ALBERT

Description: It is generally argued that Islamic banks are safer than conventional banks. The prime reason is that their product structure is essentially asset-backed financing, while conventional banks rely heavily on leveraging, which was considered one of the main causes of the 2008 global financial crisis. This paper examines the riskiness of Islamic and conventional banks during the 2008 global crisis by measuring overleveraging, defined as the difference between actual and optimal debt. This research conducted empirical analysis on the overleveraging of 20 banks (10 conventional and 10 Islamic banks) from five different countries, namely, Bahrain, Kuwait, Malaysia, the United States, and the United Kingdom. The analysis is double-folded: on the one hand, the results in this paper suggest that excess debt, rather than the mere holding of debt, was the reason behind the severe financial meltdown in 2007–2009; on the other hand, this paper shows that Islamic banks, in most of the countries in context, performed better during the recent crisis, but were subject to the second-round effect of the global crisis around the years of 2011–2013.

Description: Abstract 451FN2 Background: While nilotinib and dasatinib produce faster responses than imatinib as first-line therapy in de novo Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML), an equally effective strategy may be to selectively use these more potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) only in patients who fail to achieve stringent early molecular targets or are intolerant. Aim: To update the molecular outcome and survival of patients in the TIDEL-II study. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial for de novo CP-CML adult patients with two sequential cohorts each of 105 patients. All patients started on imatinib (IM) 600mg OD. Patients with IM trough levels

Description: The hallmark of CML is the BCR/ABL fusion gene that is usually formed as a result of the t(9;22) translocation. Conventional cytogenetic analysis has been the standard method for monitoring the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, however evaluation of the BCR/ABL fusion gene using interphase Fluorescence in situHybridisation (FISH) on peripheral blood may allow more frequent and less invasive follow up of CML patients. The objective of this study was to compare the utility of peripheral blood FISH versus bone marrow FISH and conventional cytogenetics in patients with CML following treatment with Imatinib mesylate. 61 sets of peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirate samples from 33 Ph positive chronic phase CML patients receiving treatment with Imatinib mesylate were assessed from December 2002 to February 2004. Bone marrow samples were processed by standard cytogenetic procedures and G-banded analysis of at least 20 metaphases per sample was performed. Interphase FISH on non selected peripheral blood and bone marrow samples was carried out by scoring positive signals in 600 nuclei in each sample using BCR/ABL dual fusion or extra signal probes (Vysis). Bland and Altman plots were constructed to assess the level of agreement between the tests and the mean differences (with 95% confidence intervals) were determined. 13 of the 33 patients studied were male and 21 (64%) of the patients were analyzed at more than one timepoint. Although there was good agreement of peripheral blood FISH with bone marrow FISH and bone marrow cytogenetics in monitoring changes in the level of Ph positive cells following therapy, there were statistically significant differences in the agreement between the percentage levels of BCR/ABL positive cells between bone marrow cytogenetics and bone marrow and peripheral blood FISH. Cytogenetic analysis revealed significantly higher levels of BCR/ABL positive cells when compared to both peripheral blood FISH [9% (95% CI 4.6, 14.1), p=0.013] and bone marrow FISH [5% (95% CI 1.7, 7.8, p=0.013)]. The mean difference in the percentages of the Ph positive cells measured by bone marrow FISH exceeded the peripheral blood FISH by 5% (95% CI 1.0, 8.1, p=0.037). There was a significant relationship between the differences observed and the actual percentage level of BCR/ABL positive cells (P

