ALBERT

Description: Essential thrombocythemia (ET) is associated with arterial and venous thrombosis, hemorrhage and transformation to acute leukemia and myelofibrosis. Cytoreduction with hydroxyurea (Hu) reduces thrombotic risk, but concerns about potential toxicity have led to the widespread use of a newer agent, anagrelide (Ag) as first-line therapy. However, no randomized trials comparing the efficacy and safety of Ag with Hu have been performed. The MRC PT1 trial is an international, multi-centre, randomized controlled trial comparing Ag with Hu in patients with ET at high-risk of vascular events (based on age, platelet count or cardiovascular risk factors). The trial was independently conceived, conducted and analysed by the investigators on behalf of the UK Myeloproliferative Disorders Study Group and the MRC Adult Leukaemia Working Party. Patients (newly diagnosed or previously treated) were randomized to receive either Ag plus aspirin (Ag+asp) or Hu+asp. Clinical end-points together with blood and bone marrow morphology were assessed centrally by experts blinded to treatment allocation. With 809 patients randomized and median follow-up of 39 months, it is the largest and most comprehensive randomized study of ET performed to date. Patients in the Ag+asp arm were significantly more likely to reach the primary end-point and several secondary end-points. Intention-to-treat log-rank analyses of time to event indicate that Ag+asp patients were significantly more likely than Hu+asp patients to reach the composite primary end-point of arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis or major hemorrhage (55 v 36 events; odds ratio 1.57; 95% CI 1.04–2.37; p=0.03). Ag+asp was also associated with increased rates of arterial thrombosis (37 v 17 events; OR 2.16; 95% CI 1.27–3.69; p=0.004) and major hemorrhage (22 v 8 events; OR 2.61; CI 1.27–5.33; p=0.008) but, interestingly, decreased venous thrombosis compared to Hu+asp (3 v 14 events; OR 0.27; CI 0.11–0.71; p=0.006). Myelofibrotic transformation, the diagnosis of which required new clinical and/or laboratory features in addition to grade III/IV reticulin fibrosis, was significantly increased in the Ag+asp arm (16 v 5 events; OR 2.92, CI 1.24–6.86, p=0.01). Transformation to MDS/AML was comparable between the two arms (4 Ag+asp v 6 Hu+asp), although the small number of transformations and short follow-up prevent firm conclusions about leukemogenicity. Overall survival was not statistically different. Ag+asp was more poorly tolerated than Hu+asp. In the Ag+asp arm significantly fewer patients remained on their allocated treatment (p

Description: MRC UKALL XII / ECOG E2993 was initiated in 1993, to prospectively define the role of allogeneic transplant (allo), autologous transplant (auto) or chemotherapy in adult ALL in first CR up to age 60 (65 since 2004). All patients received two phases of induction and, if in CR, patients 35 or a high WBC (〉30,000 for B-lineage or 〉100,000 for T-ALL). In a donor versus no donor analysis, patients with a sibling donor had improved OS and EFS and the relapse rate post allo was very significantly lower than for any other therapy. However, this advantage was confined to standard-risk patients. The lack of demonstrable survival benefit in high-risk patients was due to high mortality associated with age 〉35 years; the 2-year non-relapse mortality for patients with a donor was 39% (high-risk) and 20% (standard-risk) compared with 12% (high-risk) and 7% (standard-risk) among those without a donor. In an intention-to-treat analysis of chemo versus auto, patients receiving chemo had significantly better EFS. The difference between these 2 groups was not due to a higher mortality of auto but due to a higher relapse rate. Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) after induction phase II and intensification was highly predictive of outcome among the non-allo patients (OS 70% vs 22%; p=.0012). In summary, the data demonstrate that sibling allogeneic transplants for ALL in CR1 provide the most potent anti-leukemic therapy and considerable OS and EFS benefit for standard-risk patients. In contrast, the transplant-related mortality for high-risk older patients was unacceptably high and abrogated the reduction in relapse risk. Furthermore, the data show that there is no evidence that a single auto can replace consolidation/maintenance therapy in any risk group. Large collaborative trials are necessary, and feasible, to define the optimal therapy in uncommon disorders. 5-year data No. of Patients OS (%) EFS (%) Relapse (%) * P = 〈 .05 ** Autograft patients excluded Donor vs no donor 388 vs 527 *53 vs 45 *50 vs 41 *29 vs 54     High risk 170 vs 230 39 vs 36 38 vs 32 *36 vs 63     Standard-risk 218 vs 286 *63 vs 51 *59 vs 48 *25 vs 48 Randomized auto vs chemo 220 vs 215 37 vs 46 *33 vs 42 *61 vs 54 Donor vs no donor (chemotherapy)** 384 vs 418 *54 vs 44 *50 vs 40 *29 vs 55     High-risk 168 vs 190 41 vs 35 38 vs 31 *36 vs 63     Standard risk 216 vs 223 *64 vs 51 *59 vs 47 *24 vs 48

