ALBERT

Description: Purpose: Drug resistance is the greatest obstacle to the successful treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated whether the clinical XPO1 inhibitor selinexor (KPT-330), when combined with bortezomib or carfilzomib, could overcome proteasome inhibitor (PI) resistance in myeloma. Experimental Design: PI-resistant human MM cell lines 8226-B25 and U266-PSR were treated with the XPO1 inhibitors selinexor or KOS-2464 in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib and assayed for apoptosis and viability. Mice challenged with PI-resistant human MM cells (U266-PSR) were treated with selinexor +/- bortezomib. CD138+/light-chain+ MM cells from PI-refractory MM patients were treated with selinexor +/- bortezomib or selinexor +/- carfilzomib and assayed for apoptosis. All experiments were compared to the standard of care, bortezomib therapy. IkBα-protein was assayed by Western blot and immunofluorescence microscopy and IkBα-NFkB-complex formation by proximity ligation assay. IkBα protein knockdown in human MM cells by siRNA was performed to determine the mechanism of selinexor inhibitor action. Further analysis of selinexor/bortezomib treatment on intra-cellular protein levels and intra-cellular localization was performed by lysine and N-terminal labeling with six-plex tandem mass tags (heavy isotope) and assayed by LC-MS/MS discovery proteomics. Results: Selinexor in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib decreased viability and induced apoptosis in PI-resistant MM cells. Resistant MM cell lines were up to 10-fold resistant to single agent bortezomib or carfilzomib when compared to parental cells. The combination of the XPO1 inhibitors selinexor or KOS-2464 sensitized drug resistant cells to bortezomib (P 〈 0.02) and carfilzomib (P 〈 0.005) when compared to single agents. Selinexor and bortezomib inhibited PI-resistant MM tumor growth and increased survival with minimal toxicity in NOD/SCID-g mice. Bone marrow mononuclear cells isolated and treated with selinexor or KOS-2464 and bortezomib or carfilzomib from newly diagnosed (n=8), relapsed (n=5), and bortezomib (n=8) and carfilzomib (n=6) refractory MM patient samples were all sensitized by selinexor and KOS-2464 to bortezomib (P 〈 0.043) and carfilzomib (P 〈 0.044) as shown by increased apoptosis. Normal, non-myeloma CD138/light-chain double-negative patient cells were not sensitized to apoptosis by XPO1 inhibitors. Immunofluorescence microscopy of IkBα in 8226-B25 PI-resistant cells showed an increase in IkBα after treatment with selinexor/bortezomib as compared with vehicle control or single agent bortezomib or selinexor. Nuclear IκBα was also increased by selinexor treatment. IkBα protein expression was increased by bortezomib (70%) and selinexor (50%) versus control. The selinexor/bortezomib combination increased IkBα protein (212%) as compared to vehicle control or single agent bortezomib or selinexor. Similar results were found in drug-naïve 8226 and U226 cells, as well as PI-resistant 8226-B25 and U225-PSR cells. The increase in nuclear IkBα after selinexor treatment was confirmed by ImageStream flow cytometry. Selinexor/bortezomib therapy significantly increased IkBα-NFkB-complexes in PI-resistant MM cells. Selinexor in combination with bortezomib increased proximity co-localization of NFkB and IkBα without affecting XPO1 protein expression after 4 hours of drug treatment. Analysis of the number of NFkB-IkBα foci/binding showed that selinexor/bortezomib increased the number of foci in the nucleus versus untreated control or single agent selinexor or bortezomib (P ≤ 0.00077). IkBα knockdown reduced selinexor-induced cytotoxicity in both IM-9 (9.5-fold) and 8226 (12.3 to 25.4-fold) human MM cells. Intracellular protein analysis by heavy isotope labeling and LC-MS/MS showed changes in several signaling pathways including p53, MAPK, VEGF and angiopoietin, IL-1, HMGB1/TLR and APRIL and BAFF as well as those related to NFkB signaling. Conclusion: Selinexor, when used in combination with bortezomib or carfilzomib has the potential to overcome PI drug resistance in MM. Disclosures Kashyap: Pharma: Employment. