ALBERT

Description: Background: The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signal transduction pathway integrates signals from multiple receptor tyrosine kinases to control cell proliferation and survival. Everolimus (RAD001, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) is an oral investigational antineoplastic agent that targets mTOR. Objectives: To learn the anti-tumor activity and toxicity of single-agent RAD001 in pts with relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL. Patients and Methods: Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease, a platelet count 〉75,000, an absolute neutrophil count 〉1,000, and a creatinine and bilirubin

Description: Background: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, has been shown to be highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. Methods: We studied the toxicity and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with symptomatic AL. Patients received single agent lenalidomide. If progression by 3 months or no evidence of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Originally, twenty-three patients (Cohort 1) were enrolled according to study design. Because of a significant early drop out rate and notable activity of the regimen, the trial was modified to include an additional 15 patients (Cohort 2). Baseline characteristics and adverse events are available for all enrolled patients, but at the time of this writing, response data are available for Cohort 1 patients due to short follow-up of Cohort 2, but will be updated by the time of the meeting. Results: Median age was 64 years, with 69% male. Twenty-three were previously treated. Organ involvement was cardiac (67%), renal (64%), hepatic (17%), nerve (17%). Thirty-three, twenty-two, and forty-four percent of patients were cardiac biomarker stage 1, 2, and, 3 respectively. Of the 37 patients, one was a cancel, and 6 have not yet made it through 3 months of protocol treatment and event monitoring. The respective median follow-ups for Cohorts 1 and 2 are 17 and 3.4 months. Of the remaining, 30 patients, within the first 3 cycles of therapy fifteen patients discontinued treatment: 7 early deaths and 8 adverse events or other causes. Three additional patients died 0.5 to 2 months after stopping treatment. The best predictor for early withdrawal and/or death was baseline NT-proBNP and cardiac biomarker staging system (cut-offs for serum troponin T

Description: Background: In B-CLL, the observation of interphase cells with hemizygous D13S319 deletion at 13q14 (13q-x1) as a sole anomaly in blood is widely considered a favorable prognosis. The observation of cells with 11q-, +12 or 17p- has been associated with a relatively poor prognosis. Over the past 1.5 yrs, 16.2% (174/1,076) of patients (pts) referred for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing for B-CLL in our clinical practice had a clone with homozygous D13S319 deletion (13q-x2), but the prognostic significance of this observation is poorly understood. Moreover, 39.3% (142/361) of pts with unfavorable FISH anomalies have 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 and the clinical significance of this observation is also unknown. Thus, we investigated pts with 13q- (with or without other chromosome anomalies) to establish the relative clinical significance of 13q- in B-CLL. Methods: We studied 333 pts with B-CLL sampled between 9/1999 and 6/2004 who had FISH performed on interphase nuclei from blood. The FISH probe set was designed to detect 6q-, 11q-, +12, 13q-, 17p-, and translocations involving IgH at 14q32. We classified pts into four groups: 13q-x1 only (group 1), 13q-x1 and 13q-x2 only (group 2), 13q-x2 only (group 3) and 13q-x1 and/or 13q-x2 plus other FISH anomalies (group 4). FISH groups were compared with gender, age, Rai stage, treatment status, time to treatment, CD38 and IgVH mutation. Results: Of the 333 pts, 171 (51.3%) had a 13q-: 71 were in group 1, 25 in group 2, 26 in group 3 and 49 in group 4. %CD38+ differed significantly across FISH groups; in pairwise analyses, the proportion of pts with 〉30% CD38+ was significantly greater for pts in group 4 vs. group 3 (p=0.0015) although no significant differences were observed for group 3 vs. group 1 or vs. group 2. Pts in group 3 were not significantly different from other FISH groups for Rai stage, IgVH mutation or gender. The median percentage of abnormal nuclei for pts with group 1 was 54.5% vs. 79.5% for pts in group 4 (p

