ISSN:
1572-8412
Keywords:
CAI
;
academic writing
;
critical thinking
;
process/ model
;
meaning in poetry
;
linguistic markers
;
comparison/ contrast
;
technical writing
;
argument
;
collaborative writing
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Computer Science
,
Media Resources and Communication Sciences, Journalism
Notes:
Abstract This study compares pencil-and-paper and computer-assisted versions of a college process/model program in critical thinking and academic writing to a traditional composition program. Students in the experimental sections used more linguistic markers of argument and comparison/contrast, attempted more arguments and made stronger arguments. CAI students also did better than students in the pencil-and-paper sections on some measures. Applications of computer assisted techniques in studying meaning in poetry, teaching technical writing and in teaching practice, suggest new approaches to collaborative thinking and writing.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00115026
Permalink