Electronic Resource
Bingley
:
Emerald
Industrial and commercial training
26 (1994), S. 16-20
ISSN:
0019-7858
Source:
Emerald Fulltext Archive Database 1994-2005
Topics:
Economics
Notes:
Contains a critique of Honey and Mumford's learning style theory, whilerecognizing its pioneering achievements. Questions what Honey andMumford mean by learning and experience and explores the validity ofviewing experience as the primary "motor" of learning. Raises doubts aboutthe sequence of the learning cycle as depicted by Honey and Mumford.Asks: Does the learning styles questionnaire meaningfully measurelearning preferences or is it more accurately a personalityquestionnaire? What do certain questionnaire scores mean, e.g. lowscores across the spectrum? Do not certain subjects and situationsprescribe the learning approach regardless of one's preference?
Type of Medium:
Electronic Resource
URL:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00197859410051235
Permalink
|
Location |
Call Number |
Expected |
Availability |