Description: BACKGROUND: We have previously studied and reported that the combination of pentostatin (P, 2 mg/m2), cyclophosphamide (C 600 mg/m2) and rituximab (R 375 mg/m2) in previously untreated CLL is highly effective with an overall response (OR) rate of over 90% and a complete response rate (CR) of 41% (Blood109:405–411, 2007). We also found that this regimen can be effective even in older patients (〉70 y), those with elevated beta-2 microglobulin levels, and patients with mildly reduced creatinine clearances (Cancer. 109:2291–2298, 2007). To determine whether similar benefit could be achieved without inclusion of an alkylating agent, we conducted a follow-up trial testing pentostatin and rituximab without cyclophosphamide and employing a higher pentostatin dose (4 mg/m2). METHODS: Eligible pts had documentation of active CLL by standard NCI-WG criteria, and were previously untreated. Treatment schema consisted of 6 cycles of pentostatin (4 mg/m2) and rituximab given every 21 days. Pentostatin was given on the first day of each cycle following infusion of rituximab. Rituximab was given at 100mg/m2 IV at day 1, then 375 mg/m2 IV on days 3 and 5 of the first treatment cycle. During cycles 2 to 6, Rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 as a single IV infusion day 1 of week 4, 7, 10, 13 and 16. All patients were staged two months after completion of the 6 cycles of PR using the NCI-WG criteria. PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Overall, 33 patients were enrolled at Mayo Clinic and Ohio State University between July 2005 and February 2008. All 33 were eligible: 82% male, median age 65 (range: 45–81), with 9 (27%) being 70 years or older. 76% had a baseline ECOG PS of 0, and the rest were ECOG PS 1. Overall, 36% of patients had intermediate Rai risk (stage I–II) and 63% high Rai risk (stage 3–4) disease. Prognostic testing revealed that 36% were CD38+, 50% were Zap-70 +, and 39% had an unmutated IgVh status. Chromosome analysis by FISH found that 99% had detectable FISH panel defect, including 61%, 27% and 3% of patients with 1, 2, or 3 FISH detects, respectively. RESULTS: 28 of 33 patients (85%) completed therapy. While on treatment, 6 pts (18%) had a dose held or modified with 4 of these delays due to hematologic AE. For adverse events deemed at least possibly related to treatment, 4 (12%) pts experienced grade 3+ hematologic toxicity and 5 (15%) experienced grade 3+ non-hematologic toxicity. Out of all 33 enrolled patients, the overall response rate was 79% with 10 CR, 6 nPR, and 10 PR. At the time of this analysis, 29/33 patients are still alive with a median follow-up time of 14 months on surviving patients. To date 17/33 (52%) of patients have progressed with an estimated median time to progression of 12 months (95% CI: 8.5–21 months). 13/26 responders have progressed. Median duration of response is 12.5 months ((95% CI: 11–21 months). Finally, since eligibility were nearly identical and enrollment accrued at the same two academic centers, we compared the patient characteristics, response rates, and PFS of the 33 patients treated with PR to the 64 patients previously treated on our PCR trial. Patients in the two studies were generally similar with respect to demographic and prognostic characteristics, although patients in the PR trial had higher WBC and were less likely to be IgVH unmutated (Table). Although the differences in ORR and CR rate were not significantly different, the PFS appeared to be inferior in patients treated with PR as compared to PCR (12 months vs. 31 months; p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Although the PR regimen achieves a high OR response rate, the PFS appears inferior to PCR therapy. These findings suggest that increasing the purine nucleoside analogue dose does not eliminate the need to include cyclophosphamide in chemoimmunotherapy for patients with CLL. PCR Trial N=64 PR Trial N=33 P value Age, median(range) 63 years (38–80) 65 years (45–81) 0.34 ≥70 years(%) 28% 27% Male 77% 82% 0.61 Rai stage 0 5% 0 0.46 Rai stage I–II 42% 36% Rai stage III–IV 53% 64% White Cell Count, median(range) 79 × 109/L (11–519) 127 × 109/L (8–430) 0.04 150 × 109/L 20% 47% Serum B2-microglobulin, median(range) 3.97 (1.8–13.5) 3.80 (2.0–8.2) 0.81 〉2 × Upper Limit Normal(%) 57% 58% CD38 Positive 34% 36% 1.00 ZAP-70 Positive 36% 50% 0.26 IgVH Unmutated 71% 39% 0.004 FISH Normal, 11% 9% 13q- 35% 42% +12 21% 24% 6q- 2% 0 11q- 22% 18% 17p- 6% 3% other 3% 3% Overall Response Rate 91% 79% 0.12 Complete Response Rate 41% 30% 0.38 Median PFS 31 months 12 months 0.003

Description: BACKGROUND: Infiltration of the spleen plays an important role in the disease progression of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite this fact, the role for splenectomy in the management of CLL is not well defined. Historically, splenectomy has primarily been used for management of select patients with auto-immune cytopenias (e.g. autoimmune hemolytic anemia [AIHA], immune thrombocytopenic purpura [ITP]). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the utility of splenectomy in CLL patients cared for at Mayo Clinic over the last 20 years. METHODS: We used the Mayo Clinic database to identify all CLL patients who underwent splenectomy at Mayo Clinic since 1995. Medical records were reviewed to identify the indications for splenectomy, the pathologic findings at the time of surgery, and clinical outcomes. The indications for splenectomy were categorized as: diagnostic splenectomy, AIHA, ITP, symptomatic splenomegaly, and other. Pathology reports were reviewed to identify the findings at the time of surgery with respect to involvement by CLL and/or other lymphoproliferative disorders. RESULTS: Of the 5333 CLL patients seen at Mayo Clinic between 1/1/1995 and 12/31/2015, 107 (2%) underwent splenectomy at Mayo. The rate of splenectomy in female subjects was 1.7% (31/1779), and the rate in male subjects was 2.1% (76/3554). Of the 2354 subjects with IGHV mutation status, the rate of splenectomy in IGHV mutated subjects was 2.1% (23/1085) compared to 0.7% (9/1269) in IGHV unmutated subjects (p=0.004). The indication for splenectomy in these 107 patients was diagnostic splenectomy in 14 (13.1%) patients, ITP in 22 (20.6%), hemolytic anemia in 19 (17.8%), ITP and hemolytic anemia in 3 (2.8%), symptomatic splenomegaly in 46 (43.0%), and 3 (2.8%) other lymphomas. The rate of splenectomy decreased over the interval of the study (Figure). The per year risk of requiring splenectomy for patients diagnosed with CLL prior to 1995 was 0.32%/year, compared to 0.30%/year for those diagnosed from 1995-1999, 0.24%/year for those diagnosed from 2000-2004, 0.15%/year for those diagnosed from 2005-2009, and 0.16%/year for those diagnosed from 2010-2015 (p=0.01). The indication for splenectomy also changed over the study interval (Table) Pathologic review of the spleen demonstrated normal splenic tissue in 3 (2.8%), infiltration by CLL in 99 (92.5%), involvement by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in 2 (1.9%) and involvement by other lymphomas in 3 (2.8%; T-cell lymphoma [n=1], T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia [n=1], and splenic marginal zone lymphoma [n=1]). CONCLUSION: These findings describe a large experience with the use of splenectomy in patients with CLL. Splenectomy is utilized relatively rarely (2% of CLL patients). The role of splenectomy in the management of CLL also appears to be changing with both a decreased frequency of splenectomy and a change in the indication for splenectomy over the last 2 decades. The potential benefits of splenectomy must be weighed against the know risks such as a lifelong increased risk of infection, as well as a higher risk of thromboembolism and secondary cancers. Splenectomy Indication by Time Period of CLL Diagnosis Table 1 Table 1. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Parikh: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ding:Merck: Research Funding. Shanafelt:GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.

Description: Primary systemic amyloidosis (AL) is an incurable plasma cell disorder. Lenalidomide, especially in conjunction with dexamethasone, is highly active in patients with multiple myeloma. We studied the toxicity and efficacy of lenalidomide in patients with AL. Patients with symptomatic AL, a measurable plasma cell disorder, and adequate hematologic and renal reserve were eligible. Patients received single-agent lenalidomide. If there was no evidence of progression after 3 months or of hematologic response after 3 cycles, dexamethasone was added. Twenty-three patients were enrolled. Thirteen were previously treated. Organ involvement was cardiac (64%), renal (73%), hepatic (23%), and nerve (14%). Within the first 3 cycles of therapy, 10 patients discontinued treatment: 4 early deaths, 3 adverse events, and 3 other causes. With a median follow-up of 17 months, 10 patients responded to treatment. In these patients, responses included 9 hematologic, 4 renal, 2 cardiac, and 2 hepatic. All but one of the responders had dexamethasone added to their treatment program. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events at least possibly attributable to lenalidomide were neutropenia (45%), thrombocytopenia (27%), rash (18%), and fatigue (18%). In AL patients, we saw limited activity of single-agent lenalidomide, but significant activity of the combination with dexamethasone, which warrants further investigation.

Description: We report the results of a phase 2 trial using lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rev/Dex) as initial therapy for myeloma. Thirtyfour patients were enrolled. Lenalidomide was given orally 25 mg daily on days 1 to 21 of a 28-day cycle. Dexamethasone was given orally 40 mg daily on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20 of each cycle. Objective response was defined as a decrease in serum monoclonal protein level by 50% or greater and a decrease in urine M protein level by at least 90% or to a level less than 200 mg/24 hours, confirmed by 2 consecutive determinations at least 4 weeks apart. Thirty-one of 34 patients achieved an objective response, including 2 (6%) achieving complete response (CR) and 11 (32%) meeting criteria for both very good partial response and near complete response, resulting in an overall objective response rate of 91%. Of the 3 remaining patients not achieving an objective response, 2 had minor response (MR) and one had stable disease. Fortyseven percent of patients experienced grade III or higher nonhematologic toxicity, most commonly fatigue (15%), muscle weakness (6%), anxiety (6%), pneumonitis (6%), and rash (6%). Rev/Dex is a highly active regimen with manageable side effects in the treatment of newly diagnosed myeloma.

Description: Introduction: The use of B-cell receptor (BCR) signal inhibitors-based therapies (e.g., Ibrutinib) for B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) was initiated just a few years ago but has rapidly escalated due to their clinical efficacy and relative ease of use. However newer therapeutic approaches are needed due to multiple issues including the continued need to improve complete responses and reduce toxicity profiles. To that end our group has discovered a novel membrane target in the ubiquitous presence of Axl receptor tyrosine kinase (Axl RTK) on CLL B-cells and has reported that the Axl RTK inhibitor TP-0903 is able to induce apoptosis of CLL B-cells at nanomolar doses (Sinha, Clin Cancer Res, 2015). Given this we assessed if TP-0903 would be effective in the induction of apoptosis of leukemic B-cells from CLL patients who are currently on Ibrutinib therapy or whom have relapsed while on Ibrutinib treatment. Methods: Relapsed/refractory CLL patients (n=22) who were placed on Ibrutinib for progressive disease provided blood samples at a median of 3.2 months after Ibrutinib therapy initiation for these studies. We also obtained sequential samples on 8 patients from initial start of ibrutinib therapy and then over a 6 month follow-up period. CLL B-cells from these blood samples were subject to Ficoll separation, purified by using a Rosette Sep B-cell enrichment kit and then studied by flow cytometry to determine Axl RTK expression levels by flow cytometric analysis. Purified CLL B-cells (CD19+/CD5+) were cultured with TP-0903 in vitroat increasing doses (0.01µM - 0.50µM) for 24 hours and the LD50 dose was determined. In addition, 3 CLL patients who had been on Ibrutinib therapy and had a documented relapse were studied in similar fashion using TP-0903. LD50-sensitivity was measured. "LD50-sensitivity" was defined as an LD50 ≤0.50µM and "insensitive" was defined as an LD50 dose 〉0.50µM. CLL prognostic factors (e.g., FISH, IGHV mutation status, Rai stage, CD38, and CD49d) were evaluated at the time of ibrutinib treatment. Differences in factors between sensitive and insensitive cases were computed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and Chi-square test for categorical variables. Results: Twenty-two CLL patients (5 female, 17 male) were included in the analysis. Fourteen (64%) patients were found to be TP-0903 LD50-sensitive. Axl expression on CLL B-cells for this cohort was heterogeneous with a median of CD19+/CD5+ cells positive for Axl at 69.9% (range of 2.7-91.3%). The sensitive subjects tended to be younger with a median age at Ibrutinib treatment initiation of 62 vs 75.5 years (p=0.004). There were no significant differences in gender, FISH, IGHV mutation status, CD38, CD49d, or Rai stage between the sensitive and insensitive LD50 groups. There were no significant differences in relation to median Axl expression on CLL B-cells (sensitive: 72.6%, range: 2.7-91.3%; insensitive: 41.5%, range: 16.5-83.1%; p=0.35). The median number of treatments prior to initiation of ibrutinib did not differ between sensitivity groups (sensitive: 2.53, range: 8-10; insensitive: 43.5, range 12-20; p=0.2833). Association for ZAP70+ CLL B-cells tended to have more apoptosis induction by TP-0903 (sensitive: 84.6% ZAP70+; insensitive: 42.9% ZAP70+; p=0.052). In 8 CLL patients that were studied sequentially while on Ibrutinib continued to express Axl or increased their Axl expression (n=2) over a 3-6 month follow-up period. Three CLL patients who had relapsed on Ibrutinib were sensitive to TP-0903 with LD50 values of ≤0.50µM. Summary: Here we find that CLL B-cells from over 60% of relapsed CLL patients on Ibrutinib therapy were highly sensitive to the high-affinity Axl inhibitor TP-0903 with induction of apoptosis at nanomolar doses (≤0.50µM). The sensitivity of CLL B-cells to TP-0903 appears to be independent of Axl expression levels and of the known CLL prognostic factors but more evident for younger patients and for ZAP70+ expression status. Given this level of activity for apoptosis induction of CLL B-cells by TP-0903 encourages the further testing of this drug in clinical trials for CLL patients. Disclosures Parikh: Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shanafelt:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding. Warner:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Bearss:Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Kay:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Tolero Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Morpho-Sys: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Infinity Pharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Background: CLL is still an incurable lymphoid malignancy. The current standard of care is to treat only patients with obvious clinical progression as defined by the National Cancer Institute Working Group in 1996 (NCI–WG 1996). High risk CLL can be identified at diagnosis by a variety of tests including fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IgVH) analysis, and expression of ZAP-70 or CD38. With this information we can identify patients with high risk, early stage disease who are candidates for novel low toxicity therapies that could alter the natural course of their disease. Our hypothesis was that combination monoclonal antibody (MoAb) therapy using alemtuzumab and rituximab would significantly reduce the high risk clone in early stage CLL. Methods: This phase II trial was conducted with IRB approval and accrued the planned 30 patients between January 2005 and July 2007 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. The study enrolled consenting patients with Rai stage 0–II CLL without NCI–WG 1996 criteria for treatment who had high risk CLL as defined as one or more of the following 17p13–, 11q22–, unmutated (UM) IgVH (〈 2%) and expression of ZAP–70 (≥ 30%) and/or CD38 (≥20%). Treatment was one 30 day cycle (alemtuzumab 3 mg, 10 mg, 30 mg days 1–3 then 30 mg 3 × week × 4 weeks with all doses subcutaneously and rituximab at 375 mg/m2/week IV × 4 doses from day 8). Patients received 7 days of allopurinol and antimicrobial prophylaxis against PCP and herpes virus infections for 7 months. CMV testing by PCR was done weekly during treatment, then monthly × 6. Results: All 30 patients have completed therapy and 27 have been evaluated for response. The median age of these 27 patients was 62 yr (range 29–77) with 8 patients 〉 70 years. There was a male predominance (67%) with median time from diagnosis to treatment of 0.7 yr (range 0.1 – 6.1). Stage (Rai) at the start of therapy was 0 in 7 (26%), I in 19 (70%), and II in 1. High risk markers were 17p13– in 9 (33%), 11q22– in 7 (26%), UM IgV and expression of either ZAP–70 or CD38 in 11 (41%). All 27 patients completed therapy without interruption. Non hematological grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 3 patients (2 drug reactions caused by SMX/TMP, 1 CMV reactivation responsive to IV therapy). Response evaluation at 2 months after completion of therapy using NCI–WG 1996 criteria showed an ORR of 93% with 12 (44%) CR, 8 (30%) nPR, and 5 (19%) PR. Two (7%) patients had disease progression. Median duration of follow up was 14.1 months (range 1.9 – 27.2). Median time to disease progression in the 25 responding patients was 14.4 months (95% CI 5.9 – 22.4). Seven (26%) patients have received subsequent treatment for CLL (median 5.2 months, range 2.4 – 20.1). A minimal residual disease assay using 3-color flow cytometry on peripheral blood was negative in 6 of the 7 patients with CR who had no evidence of residual CLL on immunohistochemical examination of the bone marrow. These 6 patients all remain in sustained CR (median follow up 15 months, range 2 – 27.2). Conclusion: Alemtuzumab and rituximab is an effective and tolerable therapy in patients with high risk early stage CLL. A randomized controlled trial is now required to test if this intervention is better than the standard observation approach. In addition, this combination MoAb regimen could be used as a platform to develop even more effective combination treatments for patients with CLL.

Description: Introduction: Immunotherapy is most likely to work in a setting of low tumor burden, making vaccine strategies attractive as maintenance therapy post autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). However, it is difficult to ascertain the effects of the vaccines from delayed responses to the transplant. A novel immunotherapeutic, APC8020 (Mylovenge), was studied as consolidation therapy after for MM post PBSCT (Mayo vaccine trial). Mylovenge is prepared from autologous antigen presenting cells, including dendritic cells, partially purified from an unmobilized leukapheresis product by gradient density isolation and then incubated for two days with autologous serum containing M protein obtained pretransplant. We report long term results of the Mayo vaccine trial compared retrospectively to a consecutive cohort of MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplant at Mayo Clinic during the same time period. Methods: The Mayo vaccine trial patients had transplants between July of 1998 and May of 2001. Using these cutoff dates we analyzed 151 total MM patients, 27 from the vaccine trial (9 newly diagnosed and 18 relapsed) and 124 from database (DB) (50 newly diagnosed patients and 74 relapsed). The median (range) of follow-up for alive patients in vaccine trial is 6.5 years (2.9 – 8), and in the DB is 7.1 years (6 – 8). Two-sided Fisher’s exact tests and stratified log rank tests (with newly diagnosed or relapsed as the stratum) were used to compare baseline patient characteristics and time to event distributions (overall survival – OS, progression free survival – PFS, and time to progression – TTP) between the two groups. Results: The median (range) of age in vaccine trial and DB was 56 (30–69) and 57 (36–71) years respectively. There were no significant differences in the known prognostic factors including PCLI, B2M, and CRP. The median (95% confidence interval - CI) TTP for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.6 years (1.3 – 1.8); stratified log rank p value = 0.46. The median (95% CI) PFS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 1.5 years (1.3 – 2.4) and 1.5 years (1.1 – 1.8), stratified logrank p value = 0.30. The median (95% CI) OS for the vaccine trial and DB patients was 5.3 years (4.0 -N/A), and 3.4 years (2.7 – 4.6); stratified logrank p value = 0.02. Conclusions: Despite the fact that no difference was seen in TTP or PFS, post-transplant vaccine therapy was associated with prolonged survival. This is similar to what has been reported in other tumor systems including prostate cancer and glioblastoma multiforme. This approach warrants further investigation, including preclinical studies aimed at optimizing the immune response and randomized trials to define the role of vaccine therapy in myeloma. Figure Figure