ALBERT

Description: Background.This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods.Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al. (Blood 2014). The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. The induction phase was followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle was defined as 28 consecutive days for a total of 24 months period. Bone marrow samples of all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment for minimal residual disease (MRD) testing, whole-exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle for isolating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results.In total, 53 of the planned 62 patients have been enrolled in this study from February 2017 to May 2019. The median age of the patients enrolled was 61 years (range, 41 to 84) with 22 male (41.5%). The analysis was conducted on patients who have completed at least 1 cycle of therapy (n=45). The median follow-up for the trial is 14.4 months (range: 2- 27.6). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 37 patients (82.2%). High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 20 patients (54%). The median number of cycles completed was 14 cycles (range: 1-24). According to the study's inclusion criteria, baseline markers showed that 15, 14, and 13 patients had 3, 4, and 5 high-risk features, respectively. Moreover, 24 patients (53.3%) met the criteria of high-risk SMM, according to the Mayo 2018 model. The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypertension (6.3%), hypophosphatemia (4.2%), and rash (4.2%). Grade 4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were each reported in 4.4% of patients, and hyperglycemia was reported in 2.2%. Stem cells were collected in all eligible patients by the end of the induction phase. As of the abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who completed at least 1 cycle of treatment was 91.1% (41/45), with 14 Complete Responses (CR, 31.1%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 20%), 18 partial responses (40%), and 4 minimal Responses (MR, 10%). ORR in patients who completed the induction phase (≥9 cycles) was 97% (n= 32/33), with 14(42.4%) and 9 (27.2%) having CR and VGPR, respectively. All patients who had a CR have also achieved a stringent CR. Six patients have completed the treatment protocol and are currently on follow-up. As of July 2019, none of the patients have progressed to overt MM. MRD testing by next-generation sequencing is ongoing for patients who achieved CR or VGPR and will be presented at the meeting. Conclusion.The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma with 91% ORR and 54.7% CR and VGPR to date. The high response rate, convenient schedule and manageable toxicity build on prior studies which have shown efficacy of lenalidomide and dexamethasone in high risk smoldering myeloma. Longer follow-up for disease outcome is ongoing. Disclosures Bustoros, MD: Takeda: Honoraria. Nadeem:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy. Prescott:Janssen: Equity Ownership. Munshi:Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Anderson:OncoPep: Other: Scientific founder ; C4 Therapeutics: Other: Scientific founder ; Gilead Sciences: Other: Advisory Board; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board; Sanofi-Aventis: Other: Advisory Board. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. OffLabel Disclosure: Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone is an investigational combination in high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma and has not been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration or any other regulatory agency worldwide for the use under investigation.

Description: Background. This study aimed to determine the progression-free survival and response rate using early therapeutic intervention in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) using the combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone. Methods. Patients enrolled on study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al., Blood 2014. The treatment plan was designed to be administered on an outpatient basis where patients receive 9 cycles of induction therapy of ixazomib (4mg) at days 1, 8, and 15, in combination with lenalidomide (25mg) at days 1-21 and Dexamethasone at days 1, 8, 15, and 22. This induction phase is followed by ixazomib (4mg) and lenalidomide (15mg) maintenance for another 15 cycles. A treatment cycle is defined as 28 consecutive days, and therapy is administered for a total of 24 cycles total. Bone marrow samples from all patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment, whole exome sequencing (WES), and RNA sequencing of plasma and bone marrow microenvironment cells. Moreover, blood samples were obtained at screening and before each cycle to isolate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Stem cell collection is planned for all eligible patients. Results. In total, 26 of the planned 56 patients were enrolled in this study from February 2017 to April 2018. The median age of the patients enrolled was 63 years (range, 41 to 73) with 12 males (46.2%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) was successful in 18 patients. High-risk cytogenetics (defined as the presence of t(4;14), 17p deletion, and 1q gain) were found in 11 patients (61.1%). The median number of cycles completed was 8 cycles (3-15). The most common toxicities were fatigue (69.6%), followed by rash (56.5%), and neutropenia (56.5%). The most common grade 3 adverse events were hypophosphatemia (13%), leukopenia (13%), and neutropenia (8.7%). One patient had grade 4 neutropenia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 hyperglycemia occurred in another patient. