ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
Filter
Collection
Years
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2008-11-16
    Description: Background: Epidemiological data on MDS is scarce in France, and registries from other countries do not provide data on the daily practice management of MDS in 2008. Methods: GFM centers were asked to collect characteristics of ongoing or recent treatments in all MDS patients (pts) seen at their clinic (as in or outpatients) during the Jan 28th–Feb 3rd, 2008 period (one week).Results: 919 pts from 74 centers were included, 57% males, mean age (+/− SD), 73 (±11) years, with 2.8%, 19% and 28% of pts aged 24h (4.5% for infections or bleeding and 8.5 % for “active” treatments), 46% were seen in the day care facility (40% for transfusions), and 41% as consultations (for staging, follow up or ambulatory treatment). 93% of patients had PS ≤2. Median interval from diagnosis to survey was 29.2 months. FAB at time of survey was: 35.1% RA, 18.5% RARS, 39.1% RAEB, 7.4% CMML; WHO was: 17.4% RA, 13.3% RARS, 14% RCMD, 4.5% RCMD-RS, 18.5% RAEB-1, 15.9% RAEB-2, 7.7% CMML, 4.9% 5q-syndrome and 3.9% unclassifiable. Cytogenetic analysis had been performed at least once in 77.4 % pts: favorable (498 pts), intermediate (88 pts), unfavorable (96 pts). IPSS (determined in 75.4% of pts) was: 41.6% low, 33.3% Int-1, 16.4% Int-2 and 8.7% high. Significant differences between pts 65 years were, respectively, % of unfav karyotype (25.8% vs. 12.7%, p=0.0004), of isolated +8 (5.1% vs. 2.1%, p=0.04), of isolated −7 (6.2% vs. 1.1%, p=0.0003), and, with borderline significance, of CMML (4.5% vs. 9.5%, p=0.06), of 5q-syndrome (1.5% vs. 5%, p=0.07). EPO level, assessed in 359 (39.1%) of pts at diagnosis and 252 (27.4%) of pts at time of survey) was 〉200UI/l in 24.5% and 26.6% resp, and 〉500U/l in 13.5% and 14.7% pts resp and was significantly correlated with interval from diagnosis. At the time of survey, treatment received in the last 6 months (IPSS: high-int 2 vs low–int1) included: no active treatment 66.5% (IPSS: 42% vs. 72.9%), chemotherapy 12.8% (IPSS: 22.6% vs. 9.1%) including 2.7% intensive and 0.7% LD AraC, allogeneic SCT 1.7% (IPSS: 3.8% vs. 2.6 %) including 0.3% classical and 1.4% NMA, azacytidine 6.5%, (IPSS: 21.6% vs. 2.3%), decitabine 0.8%, lenalidomide 4%, thalidomide 0.5%, ATG 0.2 %, androgens 2.2% while 64.8% pts required RBC transfusions (IPSS: 81% vs. 61%) and 39.7% pts received an Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) (IPSS: 40.3% vs. 37.2%), alone in 314 pts (epoetin alfa or beta in 92 pts, darbepoetin in 222 pts), and with G-CSF (61 pts). Response rates to ESAs were 58.6% and 33.8% in low int-1 and int-2-high risk MDS, resp (p=0.0009). Iron chelation therapy was administered in 17.6% pts (5.8% desferroxamine, 11% deferasirox) including 22.1% and 13.6% low-int-1 and int-2-high risk MDS, resp (p=0.009). Conclusions: Our survey provides a better knowledge of the characteristics and of the daily management of MDS in France. Of particular note are the more frequent unfavorable karyotypes in MDS pts
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2006-11-16
    Description: Background: RBC transfusions remain a mainstay in the treatment in MDS, but their characteristics in a large MDS population have not been reported in detail. Indications of iron chelation therapy (CT) in those patients, are based on consensus (Gattermann Hematology/Oncology Clinics 2005;19:supp1 ) but have not been reported in a large MDS cohort. In addition, a positive effect of desferioxamine (DFO) therapy on hematopoiesis has been reported in a small group of MDS (Jensen BJH, 1996;94:288). Methods: We analyzed the hematological characteristics, RBC transfusion requirement and iron CT in MDS patients referred for RBC transfusion in 18 French centers between May 15 and June 15, 2005. Results: 170 pts were included in the survey, median age 75 (14–95); M/F ratio 1.37; median time from diagnosis was 43 months (1 month to 17.5 years); WHO: pure RA 8.8%, pure RARS 18%, RCMD 3.5%, RCMD-RS 3%, RAEB I 16.5%, RAEB II 5.3%, 5q- syndrome 7%, CMML 4.7%, unclassified12.6%. Karyotype: fav (12%), int (37%), unfav ( 23%), failure or not done ( 28%). IPSS: low 39%, Int1 45%, Int2 13.5%, high 2.5%, unavailable 28%. Median serum ferritin (SF) level at diagnosis was 562ng/ml (9–2500). Median number of RBC units transfused since diagnosis was 49, mean 80 (2–610) and did not differ statistically according to WHO or IPSS. 81% of patients had received 〉 21 RBC units. Median number of RBC units transfused at initiation of CT was 21 (2–151). 68/170 pts ( 40 %) had received CT during the disease course including: DFO continuous s/c (8h) (40mg/kg/d, 3 to 5d/ week) n = 37, DFO s/c bolus (2 to 8g/week) n = 14, DFO IV (50 to 100mg/kg/d once after each RBC transfusion) n=7, deferiprone alone (30 to 75 mg/kg/d) n=4. Deferiprone + DFO s/c n=6. Median SF level was 1492ng/ml at the start of iron CT (436–6572). 50/68 pts were still on iron CT at the time of the survey after 2 to 114 months. Median SF level at the time of survey was 1828ng/ml (not statistically different from pre CT level). No positive effects were observed on hematopoiesis even in pts chelated for prolonged periods. 18/68 patients stopped CT (all were on DFO therapy) due to over efficacy n= 1, local complications n = 7, patient decision n=10 ). Median duration of treatment was 9 months (1–78) and median level of SF 3227ng/ml at the time of survey in those 18pts. For the 102/170 pts who did not receive CT, main reasons given by physicians were: older age 33% (median age in this group was indeed 82); cumbersome treatment 12%; high IPSS 8% (all cases had indeed IPSS〉=1.5); low transfusion requirement 8% (median=11 RBC units transfused in this group); other reasons 5% (refusal, skin lesions), no reason given 34%. By comparison to non chelated patients, chelated patients had significantly higher number of RBC units transfused (mean 115 vs 55) (p
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2004-11-16
    Description: Background: Supportive care with blood product transfusions is the primary management strategy for the majority of patients with MDS. Approximately 80% of MDS patients are anemic at the time of presentation and more than 40% require regular RBC transfusions at some stage of disease, while platelet transfusions are less often required. Methods: In an effort to systematically study quality of life and economic cost associated with transfusion dependency (especially RBC transfusions), The MDS Foundation has disseminated a practices and treatment survey to its Centers of Excellence and is also accumulating transfusion data. Retrospective and prospective data collected include hematologic parameters defining transfusion need; percentage (%) of MDS patients requiring transfusion; % of transfusion-dependent MDS patients by subtype and International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk group; per patient frequency of transfusions; % of patients requiring iron chelation therapy. Results: A total of 30 Centers have replied to the survey to date, and responses reveal that a substantial proportion of MDS patients receive multiple RBC transfusions with most of these patients needing chelation therapy with desferoxamine (generally subcutaneous administration, 4-times weekly): Table 1. In addition, detailed data are available from 4 European Centers that have provided transfusion records from randomly selected multiply-transfused MDS patients: 38 patients (median age: 73) received a median of 42 transfusions over the last 24 months (range: 11–207). The average per transfusion costs calculated from estimates provided by the 4 European centers is 436 euros or $ 526 ($1 US dollar = 0.83 euros), where the per transfusion cost includes 2 filtered red blood cell units, blood collection, administrative costs, and staff time, resulting in a median per patient cost over the last 24 months of 11,118 euros (range: 5668–21,800 euros). This does not include the cost of chelation therapy (300 euros/month for desferioxamine SC) and indirect costs (e.g., time spent at transfusion facility, travel time for patient to facility, travel and wait time for private caretaker or family member). Conclusion: Preliminary data analysis from the ongoing retrospective study suggests that the transfusion burden to MDS patients and to society, in terms of quality of life and cost, is much greater than generally appreciated. Updated data of this study will be presented. Table 1: RBC Transfusion-dependent MDS patients Mean % IPSS low risk 39 IPSS intermediate-1 risk 50 IPSS intermediate-2 risk 63 IPSS high risk 79 Iron chelation therapy 28
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2006-11-16
    Description: Background: Cardiac iron overload is the first cause of mortality in thalassemia. In MDS, a causal relationship between cardiac iron overload and death is not as well established and heart complication may be of intricate origins in these elderly pts. Cardiac MRI T2* allows accurate measurement of heart iron and is influenced by iron content only (and not by other cardiac diseases). T2* value 〈 20ms is clearly associated with cardiac iron overload. A few reports (Winder et al ASH 2005, Chacko J BJH2006;133: supp1) showed no cardiac iron overload by T2* in small numbers of multitransfused MDS. We performed a similar analysis in our transfused low risk MDS pts. Methods: We prospectively evaluated by MRI both cardiac T2* according to Anderson (Eur Heart J 2001) and liver iron content (LIC ) according to Gandon (Lancet 2004) and cardiac function by echocardiography in multitransfused low risk MDS pts. Cardiac MRI T2* was also assessed in 33 controls. Results: 21 MDS were analyzed, 9M/12F. Median age: 75 years ( 50–83); FAB : RA= 3, RAS=13, RAEB = 3, CMML n=1, unclassified n=1. Karyotype: fav n= 1, Int n= 18, failure n=1. IPSS: low n= 10, Int I n= 10, unavailable n=1. Median interval from MDS diagnosis and first transfusion was 40 and 24 months respectively. At inclusion, median number of RBC units transfused was 81 (range 6–282, and greater than 100 in 8 pts). Median serum ferritin level was 2152 ng/ml and 11 patients were on chelation therapy (CT). 9/21 pts had cardiac symptoms and were on cardiac therapy. LVEF was below normal (55%) in 3/21 cases. Left ventricular telediastolic diameter LVTD was above normal (normal 53 mm) in 6/14 pts evaluated. Median LIC was 350 micromoles/g/dw (95–898 ). Median Cardiac T2* was 27 ms (8–74) and did not differ significantly from controls (T2*=27ms+/−6.4). No correlation was found between cardiac T2* and ferritin, LIC, LVEF, time from MDS diagnosis. However 3/21 pts had cardiac iron overload with T2* 〈 20 (18ms,15ms,8ms respectively). LVEF and number of RBC units transfused of these pts was respectively 69%,51%,33% and 119,150,282 RBC units. Two of them were on iron CT, one of them since 8 years. The last 2 pts had clinical signs of cardiac failure unexplained by other causes and both had increased LVTD. Conclusions: Although cardiac T2* did not differ significantly in transfused MDS and in controls, 3 heavily transfused (all in the 8 patients who had received 〉100 RBC units) had clear cardiac iron overload, clinically relevant in 2 of them and not correlated with higher liver iron overload. Differences between our study and previous studies could be due to the higher number of transfused RBC units in our pts with abnormal T2*, as compared to a median of 50 in the study of Winder, but further studies are required to confirm this finding.
    Print ISSN: 0006-4971
    Electronic ISSN: 1528-0020
    Topics: Biology , Medicine
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...