ALBERT

Description: Purpose In patients with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 〉 60 years of age we analyzed age at relapse, interval from first complete remission (CR1) to relapse, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis, prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) and FLT3/NPM1 mutational status as possible prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Introduction After achieving CR1 more than 50% of elderly AML patients eventually relapse. Prognostic factors for OS are poorly defined in this patient population. For younger patients with relapsed AML a risk score has been described including age at relapse, interval from CR1 to relapse, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis and prior stem cell transplantation (SCT) as prognostic factors. We sought to investigate whether these are also prognostic factors in elderly patients with relapsed AML. In addition, we assessed the prognostic impact of FLT3- and NPM1 mutational status (wild-type (wt) or mutated (mut)) at diagnosis. Patients and methods In the ongoing multicenter OSHO trial #69 for AML patients 〉 60 years we evaluated data of all relapsed patients. Overall survival was calculated from the day of first relapse until the day of death using the Kaplan Meier method. Univariate analysis was performed to test for the influence of age at relapse, interval from CR1 to relapse, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis, prior alloSCT and FLT3/NPM1 mutational status. Subsequently, independent prognostic factors were defined in a multivariate analysis with age at relapse, time from CR1 to relapse, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis and prior alloSCT as covariates. Results From April 2005 until April 2013 904 patients were registered. 733 of these received intensive induction chemotherapy which resulted in CR1 in 447 (61%) pts. In this patient group 260 relapses were observed after a median interval, calculated from the day of CR1, for living patients of 2.7 years (range 0.1 to 7.5). Median age at relapse was 69 years (range 60 – 85) with 129 (49.6%) pts. being 60 to 68 years old, 102 (39.2%) pts. being 69 to 74 years old and 29 (11.1%) pts. being 75 to 85 years old. Median interval from CR1 to relapse was 0.58 years (0.07 – 6.28). 114 (43.8%) relapses occurred up to 6 months after CR1, 119 (45.8%) between 7 and 18 months after CR1 and 27 (10.4%) later than 18 months after CR1. Only five (1.9%) relapsed pts. showed good risk cytogenetics at diagnosis, whereas it was of intermediate risk in 159 (61.1%) pts., of poor risk in 68 (26.2%) pts. and unknown in 28 (10.8%) pts. Forty-one (15.8%) pts. had received prior alloSCT in CR1. Information on FLT3- and NPM1 mutational status at diagnosis was available in 194 (74.6%) pts. 110 (42.3%) pts. had FLT3/NPM1 wt/wt, 48 (18.5%) pts. had FLT3/NPM1 wt/mut, 23 (8.8%) pts. had FLT3/NPM1 mut/wt and 13 (5.0%) pts. had FLT3/NPM1 mut/mut. OS rate at 2 years of all relapsed pts. was 13 ± 2%. For patients younger than 69 years and for those 69 years of age or older OS rate at 2 years was 17 ± 4% and 9 ± 3%, respectively (p=0.03). The interval between CR1 and first relapse also affected 2 year-OS with 7 ± 3%, 15 ± 4% and 36 ± 12% for pts. with relapse up to 6 months, 7 to 18 months and later than 18 months after CR1, respectively ( 18 months: p=0.009). OS rate at 2 years was also influenced by cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis with 17 ± 3% for pts. having good or intermediate risk cytogenetics and 3 ± 2% for those with poor risk cytogenetics (p〈 0.0005). Prior alloSCT had a negative influence on OS. Two-year OS rate was 10 ± 5 and 13 ± 3% (p= .015) for patients with prior alloSCT vs. those without prior alloSCT, respectively. FLT3/NPM1 mutational status at diagnosis had no impact on OS. In univariate analysis age at relapse (p

Description: AML patients with unfavourable cytogenetics generally have a poor outcome. Over the last decade a number of strategies to improving survival have been assessed by the East German Study Group (OSHO). Here, we analyse the results of three protocols (AML 93, AML 96 and AML 2002) for effects on outcome in younger patients (