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate (partial response or better) in participants who had at least 3 cycles of treatment was 89% (23/26), with 5 Complete Responses (CR, 19.2%), 9 very good partial responses (VGPR, 34.6%), 9 partial responses (34.6%), and 3 Minimal Responses (MR, 11.5%). None of the patients have shown progression to overt MM to date. Correlative studies including WES of plasma cells and single-cell RNA sequencing of the bone microenvironment cells are ongoing to identify the genomic and transcriptomic predictors for the differential response to therapy as well as for disease evolution. Furthermore, we are analyzing the cfDNA and CTCs of the patients at different time points to investigate their use in monitoring minimal residual disease and disease progression. Conclusion. The combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is an effective and well-tolerated intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma. The high response rate, convenient schedule with minimal toxicity observed to date are promising in this patient population at high risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Further studies and longer follow up for disease progression are warranted. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; Celgene: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership. Richardson:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy.

Description: Background This study aimed to determine the benefit of early therapeutic intervention with the combination of elotuzumab, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02279394. Aims The overarching objective of this trial is to determine progression free survival to symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM). Furthermore, the study examined whether genomic studies can help in determining patients who would benefit the most from this early therapeutic intervention. Methods Patients enrolled in this study met eligibility for high-risk SMM based on the newly defined criteria proposed by Rajkumar et al, Blood 2014. Patients were administered weekly elotuzumab (10 mg/kg) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for the first two 28-day cycles while receiving lenalidomide on days 1-21. For cycles 3-8, patients were administered elotuzumab infusions on days 1, 8, and 15. dexamethasone (40mg) was given on days 1, 8 and 15 to 40 of the 50 enrolled patients. After 8 cycles or best response, patients were given the option to mobilize with either cyclophosphamide or plerixafor and collect stem cells for future transplant. Patients were then allowed to continue on maintenance therapy where they were administered elotuzumab (20 mg/kg) on day 1, in combination with lenalidomide days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. Bone marrow (BM) samples of 32 patients were obtained before starting therapy for baseline assessment and whole exome sequencing (WES) of plasma cells. Results In total, 50 patients were enrolled on this study from January 2015 and completed accrual in December 2016, with the participation of eight sites. The median age of enrolled patients was 62 years (range, 29-79) with 18 males (36%) and 32 females (64%). Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) detected high-risk cytogenetics (defined by the presence of 17p deletion, t(4;14), and 1q gain) in 20 patients. The median time to response was 2.8 months (range, 1.8-4.6). The most common toxicities were fatigue (92%), followed by diarrhea (72%), and hyperglycemia (62%). The most common grade 3 or more adverse events were hypophosphatemia (34%), neutropenia (26%), and lymphocyte count decreased (22%). Three patients (6%) had grade 4 hypophosphatemia during treatment. Additionally, grade 4 cholecystitis, cataract, lymphocyte count increase, hyperglycemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient (2%). Diabetic Ketoacidosis and sepsis led to death in a patient (2%). Stem cell collection was successful in all mobilized patients to date. As of this abstract date, the overall response rate is 84% (41/49). There were 3 complete responses (6%), 18 very good partial responses (37%), 20 partial responses (41%), 5 minimal responses (10%), 3 stable disease (6%), and 2 unevaluable patients. All the study participants except for three have finished treatment and are currently under follow up. None of the patients showed progression to overt MM to date. We continue to collect data for progression free survival. WES was performed on 32 samples at the time of initiation of therapy. Recurrent mutations in the MAPK pathway (KRAS, NRAS) and tumor suppressor gene, TP53, were detected in 40% of the cases (16% and 24%, respectively), while mutations in the NF-KB and plasma cell differentiation pathways were present in 13% of patients. Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) were called based on WES: 1q duplication, 13q, 17p, and 1p deletions were identified in 25, 31, 12, and 7% of cases, respectively. Interestingly, in 6 patients, high-risk SCNAs (1q gain and 17p deletion) were not reported in iFISH but were detected by WES. The analysis of these 32 samples showed that patients who are harboring mutations in the DNA repair pathway genes, had modest response to treatment. Finally, we are analyzing the transcriptomic profile of CD138 negative cells, which represent the BM microenvironment cells (immune and stromal cells) to characterize the BM microenvironment at baseline and end of treatment, and thus, elucidate the role of these cells in the differential response to therapy. Conclusion The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is well tolerated and demonstrates a high response rate with no progression to overt MM to date. Correlation with genomic studies can help define patients who benefit the most from this early therapeutic intervention. Disclosures Ghobrial: Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Bustoros:Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Badros:GSK: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Rosenblatt:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Jakubowiak:Karyopharm: Consultancy, Honoraria; SkylineDx: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Usmani:Abbvie, Amgen, Celgene, Genmab, Merck, MundiPharma, Janssen, Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Pharmacyclics,Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda: Research Funding. Zonder:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics: Other: DSMC; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Alnylam: Honoraria; Coelum: Honoraria; BMS: Research Funding. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; OncoPep: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Millennium Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy. Richardson:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: In multiple myeloma (MM), despite well-characterized precursor states such as monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), there is a lack of sufficient biomarkers to predict mechanisms of disease progression. Most genomic analyses have sought biomarkers by study of the malignant plasma cells, however, cancers form a complex ecosystem with the immune and stromal microenvironment. Thus, to characterize the cellular composition and transcriptional programs of each component of the tumor and microenvironment at different stages of MM progression, we employed a single-cell RNA sequencing on a cohort of 22 patients and 9 healthy donors. Methods: We performed 10X droplet-based single-cell RNA sequencing using CD138-expressing plasma cells and microenvironmental populations isolated from bone marrow (BM) aspirates of patients with MGUS (n=6), low-risk SMM (n=3), high-risk SMM (n=13), newly diagnosed MM (n=8) and from 9 healthy donors (NBM). We collected a total of ~88.8K cells, comprising ~48K CD138+ cells (~36.4 from MM stages) and ~40.8K CD45+/CD138- cells (~30.8 from MM stages).Raw read data was processed using the Cell Ranger pipeline to obtain a gene-by-cell expression matrix, which was used to identify cell types and transcriptional programs by clustering and non-negative matrix factorization. Results: Expression profiles of plasma cells revealed clear tumor-specific differences including known oncogenic drivers in MM (MMSET/FGFR3, CCND1 and MAFB) as well as Lysosome-associated Membrane Protein 5 (LAMP5),Histone Cluster 1 H1 Family Member C (HIST1H1C) and Amphiregulin (AREG) distinguishing them from healthy plasma cells. We identified a subset of cycling plasma cells, observing a range of proliferative activity of the malignant fraction. Furthermore, our approach allowed a unique head-to-head comparison of gene expression changes in normal and malignant plasma cells in the MGUS and SMM patients within an individual, excluding inter-individual variation. We were able to discriminate malignant from non-malignant plasma cells and identify transcriptional alterations including known drivers, genes related to immune modulation (NKBIA) or controlling transcription and differentiation (EID1).Some alterations were patient-specific, while others, such as MHC I overexpression and CD27 loss, were recurrently observed across subsets of the cohort. Analysis of BM microenvironment in several stages of MM progression demonstrated a striking shift in the composition of immune cells with significant infiltration of natural killer cells, non-classical monocytes/macrophages, and T cells, enriched even in the earliest stages of the disease. Further investigation revealed significant upregulation of HLA expression at the mRNA level in CD14+ monocytes/macrophages. Intriguingly, comparison of healthy and patient samples by CyTOF showed downregulation of surface MHC II representation in the corresponding cell type, and moreover, co-culture with MM cell lines induced a sharp decrease of extracellular MHC II. This provided strong evidence for compromised antigen presentation by macrophages in the disease setting, hinting at a mechanism of immune evasion. Additionally, expression signatures in cytotoxic T-cells indicated a substantial skewing towards either granzyme B/H- or granzyme K-expressing memory cell-like transcriptional program. In a subgroup of patients, we found a strong simultaneous enrichment of the anti-viral/anti-bacterial gene expression signature for interferon type-1 activated genes in CD14+ monocytes/macrophages and T cells. Together, our results provide a comprehensive view at the complex interplay of the immune and malignant cells in different stages of the disease. We, for the first time, demonstrate the immune response beginning in premalignant conditions to be heterogeneous, including compromised antigen presentation as well as alterations in cellular composition and signaling. Consideration of the type of immunological response may prove valuable in determination of progression risk, as well as open up potential strategies for therapy. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.