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Description: Introduction: Exportin 1 (XPO1) is a well characterized and essential nucleo-cytoplasmic transport protein in the karyopherin family, and is responsible for the nuclear export of over 200 cargo proteins, including the major tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) p53, p21, FOXO and the translation regulator elF4E. XPO1 is overexpressed in numerous cancer types including solid and hematological malignancies, often correlating with poor prognosis. Recently, a novel class of Selective Inhibitors of Nuclear Export (SINE) compounds, selinexor (KPT-330) and the second generation KPT-8602, have been developed for the treatment of advanced cancers. We have previously shown that selinexor has marked activity in AML and DLBCL pre-clinical models. The BCL-2 family of anti-apoptotic proteins are deregulated and linked to maintenance and survival in AML and DLBCL. For its translation, the mRNA for BCL-2 is transported from the nucleus to the cytoplasm by forming a complex with XPO1 cargo, elF4E. Other important mRNAs exported from the nucleus via this mechanism include BCL6 and MYC. We hypothesize that SINE compounds inhibit XPO1/elF4E-mediated nuclear-cytoplasmic transport by covalently binding to the XPO1 cargo binding site and that in the absence of protein translation, BCL-2, BCL6 and MYC levels rapidly decline. Venetoclax (VEN; ABT-199) is a potent, selective inhibitor of BCL-2. In vitro, AML cells acquire resistance to VEN over time, often due to up-regulation of another BCL-2 family anti-apoptotic protein, MCL-1. MCL-1 is regulated by the anti-apoptotic transcription factor and XPO1 cargo NF-kB. We have previously shown that SINE compounds significantly decreased MCL-1 levels, presumably via inactivation of NF-kB. The goal of this study was to test whether SINE compounds will synergize with VEN via BCL-2 modulation and whether the combination would diminish MCL-1 mediated resistance to BCL-2 inhibition in DLBCL and AML models, respectively. Methods: BH3 profiling was performed in a sample of cell lines using a cytochrome c release assay to identify anti-apoptotic dependencies. The effects of SINE compounds and VEN as single agents or in combination on cell viability were performed in AML (K-562, MOLM-13, MV-4-11, and U-937) and DLBCL cell lines (SU-DHL-6, DoHH-2 and Toledo). Whole cell protein lysates were extracted 24 hours after treatment for immunoblot analysis. The activity of SINE compounds (5 mg/kg) and VEN (25 mg/kg) as single agents, or in combination were measured in AML (MV-4-11) and DLBCL (DoHH-2 and Toledo) xenografts in NSGS and nude mice, respectively. Tumor growth and survival were measured throughout these animal studies. Tumor tissue was collected at the end of treatment for flow cytometric analysis, western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: By employing BH3 profiling, we identified AML cell lines that were dependent (MV-4-11 and MOLM-13) and not dependent (U-937 and K-562) on MCL-1. Dose response analysis demonstrated that each of the AML cell lines was sensitive to the SINE compounds, while VEN only reduced viability in the MV-4-11 and MOLM-13 cells. Additionally, there was enhanced growth inhibition when the SINE compounds were combined with VEN in the MCL-1 dependent cells. SINE compound treatment synergistically decreased c-MYC protein levels in all 4 AML cell lines with the combination treatment (Figure 1), whereas PARP cleavage was only enhanced with the combination in the MV-4-11 and MOLM-13 cells. Likewise, MCL-1 is reduced in the presence of SINE compound or SINE compound-VEN combinations. In DLBCL xenograft studies (DoHH-2 and Toledo), combination of selinexor with VEN was synergistic for tumor reduction and increased animal survival when compared to either single agent alone. By IHC we observed a concomitant reduction in BCL-2 and BCL-6 and an increase in cleaved caspase 3 in DLBCL tumors after combination treatment. Conclusions: SINE compound-VEN combinations show enhanced antitumor effect, with reduction of oncogenic activity. SINE compounds reduce MCL-1 in VEN-resistant cells. As MCL-1 driven anti-apoptotic machinery is responsible for resistance to inhibition of BCL-2 in DLBCL and AML, SINE compound regulation of MCL-1 may lead to rescue of VEN resistance. SINE compounds and VEN are excellent candidate partners for combination therapies in AML and DLBCL. Disclosures Friedlander: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Chang:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Argueta:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Klebanov:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Baloglu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lee:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Savona:TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Amgen Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Sunesis: Research Funding; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Introduction: The nuclear export protein exportin 1, (XPO1) is overexpressed in a wide variety of cancers including MM and often correlate