Description: Clinical trials on different cytarabine doses for treatment of AML provide evidence of a dose response effect, but also for increase toxicity after high dose AraC (HDAC). Pharmacokinetic measurements of cytarabine-triphosphate (AraC-CTP), which is the most relevant cytotoxic metabolite of AraC, have revealed its formation in leukemic cells to be saturated with infusion rates above 250 mg/m2/h, this being significantly lower than used in HDAC schedules. Methods: Based on a pharmacological model and encouraging results of a phase II study we conducted a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial comparing the effects of two different application modes of AraC in patients up to 60 years with untreated newly diagnosed AML. Patients were randomized to receive AraC at two different infusion rates (IR) during induction and consolidation treatment: arm A/experimental: 1 × 2 g/m2/d AraC over 8 hours (IR 250 mg/m2/h) arm B/standard: 2 × 1 g/m2/d AraC over 3 hours (IR 333 mg/m2/h). Induction and first consolidation consisted of AraC (days 1, 3, 5, 7) in combination with an anthracycline (Idarubicine 12 mg/m2 or Mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2, days 1–3). The final dosage points (AraC day 7 and anthracycline day 3) were excluded from the second consolidation. The third consolidation consisted of either allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation or of chemotherapy identical to second consolidation. Results: From 02/97 to 04/02 419 patients were enrolled in the study. The present analysis is based on 361 eligible and evaluable patients with a median follow up of 7 years. CR was reached in 249/361 (69%; 95%CI: 65%–74%) patients. No statistically significant differences were detected between arms A and B with regard to CR-rate (69% vs 69%) or early death rate (11% vs 8%). Hematological recovery of median white blood cell count (WBC) 〉 109/l and median platelets (plt) 〉 50 × 109/l revealed no difference between arms A and B after induction (WBC day 22 vs 22, p=0,68; plt day 25 vs 26, p=0,41) and consolidation (WBC day 28 vs 27, p=0,07; plt day 42 vs 40, p= 0,58). The event free survival (EFS) after 5 years is 0,25 ± 0,03 % for all patients with an overall survival of 0,31 ± 0,03 % after 5 years. For the purposes of analysis, the 83 transplant patients (23 allogeneic MRD, 14 allogeneic MUD and 46 autologous) were censored at time of transplant. No statistically significant difference between arms A and B in regard to EFS (0,25 ± 0,04 vs 0,25 ± 0,04, p=0,99), relapse incidence (0,63 ± 0,06 vs 0,60 ± 0,06, p=0,89), overall survival (0,32 ± 0,04 vs 0,30 ± 0,04, p=0,44) and therapy associated mortality (0,18 ± 0,04 vs 0,17 ± 0,03, p=0,95) were detectable after adjustment of prognostic factors. An analysis of risk factors by multivariate cox regression model confirmed cytogenetics at diagnosis to be the most important risk factor for CR rate (p

Description: Background The German AML Intergroup conducted two randomized studies in younger (

Description: Purpose: To define prognostic factors for overall survival in adult patients (pts) with relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Introduction: Prognostic factors for overall survival after AML relapse are poorly defined. Here, we investigate patient and disease related factors in terms of their impact on prognosis after AML relapse in a cohort of 495 adult AML relapse patients treated in two prospective AML trials of the East German Society of Hematology and Oncology (OSHO). Patients and methods: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive relapsed AML pts treated in two OSHO trials (OSHO #61 (pts 〈 60 years) and OSHO #69 (pts 〉 60 years)). Age, cytogenetic risk at initial diagnosis, FLT3/NPM1 mutational status, type of AML (de novo versus secondary to myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative neoplasia (MDS/MPN) versus therapy related), time interval from first complete remission (CR1) to relapse and allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) as consolidation in CR1 were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Between March 2002 and July 2014, a total of 862 and 968 patients (pts) were enrolled in the OSHO #61 and #69 trial, respectively. Five hundred and thirty two of 690 (77%) documented pts achieved first complete remission in the #61 and 501 of 813 (62%) pts in the #69 trial. Of these, 495 pts (252 male, 243 female) experienced AML relapse, 207(39%) pts in #61 