Description: Abstract 155 Background Bendamustine is a unique alkylating agent, active as monotherapy and in combination with rituximab for relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). This study compared efficacy and safety of bendamustine-rituximab (BR) with standard treatment regimens of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CVP) in first-line treatment of patients with indolent NHL or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The primary objective was to determine whether the complete response rate for BR was noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP (presented separately). The present analysis reports results for quality of life (QOL) as measured by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30). Methods Previously untreated patients with indolent NHL or MCL were randomized to receive BR (bendamustine 90 mg/m2/day on days 1 and 2; rituximab 375 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day cycle) or R-CHOP/R-CVP (rituximab 375 mg/m2 and vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 (up to maximum 2 mg) on day 1 and prednisone at 100 mg on days 1–5 (of a 21-day cycle), plus either [1] cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 on day 1 or [2] cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 or 1000 mg/m2(investigator choice) on day 1. QLQ-C30 was administered at screening (baseline); after cycles 1, 3, 6, 8; and at the end-of-treatment visit. Linear transformation to standardize raw scores was performed. The QLQ-C30 is composed of 5 multi-item functional scales, 1 global health status (GHS)/QOL scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single-item measures; all scores could range from 0 to 100. Rising scores for functional scales and GHS/QOL indicate improvement. Rising scores for symptom scales/single items indicate worsening. GHS/QOL score change at last QLQ-C30 administration postbaseline was interpreted using analysis of covariance. Data from the last observation (end-of-treatment visit) were analyzed. Results The 447 enrolled patients were randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 treatments; 224 to BR (NHL n=187, MCL n=36, missing n=1) and 223 to R-CHOP/R-CVP (NHL n=184, MCL n=38, missing n=1). Treatment groups were well matched for demographic and clinical characteristics. Among all randomized patients, mean change in GHS/QOL score from baseline to final visit was significantly higher (indicating relative improvement) for patients treated with BR than those treated with R-CHOP/R-CVP (3.6 vs −5.1 respectively, P=0.0005). For patients with indolent NHL, mean change in GHS/QOL score by final visit was significantly higher in patients treated with BR than those receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP (2.1 vs −6.3, respectively, P=0.0021); in patients with MCL, mean change in GHS/QOL score was numerically higher in the BR group, but the difference was not statistically significant (10.9 vs 1.6, P=0.0654). All randomized patients receiving BR showed greater improvement in QLQ-C30 Emotional Functioning (from baseline to final visit), compared with patients receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP. Mean change from baseline scores (± SEM) for QLQ-C30 for Cognitive, Physical, Role, and Social Functioning scales of the QLQ-C30 decreased (signifying deteriorating effect) in both treatment groups, with patients treated with BR deteriorating less than patients treated with R-CHOP/R-CVP (Figure). For symptom scales/item measures, patients treated with BR showed larger reductions in mean scores from elevated baseline levels (signifying greater improvement), compared with R-CHOP/R-CVP for Appetite Loss (−2.9 for BR vs −1.1 for R-CHOP/R-CVP), Pain (−5.6 vs −1.7), and Constipation (−0.7 vs 1.8). For symptom scales/item measures of Dyspnea, Fatigue, and Financial Difficulties, both treatments showed deteriorating effects, with BR showing less than R-CHOP/R-CVP: Dyspnea (0.8 vs 4.8), Fatigue (0.5 vs 7.2), and Financial Difficulties (0.9 vs 1.3). Patients receiving R-CHOP/R-CVP had larger reductions in mean scores for Insomnia (−2.1 for BR vs −6.7 for R-CHOP/R-CVP), Diarrhea (0.5 vs −1.3), and Nausea and Vomiting (1.8 vs 0.9). Conclusions In this study, BR significantly improved GHS/QOL, compared with R-CHOP/R-CVP treatment, in previously untreated patients with indolent NHL or MCL. In addition, BR provided improved patient QOL scores for most aspects of functioning and symptoms, as measured by the QLQ-C30. Support: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. Disclosures: Burke: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Bendamustine is FDA-approved for adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma that has progressed during or within six months of treatment with rituximab or a rituximab-containing regimen. Van der Jagt:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Sponsorship Other; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Sponsorship, Sponsorship Other; Roche: Consultancy, Sponsorship, Sponsorship Other; Teva: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Xanthus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Kahl:Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. MacDonald:Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. White:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Munteanu:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Clementi:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Chen:Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.: Employment. Flinn:Teva: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 209 Background: Although the majority of chronic phase (CP) Philadelphia positive (Ph+) chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) patients (pts) achieve good disease control with imatinib, some pts demonstrate suboptimal responses. Early dose escalation or switching to nilotinib, a more potent BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor, as soon as suboptimal molecular response is recognised may improve response and disease outcome. Aim: To optimise clinical and molecular outcomes in Ph+ CML using imatinib (IM) as frontline therapy with selective IM dose escalation based on pharmacokinetic (PK) results and switching to nilotinib (NIL) in case of suboptimal response, or IM-intolerance. Method: TIDEL-II is a multicentre, single arm prospective ALLG trial in de novo CP-CML pts with 2 separate sequential cohorts. In Cohort I, pts are treated with IM 600mg/d up-front, aiming for BCR-ABL RQ-PCR target values of ≤ 10%, 1%, and 0.1% IS (major molecular response, MMR) at 3, 6, and 12 months respectively. Pts who do not reach these treatment targets are classified as suboptimal responders. Dose escalation to 800mg/d or maximal tolerated dose occurs if trough IM level is

Description: Background Primary and secondary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL/SCNSL) are rare brain malignancies with an aggressive clinical course and dismal outcomes. The BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has activity in a range of B-cell lymphomas. Phase I and II studies of ibrutinib monotherapy in relapsed/refractory PCNSL have demonstrated promising results, with response rates of up to 81%. Response rates of up to 69% have also been seen in SCNSL. Ibrutinib has been combined with other systemic agents (e.g. rituximab and methotrexate) in phase 1 trials with promising results (Grommes et al Blood 2019); combination with more intensive combination chemotherapy regimens also appears efficacious but has exhibited a potentially limiting toxicity profile, in particular invasive fungal infections. (Lionakis et al Cancer Cell 2017). However, data for ibrutinib in PCNSL and SCNSL outside the clinical trial setting are scarce. Methods We performed a national, multicentre, retrospective study of the clinical outcomes and safety of patients (pts) with PCNSL and SCNSL who received ibrutinib between December 2015 and June 2019. Results The baseline characteristics of the 16 eligible pts are summarised in the table (Figure 1a). 88% (n=14) had relapsed/refractory disease, with two patients receiving ibrutinib as a component of multiagent frontline therapy. The most common target daily dose was 560mg (range 420-840mg); this was reached in all pts. Among all pts, the objective response rate (ORR) was 69%, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 63%. Both patients receiving ibrutinib in combination frontline therapy achieved a CR. ORR in PCNSL pts was 50% (n=4) and SCNSL pts was 88% (n=7), (P=0.28). ORR was 80% (n=4) when ibrutinib was administered as monotherapy, 80% (n=4) when administered with chemotherapy and 75% (n=3) when administered concomitant with whole brain radiotherapy. MYD88L265P mutation at time of starting ibrutinib was only tested in two patients with PCNSL and none with SCNSL. The mutation was detected in both PCNSL cases, and both later attained a CR. With a median follow up of 14 months, calculated using median observation period among patients alive at last follow-up, median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. 12 month PFS was 56% for the entire cohort (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-76); 50% for PCNSL (95% CI 15-77) and 60% for SCNSL (95% CI 20-85%) (Figure 1b). 12 month OS was 66% for the entire cohort (95% CI 36-85) ; 50% for PCNSL (95% CI 15-77) and 80% for SCNSL (95% CI 20-97%) (Figure 1c). Ten pts had PFS 〉6 months (longest 41.3 months), and 11 pts (69%) remained alive, with 9/11 being free from disease progression. Seven pts remain on ibrutinib at time of data analysis, 3 with PCNSL and 4 with SCNSL. Nine pts (56%) have discontinued therapy; 6 due to progressive disease (PD), 1 due to atrial fibrillation with hypotension requiring inotropic support and 2 in remission, one of whom subsequently underwent autologous stem cell transplant. Dose interruptions or reductions were required in 6 pts (37%), due to bleeding (n=2), infection (n=3) and neutropenia (n=1). Grade 3/4 adverse events were infection (31%, n=5), neutropenia (25%, n=4), febrile neutropenia (12%, n=2) and one each (6%, n=1) of atrial fibrillation, thrombocytopenia, and anaemia. No invasive fungal infections were observed, despite use of 8-16mg daily dexamethasone immediately prior to or during ibrutinib therapy in 10 pts (62%). Conclusions In this small real-world, majority methotrexate-refractory population, ibrutinib demonstrates encouraging efficacy and durable responses despite doses lower than used in clinical trials. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Invasive fungal infections were not seen, despite most patients receiving concurrent dexamethasone and/or chemotherapy. We observed substantial variety in additional therapy during ibrutinib treatment, and the optimal way to use ibrutinib in this heterogenous patient group remains unclear. Disclosures Manos: NovoNordisk Pharmaceuticals: Other: Travel; Janssen: Honoraria. Ho:Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Grigg:Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Other: Travel. Gandhi:Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Other: Travel Support; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hawkes:Astra Zeneca: Research Funding; Mundi pharma: Research Funding; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck KgA: Research Funding; Merck Sharpe & Dohme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche/Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Travel Expenses, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Cheah:Roche: Other: Travel expenses; Roche, Janssen, MSD, Gilead, Loxo Oncology, AstraZeneca, TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene, Roche, Abbvie: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Ibrutinib is not currently approved for use in DLBCL/CNS lymphoma.

Description: The treatment of patients with Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is not standardized. We included patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and a radiologic and/or cytologic diagnosis of BNS treated with ibrutinib monotherapy. Response assessment was based on criteria for BNS from the 8th International Workshop for WM. Survival from BNS diagnosis (BNS survival), survival from ibrutinib initiation to last follow-up or death (ibrutinib survival), and time from ibrutinib initiation to ibrutinib discontinuation for toxicity, progression, or death (event-free survival [EFS]) were estimated. Twenty-eight patients were included in our study. The median age at BNS diagnosis was 65 years. Ibrutinib was the first line of treatment for BNS in 39% of patients. Ibrutinib was administered orally at a dose of 560 and 420 mg once daily in 46% and 54% of patients, respectively; symptomatic and radiologic improvements were seen in 85% and 60% of patients within 3 months of therapy. At best response, 85% of patients had improvement or resolution of BNS symptoms, 83% had improvement or resolution of radiologic abnormalities, and 47% had cleared the disease in the cerebrospinal fluid. The 2-year EFS rate with ibrutinib was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-91%), the 2-year ibrutinib survival rate was 81% (95% CI, 49%-94%), and the 5-year BNS survival rate was 86% (95% CI, 63%-95%). Ibrutinib therapy is effective in patients with BNS and should be considered as a treatment option in these patients.

Description: Background: The oral BTK inhibitor ibrutinib is the only approved therapy for patients with symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). Bing-Neel syndrome (BNS) is a rare complication of WM that results from infiltration of malignant lymphoplasmacytic cells into the central nervous system (CNS) causing neurological deficits. Treatment options in patients with BNS are limited to agents with CNS penetration. Ibrutinib can penetrate into the CNS, but data on its efficacy in BNS is lacking outside case reports. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study evaluating the efficacy of ibrutinib in patients with BNS. The diagnosis of BNS was established in patients with a clinicopathological diagnosis of WM by radiological and/or cytological evidence of CNS involvement by WM, and response was assessed based on recently published criteria. Ibrutinib was given orally at doses of 420-560 mg PO once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Response was assessed using criteria from the 8th International Workshop for WM (Minnema et al. Haematologica 2017). Events were defined as death from any cause, progression of disease and stopping ibrutinib from any reason. Time to events was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We present data on 24 patients with BNS treated with ibrutinib. The median age at diagnosis of WM was 60 years (range 38-76 years) and 14 patients (58%) were men. The median lines of therapy for WM prior to BNS diagnosis was 1 (range 0-7 lines), and 9 patients (38%) were untreated for WM at the time of BNS diagnosis. Previous WM therapies included anti-CD20 antibodies (n=15), alkylators (n=13), nucleoside analogues (n=8), proteasome inhibitors (n=3), immunomodulators (n=2), and autologous transplant (n=1). The median age at BNS diagnosis was 65 years (range 38-80). The median time from WM to BNS diagnosis was 4 years (range 0-27 years). In 2 patients, the diagnosis of BNS was made concurrently with WM diagnosis. The median number of BNS lines prior to ibrutinib was 1 (range 0-5 lines). Previous BNS therapies included intrathecal chemotherapy (n=9), high-dose methotrexate (n=6), bendamustine (n=3) and radiation therapy (n=3). In 7 patients (29%), ibrutinib was the first line of treatment for BNS. The most common symptoms at BNS presentation were cognitive deficits (n=10), sensory deficits (n=8), ataxia/falls (n=8), motor deficits (n=6), headache (n=5) and seizures (n=5). MRI findings included leptomeningeal enhancement (n=16) and brain masses (n=5). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow cytometry confirmed the presence of clonal CD19+ in 19 patients (79%). Biopsies were performed in 5 patients (21%) and confirmed presence of WM cells. 4 patients had normal MRI but had abnormal CSF cytology and/or flow cytometry. Tissue was not obtained in 1 patient in whom MRI showed leptomeningeal enhancement. Interestingly, 2 patients were diagnosed with lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma secreting IgG paraprotein. The median serum IgM (n=20) prior to ibrutinib initiation was 1,294 mg/dl (range 125-5,938 mg/dl), and the median hemoglobin level was 11.9 g/dl (7.7-15.2 g/dl). Ten patients (42%) received ibrutinib 560 mg PO once daily, and 14 (58%) received ibrutinib 420 mg PO once daily. At best response, median serum IgM and hemoglobin levels were 340 mg/dl (82-3,330 mg/dl) and 14.6 g/dl (range 9.2-16.0 g/dl). Based on consensus BNS response criteria, complete response was attained in 2 patients (8%), partial response in 14 (58%) and clinical improvement in 3 patients (13%). With a median follow-up time of 13 months (95% CI 8-21 months), 5 patients have stopped ibrutinib, 3 due to BNS progression, 1 due to grade 3 muscle cramps and 1 due to arrhythmia, and 3 patients have died, 2 from infection and 1 from BNS progression. The median event-free survival (EFS) from ibrutinib initiation was not yet reached. The 1-year and 2-year EFS rates were 71% (95% CI 46-86%) and 52% (23-75%), respectively. Conclusion: Ibrutinib is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with BNS. Disclosures Palomba: Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Talaulikar:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Buske:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tedeschi:Gilead: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Simpson:Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Novartis: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; MSD: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding, TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Tam:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ansell:Affimed: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Merck & Co: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding. Treon:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses. Castillo:Millennium: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding.