pretreated bortezomib-naive patients. The results of the present study support the use of carfilzomib in R/R MM patients. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00530816.

Description: Background: Bortezomib-containing combination chemotherapy regimens are effective in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), although there are limited data on toxicity in the front-line setting for indolent NHL when combined with reduced-dose vincristine-containing chemotherapy. Our group (Sinha et al, Cancer 2012) reported outcomes from a phase I study of bortezomib combined with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, modified vincristine, and prednisone (VR-CHOP) and found a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of bortezomib (V) of 1.6mg/m2 with vincristine capped at 1.5 mg with an overall response rate (ORR) of 100%. Herein we report the results of our phase II study of this regimen. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients had untreated indolent NHL (small lymphocytic lymphoma [SLL], marginal zone lymphoma [MZL], or follicular lymphoma [FL] grades 1-3) meeting standard criteria for treatment or with FL international prognostic index (FLIPI) ≥3. Patients received V administered at a dose of 1.6mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 as well as rituximab (R) 375mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750mg/m2, doxorubicin 50mg/m2, and vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (capped at 1.5mg/dose) on day 1 and prednisone 100mg on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. Patients received at least 6 cycles and up to 8 cycles of therapy at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients who achieved a complete response (CR) after induction were assigned to receive maintenance R 375mg/m2 every 12 weeks for 2 years while patients with a partial response (PR) or stable disease received R 375mg/m2 along with V 1.6mg/m2 (VR), both administered weekly for 4 weeks every 6 months for up to 2 years. Response was assessed by Cheson 1999 criteria, and toxicity assessed by CTCAE version 3.0. One FL patient discontinued study therapy after cycle 2 when a central pathology review revised the diagnosis to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. This patient was not included in the efficacy analysis but is included in the safety reports. CR rate and ORR were determined at the conclusion of induction therapy, and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method from the date of study entry. Results: Thirty patients received at least 1 treatment of VR-CHOP, including 16 males and 14 females. The median age was 58 (range: 31-71), and histologies included MZL (n=5), SLL (n=4), and FL (Grade 1, n=7; Grade 2, n=12; Grade 3, n=2). FLIPI score for patients with FL were 1 (n=2), 2 (n=4), 3 (n=12), and 4 (n=3). Twenty-nine were evaluable for response, including 19 patients with CR and 10 patients with PR at the conclusion of induction therapy (CR rate of 66%; ORR of 100%). For 20 evaluable patients with FL, the CR rate was 75%. Twenty-five patients proceeded with maintenance therapy, including 6 patients who received VR and 19 patients who received R alone. Three patients with PR to induction converted to CR after maintenance with VR. Four patients received no maintenance due to refusal/lost to follow-up (n=2), toxicity (n=1), and progression (n=1). Three patients with PR received only R due to neuropathy. Four patients have relapsed or progressed on therapy, including 1 patient prior to starting maintenance, 2 patients during VR maintenance, and 1 patient who achieved a PR but was receiving R maintenance. One additional patient progressed after completing R maintenance. With a median follow-up of 39 months, 3-year PFS rate is 85.8%, and the 3-year OS rate is 96.4% (Figure). Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy was noted in 2 patients (7%), while grade 1-2 neuropathy occurred in 17 patients (57%). Grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities included neutropenia (n=14, 47%), thrombocytopenia (n=3, 10%), anemia (n=1, 3%), and febrile neutropenia (n=1, 3%). Eight patients experienced additional grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities, including the following which occurred in more than 1 patient: vomiting (n=3, 10%), abdominal pain (n=2, 7%), fatigue (n=2, 7%), hyperglycemia (n=2, 7%), hypokalemia (n=2, 7%), and nausea (n=2, 7%). Conclusion: VR-CHOP is highly efficacious in the front-line setting for management of patients with untreated indolent NHL, and toxicities are expected and manageable. Incidence of grade 3 peripheral neuropathy is low with incorporation of a decreased dose of vincristine, and the PFS compares favorably with previously reported outcomes in FL and indolent NHL for R-CHOP, R-Bendamustine, and R-CHOP plus maintenance R. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Cohen: Janssen: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bortezomib is not currently approved for follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, or small lymphocytic lymphoma and is being evaluated in combination with a standard induction regimen.. Kaufman:Millennium: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Nastoupil:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; Janssen: Research Funding. Lechowicz:Millennium: Consultancy. Lonial:Millennium, Celgene, Novartis, BMS, Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Flowers:Gilead, Spectrum, Millennium, Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene, Prescription Solutions, Seattle Genetics, Millennium (unpaid), Genentech (unpaid) : Consultancy.

