ISSN:
1573-8205
Source:
Springer Online Journal Archives 1860-2000
Topics:
Energy, Environment Protection, Nuclear Power Engineering
,
Physics
Notes:
Conclusions The advantage of the instrumental methods here described lies in the fact that no additional apparatus is required for determining subcriticality; it is sufficient simply to use an analog reactivity meter allowing the source component in the solving part to be varied. By using these methods we may determine the bias voltage (constituting the analog of a steady-state source in the reactor) in the subcritical state. If the intensity of the source does not alter very sharply over the period of measurement (5–10 min), the introduction of the source function into the instrument is an “on-off” operation, after which the reactivity meter is able to monitor any changes in Keff continuously without first bringing the reactor into the critical state. This offers the possibility of making quite accurate measurements to ensure nuclear safety. In cases in which it is required to secure especially accurate and reliable results, these measurements may be repeated as from the critical state as part of a total monitoring operation. The safety of operations requiring passage into the critical state is also increased, since the passage into the critical state is monitored completely. Instrumental methods of measuring subcriticality are universal; they embrace not only critical assemblies but also any energy-stressed reactors in the subcritical state, and enable us to measure temperature effects, effects of poisoning, and so on, i. e., effects characteristic of energy-stressed reactors. In addition to this, these methods may be applied both in the presence and in the absence of a strong neutron background in the reactor.
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01118776
Permalink