Description: Background: CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor overexpressed in more than 20 tumor types, including malignant plasma cells. The CXCR4/CXCL12 (SDF-1) axis has been known for many years as a critical regulator of tumor proliferation, cell, as well as migration into and out of the bone marrow. Ulocuplumab (BMS- 936564) is a first in class, fully human IgG4 monoclonal anti-CXCR4 antibody which inhibits the binding of CXCR4 to CXCL12. This study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and clinical activity of Ulocuplumab alone and in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Len-Dex), or in combination with bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Bor-Dex) in subjects with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Patients / Methods: Patients were eligible for this trial if they were 18 years of age or older with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after having received at least 2 prior lines of treatment. Patients in whom who both lenalidomide and bortezomib had failed were not excluded from re-treatment with the same regimen. Patients were enrolled at four cancer centers in the U.S. from October 2011 to March 2014. Ulocuplumab (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) was dose escalated with a 3-plus-3 design with doses of Len-Dex or Bor-Dex to identify maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Ulocuplumab was given weekly in combination with either 25mg lenalidomide on days 1-21 and 40mg oral dexamethasone on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of the 28-day cycles on Arm A or 1.3 mg/m2 bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and 20mg oral dexamethasone on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 of the 21-day cycles on Arm B since cycle 2. The primary endpoints for this study were dose-limiting toxicities. Other key safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events (AE), AEs leading to discontinuation, SAEs, deaths, and laboratory abnormalities. The efficacy endpoints included overall responses, duration of response, and time to response. Responses were assessed using the IMWG criteria. Results: Forty-six patients were enrolled (median age, 60 years; range, 53-67). The median number of prior therapies was 3 (range, 1-11), with 70.0% of patients having received ≥ 3 lines of treatment. Ulocuplumab was escalated to a maximum of 10 mg/kg without reaching MTD. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were neutropenia (13 patients, 43.3%), diarrhea (10 patients, 33.3%), thrombocytopenia (10 patients, 33.3%), and fatigue (7 patients, 23.3%) in Arm A; and thrombocytopenia (6 patients, 37.5%), fatigue (4 patients, 25.0%) and anemia (4 patients, 25.0%) in Arm B. The overall response rate (≥ partial response) for all subjects in escalation and expansion was 44.4% (20/45). The median time to response was 1.5 months (range 0.4-7.8 months) for Arm A and 1.0 month (range 0.5-3.7 months) for Arm B, respectively. Of note, the combination of Ulocuplumab with Len-Dex showed a high response rate of 55.2% and a clinical benefit rate ( ≥ minimal response) of 72.4%, including patients who have been previously treated with lenalidomide. Conclusion: This study shows that the blockade of the CXCR4-CXCL12 axis by Ulocuplumab is safe and has an encouraging response rate of over 50% in the Len-Dex arm of patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. The distinct mechanisms of action of this antibody, as well as its non- cross resistance with currently approved approaches, make it a new class of anti-myeloma drug that warrants further exploration and evaluation in future clinical trials. Disclosures Ghobrial: Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Richardson:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Anderson:Celgene: Consultancy; Takeda Millennium: Consultancy; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopep: Equity Ownership; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership. Becker:GlycoMimetics: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a complex and heterogeneous malignancy of plasma cells that has two precursor states: monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). MGUS and SMM are asymptomatic states that eventually give rise to overt MM, with some patients progressing, while others do not. Recent studies in MM pathobiology