Description: Introduction: Oprozomib is a selective oral tripeptide epoxyketone inhibitor of the chymotrypsin-like subunit of the constitutive proteasome and immunoproteasome. This phase 1b study evaluated the safety and tolerability of two new formulations of oprozomib in combination with dexamethasone (Odex) or pomalidomide and dexamethasone (OPomD) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Methods: Adult patients with RRMM who had received at least 2 prior lines of therapy and whose prior treatment included both lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible for inclusion. Patients received either immediate-release (IR) or extended-release gastroretentive (GR) oprozomib, orally, in combination with dexamethasone (20 mg) alone or pomalidomide (4 mg) and dexamethasone (20 mg) in 4-week cycles. Oprozomib was given according to a 2/7 schedule on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 of each 4-week cycle. In part 1 of the study, patients received Odex with either IR oprozomib at 150 mg/day or GR oprozomib at 150 mg/day. In part 2 of the study, patients received OPomD at increasing dose levels. Dosing for the IR formulation began at 150 mg/day and could be increased to 300 mg/day in increments of 25 mg as needed; at least one cohort could be enrolled at each dose level of oprozomib. Dosing for the GR formulation was determined based on the efficacy and safety data observed in the initial IR dose escalation and was at least one dose level lower than the highest dose tested of the IR formulation. The primary objectives of the study were to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate the safety and tolerability of the OPomD formulations. Results: Overall, 34 patients were assessed at the time of this analysis. Baseline patient demographics and disease characteristics are shown in Table 1. Fourteen patients (41%) received prior carfilzomib, and 10 of these were carfilzomib-refractory; 27 patients (79%) received prior bortezomib and 14 were bortezomib-refractory. Patients were enrolled into 6 cohorts and received either IR 150 mg/day (n=5) or GR 150 mg/day (n=8) Odex, or IR 150 mg/day (n=4), IR 200 mg/day (n=8), IR 225 mg/day (n=5), or GR 150 mg/day (n=4) OPomD. Median (interquartile range) number of cycles of oprozomib received for each cohort was 2.0 (1.0-11.0), 3.5 (1.5-4.0), 6.5 (2.5-9.5), 4.5 (3.0-5.5), 1.0 (1.0-1.0), and 2.0 (1.5-2.0), respectively. Three patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities (IR 150 mg/day OPomD, increased lipase; IR 200 mg/day OPomD, acute kidney injury; GR 150 mg/day OPomD, febrile neutropenia). At the time of this analysis the MTD was not yet reached for either the IR or GR formulation. Most patients (97%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) and 23 (68%) experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent grade ≥3 AE. AEs that occurred in ≥50% of patients in any cohort are listed in Table 2; the most common overall were nausea (62% any grade; 3% grade ≥3), diarrhea (50% any grade; 6% grade ≥3), and vomiting (47% any grade; 6% grade ≥3). Four patients (12%) experienced treatment-emergent AEs leading to discontinuation of study drug; no fatal AEs occurred. Seven patients who received OPomD had an objective response at the time of this analysis (IR 150 mg/day, n=1 [33%], median duration of response [DOR]=169 days; IR 200 mg/day, n=6 [67%], median DOR=86.5 days; DOR assessments ongoing). Of the seven patients with an objective response, six had a partial response (IR 150 mg/day and IR 200 mg/day) and one had a very good partial response (IR 200 mg/day). Progression-free survival data were not yet mature. In total, 16 of 34 patients continue to receive oprozomib therapy. The results reported are based on preliminary data available at the time of analysis. The study is ongoing and updated results will be provided at the meeting. Conclusion: Results from this study showed that treatment with OPomD had manageable toxicity in patients with RRMM. The most common AEs observed were gastrointestinal disorders, and most of these were grade 1-2 with no gastrointestinal bleeding reported. Furthermore, OPomD therapy showed promising efficacy, with an objective response rate of 67% for patients in the IR 200-mg/day cohort. Disclosures Hari: Sanofi: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding. Schroeder:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berenson:Amgen Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Jakubowiak:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kaufman:BMS: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Other: data monitoring committee; Janssen: Consultancy. Voorhees:Amgen Inc.: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: served on an IRC; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; TeneoBio: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: served on an IRC; Novartis: Consultancy, Other: served on an IRC. Fujii:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yang:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Galimi:Amgen Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Description: Abstract 336 Background: The combination of lenalidomide (R), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (D) (RVD) in newly diagnosed MM patients is well tolerated and associated with a very high overall response rate (Richardson et al, Blood 2010; Kumar et al, Blood 2012). The addition of a novel targeted agent to RVD may improve depth of response as reflected by an increase in complete remission (CR) rate. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that vorinostat (Vor), a histone deacetylase inhibitor, is synergistic with bortezomib, immunomodulatory compounds and dexamethasone. Clinical studies in the relapsed setting using either bortezomib or lenalidomide with vorinostat have yielded promising results with manageable toxicity. The aim of this study was to determine the tolerability and activity of the combination of RVD with vorinostat in newly diagnosed patients with symptomatic MM. Methods: Patients (pts) received the classical RVD regimen (lenalidomide 25 mg days 1–14, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1, 4, 8, 11 and dexamethasone 20/10 mg PO [cycles 1–4/5–8] days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12 for up to 8 21 day cycles) combined with oral vorinostat (Vor), provided by Merck and Co. Inc., at 100, 200, 300 or 400 mg daily days 1 – 14 of each cycle. Pts were assigned to one of the four dosing cohorts according to the Bayesian Escalation with Overdose Control (EWOC) algorithm. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (Grade (G) 3 non hematologic toxicity, G4 hematologic toxicities defined as G4 thrombocytopenia of any duration; failure of recovery of neutrophils to 1,000/μL or platelets to 50,000/μL within 14 days of the last treatment; or inability to receive Day 1 dose for Cycle 2 due to continued drug-related toxicity from cycle 1) was determined in the first cycle of therapy. Toxicities were assessed and graded for all cycles using the NCI CTCAE v 3.0. Responses were assessed by modified European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Uniform Criteria. Pts with partial remission (PR) or better could proceed to autologous transplant after 4 cycles. After completion of 8 cycles, patients could continue maintenance with lenalidomide +/− bortezomib, with Vor not administered during maintenance therapy. Results: Thirty pts (median age 56 years [range 40–76], 63% men) were enrolled with 4 pts in cohort 1 (Vor 100mg), 15 pts in cohort 2 (Vor 200mg), 8 pts in cohort 3 (Vor 300 mg) and 3 pts in cohort 4 (Vor 400mg). The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 200 mg Vor with RVD. Including maintenance, the median number of cycles completed was 4 (range

Description: Abstract 2947 Poster Board II-923 Introduction: DLBCL occasionally presents in leukemic phase, and the prognostic significance of circulating lymphoma cells is unknown. We herein report characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed DLBCL presenting in leukemic phase at 2 Institutions. Methods: Flow cytometry database analysis and retrospective chart reviews were carried out with IRB-approval for cases accrued between 2001 and 2008. Leukemic phase DLBCL patients were matched on a 3:1 basis with control DLBCL with no circulating lymphoma cells based on IPI, year of diagnosis, and age ± 10 years. Results: 18 patients, median age 48 years (range 34-80), ECOG PS-1 (22%), 2(38%) and 3(40%), and IPI - 3(56%), 4(40%) and 5(4%) presented in leukemic phase. Extranodal sites included bone marrow (100%), spleen (83%), pleura (61%) and CSF (22%). 61% had B symptoms, and LDH was 6xULN (range, 1-56). WBC was 13,000/microL (range, 7,100-127,400), with 50% lymphoma cells (range, 2-92); these cells were immunophenotypically similar to those in the histologically confirmed DLBCL node, and co-expressed CD19, CD20, CD22, CD38, CD45, HLA-DR and FMC7 in 〉90% of cases, and kappa or lambda light chain restriction in 〉 50%. Karyotype was abnormal and complex in 61%. One patient expired before treatment began. Treatment consisted of R-CHOP (10), R-HCVAD (6), and single agent rituximab (1). 8 (44%) achieved CR (5 R-HCVAD and 3 R-CHOP), 5 (28%) PR, and 4 (22%) had resistant disease. 1 patient was autografted in CR1 and remains in remission. With a median follow-up of 32 months, 2 relapsed in leukemic phase, 1 of whom achieved CR2, but relapsed at the time of conditioning for a consolidative allograft. 10 (56%) patients died from progressive disease, 2 (11%) were lost to follow-up and 6 (33%) remain alive in remission. Overall (Panel A) and progression-free (Panel B) survival curves the 18 leukemic (solid line) and 54 non-leukemic phase (dashed line) DLBCL are depicted in the Figure. Conclusion: DLBCL presenting with circulating lymphoma cells is associated with chemo-resistance (44% CR) and poor outcomes with the exception of those who achieve complete remission. These patients are candidates for alternative therapies. Disclosures: Kaufman: Millenium: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Lonial:Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Gloucester: Research Funding. Armitage:Eisa: Consultancy; Allo: Consultancy; Ziopharm: Consultancy.