with poor prognosis. Selinexor (KPT-330) is an oral Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) XPO1 antagonist in Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies. Selinexor forces nuclear retention and reactivation of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) and reduction of many proto-oncogenes, including MDM2, MYC and Cyclin D. In addition, selinexor potently deactivates NF-κB, through forced nuclear retention of IκBα. Together these effects induce selective apoptosis in MM cells and inhibition of NF-κB dependent osteoclast activation. XPO1 is also responsible for nuclear export of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). We hypothesized that selinexor will enhance the activity of dexamethasone (DEX)-bound GR, resulting in synergistic tumor cell killing. Methods: In vitro tumor cell viability measurements were based on MTT (CellTiter 96¨/Promega) and combination indices were calculated using CalcuSyn software. For xenograft studies, utilized NOD-SCID mice with subcutaneous inoculation of MM.1s cells. GR nuclear localization was measured with immunofluorescent anti-GR (phosphor-S211) antibody and quantitative imaging. To assess GR transcriptional activation, GR binding to a GCR consensus sequence was measured in nuclear extracts using an ELISA method (GR ELISA kit/Affymetrix). Patients (pts) with heavily pretreated refractory MM were dosed with oral selinexor at doses of up to 60 mg/m2 (8-10 doses/4 wk cycle) as part of a Phase 1 program in advanced hematological malignancies. Response we defined based on the IMWG criteria. The effect of combining DEX with selinexor was analyzed in all pts who received selinexor at moderate to high doses (30-60 mg/m2). Safety and efficacy were analyzed separately in three groups: no DEX,

Description: Background: SINE compounds are a family of small-molecule drugs that inhibit XPO1 mediated nuclear export, resulting in nuclear retention of major tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs) such as p53, FOXO, pRB and IκB and subsequently in specific cancer cell death. Selinexor is a clinical stage SINE compound currently in human phase I/II clinical trials in patients with solid and hematological malignancies. Glucocorticoid Receptor (GR) is an XPO1 cargo and dexamethasone (Dex) acts as a GR agonist and inhibits NFκB activity. The combination of selinexor with Dex (Sel-Dex) shows enhanced anti-tumor potency in vitro and in vivo. The current study aimed at deciphering the molecular changes that contribute to the synergism of Sel-Dex. Methods: Total RNA and whole protein cell lysates from MM cell lines treated with selinexor with or without dexamethasone were analyzed by quantitative PCR and by immunoblots. Localization of GR was evaluated by immunofluorescence microscopy. GR and NFκB transcriptional activity was analyzed using ELISA assays (Affimetrix and Thermo Scientific). RNA from naïve and drug treated cells was analyzed by deep sequencing (by Asuragen). Results: Dexamethasone, but not selinexor, induced phosphorylation of GR. Selinexor blocked nuclear export of phosphorylated GR, enhancing GR transcriptional activation. Deep sequencing revealed a set of genes, whose level of expression was synergistically modified by Sel-Dex. Those genes belong to several pathways including GPCR signaling, cell metabolism and ERK, TGF-β and PI3-AKT signaling. Among the genes that were synergistically up regulated by the combination were genes from the Early Growth Response family (EGR1, EGR3, EGR4). EGR1 is a tumor suppressor protein which down-regulates survivin and triggers Caspase signaling and cell death. Interestingly, EGR1 also mediates the cytotoxic effects of bortezomib and lenalidomide in multiple myeloma cells. The Glucocorticoid-Induced Leucine Zipper (GILZ) gene was also up regulated by Sel-Dex combination. It has been shown by others that silencing GILZ expression decreased the therapeutic effects of dexamethasone in multiple myeloma. Conclusions: Selinexor increased the nuclear retention of dexamethasone-activated-GR. The increased GR transcriptional activity induces expression of genes across different pathways leading to inhibition of cell proliferation and increase cancer cell death. We are currently testing the function of several of these genes in the context of Sel-Dex combination. The current finding supports the the previously reported anti cancer activity of Sel-Dex combination in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Disclosures Kashyap: Pharma: Employment. Klebanov:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Lee:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment.