have highlighted epigenetic alterations that contribute to the onset, progression and heterogeneity of MM. Global hypomethylation of DNA, including tumor suppressor genes, and hypermethylation of B-cell specific enhancers, abnormal histone methylation patterns due to the overexpression of histone methyltransferases such as MMSET, and deregulation of non-coding RNAs along with mutations in different classes of chromatin modulators underline a potential for epigenetic biomarkers in disease prognosis and treatment. This study aimed to define epigenetic pathways that lead to the dynamic regulation of gene expression in MM pathogenesis. Methods. We performed ATAC-seq (Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin using sequencing) and RNA-seq on 10 MM cell lines and CD138+ plasma cells isolated from bone marrow aspirates of 3 healthy donors, 9 SMM, 8 newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) and 9 relapsed (RRMM) patients. ATAC-seq reads were trimmed of adapters, aligned to hg19 using bowtie2, and filtered for mapping quality 〉=Q30 using the ENCODE ATAC-seq pipeline. Reads mapping to promoter regions, defined as -400 to +250 bases from a refseq transcription start site, were counted using bedtools for each sample. Promoter read counts were then normalized by the total number of reads in promoters in the sample, scaled to 1 million total reads, and converted to log10(x+1) space. Results. To characterize the epigenetic contribution to disease progression in MM, we first identified accessible promoter regions in normal plasma cells (NPC), SMM, NDMM and RRMM patients and found regions displaying differential accessibility in MM progression. Next, we intersected the list of differential accessible regions (DARs) with matched transcriptome data and observed two main clusters: genes with unaltered transcription profiles and genes in which the dynamics of open chromatin regions (OCRs) correlated with gene expression. Transcriptomic analysis revealed that a large portion of the differentially expressed (DE) genes in SMM remain DE in NDMM as compared to NPCs (882 genes out of 1642 and 1150 DE genes in SMM and NDMM, respectively). Those genes were significantly enriched for pathways like epithelial mesenchymal transition, cell cycle checkpoints and mitosis, KRAS signaling and interleukin-JAK-STAT pathways. To investigate the genes that behaved differently among the stages of disease, we looked at differential accessibility and expression in NDMM and SMM samples, and integrated them with Whole-Genome Bisulfite-Sequencing and 450K DNA-methylation data from MM patients and healthy donors (BLUEPRINT). This analysis led to the identification of novel genes in MM progression, such as the transcriptional repressor ZNF254 and IRAK3, a negative regulator of the TLR/IL1R signaling pathway. Although gene expression data for these genes showed comparable mRNA levels in SMM and NPCs, followed by a significant decrease in NDMM/ RRMM, ATAC-seq revealed a striking drop in promoter accessibility in SMM, NDMM and RRMM cases. Comparison of ATAC-seq peaks to DNA methylation and ChIP-seq data revealed that the altered OCR of IRAK3 is actually hypermethylated in MM patients and marked by H3K4me3, a marker of active promoters, in MM cell lines. Hypermethylation of IRAK3 has been described in hepatocellular carcinoma, where it is associated with poor prognosis. Together, our data suggest that the identified IRAK3 OCR may act as a bivalent domain that loses accessibility in the precursor states and gains DNA methylation in MM progression. Hence, IRAK3 methylation could be a novel prognostic marker in MM. Conclusion. We have generated a global epigenetic map of primary tumors from patients at the smoldering, newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory stage of multiple myeloma. Integrative analysis of ATAC-seq data with DNA methylome, transcriptome and whole-genome map of active and repressive histone marks in our study led to the identification of IRAK3 as a novel epigenetic biomarker of disease progression. Disclosures Licht: Celgene: Research Funding. Ghobrial:Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Description: Background. Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma associated with overproduction of monoclonal IgM protein. It is preceded by an asymptomatic stage, called Smoldering Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (SWM), associated with a high risk of progression to overt disease. Current understanding of progression risk in SWM is based on a few small studies, and it is still unclear how to distinguish the asymptomatic patients who will progress from those who will not. Patients and Methods. We obtained clinical data of all WM patients who had been diagnosed and followed up at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute from 1982 to the end of 2014. Only patients with asymptomatic disease at the time of diagnosis were included in this study to identify risk factors for disease progression. Patients who received chemotherapy for a second cancer, before or after asymptomatic WM diagnosis (n =24), were excluded as chemotherapy might have affected the natural course of disease. Patients who progressed to or were diagnosed later with other types of B-cell lymphoproliferative disorders or Amyloidosis (n =71) and patients with myeloproliferative disorders or thalassemia (n = 4) were all excluded from our cohort. Furthermore, we excluded patients with no morphologic evidence of lymphoplasmacytic infiltration in the bone marrow biopsy (n =37), those without a bone marrow biopsy done at time of diagnosis (n =21), and those who were treated for peripheral neuropathy alone (n =13). Progression was defined based on the Consensus Panel recommendations of the Second International Workshop on WM. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences between the curves were tested by log-rank test. Effects of potential risk factors on progression rates was examined using Cox proportional-hazards models, with hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results. A total of 439 patients were included in the study. During the 35-year study period and a median follow up of 7.8 years, 317 patients (72.2%) progressed to symptomatic WM. The median time to progression was 3.9 (95% CI 3.2-4.6) years. In the multivariate analysis, IgM ≥ 4,500 mg/dL (adjusted HR 4.65; 95% CI 2.52-8.58; p 〈 0.001), BM lymphoplasmacytic infiltration ≥ 70% (adjusted HR 2.56; 95% CI 1.69-3.87; p 〈 0.001), β2-microglobulin ≥ 4.0 mg/dL (adjusted HR 2.31; 95% CI 1.19-4.49; p = 0.014), and albumin 〈 3.5 g/dL (adjusted HR 2.78; 95% CI 1.52-5.09; p = 0.001) were all identified as independent predictors of disease progression, suggesting those thresholds could be clinically useful for determining high-risk patients. On the other hand, given the continuous nature of these variables, we built a proportional hazards model based on four variables (Bone marrow infiltration percentage, serum IgM, albumin, β2-microglobulin). The model divided the cohort into 3 distinct risk groups: a high-risk group with a median time to progression (TTP) of 1.9 years (95% CI 1.64-2.13), an intermediate-risk group with median TTP of 4.6 years (95% CI 4.31-5.15), and a low-risk group with a median TTP of 8.1 years (95% CI 7.33-8.13)(See Figure). To enhance its clinical applicability, we made the model available as user interface through a webpage and mobile application, where clinicians can enter an individual SWM patient's lab values and get information regarding their risk group and estimated individual risk of progression to symptomatic WM. Conclusion. We have assembled the largest cohort of SWM patients to date, which allowed us to identify four independent predictors of progression to overt disease: BM infiltration ≥ 70%, IgM ≥ 4,500 mg/dL, b2m ≥ 4.0 mg/dL and albumin 〈 3.5 g/dL. Using those variables in a proportional hazards model, we developed a robust, flexible classification system based on risk of progression to symptomatic WM. This system stratifies SWM patients into low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups and thus has the potential to inform patient monitoring and care. Most importantly, it can help identify high-risk patients who might benefit from early intervention in this rare malignancy. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Kastritis:Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Prothena: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Treon:Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses; BMS: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding. Castillo:Genentech: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Dimopoulos:Amgen: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Ghobrial:BMS: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy.