Description: Abstract 1860 Background: ARRY-520 is a potent, selective inhibitor of kinesin spindle protein (KSP, eg5) which is required for cell cycle progression through mitosis. Treatment with ARRY-520 arrests cells in mitosis with subsequent induction of apoptosis due to degradation of survival signals during mitotic arrest. Cancers, such as multiple myeloma (MM), that depend on the short-lived survival protein Myeloid cell leukemia (MCL)-1 are highly sensitive to treatment with ARRY-520 in preclinical MM models, providing a strong rationale for its clinical investigation in this disease. Methods: This Phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary efficacy and biological activity of ARRY-520 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks without/with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Eligible patients (pts) had relapsed or refractory MM with ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy (including both bortezomib [BTZ] and an immunomodulatory [IMiD] agent), unless refusing or ineligible for this therapy. Cohorts were enrolled in a classical 3+3 dose escalation design. Results: Enrollment in this Phase 1 study is complete. Thirty-one pts have been treated, with a median age of 60 years (range 43–79) and a median of 6 prior regimens (range 2–16). All pts received a prior proteasome inhibitor (30 pts BTZ, 4 pts carfilzomib) and an IMiD-based agent (28 pts lenalidomide, 23 pts thalidomide). Twenty-four pts had an autologous stem cell transplant. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined to be 1.25 mg/m2/day without G-CSF. As neutropenia was the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), dose escalation with G-CSF support was conducted and the MTD for ARRY-520 with G-CSF was determined to be 1.5 mg/m2/day. At the MTD, 1 of 7 pts had a DLT of febrile neutropenia. At doses above the MTD, additional DLTs of Grade 3 mucositis and Grade 3 corneal disorder were observed. ARRY-520 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events (AEs) included hematologic events (anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia), as well as anorexia, blurred vision, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, febrile neutropenia, mucositis, nausea and rash. No treatment-related AEs of neuropathy or alopecia were reported at the MTD. ARRY-520 has been dosed over extended periods of time (to date, median 7 cycles [range 1–44]), with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The plasma concentrations of ARRY-520 were determined over a 7-day period during Cycle 1 following the Day 1 and 2 infusions of ARRY-520. The preliminary noncompartmental PK parameter estimates in this population were similar to those observed in prior oncology studies. The PK was characterized by low clearance (CL = 2.2 L/hr/m2) and a large volume of distribution (Vss = 232 L/m2). The t1/2 of elimination was very long (67 hrs). Concentrations were typically maintained above the in vitro IC50 for KSP inhibition for ≥ 7 days suggesting therapeutically active concentrations of drug were maintained in pts for sustained periods. Further analyses of PK relative to safety and activity are on-going. ARRY-520 showed activity as a single agent across a range of doses in this heavily pretreated population (31 evaluable pts) with 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 confirmed minimal response (MR) per International Melanoma Working Group (IMWG) and European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EMBT) criteria. PRs had a median of 7 prior therapies (range 2–8). Responses were durable; to date, the durations of responses for PRs were 3.4+ months (mos), 11.9+ mos and 12.0 mos, respectively. Of interest, the time to response with ARRY-520 was prolonged, with a median time to PR of 3.7 mos (range 3.7–8.1). Notably, responses were observed in pts refractory to multiple standard-of-care agents. In addition, 4 pts experienced a best response of stable disease (SD) lasting ≥ 10 mos. To date, 5 pts remain on study, including 2 of 3 PRs. Conclusions: In this Phase 1 study, ARRY-520 shows promising evidence of clinical activity, with a long duration of response and an acceptable safety profile in heavily pretreated MM Patients. A Phase 2 portion of the study is ongoing to obtain additional information on the efficacy, safety and biological effects of ARRY-520 at 1.5 mg/m2/day with G-CSF support. Disclosures: Shah: Array BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: ARRY-520. Zonder:Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Medtronics: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Millenium: Consultancy, Honoraria; Onyx: Consultancy, Honoraria. Orlowski:Array BioPharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alexanian:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Thomas:Array BioPharma: Research Funding; Centecor: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Immunomedics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding. Weber:Array BioPharma: Research Funding. Kaufman:Keryx: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Walker:Array BioPharma: Employment, Equity Ownership. Litwiler:Array BioPharma: Employment. Karan:Array BioPharma: Employment. Hilder:a: Employment. Ptaszynski:Array BioPharma Inc.: Consultancy. Lonial:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy.