Description: Background Selinexor (KPT-330), a selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) Exportin 1 (XPO1, CRM1) antagonist, has shown potent activity against solid and hematological malignancies in phase 1 clinical trials. Inactivation of XPO1 by selinexor results in accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins in the nucleus and activation of cell cycle checkpoints. This leads to transient cell cycle arrest in normal cells and irreversible arrest and cell death in cancer cells. Thrombocytopenia is a common side effect of selinexor and we aim to define the mechanism of selinexor-induced thrombocytopenia to potentially help in its clinical management. In this study, we have examined the effects of selinexor on platelet count in humans and mice. Additionally, we investigated the effects of selinexor on differentiation and maturation of megakaryocytes (MKs) in culture as a model system for understanding the effects on platelet levels in humans. Methods Platelet counts were measured in solid tumor patients in a Phase 1 trial of selinexor QoDx2 weekly. For in vivo studies, CD1 mice were treated with high-dose selinexor (20 mg/kg QoDx3) for 3 weeks and platelet number was determined in peripheral blood. In addition, femur bone marrow samples were analyzed histologically. In vitro, MK progenitors were isolated from fetal mouse livers, and MK maturation and platelet production was analyzed by microscopy, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. In addition, whole protein lysates from selinexor-treated MKs were analyzed to detect changes in XPO1 and its cargo proteins. Results A majority of solid tumor patients treated with selinexor QoDx2 weekly in a Phase 1 trial for at least 1 cycle (4 wks) had 〉40% reduction in platelet count within the first cycle (72%, N=50), with an average maximal reduction of 50% after 20 days. These reductions were independent of pre-dose platelet count, did not typically decrease further after the first cycle, and recovered following dose reduction or cessation of treatment. Also, administration of the thrombopoietin (TPO) receptor agonists romiplostim and eltrombopag were found to reduce selinexor mediated thrombocytopenia. As in the clinical studies, selinexor reduced the platelets in mice by 40-50% within 2-3 weeks. In studies of MKs in cell culture, selinexor inhibited XPO1 mediated nuclear export as shown by nuclear localization of IkBa and FOXO3a proteins, but was not cytotoxic to MKs or platelets in vitro and did not affect platelet activation. However, MK progenitor cell development was significantly blocked in a dose dependent fashion, with 200 nM selinexor inducing a reduction of 81% in the number of progenitor cells that differentiated into MKs. The same dose of selinexor also affected endomitosis, a marker of MK maturation, shifting ploidy from predominantly 16N to 2N. Importantly, these effects were substantially reversible. When selinexor was washed out after 6 hours of treatment, the number of progenitor cells that differentiated into MKs was 65%, accompanied by reversion to 16N ploidy. Interestingly, MK inhibition was decreased when cells were treated later in the differentiation process and treatment of mature MKs did not decrease pro-platelet formation or release, suggesting selinexor affected an earlier stage in MKs development. Conclusions Selinexor induces reductions in platelets in humans and mice. Our results suggest that this adverse effect is likely due to inhibition of the early commitment and differentiation phase of MK maturation from progenitor cells, and not a cytotoxic effect on normal stem cells or MKs. The reversibility of the effect in cell culture is congruent with the observations that selinexor-induced thrombocytopenia is reversible in humans upon dose interruption or reduction and/or the use of TPO receptor agonists by relieving the progenitor cell to MK differentiation block. Based on these results, the recommended Phase 2 dosing regimen of selinexor is twice weekly (days 1 and 3) for 3 weeks, followed by a 10-day dosing holiday and treatment with a TPO agonist if platelet counts are very low. Disclosures Machlus: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wu:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Carlson:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Friedlander:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kalid:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Rashal:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Italiano:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment.

