ISSN:
1570-1468
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Energy, Environment Protection, Nuclear Power Engineering
Notes:
Conclusions 1. The distribution of contact stresses under the buttress wall of the section of the cellular abutment of the Kiev and Kanev hydrostations in general differ from the linear distribution obtained by formulas of eccentric compression, in which the foundation of the frame is assumed absolutely rigid, which are widely used in calculation practice. For a more complete correspondence to the actual behavior of the structure, it is obviously necessary to take into account the finite rigidity of the foundation in calculations. The relation between the average stresses under the frame and on the base of the cells (the coefficient of nonuniformity of stresses) depends not only on the relationship of the moduli of deformation of the fill soil and soil of the foundation and other factors taken into account in calculations but also to a considerable degree on the characteristics of the technology of constructing the abutment, such as the rate of construction, degree of lagging of filling during construction, degree of deviation of the schemes of work on filling and compacting the soils from the design schemes. 2. The character of the stresses in the horizontal reinforcement of the buttress wall shows that their redistribution and concentration in the corners of the precast slabs are largely due to general misalignment of the section in a transverse direction due to differential settlement. Despite the fact that high stresses developed in the extreme (with respect to height) reinforcing bars of certain slabs, the overwhelming majority of bars in practically every slab and as a whole for the wall are underloaded and have a considerable factor of safety. With consideration of the continuing insignificant increase of opening of the joints and tensile stresses at individual points and the effect of corrosion, the stresses at several points can exceed the yield strength of the reinforcement, but in this case a redistribution of the stresses will occur and the load will be absorbed by adjacent underloaded bar, both of the given slab and of adjacent ones, i.e., the overall strength of the wall is ensured. 3. The earlier used method of calculating the overall strength of a cellular construction as an eccentrically compressed monolithic beam based on the hypothesis of plane sections [2] is far from the actual behavior of the structure and therefore is inapplicable. The method of calculating the overall strength of a frame on the basis of the theory of composite beams with representation of the precast slabs as infinitely rigid transverse members and members in shear [5] reflects the actual stress state of the structure, but the calculated stresses are substantially less than the actual ones at points of concentration and the given method does not explain the continuing increase of stresses. Evidently, in calculations of cellular constructions on weak soils it is necessary to take into account the flexibility of the foundation and yielding of the foundation soil.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01426829
Permalink