Description: Background Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a hematological malignancy that affects 1500 people each year in the United States. Due to lack of literature on era comparative population-based analysis, we have analyzed Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) data to evaluate the changes in incidence and survival patterns in the new millennium where modern therapeutic agents such as rituximab, immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors were offered to WM patients; in contrast to the earlier period when they were non-existent. Methods The SEER 18 registry which includes data from 1973-2010 from 18 geographic areas including 28% of US representative population was used in analysis. ICD-O-3 code 9761 was used for identifying patients for this analysis. SEER* Stat 8.0.4 is used to calculate age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates based on race, gender, and age for patients. Age adjusted rates were used in this anlaysis to avoid confounding variables when comparing rates over time. Results We have included 4304 patients in the analysis (1244 patients diagnosed before 2000 and 3060 patients after 2000). The incidence rate of WM increased with age. The 10 year cumulative incidence rate per 100,000 by age stratification (80) are 0.02%, 0.40%, 1.01%, 2.14% and 2.98% respectively. Over the last decade the trend of incidence rate in WM has been steadily decreasing across all age groups (Figure 1). Median survival for all WM patients is 74 months (m) (70.2-77.8). Significant survival improvement was seen in the current era (median survival ≥2000 vs.

Description: Abstract 1628 Introduction: Historically, relapsed DLBCL and HL has been associated with a high cure rate with salvage regimens followed by high dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplant (ASCT). However, patients (pts) who relapse early following upfront chemotherapy and pts who fail to respond to salvage have a poor overall response rate (ORR) with additional salvage regimens and a poor prognosis even when consolidated with ASCT (von Tresckow & Engert, 2011; Gisselbrecht et al., 2010). At present there is no standard therapy in the third-line setting for pts with DLBCL and HL. We designed a regimen: vinorelbine (30mg/m2) & paclitaxel (175mg/m2) given on day 1; etoposide (100mg/m2) & cisplatin (20mg/m2) given on days 2–5; and cytarabine (2000mg/m2) on days 4 and 5 (VTEPA) for treatment of lymphoma pts with 1° refractory disease or relapse following salvage. In phase 1, VTEPA was safe with a 33% ORR following 1 cycle (Lonial et al, 2006). Design and Methods: To examine the effectiveness of VTEPA, we conducted an IRB approved retrospective review of consecutive cases of relapsed/refractory DLBCL and HL identified from our database from 1999–2011. All pts had evidence of primary refractory disease or stable or progressive disease following first line salvage therapy. Responses following salvage VTEPA were retrospectively assessed using International Working Group Criteria (JCO 1999) for all pts. Responding pts proceeded to ASCT. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: 74 pts (44 DLBCL and 30 HL) with a median age at diagnosis of 30 years (range 18–63) for HL and 49 years (range 20–68) for DLBCL were included. 67% of HL pts had primary refractory disease and 33% of pts had relapsed disease; 60% were stage III/IV at diagnosis. 75% of DLBCL pts had primary refractory disease and 25% of pts had relapsed disease; 73% stage III/IV. Pts received a median of 2 prior therapies (range 1–4). 63% pts with HL received prior salvage therapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) and 13% with other regimens. 16 pts with HL received 1 cycle of VTEPA, 13 received 2 cycles and 1 pt received 3 cycles of VTEPA. 70% pts with DLBCL had received prior salvage therapy with rituximab (R) + ICE and 16% received other salvage regimens. 32 pts with DLBCL received 1 cycle of R-VTEPA and 12 pts received 2 cycles. The most common reported grade 3/4 toxicities were pancytopenia (97%), nausea/vomiting (58%), fatigue (30%), infectious complications (26%), diarrhea (24%), electrolyte imbalance (19%), and mucositis (16%). 70 pts (43 DLBCL and 27 HL) were evaluable for response. The ORR for DLBCL pts was 44% (9% CR and 35% PR) while that for HL pts was 70% (26% CR and 44% PR, p=0.04). 4 DLBCL pts had treatment related mortality. 34 pts went on to collect ≥2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; 3 pts had inadequate stem cell collection. In 23 pts collection was not attempted, and 14 pts collected stem cells prior to R+/−VTEPA. 37 pts (47%) went onto planned ASCT, and 4 pts underwent allogeneic transplantation. The PFS at 2 years for pts with HL was 68% vs. 49% for pts with DLBCL (p