Description: The International ALL trial, conducted jointly by the MRC in the UK and ECOG in the US (UKALL XII/E2993), recruited 1929 patients between 1993 and 2006. All patients aged 16 to 64 years with newly diagnosed ALL, received the identical two phases of induction therapy. Patients with an HLA-identical sibling were assigned to a sibling allogeneic transplant and those who were Ph-positive could also get an unrelated-donor transplant. Patients who did not have a donor were to be randomized between a single autologous transplant, after conditioning with etoposide/total body irradiation, versus consolidation/maintenance therapy for 2.5 years. Following randomization, but prior to receiving the assigned or randomized therapy, all patients received intensification with 3 cycles of high-dose methotrexate. After excluding patients assigned to an allogeneic transplant, 1028 patients were eligible for randomization but, as in other major transplant studies, only 457 were randomized. The rationale underlying the randomization was based on the fact that protracted consolidation/maintenance therapy in adults, extrapolated from the pediatric experience, had never been prospectively evaluated in the era of intensive chemotherapy. Given that the mortality from autotransplant is not higher than chemotherapy (Goldstone et al. Blood. 2008), it was postulated that if a single autologous transplant is at least as good as standard protracted chemotherapy that may make it the preferable option, except possibly in females in whom fertility may be an issue. The overall survival and the event-free survival were significantly superior among the chemotherapy patients (p = .05) as previously reported (Goldstone et al. Blood. 2008). Because the literature contains reports suggesting a trend in favor of autologous transplantation in some patients with ALL (Dhédiu et al. Leukemia, 2006), an analysis was performed to see if any subgroup of patients could be identified in whom: 1. chemotherapy may not be superior to autologous transplant and 2. autologous transplant may be superior. The table lists a detailed analysis of overall survival looking at various age groups, B- versus T-lineage, the rapidity with which a complete remission was achieved –after phase I or only after phase II of induction. Detailed analysis was also performed by cytogenetics looking at those with standard risk versus those with high risk abnormalities [ t(9;22), t(4;11), t(8;14)] and low hypodiploidy/near triploidy or a complex karyotype (Moorman et al. Blood. 2007)]. In all groups, the chemotherapy group was at least as efficacious as the autograft group, and in some was even significantly superior to autologous transplantation. There is no evidence that other risk factors, such as relapse rate or treatment-related mortality, influenced these overall survival data. In addition, the tests for heterogeneity were not significant across any group. In conclusion, the overall survival was longer in patients randomized to chemotherapy, although the superiority was not statistically significant in most of the groups. There is no clinical indication for autologous transplantation at any age and particularly this should not be considered for patients over age 50, those with high-risk cytogenetics or T-lineage, and late remitters, for whom it might appear most attractive. Overall Survival (OS) at 5 years in 457 Randomized Patients Chemo Auto Subgroups n OS n OS P (log rank) Age (years) 〈 20 50 58% 43 46% 〉 0.1 20–29 61 52% 70 43% 〉 0.1 30–39 46 39% 46 32% 〉 0.1 40–49 38 31% 35 31% 〉 0.1 50 + 33 38% 35 31% 〉 0.1 B-lineage 169 46% 158 35% 0.03 T-lineage 45 54% 54 49% 〉 0.1 Time to CR phase I 193 48% 190 41% 0.1 phase II 26 36% 29 19% 0.08 Cytogenetics standard-risk 109 51% 122 44% 〉 0.1 high-risk 29 23% 27 7% 0.02

