ALBERT

Description: Background Polycythemia vera (PV) is a subgroup of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) BCL-ABL1 negative. The current therapy of PV should be aimed at preventing vascular complications and avoid increasing the risk of leukemic transformation. The therapy response monitoring is based in the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) unified definition of clinical resistance and intolerance to hydroxycarbamide in polycythaemia vera consensus process, published by Barbui T et al in Br J Haematol 2010;148(6):961-963. Objectives We conducted a study to assess in our clinical practice the aplicability of the standard criteria for resistance and intolerance proposed by ELN in patients (pts) with PV that have been treated with hydroxycarbamida (HU). Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with PV enrolled in a single Hematology University center in South Brazil. All pts were treated according to PV guidelines, and the response monitoring was based on clinical practice. All database was compared to standard criteria proposed by ELN. Intolerance /resistance was defined by: a) need for phlebotomy to keep hematocrit 〈 45% after 3 months of at least 2 g/d of HU or b) uncontrolled myeloproliferation (ie, platelet count 〉 400 x109/L and white blood count (WBC) 〉 10 x109/L) after 3 months of at least 2g/d of HU or c) failure to reduce massive splenomegaly by 50% as measured by palpation or failure to completely relieve symptoms related to splenomegaly after 3 months of at least 2 g/d of HU or d) absolute neutrophil count 〈 1.0 x109/L or platelet count 〈 100 x109/L or hemoglobin 〈 10 g/dL at the lowest dose of HU required to achieve a complete or partial clinicohematologic response or e) presence of leg ulcers or other unacceptable HU related nonhematologic toxicities, such as mucocutaneous manifestations, GI symptoms, pneumonitis or fever at any dose of HU. Results We analyzed data from 33 patients with PV assisted in the last five years in our outpatient clinical data. The ELN criteria for resistance and intolerance were accessed in these patients. At diagnosis, 42,4% of pts were younger than 61yo, and 54,5 were male. Arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia were identified on 21, 2 and 7 pts, respectively. Only one patient was tobacco smoker at diagnosis. Total of 5 pts showed WBC 〉 15 x109/L, and 7 pts showed platelets 〉 450 x109/L. Massive splenomegaly is a rare PV manifestation in our series, occurring in 2 pts. Five patients complained of symptoms related to PV as pruritus and vasomotor phenomena at diagnosis. Less than 5% of patients had been treated with 2 g of HU for more than 3 months. In daily practice, when the patient presented hematologic toxicity, the HU was decreased and, if the hematocrit was over 45%, an occasional phlebotomy was performed. In relation to platelets (less than 400 x 109/L) and leucocyte (less than 10 x109/L) counts, these targets were not used exclusively in the clinical practice to change treatment. The intolerance was easily discriminated in patients with leg ulcers and other non-hematological events. Conclusion These criteria were done based on an expertise consensus for international criteria standardization for clinical studies. Its application in a retrospective study, using clinical daily practice data is not adequate. The reason is that in the last years the main target to treat patients was the hematocrit above 45%, the exact number of platelets and leucocytes is still not a consensus to define resistance, so different counts had been used to guide treatment, we rarely used HU doses above 1500 mg/daily to treat our patients and massive splenomegaly was observed in very few patients. These criteria should be used most for prospective studies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 2296 Background: Comorbidity in cancer has been shown to be a major determinant in treatment selection and survival. The most used instrument for measuring comorbidity in Hematology is the Charlson comorbidities index (CCI). It is a list of 19 conditions with weight assigned from 1 to 6, derived from relative risk estimates of a proportional hazard regression model using clinical data. The ACE-27 is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition. Little is known about the impact of comorbidity in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Aims: Our objectives were to evaluate the impact of comorbidity in the outcomes of a cohort of chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) patients (pts) treated with imatinib and compare the results from the 2 indexes (CCI and ACE-27). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with CP-CML from a south Brazilian database. All patients received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the European LeukemiaNet recommendations. Comorbidity conditions were registered at any point during evaluation and CCI and ACE-27 scores were applied to each patient. The outcomes were event-free survival rate (EFS) and imatinib temporary suspension rate. EFS was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of any of the following events while on therapy: death from any cause, loss of complete hematologic response, loss of complete cytogenetic response, discontinuation of therapy for toxicity or lack of efficacy, or progression to accelerated phase or blastic phase. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days. We conducted 3 types of analysis concerning treatment suspension: suspension for any reason (toxicity and nonadherence), suspension only due to toxicity and only due to nonadherence to treatment. Results: We analyzed data from 185 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (range 4 – 85). The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 months (range 0 – 178) and 29% of pts had more than 12 months lapse. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 70% pts. CCI distribution among pts: score point 0 was assigned to 136 pts, score point 1 to 24 pts, score point 2 to 11 pts, score point 3 – 6 to 13 pts and 1 pt with missing information. ACE-27 distribution among pts: score point 0 was assigned to 92 pts, score point 1 to 51 pts, score point 2 to 21 pts, score point 3 to 19 pts and 2 pts with missing information. The indexes showed a strong correlation (Spearman's coefficient 0,7, P

Description: Introduction: Patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory PMBCL (rrPMBCL) are typically treated like those with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), often with limited effective treatment options and poor outcomes. Unlike DLBCL and similar to classical Hodgkin lymphoma, PMBCL has frequent genetic abnormalities leading to over-expression of the programmed death (PD)-1 ligands, PD-L1 and PD-L2. This suggests that rrPMBCL should be sensitive to PD-1 blockade. In the phase 1b KEYNOTE (KN)-013 study (NCT01953692), pembrolizumab was associated with frequent and durable responses (Zinzani, Blood 2017) in pts with rrPMBCL. The international phase 2 KN170 (NCT02576990) study was conducted to extend these findings and evaluate correlative biomarkers of response. Here, we present updated results of all pts in KN013 (n=21) and the first full analysis of pts in KN170 (n=53). Methods: KN013 enrolled pts with rrPMBCL who had failed, were ineligible for, or refused autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). KN170 enrolled pts with rrPMBCL who had relapsed after or were ineligible for ASCT with ≥2 lines of prior therapy. In KN013, the initial 10 pts received pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg Q2W; the remaining 11 patients and all patients on KN170 received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W for up to 2 years. Archival or fresh tumor tissue obtained before pembrolizumab initiation was used for correlative studies. Tumor response was assessed with PET/CT scans by IWG 2007 criteria. The primary endpoint of KN170 was objective response rate (ORR) by blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety/tolerability. Exploratory endpoints included response by Lugano 2014 criteria and biomarker analyses. Data cutoff dates for this analysis were Apr 4, 2018 for KN013 and April 13, 2018 for KN170. Results: KN013 enrolled 21 pts with a median of 3 prior lines of therapy, of whom 13 (62%) were ASCT-ineligible. KN170 enrolled 53 pts also with a median of 3 prior lines, of whom 39 (74%) were ASCT-ineligible due to chemorefractoriness. In KN013, ORR was 48% (10/21; 95% CI, 26-70), with a CR rate of 33% (7/21). In KN170, ORR was 45% (24/53; 95%CI, 32-60), with a CR rate of 13% (7/53; 11/53 [21% by Lugano criteria]). In KN013, after a median follow-up duration of 29.1 mo (range, 0.6-49.6), median DOR was not reached (range, 1.9+ to 39.8+ mo) (Panel A). 2 patients in KN013 in CR at 2 years remained in CR after a further 12 and 18 mo of follow-up off therapy. After a median follow-up of 12.5 mo for KN170 (range, 0.1-25.6), median DOR was not reached (range, 1.1+ to 22.0+ mo) (Panel A). At data cutoff, no patient who achieved a CR on KN170 had relapsed. In KN013, median PFS was 10.4 mo (95%CI, 3.4 to not reached) with 12-mo PFS rate of 47%; median OS was 31.4 mo with 12-mo OS rate of 65% (Panel B). In KN170, median PFS was 5.5 mo (95%CI, 2.8-12.1) with 12-mo PFS rate of 38%; median OS was not reached (95% CI, 7.3 to not reached) with 12-mo OS rate of 58% (Panel B). In KN013, no new safety signals were observed compared with prior analyses. In KN170, 30 (57%) pts had a treatment-related AE (TRAE). Common (≥5%) TRAEs included neutropenia (19%), hypothyroidism and asthenia (8% each), and pyrexia (6%). 12 (23%) pts had a grade 3-4 TRAE, including 5 (9%) with grade 3 and 2 (4%) with grade 4 neutropenia. Six (11%) pts had an immune-mediated AE including 1 (2%) with grade 4 pneumonitis. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: Together with the longer follow-up results of KN013, KN170, the largest prospective clinical trial in rrPMBCL, establishes the robust antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in this disease, with exceptionally durable responses and survival in responding patients. These results provided the basis for the FDA accelerated approval of pembrolizumab in patients with rrPMBCL. Disclosures Armand: Otsuka: Research Funding; Adaptive: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Affimed: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding; Tensha: Research Funding. Rodig:Merck & Co., Inc.: Research Funding; Affimed Inc.: Research Funding; KITE Pharma: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers-Squibb: Research Funding. Özcan:Jazz: Other: Travel support; Bayer: Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Other: travel support, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Travel Support, Research Funding; Jazz: Other; Celgene: Other: Travel support, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Archigen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Abbvie: Other: Travel payment; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Travel payment, Research Funding. Fogliatto:Novartis: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Walewski:Roche, Celegene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, and Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche, Celgene, Takeda, Janssen-Cilag, and Servier: Honoraria; Roche, GSK/Novartis, Takeda, and Janssen-Cilag: Research Funding. Gulbas:Pfizer: Other: Travel expenses; Roche and Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ribrag:Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; MSD: Honoraria; NanoString Technologies: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: travel; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Other: travel; Infinity: Consultancy, Honoraria; epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Research Funding; pharmamar: Other: travel; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; argenX: Research Funding. Christian:Immunomedics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Genentech: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Perini:Janssen and Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen and Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Janssen and Takeda: Other: Travel expenses. Salles:Merck: Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria; Acerta: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria; Morphosys: Honoraria; Servier: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Epizyme: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Svoboda:Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa: Consultancy; Regeneron: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy; Merck: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Chatterjee:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Orlowski:Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment. Balakumaran:Amgen: Equity Ownership; Merck & Co., Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shipp:Bayer: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Zinzani:PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astra Zeneca: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; SERVIER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celltrion: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; MSD: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; PFIZER: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Verastem: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau.

Description: CML is a well characterized disease with a known chromosomal abnormality. The inhibition of BCR-ABL protein tyrose kinase activity represented an advance in the treatment of this disease. Imatinib is effective in chronic, accelerated and blastic phase disease, and is the CML first line treatment around the world. In Brazil, this drug is provided by the State since 2003. The drug is available for second line treatment in chronic phase and for accelerated and blastic phase as the first line therapy. In chronic phase, the patients are treated first with interferon. If this treatment is too toxic or not effective, the choice therapy is imatinib 400 mg and the dose can be escalated up 600 mg. In accelerated and blastic phases the treatment is imatinib 600 mg. Mutational studies are not routinely performed and the failing patients are encourage to participate in bone marrow transplantation programs or clinical research centers. The present data are obtained from public health hospital database and included 400 CML Ph+ patients from Rio Grande do Sul, south of Brazil. 232 patients are male and 158 female and around 70% were Caucasian. The median age at diagnosis was 46, 79 y (median 49, 28). The mean laboratory values at diagnosis were: hematocrit 33 (median 34, 8), hemoglobin 11, 08 (median 11, 40), white blood cells 158.594 (median 110.000) and platelets 466.000 (median 380.000). From the 400 patients, 300 pts were diagnosed in chronic phase, 52 pts in accelerated phase and 20 pts in blastic phase. In 28 patients the disease phase was unknown. In the majority of patients Imatinib was started because interferon treatment was not tolerated (121 patients) or ineffective (123 patients). Of these patients 285 were in chronic, 59 pts in accelerated and 17 pts in blastic phases. The cytogenetic response evaluated at 12 months of treatment was available in 231 patients: 164 complete responses, 20 major responses, 15 minor responses and 32 patients demonstrated none or minimal response to therapy. In 169 patients the response is unknown. The progression free survival for the chronic phase patients in 80 months of observation is 90% and the event free survival for the entire group is 60% in the same period. The progression from chronic to accelerated or blastic phase was more common in the first year of imatinib treatment and decreased progressively until the fifth year of therapy. This data demonstrate the epidemiologic profile and the treatment results of CML patients in south of Brazil. Imatinib is available in public health system as a second line treatment and the survival rate is quite good. Since last July this drug has been available as first line treatment, even in chronic phase. A longer follow up and a uniform database registry are needed to study the impact of imatinib treatment in this population.

Description: CFSA, an 18-year-old woman with a history of weight loss and abdominal discomfort was diagnosed with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in December 2002. The WBC were 440 x 109 /L with 25% neutrophils, 20% bands, 9% metamyelocytes, 9% myelocytes, 8% promyelocytes, 10% basophils, 9% eosinophils, 1% lymphocytes and 8% blasts. The hemoglobin was 9,8 g/dL and platelet count 416 x 109/ L. A bone marrow examination demonstrated granulocytic hyperplasia and the presence of Philadelphia chromosome in 100% of the metaphasis. A diagnosis of CML was made and she was started on hydroxyurea and imatinib 600mg daily. No matched HLA donor was found. There was a partial hematological response. In February 2005 on imatinib (600 mg) she was pregnant and an ultrasound scan showed a viable fetus of 17 weeks. The WBC were 22 x 109 /L with 50% neutrophils, 23% bands, 8% metamyelocytes, 12% myelocytes, 1% promyelocytes, 5% lymphocytes, hemoglobin 11,4 g/dl and platelet count 290 x 109. Imatinib was stopped and she remained off treatment during pregnancy. Cesarean section was performed at 38th week because of preeclampsia (hypertension, headache and scotomas). A healthy girl weighing 2980 g, 46,5 cm in length with Apgar score of 9 was delivered. The infant’s physical examination, WBC, hemoglobin, platelet count and cranial ultrasonography were normal. The baby is presently healthy with no developmental abnormalities. There are few reports on the use of 600 mg a day of imatinib and pregnancy. It is of notice, although probably unrelated, the event of preeclampsia. The effects of imatinib on fetus are unkown and should be considered teratogenic until more studies or cases are reported.

Description: Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patients (pts), but in a subgroup of pts controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of imatinib therapy. The definitions of response, warning signs and failure to treatment, with the identification of pts at greater risk of progression or failure, were revised and published in 2013 by the European Leukemia Net group. Aims To apply the new recomendations of ELN2013 in order to verify the evolution of the patients according to the response criteria at 12 months (mo) of imatinib therapy. Methods Retrospective study in a cohort of patients with CP-CML from a southern Brazilian database. All patients received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN2013 criteria and were classified in 3 groups according to the cytogenetic and molecular responses at 12 mo: optimal, warning and failure. An event was defined as any of the following while on therapy: death from any cause, loss of complete hematologic response, loss of complete cytogenetic response, discontinuation of therapy for toxicity or lack of efficacy, or progression to accelerated phase or blastic phase. Results Data from 98 pts with a median follow-up (FU) time of 40 mo was analysed. At 12 mo of imatinib therapy, 35 pts (36%) had optimal response according to the ELN2013 criteria. 26 (26,5%) were classified as warning and 37 (37,5%) as failure. Within the pts with optimal response, only 4 (11%) have had any event, with a median time-to-event (TTE) of 36 mo; in the warning group the event rate and TTE were 3 (12%) and 28 mo, respectively. There were no significant differences in the results between these two groups. On the other hand, within the pts with failure, 24 (65%) presented an event during FU with a TTE of 19 mo. This difference was significant compared to the two previous groups. Interestingly, within the warning group, 12 pts (46%) developed major molecular response (MMR) at any point during FU, while only 12 (32%) pts achieved RMM in the failure group. Conclusion In this cohort of CP-CML pts is established the diference in the event rate between the pts who achieve optimal or warning responses at 12 mo of imatinib treatment when compared with those with failure criteria, according to the new ELN2013 recomendations. Despite having some late responders, atention must be paid in pts in the failure group as they are in greater risk of progression or failure. As demonstrated in this analysis, the ELN2013 criteria can be applied in this population in the clinical practice. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 4487 Background: Imatinib treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) was first introduced in Brazil in 2001, initially used as second line therapy for patients resistant or intolerant to interferon (IFN). In 2008 imatinib was adopted as front-line therapy for chronic-phase (CP-CML) and clinical experience is improving since then, but little is known about the result of its introduction in our clinical practice. Aims: To evaluate the impact of imatinib treatment in the outcomes of a cohort of CP-CML and the prognostic significance of Sokal and Hasford scores and late-onset treatment. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study in a cohort of patients with CP-CML from a south Brazilian database. All patients received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the European LeukemiaNet. The outcomes were response to treatment, event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: We analyzed data from 185 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 years (4 – 85). The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 months (0 – 178) and 29% of pts had more than 12 months lapse. Prior therapy with IFN was used in 70% pts. All pts had a minimum follow-up of 12 months. At baseline, 57 pts (31%) were in complete hematological response (CHR) due to the use of previous treatment. Of the 127 pts not in CHR at baseline, 98% achieved CHR early during imatinib treatment. 177 pts had cytogenetic evaluation during treatment and 9 pts were in complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) due to the use of previous IFN. Of the 168 pts not in CCyR at baseline, 86,4% achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) during imatinib treatment (84% had a CCyR and 2,4% had a partial cytogenetic response). The rate of pts achieving MCyR any point during treatment differed significantly in the low, intermediate and high risk Sokal score groups (97%, 81% and 78% respectively, P=0,04), but not in the Hasford score groups (90%, 85% and 72%, P=0,22). Minor cytogenetic response was seen in 3,6% of pts, minimal cytogenetic response in 6% and 9,5% had no cytogenetic response. The median time to a MCyR was 9 months, with 62% of pts achieving MCyR at 12 months. The rate of pts achieving MCyR in 12 months differed significantly between pts who start imatinib before 12 months from diagnosis (68%) and those late treated (47%, P=0,02). Evaluation of minimal residual disease at the molecular level was available for 155 pts: 25,5% of pts had a complete molecular response (CMR), 43% had a major molecular response (MMR) and 2 pts were in MMR at baseline due to previous IFN. The projected EFS and OS rates at 4 years were, respectively, 68% and 92% after a median follow-up time of 4 years. The rate of EFS differed significantly in the low, intermediate and high risk Sokal score groups (80%, 66% and 52% respectively, P=0,04), but not in the Hasford score groups (78%, 62% and 44%, P=0,09). During treatment with imatinib, 120 pts (65%) had a register of any grade hematologic adverse event (21% being grades 3 or 4) and 165 pts (90%) had a register of any grade nonhematologic adverse event (9,3% being grades 3 or 4). Of the 185 pts who received treatment, 134 (72%) continue to receive imatinib and 51 (28%) discontinued treatment. The reasons for discontinuation were: 11 (6%) pts had drug-related adverse events (3 [1,6%] hematologic and 8 [4,3%] nonhematologic), 17 (9,2%) had disease progression (5 [2,7%] loss of CHR, 10 [5,4%] loss of CCyR, 2 [1%] had progression to accelerate or blastic phase), 22 (11,9%) had treatment failure (3 [1,6%] had no CHR, 13 [7%] had no CCyR and 6 [3,2%] had no MMR), 1 pt (0,5%) discontinued due to comorbidity. For the 51 (100%) pts that discontinued imatinib, 31 (61%) switched to dasatinib, 17 (33%) to nilotinib, 1 (2%) to hydroxyurea, 1 (2%) to other treatment and 1 (2%) remained without treatment. Sixteen pts (8,6%) died during imatinib treatment or during long-term follow-up after discontinuation of imatinib. Conclusions: In our population of CP-CML pts treated with imatinib, a majority of patients achieved complete cytogenetic and major molecular responses, with a prolonged of OS and EFS and good safety profile. Sokal score showed better prognosis prediction than Hasford. Early onset of imatinib therapy led to better outcomes and justifies imatinib as front-line treatment of our patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Introduction: Lymphomas are an important complication of HIV infection where they occur with high frequency and are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality.The most prevalent lymphoma subtype in HIV positive population is the diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLCBL). Antiretroviral therapy (ART) and intensive chemotherapy have been introduced to these patients aiming to increase their response to treatment. Recently, dose adjusted-EPOCH (DA-EPOCH) was associated with better outcome when compared with CHOP. Since these publications, many centers in the world started treating HIV DLBCL patients with EPOCH. In Brazil, Rituximab is not allowed for the treatment of HIV lymphomas (any subtype) in the public health system, so HIV DLBCL patients usually are treated with CHOP or DA-EPOCH. Objective:To compare the progression free survival and overall survival in HIV DLBCL patients treated with CHOP and DA-EPOCH at Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, a university public hospital from the southern part of Brazil. Material and Methods:A retrospective cohort of all HIV positive patients and DLBCL, treated from 2007 to 2017 