Description: Abstract 74 Background: Carfilzomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor (PI), and pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), have both demonstrated promising activity as single agents or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. IMiD+PI combinations including lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide, carfilzomib, dexamethasone have had high response rates and good tolerability. We aimed to combine carfilzomib and pomalidomide with dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) for the first time and hypothesized that this regimen would be highly active in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report the first findings from the Phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions of the first phase I/II trial of Car-Pom-d in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (NCT01464034). Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of Car-Pom-d. Secondary objectives included determination of overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival, and time to next therapy. All patients had to be refractory to prior lenalidomide, and must have been relapsed/refractory to their most recent therapy. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of oral pomalidomide once daily on days 1–21, intravenous (IV) carfilzomib over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, and oral or IV dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Dose-escalation of carfilzomib started with 27mg/m2 carfilzomib/4mg pomalidomide/40 mg dexamethasone using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Carfilzomib was initiated at 20 mg/m2for Cycle 1, days 1–2 at all dose levels. Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose of dexamethasone at any point based on their discretion. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: In the Phase I dose-escalation portion of the trial, a total of 12 patients were enrolled from 6 centers. The median age was 61 years (range 44–78), 67% were male. The median number of prior regimens was 6 (range 2–15), and median time from diagnosis was 5.1 years. Four (33%) patients had prior stem cell transplant, 11 (92%) had prior bortezomib, and all were lenalidomide-refractory. Cytogenetic abnormalities included 5 patients with del(17p), 2 patients with t(4;14), and 1 patient each with del(13), t(11;14), and t(14;16). In these first 12 patients, drug-related AEs occurring in 〉20% of patients included fatigue (42%), anemia (33%), pneumonia (33%), dyspnea (25%), and thrombocytopenia (25%). Six (50%) patients experienced grade ≥3 AEs including 2 incidence each of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The MTD was established as the starting dose level (carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4mg, dexamethasone 40 mg). At this dose, 1 of 6 patients experienced a protocol-defined DLT of febrile neutropenia. At dose level 2 (carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4 mg, dexamethasone 40 mg), 2 of 6 patients experienced DLTs, consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 rash. All 12 patients were response evaluable with 2 very good partial response (VGPR), 4 partial response (PR), 2 minor response (MR), 2 stable disease (SD), and 2 progressive disease (PD) for a ≥ MR rate of 67%. The 6 month progression free survival was 70% (95% CI: 37 to 90%). Of the 5 patients with del(17p), 1 achieved VGPR, 2 achieved PR, 1 achieved SD. We then enrolled an expansion cohort of 20 patients from 8 centers resulting in a total study population of 32 patients, with 25 still receiving treatment. Three patients have died, all from progressive multiple myeloma. Early response assessments in 27 out of 32 patients show 2 VGPR, 7 PR, 6 MR, 8 SD, and 4 PD for a ≥MR rate of 56%. Conclusions: The Car-Pom-d regimen is well tolerated and achieves a high response rate in a heavily pre-treated, lenalidomide-refractory population with prior bortezomib exposure. Importantly, we have seen responses in patients with poor risk cytogenetics, specifically del (17p). We are beginning enrollment in a larger phase 2 cohort, and updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Array: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Abonour:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cohen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vogl:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.