Description: Multiple factors are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of thrombosis in Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) including platelet number, activation of platelets and leukocytes; the formation of platelet leucocyte aggregates, and circulating prothrombotic and endothelial factors. The normal functional activity of platelets depends on the presence of platelet glycoprotein complexes, which play an important role in platelet adhesion and aggregation. A number of polymorphisms in platelet glycoproteins have been correlated with thrombotic events in hematologically normal patients. Particular polymorphisms of interest include three within the glycoprotein Ibα gene: −5T/C (affecting a Kozak sequence), 1018C/T (T145M, encoding Human Platelet Antigen − 2), a variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) in a region encoding the macroglycopeptide and one polymorphism C807T, within the glycoprotein Ia gene. To date whether there is a relationship between these platelet glycoprotein polymorphisms and the clinical features of ET has not been determined. In this study samples obtained from 797 ET patients recruited to the 3 large prospective PT–1 trials were genotyped for the polymorphisms of interest and the results were correlated with clinical events including haemorrhagic and arterial or venous thrombotic events in the year prior to diagnosis and following trial entry (median 30 months). The VNTR data were analysed using the sum of the number of repeats of both alleles and treated as a continuous variable using logistic regression for retrospective and a Cox survival model for prospective analyses; other polymorphisms were analysed using the Chi-squared test for the retrospective clinical events, and log-rank survival analysis for the prospective clinical events. Neither the C807T, −5T/C Kozak nor the T145M polymorphism was associated with clinical events in the ET patient cohort. Interestingly the number of VNTR repeats was inversely associated with (p=0.02) rate of arterial events after trial entry in this patient cohort, but not for events in the year prior to diagnosis or post trial entry venous thrombotic or haemorrhagic events. This analysis suggested that a decreasing sum of VNTR were associated with an increased risk of arterial thrombosis, the degree of increase in risk was 75% per repeat (95% confidence interval 1.0–2.9). After multivariate analysis of this data with correction for age, sex, JAK2V617F and MPLW515L/K status the effect of the number of VNTR repeats remained significant (p=0.048). These results suggest that the C807T, T145M and −5T/C Kozak polymorphisms do not correlate with clinical events in ET. However a reduction in the number of VNTR within the glycoprotein Ibα gene was progressively associated with arterial events post trial entry (p=0.024) and remained significant on multivariate analysis (p=0.048).

Description: This study was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (Robert L. Comis, MD and Mitchell D. Schnall, MD, PhD, Group Co-Chairs) and the Medical Research Counsel, United Kingdom, and supported in part by Public Health Service Grants CA180820, CA180794, CA180790, CA189859, CA180853, CA180791, and from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health and the Department of Health and Human Services. Its content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute. Background: Late relapse in acute leukemia is considered a relatively rare event. Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are often considered cured of the disease at 3 years, but information regarding adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is scarce. Data are presented from one of the largest prospective adult ALL studies, the MRC UKALLXII/ECOG E2993, to evaluate the rate and characteristics of late relapse in ALL. For this purpose, late relapse was defined, arbitrarily, as relapse 3 years post achievement of complete remission (CR) and very late relapse was defined as relapse 〉 5 years from CR. Methods: The UKALLXII/ECOG E2993 was an international ALL trial conducted jointly by the MRC in the United Kingdom and ECOG in the United States. All patients received identical induction therapy, followed by central nervous system prophylaxis. Patients with a sibling donor (or a matched unrelated donor in Philadelophia-chromosome-positive ALL) were assigned to receive an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT); all others were randomized to undergo an autologous transplant or protracted standard consolidation/ maintenance therapy. The study accrued 2109 patients from 1993 to 2008. Following relapse, patients were followed for survival. For this report only patients registered before the tyrosine kinase inhibitors era are included in the analysis. Results: 1518 study patients were eligible for this analysis, 1208 (79.6%) Philadelphia-chromosome negative (Ph-neg) and 267 (17.5%) Philadelphia-chromosome positive (Ph-pos). 1381 (91%) of the patients achieved CR; 93% of the Ph-neg and 82% of the Ph-pos. 572 patients (37.7%) underwent allogeneic HSCT. The median duration of follow-up of patients who achieved CR was 10 years. Among the 1381 patients who achieved CR, 626 (45.3%) had a documented relapse; 566 (90.4%) relapsed within 3 years of CR and 60 (9.6%) relapsed beyond 3 years ('late relapse') (Figure 1). Among these 60 patients, 18(2.9%) relapsed after 5 years ('very late relapse'). Table. Patients n CR All relapses Relapses〈 3 years Relapses≥ 3 years Relapses≥ 5 years All patients 1518 1381 (91%) 626 (45.3%) 566 (90.4%) 60 (9.6%) 18 (2.9%) Ph-neg 1208 (79.6%) 1123 (93%) 485 (40.1%) 429 (88.5%) 56 (11.5%) 17 (3.5%) Ph-pos 268 (17.5%) 219 (82%) 124 (56.6%) 122 (98.4%) 2 (1.6%) 1 (0.8%) Relapse beyond 3 years occurred in 4.3% of all who achieved CR, in 5% of Ph-neg and 0.01% of Ph-pos patients. Among the 60 late relapses, the median time to relapse was 46 months. 61.7% of the late-relapse patients were males, median age was 32 years, 88.3% were B-lineage ALL and the median white cell count at diagnosis was 6000/ul. 56.7% were in cytogenetic standard risk, 8.3% at high risk and the data of 35% are unknown. The median survival for the late relapse patients was longer than for those who relapsed within 3 years. The overall survival (OS) of the 56 Ph-neg patients who relapsed beyond 3 years is shown in Fig 2. Table.Relapse 〉 3 yearsRelapse 〉 3 yearsMedian survival from relapse (months)5.411.23-year OS from relapse6.5%29%5-year OS from relapse5.6%19% Conclusions: Late relapses in adults with Ph-neg ALL are not uncommon. About 10% of relapses occur beyond 3 years and 4.3% of all ALL patients who achieved a CR can expect to have a late relapse. These data are in contrast to AML where only 1% of patients relapse beyond 3 years (Watts JM et al, 2014). Most of the late relapse patients were at standard risk and appeared to have a relatively favorable outcome post relapse. Patients with ALL, particularly those who are Ph-neg, cannot be considered as cured at 3 years and need to be closely followed. Figure 1. Time to relapse of Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL Figure 1. Time to relapse of Ph-pos and Ph-neg ALL Figure 2. Survival from relapse for Ph-neg patients who relapsed after 3 years from CR. Figure 2. Survival from relapse for Ph-neg patients who relapsed after 3 years from CR. Disclosures Rowe: Amgen: Consultancy; BioSight Ltd.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BioLineRx Ltd.: Consultancy. Douer:Gilead: Consultancy.

Description: Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a high relapse rate in adults. While the biology of the patient may be responsible for the marked difference in survival seen in comparison to children, variable adherence to complex chemotherapy regimens may also play a role. However, there is very little understanding about the risk factors for delays in therapy and the impact of delays on survival. To study delays in newly diagnosed adult ALL patients, we conducted an observational study using data from ECOG 2993/ MRC_UKALLXII (Rowe, Blood 2005). We analyzed Ph- patients who started intensification after documented complete remission (CR). A long delay (LD) was defined as 〉 98 days from start of induction to start of intensification (IS), which was 〉2 weeks delay beyond the 84 days recommended per protocol. A Very Long Delay (VLD) was defined as a 〉4 weeks delay. Of 2109 patients enrolled, 1247 patients met inclusion criteria for analysis. Of note, 435 Ph- patients who achieved CR after induction but did not proceed to intensification were excluded. In univariate analysis, female sex (p

Description: Abstract 169 The Philadelphia positive (Ph+) arm of the international adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) trial UKALL12/ECOG2993 opened in 1993 and is the largest single study of patients with Ph+ ALL, with a total of 441 participants. The first cohort of study patients was treated prior to Imatinib (N=266 “Pre Imatinib“) with 2 phases of induction therapy given over 2 months followed by matched sibling or unrelated donor myeloablative allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) whenever possible. The treatment protocol and outcome for these patients has been published (Fielding et al, Blood 2009). Beginning March 2003, a second cohort of study patients had Imatinib 600mg daily added, as a consolidation block after the second induction chemotherapy, (N=86, “Late Imatinib”). From late 2005, a final cohort within the trial were given Imatinib earlier, in conjunction with the second phase of induction (N=89, “Early Imatinib”). Patients in both Imatinib cohorts resumed the drug for a further 2 years following alloHSCT, if tolerated. If alloHSCT was not possible, Imatinib was permitted for 2 years, with maintenance. The trial closed to recruitment in December 2006 (USA) and October 2008 (UK). All except 8 patients have now completed therapy. An earlier analysis of these data did not indicate a clear long-term advantage to receiving Imatinib. We now report 3-year follow-up, which shows large outcome differences between the 3 groups. There were no pre-existing differences between the 3 cohorts in terms of gender, presenting white blood cell counts and presence of central nervous system disease at diagnosis. However, the Pre-Imatinib cohort was younger than the two Imatinib cohorts, due to an increase in the upper age limit for study entry. Percentage complete remission (CR) rates and survival of induction therapy are shown in table 1. The total CR rate for the imatinib cohorts was significantly higher than for the pre-imatinib cohort (p=0.004). Table 1 Pre-Imatinib With Imatinib N=266 Total With Imatinib N=175 Part 1 Late Imatinib N=86 Part 2 Early Imatinib N=89 Died in induction

Description: The role of histopathology in the diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET) is controversial, and there has been little attempt to quantitate interobserver variability. Diagnostic bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens from 370 patients with ET by Polycythemia Vera Study Group (PVSG) criteria were assessed by 3 experienced hematopathologists for 16 different morphologic features and overall diagnosis according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Our results show substantial interobserver variability, particularly for overall diagnosis and individual cellular characteristics such as megakaryocyte morphology. Reticulin grade was the dominant independent predictor of WHO diagnostic category for all 3 hematopathologists. Factor analysis identified 3 independent factors likely to reflect underlying biologic processes. One factor related to overall and lineage-specific cellularity and was significantly associated with JAK2 V617F status (P 〈 .001), a second factor related to megakaryocyte clustering, and a third was associated with the fibrotic process. No differences could be discerned between patients labeled as having “prefibrotic myelofibrosis” or “true ET” in clinical and laboratory features at presentation, JAK2 status, survival, thrombosis, major hemorrhage, or myelofibrotic transformation. These results show that histologic criteria described in the WHO classification are difficult to apply reproducibly and question the validity of distinguishing true ET from prefibrotic myelofibrosis on the basis of subjective morphologic criteria. This study was registered at http://isrctn.org as #72251782 and at http://eudract.emea.europa.eu/ as #2004-000245-38.

Description: Pretreatment cytogenetics is a known predictor of outcome in hematologic malignancies. However, its usefulness in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is generally limited to the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome because of the low incidence of other recurrent abnormalities. We present centrally reviewed cytogenetic data from 1522 adult patients enrolled on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. The incidence and clinical associations for more than 20 specific chromosomal abnormalities are presented. Patients with a Ph chromosome, t(4;11)(q21;q23), t(8;14)(q24.1;q32), complex karyotype (5 or more chromosomal abnormalities), or low hypodiploidy/near triploidy (Ho-Tr) all had inferior rates of event-free and overall survival when compared with other patients. In contrast, patients with high hyperdiploidy or a del(9p) had a significantly improved outcome. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the prognostic relevance of t(8;14), complex karyotype, and Ho-Tr was independent of sex, age, white cell count, and T-cell status among Ph-negative patients. The observation that Ho-Tr and, for the first time, karyotype complexity confer an increased risk of treatment failure demonstrates that cytogenetic subgroups other than the Ph chromosome can and should be used to risk stratify adults with ALL in future trials.

Description: Activating mutations of MPL exon 10 have been described in a minority of patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis (IMF) or essential thrombocythemia (ET), but their prevalence and clinical significance are unclear. Here we demonstrate that MPL mutations outside exon 10 are uncommon in platelet cDNA and identify 4 different exon 10 mutations in granulocyte DNA from a retrospective cohort of 200 patients with ET or IMF. Allele-specific polymerase chain reaction was then used to genotype 776 samples from patients with ET entered into the PT-1 studies. MPL mutations were identified in 8.5% of JAK2 V617F− patients and a single V617F+ patient. Patients carrying the W515K allele had a significantly higher allele burden than did those with the W515L allele, suggesting a functional difference between the 2 variants. Compared with V617F+ ET patients, those with MPL mutations displayed lower hemoglobin and higher platelet levels at diagnosis, higher serum erythropoietin levels, endogenous megakaryocytic but not erythroid colony growth, and reduced bone marrow erythroid and overall cellularity. Compared with V617F− patients, those with MPL mutations were older with reduced bone marrow cellularity but could not be identified as a discrete clinicopathologic subgroup. MPL mutations lacked prognostic significance with respect to thrombosis, major hemorrhage, myelofibrotic transformation or survival.