ALBERT

Description: Abstract 2873 International staging system (ISS) and cytogenetics are the main prognostic factors of Multiple Myeloma (MM) but they reflect biologic characteristics of disease without taking into account individual host features. On the contrary, clinical characteristics of single patient could be substantial as to various points of view. For instance, in elderly MM patients, novel therapies reduction or interruption due to toxicity represent the major cause of unsatisfactory outcome. Therefore, it was empirically suggested different schedule of drugs in these “frail” patients but, how the “frailty” should be assessed in every single patient, is still unsettled. Advanced age, poor performance status (PS) and comorbidities are usually applied to recognize the “frailty” but it is not well known which of them are really prominent and whether these parameters, adjusted for conventional prognostic factors, still affect final outcome. We analyzed a population of symptomatic MM diagnosed from 2007 to 2010 included in the Marche Region MM Registry, to assess the frequency of “frailty” features, such as age, PS, comorbidities, cytopenias, renal insufficiency (RI) and lytic bone lesions, and their role on the overall survival (OS) when adjusted for prognostic factors. Comorbidities were scored according to Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) that split patients in 4 categories according to number and type of comorbidity. Patients were treated with transplant or standard therapy according to their eligibility. Overall, 88% of patients were treated with new drug-based therapies and 12% with MP. Median age of the 266 patients analyzed was 73 years (range 38–90). Twenty-four percent of patients had IgA MM, fifty patients (23%) had ISS stage=3 and 29/166 (17.5%) had unfavourable cytogenetics. Regarding “frailty” measures, 38% of patients had 〉 75 years, 39% had PS=2–4, 34% had 1 or more comorbidities. The most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (35%), heart diseases (22%), diabetes (15%), neurological diseases (16%), COBP (8%), secondary malignancies (8%) and chronic renal failure (6%). CCI ≥1 was detected in 51%. Increasing comorbitities number and CCI were associated with increased age although 37% of patients aged less than 65 years had CCI ≥2. Moreover, 35% had at least 2 cytopenias, 76% had bone disease and 14% had RI. Fifty patients (19%) died during follow-up. OS at 3 years was 74%. Univariate analysis performed on the total population determined age 〉 65 years (p=0.065), PS=2–4 (p

Description: Abstract 2828 Poster Board II-804 Studies including thalidomide showed a rate of severe infection that can be life-threatening complication or compromise compliance to therapy ranging from 6% to 22%. Therefore, antibacterial prophylaxis has become a routine clinical practice despite its role in the new-drugs era has to be defined. We performed a post-hoc analysis of patients treated with thalidomide based combinations within controlled trials in order to assess time, type and outcome of infections. We analysed the main demographic and disease related variables to search for factors affecting onset of infections during induction and build a risk model in order to perform targeted prophylaxis. Two hundred and twenty four patients were eligible for this study. Median age was 70 years (range 31-90 years) and 141 patients (63%) had more than 65 years. Fifty three percent of patients had de novo MM whereas the remaining had received thalidomide as second or subsequent lines of therapy. ISS stage 2-3 and renal impairment were present in 156 (69%) and 38 (17%) of patients, respectively. Induction therapy consisted in the following protocols: ThaDD (160 patients: 71.5%), ThaDD-V (42 patients: 19%), VMPT (9 patients: 4%), TD (8 patients: 3.5%) and VTD (5 patients: 2%). Prophylaxis for infections was administered to 168 patients (75%) and consisted of quinolones (72%) or thrimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (28%). Eighty six patients (38.5%) developed an infection resulting of grade 3-4 in 39 of them (17.5%) (12% grade 3, 5.5% grade 4). Probability of infection at six months was 39% although that of severe infection was 20% (18% at 4 months and just 2% from 4 to 6 months). Among the 39 patients with severe infection, 23 (59%) developed pneumonia, 9 FUO (23%), 6 bacteremia (1 septic shock) and 1 an orbital abscess. Aetiology of severe infection was recognized in 7 patients (4 Gram-negative bacteria, 1 Gram-positive bacteria, 1 CMV and 1 probable fungal infection). Eighty percent of severe infections occurred during the first 3 courses of induction therapy and only 12% during neutropenia. Fifteen percent of patients undergoing antibiotic prophylaxis developed infection vs 25% of patients who did not (p= 0.084). There were no difference between quinolones and thrimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole prophylaxis regarding incidence of infections. The majority of infections were empirically treated and cured with wide spectrum antibiotic therapy except when a specific aetiology was recognized. Only one patient died because of septic shock during neutropenia and 2 patients withdrawn from protocol because of infection. In univariate analysis monoclonal component 〉 2 g (p=0.021), platelets 〈 130.000/ml (p= 0.005), newly diagnosed MM (p=0.083) and antibiotic prophylaxis (p=0.061) were factors predicting severe infection development whereas age, sex, ECOG performance status, MM type, D-S stage, plasmacell infiltration in bone marrow, haemoglobin concentration, serum b2-microglobulin, serum albumin, ISS, serum C-Reactive Protein, serum creatinine, previous stem cell transplantation were not. Cox regression analysis selected monoclonal component 〉 2 g (p=0.015 HR= 1.8) and platelets 〈 130.000/ml (p=0.003 HR= 2.3) as covariates associated to severe infection. The 25 patients without adverse factors, the 125 with 1 and the 74 with 2 adverse factors had a probability of severe infection equal to 4%, 17% and 32 % (p= 0.023), respectively. This model remains useful apart from prophylaxis since the probability of severe infection in patients with at least 1 risk factors receiving prophylaxis is 17% vs 4% in patients without risk factors. Of note, patients developing severe infection had a significantly higher incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) compared with patients who did not (20.5% vs 9%: p= 0.041). DVT occurred after a median time of 0.9 months (range 0.1-5 months; 75% within 2 months) from infection onset. In conclusion, despite antibiotic prophylaxis, patients receiving thalidomide combination therapy can develop severe infections particularly pneumonia. Wide spectrum antibiotic therapy is effective in the majority of cases since viral or fungal infections are very rare. Patients with large size of disease, represented by high MC and low platelets count, are at higher risk of severe infection that in turn significantly increase the risk of DVT. Therefore, these patients at high-risk should receive more suitable antimicrobial prophylaxis. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Thalidomide, Bortezomib and Doxil.

Description: ThaDD regimen has provided significant results in recurrent/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients (Offidani et al, 2006). In order to further improve those results without significantly increasing toxicity, we decided to include Velcade, synergic as per activity but not toxicity with the other drugs of ThaDD regimen. ThaDD-V was scheduled as follows: Thalidomide 100 mg/day, pegylated liposomal Doxorubicin 30 mg/sm iv days 4; Dexamethasone 20 mg days 1–2, 4–5, 8–9, 11–12 and Velcade 1.3 mg/sm iv days 1, 4, 8, 11 every 28 days (induction therapy). Patients received bortezomib for alternate cycles as following: 1 mg/sm day 1, 8, 15 and dexamethasone 20 mg days 1–2, 8–9, 15–16 and thalidomide 100 mg/day and dexamethasone 40 mg/day for 4 days monthly for a total of six cycles as consolidation therapy. Then patients received thalidomide 100 mg/day until relapse (maintenance therapy). Actually 20 patients (7 M, 13 F; median age 62.5 yrs, range 31–75) are assessable for response and toxicity. Five pts (25%) showed WHO performance status (PS) 〉 1, 9 pts (45%) presented refractory disease, 8 pts (40%) were priorily administered ≥ 2 lines of a treatment and 14 patients (70%) were submitted to one previous autologous stem cell procedure. Seven patients (35%) had extramedullary disease and 7 had unfavourable cytogenetics. Twelve patients scored an ISS ≥ 2 and 11 (55%) were in first remission for ≤ 12 months median duration. No patients were previously treated with Velcade, whereas six patients had received short-term Thalidomide treatment. Response was assessed according to IMVG uniform response criteria. Seventeen of 20 patients responded after at least one chemotherapy cycle reporting 5 (25%) sCR, 3 CR (15%), 8 VGPR (40%) and 1 stable disease. Three patients (15%) had extramedullary progressive disease. In a median follow-up of 12 months, 2 (10%) patients progressed and 1 (5%) died from cardiac infarction. Time to progression and overall survival were 73% and 95% at 12 months. We observed 4 grade 3 thrombocytopenia, 2 grade 3 DVT, 1 grade 3 diarrhoea, 1 grade 3 asthenia, 1 grade 4 infection and 1 grade 3 dermatological toxicity. Six patients developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy and other three grade 3. In conclusion, ThaDD-V is extremely active in advanced MM patients as demonstrated by the elevated precentage of high quality remission. Nevertheless, patients are at substantial risk of developing neurotoxicity so the protocol was amended as per Velcade dose intensity and Thalidomide dose.

Description: Maintenance therapy with Thalidomide in MM offer controversial results. De novo or relapsing MM patients presenting at least a minor response after ThaDD were randomized to receive Interferon 3 MU x 3/week or thalidomide 100 mg /d. Both groups were given also Dexamethasone 20 mg/d x 4 days every month. Actually, we have randomized 50 patients in both treatment arms. The two groups were matched for main prognostic factors and response. During maintenance, both the ID and TD regimens improved response obtained by induction in only 10% and 11% of patients, respectively (p=0.832). After a median 2-years maintenance follow-up for both arms, 30 ID patients (60%) relapsed vs 17 (33%) TD ones (p=0.009). Time-to-progression (TTP) was significantly higher in the TD group vs the ID one (p= 0.024). So that TTP amounted to 23% in the ID group vs the 44% in the TD one. In addition, 3-years overall survival (OS) was significantly better in the TD arm with a value of 67% vs 46% of ID (p = 0.030). Both treatment arms were overall fairly well tolerated: fever, anorexia, weight loss, fatigue, liver and heart function abnormalities and hematologic toxicities were significantly more frequent in the ID cohort whereas neurotoxicity was somewhat more frequent in the TD one. This turned into a rate of therapy dropouts rate significantly higher in the ID group than in the TD one (26% vs 8%; p=0.017). Anyway, estimated risk for treatment interruption due to side effects in a 3-years period with thalidomide was only 21% vs 44% for interferon (p =0.014). We concluded that, in MM patients responding to standard induction therapy, low-dose Thalidomide maintenance therapy is feasible even in the long run and offers a significantly longer control over residual disease when compared to standard maintenance regimen.

Description: TNF-a is a potent mediator of inflammation and bone resorption that seems to be involved in the malignant transformation of plasma cells, since mononuclear cells, obtained from Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients and exposed in vitro to TNF-a and interleukin-4, produced monoclonal plasma cells. In addition, TNF-a can stimulate plasma cell proliferation, by triggering interleukin-6 secretion, and shows proangiogenic properties in vitro (1). In addition, TNF-a determination was reported to be a good parameter for estimating tumour mass and for monitoring therapy outcome during treatment with different protocols (2). In particular, TNF-a is able to activate NF-kB, which is the main target of bortezomib (3). Variation in TNF-a levels can be related to gene expression, which is regulated at transcriptional level, as well as to genetic polymorphism. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been identified at position -308 and -238 in the gene promoter. In particular, a G to A substitution at position -308 is associated with higher levels of TNF-a (1). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of this TNF-a polymorphism on the outcome of refractory and relapsed MM patients (pts), receiving Bortezomib containing regimen as second line therapy. From September 2005 to April 2008 we selected 90 MM pts, who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy before treatment with Bortezomib and at least one cycle of high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in 25 pts. TNF a polymorphism at position -308 was determined on genomic DNA extracted from blood samples. The genotype frequencies obtained (71/90 G/G; 19/90 G/A) were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Patients were categorized as responders (Complete + Partial response =R) or non responders (Stable + Progression disease=NR) to treatment. The overall response in our patients was about 74% (67/90). In MM pts carrying the rarest A allele the overall response was reduced to 58% (11/19 pts), whilst GG carriers showed a better response rate of 79% (56/71 pts) (OR = 0.37). Our data indicate that the SNP at position -308 of the TNF-a gene promoter may be associated with different outcome in patients affected by MM and treated with bortezomib containing regimen. Similar conclusion was reached in a previous study where TNF-a gene promoter could predict the outcome after thalidomide therapy (1). To investigate whether TNF-a SNP is an independent predictor for response to MM therapy, larger studies are necessary, however if these preliminary results will be confirmed, they may represent a rationale for targeting TNF-a in novel therapeutic approaches to MM (4).

Description: Abstract 1723 Poster Board I-749 Proinflammatory cytokines are suspected to play a role in the pathogenesis of multiple myeloma (MM). Therefore, it is possible that inborn genetic variations leading to a modified expression of these cytokines will influence the outcome for these patients (1). Interleukin-1 (IL-1) is a cytokine involved in the maturation and proliferation of B cells and plays a significant role in the development of lytic bone lesions, a major clinical feature of MM patients (pts). Previous studies demonstrated that the polymorphism of IL1b-31 significantly influenced overall survival, as reported in patients undergoing high-dose melphalan treatment followed by autologous-stem cell transplant (2). TNF-a, a potent mediator of inflammation and bone resorption, seems to be involved in the malignant transformation of plasma cells, since mononuclear cells, obtained from MM patients and exposed in vitro to TNF-a and interleukin-4, produced monoclonal plasma cells. In addition, TNF-a can stimulate plasma cell proliferation, by triggering interleukin-6 secretion, and shows proangiogenic properties in vitro. In addition, TNF-a determination was reported to be a good parameter for estimating tumor mass and for monitoring therapy outcome during treatment with different protocols. TNF-a is also able to activate NF-kB, which is the main target of bortezomib. Variation in TNF-a levels can be related to gene expression, which is regulated at transcriptional level, as well as to genetic polymorphism (SNP). Single nucleotide SNPs have been identified at position -308 and -238 in the gene promoter. Specifically, a G to A substitution at position -308 is associated with higher levels of TNF-a (3). TNFRSF1B is a member of the TNF-receptor superfamily. This protein through the recruitment of two anti-apoptotic proteins upgrades TNF-induced apoptosis by the ubiquitination and degradation of TNF-receptor-associated factor 2. Knockout studies in mice also suggest a role of this protein in protecting neurons from apoptosis by stimulating antioxidative pathways (4). In this study, we investigated the correlation between the SNPs of IL1A -889, IL1B -511, IL1B -31, IL1RN -371 (interleukin 1 receptor antagonist), TNF-a -308 and TNFRSF1B -587 on the outcome of refractory and relapsed MM pts, receiving bortezomib containing regimen as second line therapy. From September 2005 to April 2009 we selected 98 MM pts, who received at least one cycle of chemotherapy before treatment with bortezomib and at least one cycle of high dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in 25 pts. No associations between the SNPs at the loci regarding IL-1A, IL-1B, IL-1RN and clinical factors such as age, sex, clinical stage at onset and M-protein type were observed. TNF-a SNP at position -308 and TNFRSF1B SNP at position -587 were determined on genomic DNA extracted from blood samples. These genotypes frequencies obtained were in agreement with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium. Patients were categorized as responders (complete + partial response = R) or non responders (stable + progression disease = NR) to treatment. The overall response in our patients was about 74.5% (73/98). In MM pts carrying the rarest A allele of TNF-a the overall response was reduced to 61% (14/23 pts), whilst GG carriers showed a better response rate of 79% (59/75pts)(OR=0.42). We obtained similar results from the analysis of TNFRSF1B SNP. Pts carrying the rarest G allele the overall response was reduced to 69% (27/39 pts), whilst TT carriers showed a better response rate of 79% (46/59pts). Our results indicate that the cytokines (IL-1A, IL-1B, IL-1RN) gene SNPs do not confer differences in the outcome of advanced MM. On the contrary TNF-a and TNFRSF1B SNPs seems to be independent factors to predict the response and the outcome in patients affected by MM and treated with bortezomib containing regimen. If these preliminary results will be confirmed, they may represent a rationale for targeting TNF-a in novel therapeutic approaches to MM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Introduction Elotuzumab (Elo), an immunostimulatory monoclonal antibody targeting signaling lymphocytic activation molecule F7 (SLAMF7), received marketing approval in Italy for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), in combination with lenalidomide (R) and dexamethasone (d) (EloRd) in April 2017. Here we report preliminary data of an Italian real-life experience on EloRd as salvage therapy for RRMM patients treated outside of controlled clinical trials. The primary objectives of this study were to assess the toxicity profile and the efficacy of EloRd administered as salvage therapy in a real-world setting. Methods Retrospective data collection received approval from local ethic committee. The cohort included 180 RRMM patients from 28 Italian centers who received at least one cycle of EloRd as salvage treatment between April 2017 and June 2018. Patients were treated with EloRD according to marketing approval as follows: Elo 10 mg/kg i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during the first two cycles and then on days 1 and 15 of each following cycle, R 25 mg on days 1 to 21 of each cycle and d at a dose of 40 mg during the week without Elo, and 36 mg on the day of Elo administration. Responsive patients had to reach at least a partial remission (PR). Results Baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. Median age of the 180 patients was 72 years (range 48-89 years); 53.9% were males (Table 1). The median number of previous therapy regimens was 1 (range 1-7); 69 patients (38.3%) received a previous autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). One hundred and ten patients (61.1%) showed a symptomatic relapse, 36 (20%) a biochemical relapse, and 34 cases (18.9%) were refractory to the last therapy, including bortezomib in 12.8% of patients. Forty-four patients (24.4%) had creatinine clearance ≤60 mL/min. Among the 138 cases evaluable for International Scoring System (ISS), 54 (39.1%) had stage I, 56 (40.6%) stage II, and 28 (20.3%) stage III. At last data collection (June 2018), 164 cases were evaluable for response. The median number of courses administered so far was 5 (range 1-18). The overall response rate (ORR) was 78%, with 9 complete remissions (CRs) (5.5%) and 49 very good partial remissions (VGPRs) (35.4%). A significant higher ORR was observed in patients who had received only 1 previous line of therapy than those who had received 〉1 line (64% vs 37.5%; p=0.004). Age (

Description: Abstract 4560 Introduction The G-CSF, primary regulator of granulopoiesis, has shown its efficacy in reducing duration of neutropenia after chemotherapy or myelosuppressive therapy. In these situations G-CSF, accelerating the granulocytous reconstitution, may enable a significant reduction of the incidence, duration and severity of infection. Commercially formulations of rHu-G-CSF include lenograstim, a glycosylated form, and filgrastim, a non-glycosylated form. Glycosylation of the molecule contribute to pharmacokynetis advantages and to higher affinity to specific receptor. Additionally, lenograstim exposed neutrophils maintain unchanged all their functions in vitro, while filgrastim exposed neutrophils present functional defects due to higher adhesivity, cytoscheletric alterations and a more immature phenotype. Aim On these bases, we hypotized that lenograstim may prevent febrile episodes (FE) and reduce their lasting in patients with chemotherapy derived neutropenia more efficiently than filgrastim. Primary endpoint is the incidence of FE (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00932217). Patients and methods starting from April 2005, 180 multiple myeloma patients achieving high dose cyclophosphamide for stem cells mobilization were enrolled in 11 Italian Centers. Treatment plan consisted in: high dose cyclophosphamide (3 or 4 g/sqm) on day 1, G-CSF (random 1:1 on the base of a generated random list: filgrastim or lenograstim) 30 MU/day from day +4 to +9, 60 MU/day from day +10 to the achievement of an optimal CD34+ cell count for staminoapheresis. FE, significant if equal or higher than 38 °C for at least 2 different determinations, were recorded till day +30. Results 176 of 180 patients received scheduled treatment and are eligible for final analyses. All 176 patients underwent post-chemo grade 4 neutropenia and G-CSF was administered starting from day +4. FE were recorded in 26 pts, 16 in the filgrastim arm (89 total patients) and 10 in the lenograstim arm (87 total patients). The global fever incidence was 14.77%, 17.98% with filgrastim and 11.49% with lenograstim. However, to demonstrate functional block of filgrastim exposed neutrophils, FE have been related to neutrophil absolute count. Related to the neutropenia grade, 8 FE are recorded with filgrastim (8.99%) and 1 FE with lenograstim (1.15%) with absolute neutrophil count 〉500/μL (grade 3) (chi square test with Yates' correction: p=0.0436); this difference is still evident when neutrophils are 〉1000/μL (grade 2), with 7 episodes with filgrastim (7.87%) versus 1 (1.15%) with lenograstim. Conclusions Lenograstim is associated with a reduced global incidence of FE in multiple myeloma patients undergoing to high dose cyclophosphamide and stem cells mobilization when compared to filgrastim. Additionally, excluding the time frame when neutrophils are not yet recovered (neutrophils 500/μL) in treated patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Abstract 4775 From November 2002 to March 2006 in the centres of the region Marche participating in the study have been diagnosed 91 new cases of lymphoma B diffuse large cells in patients aged 65 years or more. All the 91 patients enrolled prospectively in our study were assessed on the basis of multidimensional geriatric evaluation (MGE). MGE analysed in detail the following aspects of elderly: Functional status, Socio-economic conditions, State cognitive, State emotional, Therapy pharmacology, State nutritional and every geriatric syndromes. On the basis of MGE we have identified 3 groups. The first group was composed of the patients who had no disability and that they could receive a standard chemotherapy with CHOP-Rituximab scheme. The second group of patients had at most 2 co-morbidities of moderate grade in the absence of geriatric syndromes. These patients have received a therapy chop-like with anthracycline liposomal peghilated (Caelyx). The third group composed of “frail patients” showed over the 85 years, 3 or more co-morbidities ADL

Description: New drugs such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide have expanded the therapeutic options for MM while improving outcome in both young and elderly patients. However, the best novel agents sequence in the therapeutic strategy for MM is still not definitely delineated as relapsed MM right after first line thalidomide therapy seems to be more resistant jeopardizing final outcome as per overall survival while still making questionable when to administer it, either at the beginning or later during the course of the disease. We analyzed 72 relapsed MM patients who were enrolled in two salvage study protocols which included bortezomib, dexamethasone and chemotherapy (Offidani et al, ASH 2007 and EHA 2008) and who had been treated with thalidomide first (18 patients) or subsequently (30 patients) or not treated at all with thalidomide (24 patients). We compared these three groups of patients in terms of response rate, post-relapse PFS and post-relapse OS with the aim to assess the role of previous administration of thalidomide on final outcome in this patient population. Median age for the 72 patients was 65 years (range 31–82); ISS stage 2–3 assessed in 51% of patients and unfavourable cytogenetics in 42%. Thirty four patients had been rescued in first relapse, 19 in second and 19 in third or subsequent relapse. Median disease history was 34 months (range 8–173). Forty four patients relapsed after high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation. The 48 patients were previously treated with thalidomide a median time of 8 months (range 4–48 months). VGPR or better response rate in the groups of patients treated with thalidomide in first line, second or subsequent line or never treated with thalidomide were 44%, 42% (p=0.795) and 79% (p=0.003; p=0.002), respectively.. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis selected only previous thalidomide treatment (OR=1.9; 95%CI=1.5–2.4; p=0.024) as factors affecting response whereas age, previous therapy lines, previous remission duration, previous transplant, previous disease history, sCRP, ISS stage and cytogenetics were not significantly associated to response. In the same groups post-relapse PFS was 9 months, 14 months (p=0.308) and not reached (p=0.018; p=0.055) while post-relapse 2 years OS was 51%, 50% (p=0.564) and 72% (p=0.074; p=0.135). Cox regression analysis showed that the presence of ISS 2–3 (p=0.010), previous thalidomide administration (p=0.052), and response 〈 VGPR (p