Description: Abstract 326 The key nuclear export protein CRM1 (chromosome region maintenance 1, Exportin 1, XPO1) may directly contribute to the pathophysiology of human multiple myeloma (MM). Here, we characterized the role of CRM1 in MM biology and defined molecular mechanisms whereby novel oral, irreversible, selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) targeting CRM1 mediate anti-MM activity. CRM1 gene expression is increased with disease progression, since it is significantly elevated in active MM and plasma cell leukemia (PCL) vs. normal/MGUS/SMM patients (p〈 0.02). CRM1 downregulation by shCRM1 lentiviruses significantly decreases MM cell viability regardless of drug sensitivity and p53 status. Importantly, SINE (KPT-185, KPT-251, KPT-276, and KPT-330) specifically blocked proliferation and decreased survival of MM cell lines (n=14) and patient MM cells (n=17) (LD50 〈 200 nM), cultured alone and with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) or osteoclasts. Caspases 3, 8, and 9 were not induced by any SINE in BMSCs derived from MM patients, cultured either alone or with MM cells, under conditions inducing marked apoptosis of MM cells (〉2-log differences). These agents potently enhanced nuclear accumulation of multiple CRM1 cargo tumor suppressor proteins p53, IκB, FOXO1A, FOXO3A, p27, and PP2A in MM cells. Transcripts of p53 and its downstream targets p21, PUMA, BAX were also induced by KPT-185, thereby inducing strong growth arrest and apoptosis. KPT-185 decreased MM oncogenes (c-myc, c-maf), anti-apoptosis molecules Mcl-1 and BCL-xL; increased pro-apoptotic protein BAX; as well as inhibited HSP70 and pIkBa. KPT-185 further blocked baseline and APRIL-induced NFkB p65 DNA-binding activity in MM cells. It triggered proteasome-dependent reduction of CRM1 protein; concurrently, KPT-185 and KPT-330 upregulated CRM1 mRNA. Furthermore, KPT-185 induced a number of tumor suppressing, regulatory, apoptotic and anti-inflammatory genes, i.e., p53, p21, PUMA, BAX, CHOP, C10orf10, MIC1, IκBα in MM1S cells in a dose-dependent manner, regardless of the presence of BMSCs. Cleavage of caspase 3 and PARP was markedly increased in MM1R cells treated with KPT-185 and bortezomib vs. either drug alone, validating that the combination of these agents triggered stronger cytotoxicity against MM cells. Combined treatment with dex and KPT-185 (or KPT-276) induced synergistic cytotoxicity against MM cells. Moreover, KPT-185 and KPT-330 impaired osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption via blockade of RANKL-induced NFκB activation in osteoclast precursor cells, without impacting osteoblasts and BMSCs (Abstract#48190). Importantly, SINEs (KPT-251 and KPT-276) suppressed MM cell growth (p〈 0.01), diminished MM cell-induced osteolysis, and prolonged survival of SCID mice with diffuse human MM bone lesions (p=0.0004). Together, these results identify CRM1 as a promising novel target in MM, strongly supporting clinical development of SINE CRM1 antagonists to inhibit both MM cell growth and related bone disease. Disclosures: Landesman: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Saint-Martin:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Ying:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. McCauley:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Richardson:Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson & Johnson: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene, Millennium, BMS, Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Acetylon, Oncopep: Scientific Founder, Scientific Founder Other.

Description: Selinexor is a novel, first-in-class, selective inhibitor of nuclear export compound, which blocks exportin 1 (XPO1) function, leads to nuclear accumulation of tumor suppressor proteins, and induces cancer cell death. A phase 1 dose-escalation study was initiated to examine the safety and efficacy of selinexor in patients with advanced hematological malignancies. Ninety-five patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were enrolled between January 2013 and June 2014 to receive 4, 8, or 10 doses of selinexor in a 21- or 28-day cycle. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) in patients with AML were grade 1 or 2 constitutional and gastrointestinal toxicities, which were generally manageable with supportive care. The only nonhematological grade 3/4 AE, occurring in 〉5% of the patient population, was fatigue (14%). There were no reported dose-limiting toxicities or evidence of cumulative toxicity. The recommended phase 2 dose was established at 60 mg (∼35 mg/m2) given twice weekly in a 4-week cycle based on the totality of safety and efficacy data. Overall, 14% of the 81 evaluable patients achieved an objective response (OR) and 31% percent showed ≥50% decrease in bone marrow blasts from baseline. Patients achieving an OR had a significant improvement in median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs 1.3 months; P = .008; hazard ratio [HR], 3.1) and overall survival (9.7 vs 2.7 months; P = .01; HR, 3.1) compared with nonresponders. These findings suggest that selinexor is safe as a monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory AML and have informed subsequent phase 2 clinical development. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01607892.