at HCPA. The medical records were reviewed to collect clinical data, reports on pathology, immunohistochemistry, computed tomography (TC) and/or FDG-PET scan from diagnosis and after treatment. Overall survival and progression free survival was determined by the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was determined by a log-rank test. The study was approved by the institutional review board and complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent. Results:Forty-three HIV positive patients with untreated DLBCL were enrolled. The median age was 44 years, and 93% had a intermediate or high age-adjusted international prognostic index (aa-IPI). Specific adverse prognostic features included elevated LDH in 84%, B symptoms in 82%, Ann Arbor stage III or IV in 70% and extra-nodal disease in 81%. Central nervous system involvement was found in 9% of patients before treatment. Patients had a median CD4 cell count of 113 cells/mm3 with 21% having a CD4 cell count less than 50 cells/mm3 and 16% of patients were ART naive. Until 2014, CHOP was the chosen treatment for 34 patients. After 2014, DA-EPOCH was the prefered chemotherapy for HIV DLBCL patients and 9 patients were treated with this protocol. The progression free survival at 24 months was 69% in the CHOP group and 83% in DA-EPOCH (p=0.68). Overall survival at same period was 34.5% for CHOP vs 37% for EPOCH (p=0.74). CHOP and DA-EPOCH treatment groups presented similar features regarding the lymphoma and HIV infection, except for higher LDH level and aa-IPI score in the CHOP arm (p=0.02 and p=0.03, respectively). Discussion:The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related to DLBCL in this subgroup of patients was associated with a very high-risk prognostic score group. Moreover, 21% of them presented a low count of CD4 cells (less than 50 cells/mm3) at diagnosis. The overall survival was lower than expected for both groups and DA-EPOCH was not associated with better outcome when compared to CHOP. This unexpected finding could be explained in part by the small sample of patients treated with DA-EPOCH, the population prognostic features and the unavailability of rituximab in the treatment of these patients. The follow up study will provide more informations about the impact of DA-EPOCH in our HIV patients. The access to rituximab in HIV DLBCL treatment should be an important point of discussion with public health care providers in Brazil. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background:Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) are limited. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class small-molecule inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase. These extended access programs (EAP) provided patient access to ibrutinib in Brazil and real-world safety data was collected, at a time when the medication was not commercially available in Brazil. Methods:These two prospective, multicenter, open-label EAPs of single-agent ibrutinib were conducted between April 2013 and August 2017, and enrolled Brazilian patients with relapsed/refractory CLL or MCL. Eligible patients must have progressive disease after at least one prior therapy and not suitable for retreatment with purine analogue therapy. After a 30-day screening, eligible patients received once-daily oral ibrutinib 420 mg (CLL) or 560 mg (MCL) continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, absence of clinical benefit, or end of EAP, whichever occurred first. Doses could be withheld or reduced based on toxicity. Patients were monitored for safety and disease evaluations were conducted per routine local standard of care practices. Results:Of 33 CLL patients enrolled, 32 received one dose of drug or more and were included in the safety analysis. Median age was 62.5 years, and most patients were male (n=24; 75%) and white (n=27; 84.4%). The median time from CLL diagnosis to study inclusion was 83.8 months and from diagnosis to relapsed/refractory state, 42.0 months. The median number of ibrutinib cycles was 12.0 (1.0-16.0) with a median treatment duration of 11.1 (0.9-11.6) months. Eight patients discontinued due to adverse event (AE; n = 4; 12.5%), consent withdrawal (n = 2; 6.3%), death (n = 1; 3.1%), or disease progression (n = 1; 3.1%). AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were intestinal bleeding, neutropenia, infection, and gastric tumor (one patient each). Three (9.4%) patients had dose reductions: one (3.1%) for neutropenia, febrile neutropenia with pneumonia, or worsening fatigue. 21 patients (65.6%) had at least one Grade ≥3 (G3) AE or serious AE (SAE). The most frequent G3 or SAEs included neutropenia in 8 (25.0%), fatigue (1), leukocytosis (1), and pneumonia (3). No atrial fibrillation or bleeding AEs were reported. Among the 47 G3 or SAEs, 17 (36.2%) were serious, 38 (80.9%) were suspected to be related to ibrutinib, and 39 (83.0%) were resolved without sequelae. All 13 MCL patients enrolled in the study were included in the safety analysis. The median age was 60.0 years, and most patients were male (n=9; 69.2%) and white (n=9; 69.2%). The median number of prior treatment regimens were 3. The median time from diagnosis to the first dose of ibrutinib was 20.4 months. The median number of ibrutinib cycles was 19 (4.0-34.0) with a median treatment duration of 16.8 (3.6-30.5) months. Eight patients discontinued because of either death (n=3; 23.1%) or disease progression (n=5; 38.5%). The three patients died with treatment-emergent G4 or higher AEs, including pneumonia (G5; probably treatment-related [TR]), sepsis (G5; not TR), and dyspnea (G4; doubtful TR); 8 patients (61.5%) had at least one G3 or higher treatment-emergent AE. The most frequent AE was diarrhea (n=3; 23.1%), and other AEs were reported in one patient each (i.e. abdominal hernia, anemia, appendicitis, dyspnea, febrile neutropenia, influenza, leukocytosis, neutropenia, pneumonia, productive cough, renal failure/insufficiency, retroperitoneal abscess, thrombocytopenia). Three (23.1%) patients had ibrutinib dose modifications: one (7.7%) each because of appendicitis/tuberculosis, thrombocytopenia, and diarrhea/retroperitoneal abscess/dyspnea. No atrial fibrillation or bleeding AEs were reported. Among the 20 G3 or higher treatment-emergent AEs, 14 (70%) were suspected to be related to ibrutinib and 15 (75%) were resolved. Conclusions: This is the first real-world experience with ibrutinib monotherapy for CLL and MCL in Brazil. Overall, treatment was well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities. No atrial fibrillation or bleeding AEs were reported. Of 32 patients with relapsed/refractory CLL, 24 (80%) remained on therapy, 4 (12.5%) discontinued due to AEs, 1 (3.1%) each died or experienced disease progression. Among 13 patients with relapsed/refractory MCL, 5 (38.5%) remained on the therapy, 3 (23.1%) died and 5 (38.5%) experienced disease progression. Disclosures Chiattone: Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Fogliatto:Novartis: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Scheinberg:Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Speakers Bureau. Bigni:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Rodrigues:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Garicochea:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Pimenta:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Boechat:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Musacchio:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Goncalves:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Vieira:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Santos:Janssen: Employment. Grings:Janssen: Employment. Parisi:Janssen: Employment. Barreyro:Janssen: Employment.

Description: Abstract 4453 Background Treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia with imatinib leads to disease remission in a majority of patient, but in some patients (pts) controlling the disease remains a challenge. One of the proposed prognostic factors for identifying this subset of pts is the treatment response in the first months of therapy. Objectives We conducted a study to evaluate the importance of the early complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) and the factors associated with its achievement. Methods This is a retrospective study in a cohort of pts with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CP-CML) enrolled in 3 Hematology centers in South Brazil. All pts received imatinib 400mg as first or second-line therapy. Early-imatinib treatment was considered when imatinib started before 12 months (mo) from diagnosis. Patient evaluation and response criteria followed the ELN recommendations. The ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) is a 27 item comorbidity index for patients with cancer and assign weights from 1 to 3 based on the dysfunction grade of each condition (mild, moderate and severe, respectively). An ACE-27 score was applied to each patient. Imatinib suspensions were considered if superior to 20 days at any point during therapy. Global survival (GS) was measured from the start of imatinib to the date of death from any cause. Results We analyzed data from 181 pts with CP-CML diagnosed since 1990. The median age at diagnosis was 48 yr (4 – 85) and 55% were male. The median time from diagnosis to imatinib was 7 mo (0 – 178) and 71% pts were early-imatinib treated. Prior therapy with interferon was used in 60% pts. The median of follow-up was 47 mo. With 6 months of imatinib therapy, 123 pts (68%) achieved CCyR, in this group the four year global survival was 97%. 58 (32%) were not in CCyR at 6 months of therapy, in this group the four year GS was 87%. This difference was significant (P=.024; Figure 1). The chance of achieving major molecular response (MMR) during follow up was 79% for the pts with CCyR at 6 months compared to 53% for the group with no CCyR at 6 months (P