ALBERT

Description: Background: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) engineered T cell therapy is currently revolutionizing the field of cancer immunotherapy. However, further enhancement of the function of CAR T cells either through modification of CAR structure or through combination with other therapies is intensively investigated. Resistance to apoptosis is one of the hallmarks of cancer biology. Overexpression of anti-apoptotic proteins of the Bcl-2 family proteins, such as Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and Bcl-xl is considered primarily responsible for the increased apoptosis resistance and prolonged survival of hematological tumor cells. Apoptosis inhibitor blockade agents (AIBAs) such as Bcl-2, Mcl-1 and COX inhibitors could sensitize malignant cells to apoptosis. Therefore, combining CAR T cell therapy with AIBAs might be a promising approach to increase the therapeutic response. However, the third generation of CAR T cells including a 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain which triggers a signaling cascade with the upregulation of anti-apoptotic molecules might be hampered by AIBAs. Therefore, in this study we analyzed the influence of AIBAs on third generation CD19 CAR T cells. Materials and methods: CD19 CAR T cells were manufactured using a 3rd generation CAR vector containing both CD28 and 4-1BB co-stimulatory domains. The expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family members in leukemia/lymphoma cell lines and in CD19 CAR T cells have been assessed by quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blot (WB) and flow cytometery. The optimal concentrations of inhibitors have been determined by CellTiter Glo™ assay. The effect of inhibitors on CAR T cells and tumor cells has been evaluated by chromium-51 (51Cr) release assay, Calcein AM™ assay and FACS-based apoptosis assay. Intracellular cytokine staining and surface marker staining were performed to determine the function of CAR T cells. Results: qRT-PCR and WB showed that leukemia/lymphoma cell lines 380 and U698M had the highest Bcl-2 (qRT-PCR: 1.73 ± 0.04, p = 0.001; WB: 1.82 ± 0.54, p = 0.016) and Mcl-1 (qRT-PCR: 12.39 ± 1.37, p = 0.000; WB: 1.92 ± 1.08, p = 0.142) expression levels, respectively,. These findings were confirmed by anti-apoptotic BCL-2 family protein intracellular staining. Elevated protein expression of Mcl-1, Bcl-2 and Bcl-xl was observed in CAR T cells upon 380 cell stimulation. The manufactured CD19 CAR T cells exhibited specific killing on CD19+ tumor cells. A slightly enhanced killing efficiency of CAR T cells was observed when 380 cells were co-cultured with CAR T cells in the presence of ABT199 (0 µM vs. 1 µM: 54.21 ± 3.23 vs. 69.06 ± 2.17, p = 0.0041). This result could be explained by a higher sensitivity of 380 cells to ABT199 than CART cells and by an increased activation of CAR T cells. Even though the killing efficiency of CAR T cells was not improved by S63845, the CD107a+TNF-α+IFN-γ+ CAR T cells were increased as well as the proliferation and persistence of CAR T cells were strengthened. Of note, pretreatment of tumor cells with inhibitors could significantly enhance the killing efficiency of CAR T cells via upregulation of CD19 antigen on tumor cells (ABT199-pretreated 380 cells: 0 µM vs.1 µM, 42.59 ± 5.82 vs. 54.58 ± 4.87, p = 0.0493; S63845-pretreated-U698M cells: 0 µM vs. 0.3 µM, 31.88 ± 4.77 vs. 66.35 ± 8.09, p = 0.000). Conclusion: The quantity of CAR T cells can be negatively affected by Apoptosis inhibitor blockade agents. However, the quality of CAR T cells could be improved. The cytotoxic effect of CAR T cells can be further enhanced by pretreatment of tumor cells with inhibitors. Disclosures Müller-Tidow: MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dreger:Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau. Schmitt:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia; Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support. Schmitt:Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support.

Description: Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy is currently one of the most promising treatment approaches in cancer immunotherapy. However, the immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment, in particular increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, provides considerable limitations. In this study, we aimed to exploit increased ROS levels in the tumor microenvironment with prodrugs of ROS accelerators, which are specifically activated in cancer cells. Upon activation, ROS accelerators induce further generation of ROS. This leads to an accumulation of ROS in tumor cells. We hypothesized that the latter cells will be more susceptible to CARTs. CD19-specific CARTs were generated with a CD19.CAR.CD28.CD137zeta third-generation retroviral vector. Cytotoxicity was determined by chromium-51 release assay. Influence of the ROS accelerators on viability and phenotype of CARTs was determined by flow cytometry. The combination of CARTs with the ROS accelerator PipFcB significantly increased their cytotoxicity in the Burkitt lymphoma cell lines Raji and Daudi, as well as primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Exposure of CARTs to PipFcB for 48 h did not influence T cell exhaustion, viability, or T cell subpopulations. In summary, the combination of CARTs with ROS accelerators may improve adoptive immunotherapy and help to overcome tumor microenvironment-mediated treatment resistance.