Description: Selinexor (KPT-330) is a first in class nuclear transport inhibitor of exportin-1(XPO1) currently in advanced clinical trials to treat patients with solid and hematological malignancies. To determine how selinexor might impact anti-tumor immunity, we analyzed immune homeostasis in mice treated with high selinexor doses (15 mg/kg, three times a week: M, W, F) and found disruptions in T cell development, a progressive loss of CD8 T cells and increases in inflammatory monocytes. Antibody production in response to immunization was mostly normal. Precursor populations in bone marrow and thymus were unaffected by high doses of selinexor, suggesting that normal immune homeostasis could recover. We found that high dose of selinexor given once per week preserved nearly normal immune functioning, whereas a lower dose given 3 times per week (7.5 mg/kg, M, W, F) was not able to restore immune homeostasis. Both naïve and effector CD8 T cells cultured in vitro showed impaired activation in the presence of selinexor. These experiments suggest that XPO1 function is required for T cell development and function. We then determined the minimum concentration of selinexor required to block T cell activation, and showed that T cell inhibitory effects of selinexor occur at levels above 100nM, corresponding to the first 24 hours post-oral dosing of 10 mg/kg. In a model of implantable melanoma, we used selinexor treatment at the clinically relevant dosing regimen of 10 mg/kg with a 5-day drug holiday (M, W selinexor treatment). After two weeks of treatment, tumors were harvested and tumor infiltrating leukocyte (TIL) populations were analyzed. This treatment led to intratumoral IFNg+, granzyme B+ cytotoxic CD8 T cells that were comparable to vehicle treated mice. Overall, selinexor treatment leads to transient inhibition of T cell activation but the clinically relevant once and twice weekly dosing schedules that incorporate sufficient drug holidays allow for normal CD8 T cell functioning and development of anti-tumor immunity. These results provide additional support to the recommended selinexor phase 2 dosing regimen, as was determined recently (Razak et al. 2016). Disclosures Klebanov: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kashyap:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dougan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy. Dougan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Consultancy.

Description: Introduction: Acquired proteasome-inhibitor (PI) resistance is a major obstacle in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We investigated whether the clinical XPO1-inhibitor selinexor, when combined with bortezomib or carfilzomib, could overcome acquired-resistance in MM. Materials and Methods: PI-resistant myeloma cell lines, RPMI8226-B25 and U226 PSR, and their respective parental cell lines RPMI8226 and U266, were treated both in vitro with selinexor/bortezomib or selinexor/carfilzomib and assayed for apoptosis. In vivo studies using U266 and U266PSR tumors were performed in NOD/SCID-gamma (NSG) mice. Mice were treated with selinexor/bortezomib and single agents. Bone marrow biopsies from refractory myeloma patients were treated ex vivo with selinexor/bortezomib or selinexor/carfilzomib and assayed for apoptosis. Mechanistic studies included NFkB pathway protein expression assays, immunofluorescence microscopy, ImageStream flow-cytometry and proximity-ligation assay. IkBα knockdown and NFkB transcriptional activity were measured in selinexor/bortezomib treated MM cells. Results: We found that selinexor restored sensitivity of PI-resistant RPMI8226-B25 and U266PSR MM cells to bortezomib (P = 0.00055) and carfilzomib (P = 0.0017). Bortezomib, when combined with selinexor reduced U266 MM tumor growth versus single-agent bortezomib (P = 0.022) in NSG mice. NSG mice challenged with PI-resistant U266PSR MM tumors also had reduced tumor growth with selinexor/bortezomib as compared to single agent bortezomib (P = 0.0006). Combining bortezomib and selinexor improved survival in mice with U266 MM tumors (P = 0.0072) and PI-resistant U266PSR when compared to single-agent bortezomib (P = 0.0072). Myeloma cells from PI-refractory MM patients (n=14) were sensitized by selinexor to bortezomib (P = 0.002) and carfilzomib (P = 0.001) without affecting non-myeloma cells. Immunofluorescence microscopy of PI-resistant human MM cell lines found