Publication Date:
2012-02-24
Description:
Scientific communication relies on evidence that cannot be entirely included in publications, but the rise of computational science has added a new layer of inaccessibility. Although it is now accepted that data should be made available on request, the current regulations regarding the availability of software are inconsistent. We argue that, with some exceptions, anything less than the release of source programs is intolerable for results that depend on computation. The vagaries of hardware, software and natural language will always ensure that exact reproducibility remains uncertain, but withholding code increases the chances that efforts to reproduce results will fail.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Notes: 〈/span〉Ince, Darrel C -- Hatton, Leslie -- Graham-Cumming, John -- England -- Nature. 2012 Feb 22;482(7386):485-8. doi: 10.1038/nature10836.〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Author address: 〈/span〉Department of Computing Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK. d.c.ince@open.ac.uk〈br /〉〈span class="detail_caption"〉Record origin:〈/span〉 〈a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22358837" target="_blank"〉PubMed〈/a〉
Keywords:
Algorithms
;
Editorial Policies
;
*Information Dissemination
;
Intellectual Property
;
Periodicals as Topic/standards
;
Publishing/*standards
;
Reproducibility of Results
;
Research/*standards
;
Research Design
;
*Software
Print ISSN:
0028-0836
Electronic ISSN:
1476-4687
Topics:
Biology
,
Chemistry and Pharmacology
,
Medicine
,
Natural Sciences in General
,
Physics
Permalink