Description: Introduction T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) have demonstrated significant clinical efficacy in patients with lymphoid malignancies including relapsed or refractory (r/r) B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) or r/r B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Second-generation CAR T cells comprising 4-1BB or CD28 as costimulatory domains have become commercially available for the treatment of patients with CD19+ lymphoid malignancies. However, achievement of durable clinical responses remains a challenge in CAR T cell therapy. Consequently, third-generation CARs incorporating both elements might display short-term efficacy with potent and rapid tumor elimination (CD28) as well as long-term persistence (4-1BB). So far, only two clinical trials employing third-generation CAR T cells have been reported. Both enrolled 31 patients in summary and demonstrated favorable results for third-generation CAR T cells. Here, we report on first results of our investigator-initiated trial (IIT) on third-generation CD19-directed CAR T cells: The Heidelberg CAR trial 1 (HD-CAR-1; NCT03676504; EudraCT 2016-004808-60) is a phase I/II trial initiated in September 2018 with in-house leukapheresis and CAR T cell manufacturing in full compliance with European Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines at the University Hospital Heidelberg. Methods Adult and pediatric patients with r/r ALL and patients with r/r chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or NHL including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are treated with autologous T lymphocytes transduced with a CD19 targeting third-generation CAR retroviral vector (RV-SFG.CD19.CD28.4-1BBzeta). The main purpose of HD-CAR-1 is to evaluate safety and feasibility of escalating third-generation CAR T cell doses (1-20×106 transduced cells/m2) after lymphodepletion with fludarabine (30 mg/m2/d on days -4 to -2) cyclophosphamide (500 mg/m2/d on days -4 to -2). Patients are monitored for cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and/or other toxicities. In vivo function, survival and anti-tumor efficacy of CAR T cells are assessed. Results To date, 10 patients (3 adult ALL, 2 CLL, 2 MCL, 2 DLBCL, 1 transformed FL) have been enrolled and subjected to leukapheresis. Transduction efficiency of T lymphocytes ranged between 33%-66% and high numbers of transduced CAR T cells were harvested (70-123x106 CAR T cells). No production failure occurred. CAR T cell products were sterile and free from mycoplasma and endotoxins. The copy number per CAR T cell did not exceed 7. Eight patients (2 adult ALL, 2 CLL, 1 MCL, 2 DLBCL, 1 transformed FL) have received the CAR T cell product (6 patients: 106 transduced cells/m2; 2 patients 5×106 transduced cells/m2). No signs of CRS or ICANS 〉 grade 2 have been observed. Only one patient required tocilizumab. No neurological side-effects occurred, even not in patients with involvement of the central nervous system (CNS). In quantitative real-time PCR, CAR T cells were detectable in the peripheral blood (PB) in 3 of 4 analyzed patients or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of an ALL patient with CNS involvement. The CAR T cell frequency reached up to 200,000 copies/µg DNA, in some patients beyond end-of-study at day 90 after CAR T cell administration. Clinical responses to treatment were observed in 6/8 (75%) treated patients so far (2/8 patients have received CAR T cells recently and are not yet evaluable for response). Conclusion Leukapheresis and CAR T cell manufacturing were effective for all patients enrolled in the HD-CAR trial to date. Patients responded clinically to treatment despite low numbers of administered CAR T cells. CAR T cells displayed an excellent safety profile and were detectable for more than 3 months following administration. Furthermore, CAR T cells migrated into different compartments including the CSF in case of CNS involvement. For HD-CAR-1 leukapheresis, CAR T cell manufacturing, CAR T cell administration, patient monitoring and follow-up are performed in-house, providing autarky from transport or production sites outside the University Hospital Heidelberg. Altogether, HD-CAR-1 accounts to clinical evaluation of third-generation CAR T cells that might contribute to long-term CAR T cell persistence, hence improving efficient and durable responses in treated patients. Disclosures Schmitt: Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support . Sellner:Takeda: Employment. Müller-Tidow:MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dreger:AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Consultancy; AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis, Riemser, Roche: Speakers Bureau; Neovii, Riemser: Research Funding; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia. Schmitt:Therakos Mallinckrodt: Other: Financial Support; MSD: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: Sponsoring of Symposia.