a greater than 212% increase in IkBα when compared to untreated cells (confirmed by Western blot). A similar increase in IkBα immunofluorescence was found in newly diagnosed, relapsed and refractory patient MM cells. ImageStream analyses of MM cells showed an increase in total and nuclear IkBα from selinexor/bortezomib exposure. Proximity-ligation assays showed that IkBα-NFkB-complexes were increased 12-fold in bortezomib/selinexor treated MM cells. IkBα knockdown abrogated selinexor/bortezomib induced cytotoxicity in MM cells. Selinexor/bortezomib treatment decreased NFkB transcriptional activity in addition to a reduction of NFkB induced IAP-1, IAP-2, BCL-2, cyclin D2 and c-myc protein expression.. Conclusions: Selinexor, when used with bortezomib or carfilzomib has the potential to overcome proteasome-inhibitor drug-resistance in MM. Sensitization may be due to inactivation of the NFkB pathway by IkBα. Selinexor, an orally active selective inhibitor of XPO1-mediated nuclear export (SINE), is currently undergoing phase I/II studies in a variety of indications, including a combination with carfilzomib, in both relapsed and refractory MM patients (NCT02199665). The results presented in this study support combinatorial clinical trials in relapsed and refractory MM that utilize PI therapies. Disclosures Kashyap: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shain:Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Other: stockholder.

Description: Background: XPO1 (exportin-1/CRM1) mediates nuclear export of proteins containing leucine-rich amino-acid consensus sequences. XPO1 cargo proteins include many of the major tumor suppressor proteins (p53, IkB, pRB, FOXOs) and their export leads to the inactivation of cell cycle checkpoints. Overexpression of XPO1 has been reported to correlate with poor cancer prognosis. The Selective Inhibitor of Nuclear Export (SINE) compound, selinexor, binds covalently to the cargo pocket on XPO1, inhibits nuclear export which leads to cell cycle arrest and specific cancer cell death. Selinexor is currently in advanced clinical trials for patients with solid and hematological malignancies including patients with relapsed/refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) (NCT02227251). Using preclinical models, we recently demonstrated that proteasome inhibitors (PI) can re-sensitize multiple myeloma that acquired resistance to selinexor. Here, we aimed to find if treatment with selinexor and bortezomib is beneficial for the treatment of DLBCL. Methods: DLBCLcell lines were treated with selinexor in combination with bortezomib. Cell viability was examined using standard viability assays after 72 hours of treatment. Whole cell protein lysates were evaluated by immunoblotting. NF-κB transcriptional activity was analyzed using an ELISA assay. WSU-DLCL2 cells were grown as sub-cutaneous tumors in ICR SCID mice. Tumor bearing mice were divided into 4 groups and were administered either vehicle, sub-maximum tolerated doses of selinexor (10 mg/kg p.o. twice a week, M, Th), bortezomib (1 mg/kg i.v. twice a week, M, TH) and the combination of selinexor (10 mg/kg p.o. twice a week) plus bortezomib (1 mg/kg i.v. twice a week). Results: The combination treatment of selinexor with bortezomib synergistically killed DLBCL cells compared to the single agents alone. Co-treatment with bortezomib enhanced selinexor mediated nuclear retention of IκB-α. Selinexor plus bortezomib treatment decreased NF-κB transcriptional activity. Finally, the combination of selinexor with bortezomib showed superior anti-tumor efficacy in the combination group compared to single agent treatments in WSU-DLCL2 xenograft model. Conclusions: Based on our results, inhibition of NF-κB transcriptional activity through forced nuclear retention of IκB appears to be an important mechanism underlying the synergistic effects of selinexor plus bortezomib in many different cell lines including DLBCL. The superior efficacy of selinexor plus bortezomib combination both in vitro and in vivo when compared to single agents along provides a rational for conducting clinical trials with these combinations in DLBCL patients. Disclosures Kashyap: Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Klebanov:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Senapedis:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Landesman:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership.