ALBERT

Description: Background Peripheral neuropathy is one of the most frequent adverse events associated to bortezomib therapy; among neuropathic syndromes, postural hypotension is described as well. However, information on disautonomic toxicity are limited and there are no studies addressed to this particular issue so far. Before starting this study we had observed a case of dramatic acute autonomic failure during bortezomib treatment in a patient with advanced multiple myeloma, who developed severe orthostatic hypotension, tachycardia and impairment to tolerate the sitting and orthostatic posture for several weeks. Methods We prospectively studied 12 consecutive patients, treated with bortezomib at our Institution between February 2005 and July 2006. Assessment included neurological examination, INCAT Disability scale, INCAT sensory sum score, MRC sum score, nerve conduction studies, and standard cardiovascular autonomic tests including Lying to standing, Deep breathing and Postural hypotension. These tests were conducted baseline and after each bortezomib 21-days cycle up to three consecutive cycles. Results Two pts showed a clinically evident autonomic involvement with orthostatic hypotension; a change to a pathological score in 2 out of 3 tests anticipated clinical disautonomic signs in 1 and 11 weeks respectively. Clinical impairment showed to be reversible in both cases. Four pts presented only 1 pathological test (without any clinical sign or symptom of postural hypotension) and 6 patient had normal results. There was no apparent correlation between autonomic impairment and disease response to therapy or patients baseline characteristics (disease stage, Ig class, previous anti-myeloma therapies, concomitant thalidomide or anti-hypertensive treatment); furthermore, none had evidence of amyloidosis. Conclusions Our prospective study confirms that autonomic dysfunction is a potential adverse effect of bortezomib. Autonomic, non invasive, cardiovascular testing may reveal subclinical involvement and precede clinical evidence of disautonomic neuropathy. Further studies in larger cohorts of patients are needed to clarify the interactions between proteasome inhibitor activity and autonomic nervous system, in order to assess the frequency, the ability of available test in early pre-clinical diagnosis and the potential of the reversibility of neuropathic signs after drug discontinuation.

Description: Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are effective against multiple myeloma (MM), but the mechanisms of action and bases of individual susceptibility remain unclear. Recent work linked PI sensitivity to protein synthesis and proteasome activity, raising the question whether different levels of proteasome expression and workload underlie PI sensitivity in MM cells (MMCs). Exploiting human MM lines characterized by differential PI sensitivity, we report that highly sensitive MMCs express lower proteasome levels and higher proteasomal workload than relatively PI-resistant MMCs, resulting in the accumulation of polyubiquitinated proteins at the expense of free ubiquitin (proteasome stress). Manipulating proteasome expression or workload alters apoptotic sensitivity to PI, demonstrating a cause-effect relationship between proteasome stress and apoptotic responses in MMCs. Intracellular immunostaining in primary, patient-derived MMCs reveals that polyubiquitinated proteins hallmark neoplastic plasma cells, in positive correlation with immunoglobulin (Ig) content, both intra- and interpatient. Moreover, overall proteasome activity of primary MMCs inversely correlates with apoptotic sensitivity to PI. Altogether, our data indicate that the balance between proteasome workload and degradative capacity represents a critical determinant of apoptotic sensitivity of MMCs to PI, potentially providing a framework for identifying indicators of responsiveness and designing novel combination therapies.

Description: Proteasome inhibitors (PI) proved to be extremely effective against different types of cancer, particularly against Multiple Myeloma (MM), a frequent and still incurable plasma cell malignancy. Phase II clinical trials showed that more than 50% of MM patients fail to respond to bortezomib, the only PI currently approved for clinical use. However, the mechanisms of action and bases of individual susceptibility to PI remain largely unclear, with no reliable predictor of response identified so far. Recent evidences linking proteasome activity and Ig synthesis to susceptibility to PI suggest that the exquisite sensitivity of MM cells (MMC) to PI might be explained by an imbalance between the efficiency of the ubiquitin (Ub)-proteasome pathway and the demand for proteasome-mediated degradation. We set out to explore this hypothesis both in vitro and ex vivo. To achieve this aim, we employed human MM cell lines characterized by differential apoptotic sensitivity to PI (U266 and RPMI8226, fairly resistant cell lines, versus MM.1S, an extremely sensitive one) and primary, patient derived MMC. In MM cell lines, we found that high apoptotic sensitivity to PI is associated with lower expression of active proteasomes (as assessed by decreased expression of cleaved catalytic subunits and enzymatic assays with fluorogenic substrates in cell extracts), together with higher proteasomal workload (demonstrated by higher proteasome-dependent loss of TCA-insoluble radioactivity in pulse-chase assays). Indeed, MM.1S cells displayed 2–3 times lower proteasomal activity as compared to the more resistant U266 and RPMI8226 cells, both on a per cell basis and upon normalization by protein content. Together with the reduced proteasome capacity, MM.1S cells showed a consistently higher production of client proteins for the Ub-proteasome pathway. Such an increased load appears to be the consequence of a higher production of Rapidly Degraded Polypeptides (RDP). These are newly synthesized proteins which are quickly redirected to proteasome-mediated degradation. The imbalance between proteasomal load and capacity results in remarkable accumulation of poly-Ub proteins at the expense of free Ub (as established by both western blotting and immunofluorescence), unveiling basal proteasome stress in PI-sensitive MMC. In order to establish a causal link between proteasome stress and sensitivity to PI, we pharmacologically modulated either proteasome expression or workload and successfully altered PI-induced apoptosis. As predicted, increasing proteasome workload by means of ER stressors (e.g. tunicamycin, thapsigargin, brefeldin A) dramatically enhances susceptibility to PI, while a raise in proteasomal activity (achieved by exploiting the proteasome stress response, an adaptive mechanism by which mammalian cells induce proteasome biogenesis in response to either decreased proteasome function or increased proteasomal demand), confers marked resistance to PI-induced apoptosis. Having established cause-effect relationships between determinants of proteasome stress and vulnerability to PI in vitro, we then asked if our model could be used to predict responsiveness to PI in MM patients. In keeping with this hypothesis, intracellular immunostaining in primary, patient-derived MMC reveals that accumulation of poly-Ub proteins specifically hallmarks neoplastic plasma cells, indicating that the cancer compartment in MM patients suffers from proteasome stress. Moreover, poly-Ub levels positively correlate with Ig content, both intra- and inter-patient, suggesting a direct effect of Ig synthesis and/or retention on proteasome functional load. Finally, overall proteasome activity of primary MMC inversely correlates with the intrinsic apoptotic sensitivity to PI as assessed ex vivo, providing a rationale for the assessment of this parameter as a potential predictor of the in vivo response to bortezomib or other PI. Altogether, our data indicate that the balance between proteasome workload and degradative capacity represents a critical determinant of apoptotic sensitivity of MMC to PI, providing both a novel predictive tool of potential prognostic value and the framework for novel combination therapies aimed at exacerbating proteasome stress in MM.

Description: Abstract 2494 Background. Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is currently listed in the WHO classification of lymphoid tumors as a single genetic and morphological entity with variation in clinical presentation. In particular, three clinical subsets of BL are recognized: endemic (eBL), sporadic (sBL) and immunodeficiency associated (ID-BL). Each affects different populations and can present with different features. So far, possible differences in their gene expression profiles (GEP) have not been investigated. In this study we aimed to 1) assess whether BL subtypes present with differences in their GEP; 2) investigate the relationship of the different BL subtypes with the non-neoplastic cellular counterparts; 3) Identify genes and programs specifically deregulated in BLs and possibly contributing to the malignant phenotype. Methods. We studied by GEP 128 cases of B-cell derived malignancies and 20 samples of normal B-cell subpopulations GEP analysis. In particular, we included 40 BLs (13 eBLs, 21 sBLs 6 HIV-BLs), 40 follicular lymphomas, 10 chronic lymphocytic leukemias, 10 GCB-type diffuse large B-cell lymphomas, 10 ABC-type DLBCL, 5 primary mediastinal B-cell lymphomas, 13 HIV-related DLBCL, as well as 10 germinal center (GC), 5 naïve and 5 memory cells samples. GEP results were confirmed by dividing BL cases into training and test subgroups. In addition, as further validation, we performed immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tissue microarrays containing 85 BL cases as well as functional assays in vitro and in vivo, by focusing on the role of RBL2, a tumor suppressor gene involved in cell cycle control and mutated in eBL. Specifically, we used cell transfection and shRNAs (for mimicking MYC over-expression and RBL2 silencing), soft agar and invasion capability assays, and xenografted mouse models. Results. First, we found that BLs constitute a unique molecular entity, with a relatively homogeneous GEP, distinct from other B-cell malignancies. Indeed, by unsupervised analysis all BLs clearly clustered apart of other lymphomas. However, by supervised analysis, we found that BL subtypes presented slight differences in their GEPs. Particularly, eBLs and ID-BLs appeared to be almost identical, diverging from sBLs. Specifically, they varied for genes involved in cell cycle control, BCR-signaling, and TNF/NFKB-pathways. Of note, eBLs and ID-BLs on one hand, and sBLs on the other (roughly corresponding to EBV+ vs. EBV− cases) also differed for genes target of mi-R127a, which is altered in EBV+ cases as a direct consequence of viral integration. To further investigate cell cycle regulation in BLs, we inferred a network of RBL2-depending genes by reverse engineering, by uncovering possible RBL2 transcriptional targets. Interestingly, we found that eBL and sBL diverged for genes belonging to such network. Notably, we provided evidences that RBL2 can cooperate with MYC in inducing a neoplastic phenotype in vitro and in vivo. In particular, lymphoblastoid cells engineered to carry both MYC over-expression and RBL2 silencing presented with increased colony formation and matrix invasion capabilities, and higher efficiency in inducing tumor formation in nude mice if compared to single transfectants (MYC+ or RBL2−). Moreover, as the present WHO classification does not definitely identify the counterpart of eBL, we compared BLs GEP to those of normal B-cells. We found that all BL subtypes were intimately related to GC cells (by showing an early stage GC differentiation arrest), differing from them for molecules specially involved in cell proliferation, immune response, and signal transduction. Finally, as further validation of GEP, we studied by IHC the expression of SPARC and CYR61, two molecules involved in human tumorigenesis. Indeed, they turned out to be consistently expressed by neoplastic elements in all instances, as indicated by GEP analysis. Conclusions. Our study provided substantial insights on the pathobiology of BLs, by offering novel evidences which may be relevant for its classification and possibly future treatment. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 2385 Background. Allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the best therapeutic option for high-risk hematological disease (HRHD), particularly acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia (AML/ALL). A widely application of HSCT is limited by lack of availability of a suitable donor for every candidate patients (pts). In order to offer a donor to every candidate pts, several centers had developed in the last decade alternative strategy of HSCT, such as umbilical cord blood (UCB) or family haploidentical HSCT (haplo-HSCT). With the aim to treat high-risk leukemia in the ideal appropriate time by allogeneic HSCT, we adopted a policy relying upon HLA typing at entry of every pts diagnosed with HRHD, followed, in absence of a MRD, by the prompt activation of the MUD search. Patients lacking a MRD or a MUD at the appropriate timing are proposed for haplo-HSCT. Methods. Here we report an intention-to-treat analysis of alternative donor HSCT at our Institution for pts diagnosed with high risk AML or ALL. Data were obtained from local institutional database. Results. Between Jan-2004 and July-2010 241 pts (median age 48y, r 15–72) with diagnosis of ALL (60 pts; median age 33y, r 15–64; male 39) or AML (181 pts, median age 51y, r 19–72; male 83) were defined as “high risk status” and received an indication to HSCT according to EBMT (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation) and Northern Italy Leukemia Group (NILG, www.nilg.it) recommendations. In the ALL group 3 pts died before proceed to HSCT, 5 pts are waiting for the identification of a donor. Overall, 52/60 (86%) pts underwent HSCT, the status of disease at transplant was of complete remission (CR) for 27 pts, persistence of disease (PD) for 25. In the AML group 6 pts died before proceed to HSCT, 15 pts are waiting for the identification of a donor. Overall, 160/181 (88%) pts underwent HSCT, the status of disease at transplant was of CR for 97 pts, PD 63. Overall 92 pts activated the research of a MUD, 42 proceed to transplant, 7 received a UCB, 26 received a haplo-HSCT due to absence of a suitable donor in the appropriate time frame or failure to met the criteria to engage a MUD donor. The median time from diagnosis to registry activation was 69 days (r 5–876), the median time from activation to transplant 84 days (r 28–348). In the group of pts in CR at transplant, 37 underwent HSCT from a MRD and 36 from a MUD, 4 pts received a UCB and 47 a haplo-HSCT. Seventy-two pts are alive and in CR at last follow-up, 3/72 after a second transplant from a different donor (haplo-HSCT) and 3/72 after chemotherapy and adoptive immunotherapy to treat hematological relapse. Fifty-two pts died and the causes of death were: relapse (27), infection-related (19), graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD; 5), acute myocardial infarction (1). In the group of pts in PD at transplant, 16 underwent HSCT from a MRD and 6 from a MUD, 3 pts received UCB and 63 a haplo-HSCT. Fifteen pts are alive, 14 in CR, 1 pts under adoptive immunotherapy; 1/14 pts received a second transplant from a different donor (haplo-HSCT) to treat hematological relapse. Seventy-three pts died and the causes of death were: relapse (43), infection (23), GvHD (7). Overall, the median survival is 382 days and the median follow-up for pts alive is 548 days. The 1-year overall survival (OS)/transplant related mortality (TRM)/relapse incidence (RI) are 50,76% 26,96% and 40% respectively. For pts transplanted in CR the 1y OS/TRM/RI are 77,2%, 20,01% and 25% respectively. The outcome analysis per donor source (MRD vs MUD vs haplo-HSCT) is comparable (p=ns). For pts transplanted in PD the 1y OS/TRM/RI are 19,7%, 41% and 67% respectively. The outcome analysis per donor source (MRD vs MUD vs haplo-HSCT) shows a trend of lower RI and TRM in the haplo-SCT vs MRD. Conclusion. The policy adopted provided an allogeneic HSCT in 〉 80% of candidate high-risk acute leukemia patients. No significant differences were registered in outcome for patients transplanted from matched-related, unrelated or family haploidentical donors. Further evaluation and a long-term follow-up will add important evaluation in term of long-term disease control and long-term toxicities. Disclosures: Bonini: MolMed: Consultancy. Bordignon: Molmed: Employment.

Description: Background: Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is a rare, X-linked, life-threatening primary immunodeficiency caused by mutations in the gene encoding the WAS protein (WASP). WASP-deficient immune cells have compromised immunological synapse formation, cell migration and cytotoxicity. Thus, WAS is characterized by development of recurrent or severe infections, eczema, and increased risk of autoimmunity and malignancies. In addition, WASP deficiency results in microthrombocytopenia, leading to severe bleeding episodes. When a suitable donor is available, WAS can be treated by hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), but HSCT can be impeded by complications such as graft versus host disease, rejection and autoimmunity. Importantly, HSCT may carry higher risks in older children (〉2-5 yrs) [Shin et al, 2012; Moratto et al, 2011]. An alternative approach is gene therapy (GT). We previously reported interim results of a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT01515462) in 8 subjects treated with OTL-103, a drug product composed of autologous CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) transduced ex vivo with a lentiviral vector (LV) encoding human WASP cDNA under the control of the endogenous promoter [Ferrua et al, 2019]. We now report updated results on the safety and efficacy of OTL-103 in 17 subjects treated at San Raffaele Hospital as part of the same clinical trial or expanded access programs (EAP) with up to 8 yrs follow up (FU). Methods: NCT01515462: As described in Ferrua et al, 8 male subjects (mean age at GT: 4.8 yrs, range 1.1-12.4) were treated with OTL-103. The source of autologous CD34+ HSPCs was bone marrow (BM; n=5), mobilized peripheral blood (mPB; n=2) or both (n=1). As part of a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen, rituximab was given 22 days prior and busulfan + fludarabine during the week before OTL-103 infusion. At time of reporting, all subjects had ≥3 yrs FU (range: 3-8 yrs). EAP: 9 male subjects (11.2 yrs, 1.4-35.1) received identical treatment to subjects in the clinical trial; autologous CD34+ HSPCs source was mPB in all subjects. At time of reporting, subjects had a median of 1.4 yrs FU (range: 0.1-3.0 yrs) with 6/9 having ≥1 yr FU. Results: At last FU for all subjects (median: 3.0 yrs, range 0.1-8.0), overall survival was 94% (16/17). One EAP subject died 4.5 mo post-GT, due to deterioration of an underlying neurodegenerative condition considered unrelated to OTL-103 by investigator. To date, there have been no reports of insertional oncogenesis or replication-competent LV. While most subjects experienced adverse events (AEs) due to the reduced-intensity conditioning regimen (mainly mild or moderate), there were no reports of AEs related to OTL-103. Efficacy endpoints analyses were performed on surviving patients with ≥1 yr FU. Evidence of engraftment of genetically corrected HSPCs and LV+ colonies in BM was observed within 3 mo and persisted up to 8 yrs - the longest published FU of LV vector durability to date (Figure). WASP expression was restored after GT, shown by increases in the fraction of WASP+ lymphocytes and platelets (PLT) within 3 mo and maintained thereafter (Table). After GT, PLT counts improved, leading to a reduction of frequency and severity of bleeding events. Independence from PLT transfusions and absence of severe bleeding events were observed in all subjects by 9 mo FU (Table). Immune function improved; all evaluable patients discontinued immunoglobulin supplementation after GT (median time to discontinuation: 0.9 years after GT, range: 0.2-5 years). Furthermore, reduction in severe infection rate was observed post-GT, suggestive of immune reconstitution (Table). The decrease in bleeding events and severe infection rates occurred despite the integration of subjects into normal daily activities. Eczema progressively resolved or was reduced compared to baseline. Conclusions: This combined analysis of 17 subjects treated in a clinical trial or EAP with up to 8 yrs FU demonstrates that GT continues to be an effective treatment for WAS. All surviving subjects achieved high levels of multilineage engraftment, sustained restoration of WASP expression in lymphocytes and PLTs, improved PLT counts, and fewer bleeding events. A significant reduction in severe infection rate suggests reconstitution of immune function. Importantly, clinical benefit was also attained in older subjects (〉5 yrs), a group considered at higher risk when treated with allogeneic HSCT. Disclosures Jones: Orchard Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dott:Orchard Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Naldini:Genenta Science: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Magenta Therapeutics: Equity Ownership; San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-TIGET), a joint venture between Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele (OSR): Other: Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) gene therapy was licensed to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in 2014. It was then licensed to Orchard Therapeutics (OTL) in April 2018. OTL is the current sponsor of the clinical trial.. Aiuti:San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-TIGET), a joint venture between Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele (OSR): Other: Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome (WAS) gene therapy was licensed to GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) in 2014. It was than licensed to Orchard Therapeutics (OTL) in April 2018. OTL is the current sponsor of the clinical trial.; San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (SR-TIGET), a joint venture between Fondazione Telethon and Ospedale San Raffaele (OSR): Other: Study PI.

Description: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is classified into 3 clinical subsets: endemic, sporadic, and immunodeficiency-associated BL. So far, possible differences in their gene expression profiles (GEPs) have not been investigated. We studied GEPs of BL subtypes, other B-cell lymphomas, and B lymphocytes; first, we found that BL is a unique molecular entity, distinct from other B-cell malignancies. Indeed, by unsupervised analysis all BLs clearly clustered apart of other lymphomas. Second, we found that BL subtypes presented slight differences in GEPs. Particularly, they differed for genes involved in cell cycle control, B-cell receptor signaling, and tumor necrosis factor/nuclear factor κB pathways. Notably, by reverse engineering, we found that endemic and sporadic BLs diverged for genes dependent on RBL2 activity. Furthermore, we found that all BLs were intimately related to germinal center cells, differing from them for molecules involved in cell proliferation, immune response, and signal transduction. Finally, to validate GEP, we applied immunohistochemistry to a large panel of cases and showed that RBL2 can cooperate with MYC in inducing a neoplastic phenotype in vitro and in vivo. In conclusion, our study provided substantial insights on the pathobiology of BLs, by offering novel evidences that may be relevant for its classification and possibly future treatment.