and 288(57%) pts in #69. Median age at relapse was 63 years (range 18 to 86 years). Initial diagnoses were de novo AML, secondary AML to MDS/MPN and therapy related AML in 332(67%) pts, 129 (25.9%) pts and 30 (6%) pts, respectively. Time from CR1 to relapse was 〈 = 6 months in 198 (40%) pts, 7 to 18 months in 226 (45.7%) pts and 〉 18 months in 71 (14.3%) pts. Initial karyotpe was available for 449 pts (90.7 %). It was favorable, intermediate and poor in 20 (4.5%) pts, 301(67%) pts and 128(28.5%) pts, respectively. Sixty two (13.9%) relapsed pts had a monosomal karyotype at initial diagnosis. NPM1/FLT3 mutational status at initial diagnosis was available in 354 (78.8%) pts, 378 (71%) pts in #61 and 370 (74%) pts in #69. One hundred and three (20.8%) had allogeneic stem cell transplantation as consolidation in CR1 (56 pts) in #61 and (47 pts) in #69. Relapse therapy was documented in 450 (91%) pts. Six pts that had immunosuppression withdrawn as the only therapy and nine pts that had received a tyrosine kinase inhibitor as monotherapy were excluded from further analysis due to small numbers. All other treatments were as follows: intensive chemotherapy (INT) n=225, alloSCT with or without prior INT n=50, donor lymphocyte infusions (DLi) with or without prior chemotherapy n=22, palliative mild cytoreductive chemotherapy (mCT) n=66, azacitidine (Aza) n=52, best supportive care (BSC) n=20. With these, CR was achieved in 78 (36%), 34 (68%), 8 (36%), 6 (9%), 1 (2%), 0 (0%), respectively. Median overall survival probability (OS) for all 495 relapsed patients was 6 months. It was 11.3 months, 5.7 months, 4.5 months and 4.6 months for patients aged 18 to 50 years, 51 to 60 years, 61 to 70 years and 71 to 86 years, respectively (p

Description: The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is age-dependent with the majority of patients (pts) being older than 60 years at diagnosis. Treatment of these pts needs to be well balanced between sufficient efficacy and tolerable toxicity. Here, we report long term follow-up of the OSHO AML97 study. Pts with AML older than 60 years were registered after informed consent and received age-adapted intensive chemotherapy treatment (curative arm; induction therapy with AraC 2 g/m2 iv day 1, 3, 5, 7 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 iv day 1 to 3 to induce complete remission (CR), followed by 2 consolidation courses with AraC 240 mg/m2 iv day 1 to 5 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 iv day 1 to 2), low dose chemotherapy (palliative arm; idarubicin 10 mg po day 1 and either thioguanine 40 mg po day 1-5, or AraC 80 mg sc day 1-5 or etoposide 100mg po day 1-5) or supportive therapy (best supportive care including transfusions). A total of 618 pts were enrolled (curative arm n=471, palliative treatment n=115 and supportive therapy n=32 pts). In the curative arm, CR was obtained in 66.8% of pts. Treatment related mortality (TRM) was 11.2% after induction and 4.5% after consolidation I, respectively. Median overall survival for all pts in the curative arm was 12 months, event free survival (EFS) at 12 years was 0.11±0.02%. In multivariate analysis, cytogenetics at diagnosis was the most important prognostic factor for CR (p=0.001). With a median follow up of 10 years (range 0.1 - 11.8) probability of overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 0.48±0.11; 0.13±0.03; 0.10±0.04 and 0.08±0.03 for pts with favorable, normal, other and unfavorable cytogenetics. Median survival for pts treated with palliative chemotherapy was 54 days. In conclusion treatment of older AML pts with an intense dose of AraC in the induction therapy is feasible and able to induce high rates of CR. Nevertheless, despite the high CR rate in this setting OS and EFS are still low. However, importantly, this does not apply for patients with favorable cytogenetics. This result also confirms the need for cytogenetic analysis to be performed in all pts older than 60 years potentially eligible for intensive induction therapy. The treatment results with palliative chemotherapy are disappointing. These results reported here need to be set in relation with the new therapeutic modalities for AML including epigenetic and molecular therapies. Disclosures Al-Ali: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Wolf:Bayer: Honoraria; Geo Pharma: Honoraria.

Description: Abstract 1612 Poster Board I-638 Cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) is a heterogeneous disease with molecular markers impacting considerably on survival. Acquired gene mutations such as the internal tandem duplication (ITD) of the FLT3 gene has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, it has been shown that the poor prognosis in the group of patients with high risk cytogenetics could be improved, when a consolidation therapy with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HCT) was performed. To investigate the importance of a postremission consolidation therapy in CN-AML patients according their mutational status for the FLT3-ITD mutation we compared the clinical outcome in these patients on an intention to treat analysis. A total of 800 patients have been entered into two OSHO (East German study group for hematology and oncology) studies between 1997 and now. The first protocol (AML 96) compared two different induction schedules employing different schedules of intermediate AraC and Idarubicin. The second protocol (AML 2002) studied the role of two different induction therapies in patients failing to reach CR after the first induction therapy. From the 800 patients treated within these protocols 338 pts. had a normal karyotype. Complete remissions were obtained in 277 patients after one or two induction cycles. Out of these patients 78 pts received a consolidation therapy by allogeneic HCT whereas 169 pts were further treated by conventional chemotherapy or by autologous transplantation. HCT was performed after conditioning with cytoxan and 1200 cGy total body irradiation followed by GvH-D prophylaxis with cyclosporine and methotrexate. Material at the time of diagnosis to analyse the presence of a FLT3-ITD mutation was available in 116 pts. Of those, 70 patients received conventional chemotherapy whereas 46 pts. were transplanted from an allogeneic donor as postremission therapy. Data were analyzed on an intend-to-treat-analysis in 116/277 patients being in CR1 after induction therapy from whom a FLT3-ITD mutation analysis was available. The EFS in this cohort of 116 patients was 38% after 5 years. Within the subgroup of patients (n=46) who received a HCT from an allogeneic donor the EFS was 44% compared to 33% (p=0.19) within the subgroup of conventional treated patients(n=70). As previously described, the detection of a FLT3-ITD mutation had a negative impact on event free survival which was calculated with 25% after 5 years in contrast to 46% in FLT3-ITD negative patients (p=0.06). In a further step EFS was analyzed according to the FLT3 status and the postremission treatment given. The EFS in conventional treated patients was significantly different (FLT3-ITD negative: LFS=50% vs. FLT3-ITD positive: LFS=19%; p=0.05). But, allogeneic HCT in first complete remission equalizes this difference (FLT3-ITD negative: LFS=50% vs. FLT3-ITD positive: LFS=35%; p=0.58). Major significant differences were seen in relapse incidences (RI) between the four subgroups of patients (FLT3-ITD positive and negative, conventional postremission therapy or allogeneic HCT; p=0.003). FLT3-ITD positive patients treated with conventional chemotherapy had a RI of 80% that could be reduced to a RI of 48% in the group of HCT patients. Within the two different treatment groups of FLT3-ITD negative patients the RI in the conventional treated group was 55% compared to 26% in HCT patients. To conclude, the worse prognostic impact of the presence FLT3-ITD mutation on the outcome of CN-AML pts. can be improved by allogeneic HCT performed in first complete remission after two courses of induction therapy. Allogeneic HCT reduces the relapse incidence in FLT3-ITD positive as well as in FLT3-ITD negative pts. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Treatment of elderly patients with AML remains challenging. While increasing doses of induction and consolidation chemotherapy have failed to improve outcome, efforts to decrease relapse rates using the graft-versus-leukemia effect have shown promising results in phase II studies. In the present analysis of the prospective OSHO 2004 study we evaluated the effect of post-induction hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in comparison to conventional consolidation chemotherapy (CT) on outcome in elderly patients with AML. The OSHO 2004 study is part of the German intergroup study. Upon achieving complete remission (CR) after induction, patients were assigned to CT or HCT depending on the availability of a matched related or unrelated donor. Unrelated, single antigen mismatched donors were accepted in high risk situations. By April 2014 from 817 eligible patients, 505 entered CR (62%) after one or two induction therapies. From the 452 patients who received consolidation in CR 1, 31 patients (7%) relapsed and 10 (2%) died of complications during consolidation. No further therapy for medical reasons was given to 73 patients, 206 patients received second consolidation with cytarabine (0.5 g/m2 i.v. bid d1, 3, 5) plus mitoxantrone (10 mg/m² d1-2) and 132 patients underwent HCT. Most frequent conditioning regimens for HCT were low dose TBI (83%) and treosulfan/fludarabine (12%). Most of the patients received HCT from unrelated (80%) donors and the majority received grafts from HLA-identical (78%) donors. Our analysis was restricted to the 315 patients

Description: The optimal consolidation chemotherapy in AML patients 〉60 years has yet to be defined in detail. Although age-adjusted induction chemotherapy results in CR rates comparable to those in younger patients, relapse remains the major hurdle to successful treatment. While the role of stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in elderly patients is currently being evaluated in randomized studies, we focus here on the intensity of consolidation chemotherapy. Patients data from the elderly AML trials OSHO 1997 (n=410) and OSHO 2004 (n=733) were pooled and analyzed. These protocols have identical inclusion/exclusion criteria and induction chemotherapy, but differ in the intensity of consolidation therapy. In the OSHO 1997 trial, Ara-C 120 mg/m2 bid was given from day 1-5 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 from day 1-2 as consolidation. In the OSHO 2004 an intensified consolidation using Ara-C 500 mg/m2 bid on day 1/3/5 was applied together with mitoxantrone as used in the OSHO 1997 study. Of the 1143 patients, 689 entered CR (60% in the OSHO 1997 and 61% in the OSHO 2004) and 536 (OSHO 1997, n=242, OSHO 2004, n=294) did not receive HSCT as consolidation. The analysis concentrated on the dose of AraC used in the consolidation for this elderly population and on the cycles of consolidation applied. Patient characteristics were compared using chi-square test for categorical data and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous data. OS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariate comparisons were made by means of the log-rank test. Cox regression was used to find any association between consolidation chemotherapy considered as a time-dependent covariate on Overall Survival (OS) or Relapse Incidence (RI). RI and Non Relapse Mortality (NRM) were calculated using the competing risk method, and the Gray test was applied to compare differences. Multivariate modeling was performed by Cox regression analyses with a forward selection method. Median ages in the AML studies were 66 (60-81) years and 69 (60-85) years for the OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004, respectively. Patients characteristics were balanced except for age and Karnofsky score (p〈 .0005) and a trend towards more intermediate and high risk karyotypes, more female and less WBC in the OSHO 2004 compared to the OSHO 1997 study (p=0.06). OS at 15 years was 14±2% in all patients with no difference between the two consolidations, but strong dependence on cytogenetic risk factors. In multivariate analyses risk factors for survival were high/intermediate risk karyotypes, male gender, non de-novo AML and less than two consolidations. Patients with two consolidations had better OS than patients with one or no consolidations in the pooled group and in each of the two protocols with no difference between OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004. Relapse incidence amounted to 79±2% and NRM 10±04% at 15 years with no difference between the two protocols. Relapse incidence was dependent upon cytogenetic risk and the number of consolidations applied in a multivariate model. There were no risk factors predicting TRM in multivariate analysis. Our analysis of patient characteristics according to the number of consolidations showed the distribution of consolidation therapies to be 15.2%, 28.0%, 56.6% and 14.2%, 32.3% and 53.4% for 0, 1 and 2 consolidations in the OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004 respectively (n.s.). Higher age, higher risk cytogenetics, non-de novo AML type, less CR after one induction cycle and lower WBC count at diagnosis were characteristic of patients receiving none or one as compared to two consolidation therapies. The multivariate analysis revealed cytogenetics and gender as independent risk factors, but not the application of one as opposed to two consolidation treatments. The increase of AraC dose in the OSHO 2004 was unable to either increase survival or improve relapse incidence in the cohort of elderly patients. TRM was not different between the OSHO 1997 and 2004 studies. However, the application of one or two consolidation cycles had a significant impact on survival that was not due to decreased relapse incidence after normalization for risk factors. Interestingly, just above 50% of patients received 2 consolidations as proposed in the protocol with no statistically significant difference between OSHO 1997 and OSHO 2004. Patients receiving fewer consolidation therapy cycles are older, have more non-de novo AML and lower WBC count. Disclosures: Hochhaus: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Travel Other; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Description: Background: Clinical superiority of R-MCP (rituximab, mitoxantrone, chlorambucil, prednisolone) vs. MCP alone in patients with advanced stage indolent Non-Hodgkin’s-Lymphoma was demonstrated in a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical trial (n=358). Data on resource utilization were collected alongside this clinical trial. Objective: To evaluate the health economic consequences, i.e. total cost and cost-consequences, of R-MCP vs. MCP from the perspective of a German payer (statutory sickness fund). Methods: Resource utilization data on 329 patients were collected and analyzed for the treatment phase (8 month). In addition, an interim analysis of the first 3 years of the subsequent observation period (planned: 7 years) was conducted. Data on resource utilization for initial chemotherapy, chemotherapy administration, treatment of adverse events, treatment of complications/progressive disease, subsequent chemotherapies and treatment for other reasons were collected. Several sensitivity analyses were performed to address different cost environments (e.g. treatment at university hospital vs. municipal hospital vs. private practice) and discounting scenarios. Results: Mean cost of the treatment phase in the base case analysis was EUR 35,890 for R-MCP (95%CI: EUR 33,178 – 38,602 and EUR 21,508 MCP per patient (95%CI: EUR 17,703 – 25,314). More treatment cycles were administered in the R-MCP arm (1,026 MCP, 1,237 R-MCP). Mean cost per active treatment cycle was EUR 4,932 for R-MCP (95%CI: EUR 4,512 – 5,353) and EUR 3,270 for MCP (95%CI: EUR 2,619 – 3,922). Mean (undiscounted) cost per patient in the observation period amounted to EUR 9,973 for R-MCP (95%CI: EUR 6,015 – 13,931) and EUR 15,896 for MCP (95%CI: 13,407 – 18,385). Mean observation time, after end of active treatment, was similar in both arms, 28.5 months for R-MCP, 27.5 months for MCP. Costs for treatment of adverse events, new chemotherapies and other reasons were reduced by 23%–39%, cost for treatment of progressive disease by 76% in the R-MCP arm compared to MCP alone. Extrapolating data to a full 3-year observation period results in savings of EUR 8,214 per patient with R-MCP compared to MCP alone. This compensates approx. 60% of the higher costs from the treatment phase. Clinically, R-MCP resulted in an objective response rate of 85.6% vs. 65.5% with MCP. After two years, based on Kaplan Maier estimate, event free survival for R-MCP was 69% vs. 44% for MCP alone (p〈 0.001) (For more detailed clinical results see abstract by Herold et al.) Conclusion: Initial treatment costs with R-MCP were EUR 14,382 higher compared to MCP alone. However, approx. 60% of additional costs are regained during the first three years after therapy due to savings for subsequent treatments, particularly for progressive disease. Combined with the clinical superiority of R-MCP, a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio may be expected when more mature data are available.