Description: Introduction: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is a clonal plasma cell malignancy, accounting for 10% of all hematological malignancies. Genetic analyses of large populations revealed that blood-specific somatic mutations in hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are commonly acquired during aging, a new entity labeled: clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). We sought to determine the role of CHIP on survival of MM patients, specifically those receiving immunomodulator (IMiD) maintenance (Lenalidomide or Thalidomide) post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: We collected the cryopreserved, growth factor mobilized peripheral blood of 629 MM patients who underwent ASCT between 2003 and 2011 at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). Then, we performed targeted next-generation sequencing using a 224-gene panel at a mean depth of coverage of 978X and ultra-low pass whole-genome sequencing at 0.1X to account for tumor contamination. We downloaded (dbGAP # phs000748.v6.p4) the whole-exome sequencing (WES) data of a cohort of 1144 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) Clinical Outcomes in MM to Personal Assessment of Genetic Profile (CoMMpass, NCT0145429) study (MMRC) and the WES data of a cohort of 205 newly diagnosed, untreated MM patients from the Broad Institute dataset. We analyzed their peripheral blood (average coverage of 108X) and tumor (average coverage of 107X) data separately, looking for the same CHIP genes included in our target bait panel. Results: The DFCI cohort had a median age of 58 years [range, 24-83] at time of ASCT and median follow up post ASCT of 8 years [range, 0.1-14.5]. 204 patients (32%) in the DFCI cohort had CHIP at time of ASCT. The most commonly detected mutated genes were DNMT3A, TET2, TP53, ASXL1 and PPM1D. 24 patients (3.8%) developed a second hematological malignancy at a median of 4 years [range, 1-10] post ASCT, half of whom had CHIP. Around 48% of the DFCI cohort received IMiDs as part of induction therapy. Different induction regimens had no effect on CHIP prevalence at time of ASCT. Around 56% of the DFCI cohort received IMiD maintenance, 22% of which received maintenance for at least 3 years [range, 0.06-12.8]. Among those who did not receive IMiD maintenance, patients with CHIP had worse progression free survival (PFS) (p-value 〈 0.001) and overall survival (OS) (p-value = 0.005). In patients receiving IMiD maintenance, having CHIP had no effect on PFS or OS. On the other hand, the MMRF cohort had a median age of 63 years [range, 27-93] and median follow up of 3.03 years [range, 0-5.9] from time of diagnosis. Around 52% of that cohort underwent ASCT and around 76% of those received IMiD maintenance with a median follow up of 2.7 years [range, 0-5.5] from time of ASCT. Furthermore, 200 patients of the MMRF cohort have follow-up samples of both tumor and peripheral blood that had targeted sequencing done by a 562-gene panel that included our genes of interest. Similarly, when studying the genomic results of 139 out of 1144 MMRF patients, as well as the 205 patients from the Broad Institute dataset, we detected CHIP in 25.6% of them and the top 5 most commonly mutated genes were similar to those of our cohort. Conclusion: CHIP is a common entity among MM patients, reaching a prevalence of up to 32%, that predicts a worse PFS and OS in those who do not receive IMiD maintenance therapy post ASCT. As expected, IMiD maintenance improves outcome in MM patients, with and without CHIP. In patients with CHIP, the use of IMiDs abrogated the deleterious effect imposed by CHIP to a point that outcome is identical to that of patients without CHIP. Figure Figure. Disclosures Bustoros: Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Munshi:OncoPep: Other: Board of director. Anderson:Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; OncoPep: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Celgene: Consultancy; C4 Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Other: Scientific founder; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Millennium Takeda: Consultancy. Richardson:Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Soiffer:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ghobrial:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy.