ALBERT

Description: Abstract 1868 Aim: Erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) or lenalidomide (in case of del 5q) are the usual first line treatments of anemia of low/int-1 IPSS (lower) risk MDS. After their failure, IST with ATG+/−CsA is among the approaches considered, with 30 to 50% erythroid response (Sloand, JCO 2008; Lim, Leukemia 2007, and others), including durable red cell transfusion independence (RBC-TI). In multivariate analysis, predictors of response to IST in MDS include low/Int-1IPSS (especially int-1 without excess blasts due to presence, in addition of anemia, of thrombocytopenia or intermediate (int) karyotype) and, depending on studies, age ≤60 y and HLA DR-15 positivity. Pts with those good prognostic factors were however overrepresented in several MDS series treated with IST and analysis of the first 400 pts included in the European LeukemiaNet lower risk MDS registry found only 2 pts treated with IST (De Witte, personal communication). We reviewed the characteristics and outcome of MDS pts treated with IST in our centre and assessed the frequency of low/int-1 MDS pts potentially candidates to IST, based on published prognostic factors, in the Groupe Francophone des Myélodysplasies (GFM) patient database. Methods: From Jan 2004 to Feb 2010, we treated in our center 12 MDS by IST. From mid 2003 to end of 2008, 1311 MDS pts with IPSS scoring, were entered into the GFM registry. We computed in this registry the frequency of pt subsets potentially good candidates to IST based on age, having anemia with low/int-1 IPSS, or int-1 with 65 y responded. With a median follow-up of 21.5 months (6-68), erythroid response was ongoing after 17, 21, 44, 47 and 62 months, respectively. Three NR pts died at 11, 16 and 18 months (one Int-2 pt with RAEB and +8, from AML progression, and 2 pts from marrow failure). In the GFM database, pts with transfusion dependent anemia and IPSS low or int-1, and IPSS int-1 with

Description: Background: RBC transfusions are required in most MDS, leading to iron overload which probably contributes to shortened survival (Malcovati, JCO, 2005). Consensus for indications of iron chelation therapy (CT) in MDS patients are recent (Gattermann Hemato/Oncol Clin2005; 19:supp1). A positive impact on survival of CT, clearly demonstrated in thalassemia, has not yet been prospectively reported in large MDS cohorts. Methods: We performed in 2005 a survey on hematological data, RBC transfusion requirement and CT in 170 MDS referred for RBC transfusion during a month period (May 15–June 15, 2005) to 18 French GFM centers (Rose, ASH 2006, abstr:2661). Survival of this prospective cohort was reanalyzed at the reference date of May 15, 2007. Results: 5 pts were lost to follow up. Median age of the remaining 165 pts was 77 (range 14–95).M/F 1.4. WHO: 13 pure RA (10%), 30 pure RARS (23%), 6 RCMD (5%),5 RCMD-RS (4%), 28 RAEB I (21%), 10 RAEB II (8%),11 5q- Sd (7%), 8 CMML (6%); 21 MDS unclass (16%). Karyotype: fav (12%), int (36%), unfav (22%), failure or ND (30%) IPSS: low 27%, Int1 32%, Int2 10%, high 2%, unavailable 29%. 76 pts (46%) received CT for at least 6 months, including 65 before May 2005, and 11 since May 2005. Median interval from diagnosis to onset of CT was 30 months (range 0–192). CT included: DFO continuous s/c (8h) (40mg/kg/d, 3 – 5d/w) n= 41, deferiprone alone (30 to 75 mg/kg/d) n= 5, Deferiprone + DFO s/c n= 5, deferasirox (20 to 30 mg/kg/d) n= 6 (Defined as “standard” chelation) and DFO s/c bolus (2 to 3g/week) n = 12 or DFO IV (50 to 100mg/kg/d once after each RBC transfusion) n= 7 (defined as “low” chelation). Median duration of CT was 35 months (6–138+). Median serum ferritin (SF) level was 569ng/ml (range 9–2500), 1436ng/ml (range 436–6572) and 1498ng/ml (range 272–7502) at diagnosis, onset of CT and last evaluation, respectively (resp). By comparison to non chelated pts, chelated pts had significantly higher number of RBC units transfused (mean 104 vs 57) (p1 in 27%, 53%, 20% of non chelated versus 49%,36%,15% of chelated pts with available IPSS, resp (p=0.044). Median overall survival from diagnosis (OS, Kaplan-Meier analysis) was 115 and 51 months in chelated and non chelated pts,resp (p〈 0.0001). After adjustment on other prognostic parameters (sex,age, IPSS, transfusion requirement) the survival difference remained significant. In IPSS 0 pts, median OS was not reached in chelated pts and 69 months in non chelated pts(p=0.002).In IPSS 0–1 pts, median OS was 115 months in chelated pts and 50 months in non chelated pts (p=0.003). Longer interval from diagnosis to onset of CT did not influence OS negatively but median OS was 120 months with “standard” chelation versus 69 months with “low “chelation (p

Description: It is important to have an effective therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at first relapse, particularly if an autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered at this stage. This multicenter, phase 2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly oral pomalidomide-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (PCD) in patients with MM in first relapse after treatment with lenalidomide-bortezomib-dexamethasone (RVD). All patients had received RVD as induction and consolidation therapy, plus lenalidomide maintenance for 1 year (arm A). Half had also received an ASCT after induction (arm B). At MM relapse, all patients received 4 oral cycles of pomalidomide 4 mg (days 1-21), cyclophosphamide 300 mg (days 1, 8, 15, and 22), and dexamethasone 40 mg (days 1-4 and days 15-18 of a 28-day cycle; PCD). Responding patients in arm A underwent ASCT and received 2 additional cycles of PCD, whereas those in arm B received 5 cycles of PCD. All patients received pomalidomide-dexamethasone maintenance until disease progression. Primary end point was partial remission or better after the initial 4 cycles of PCD. Responses were obtained in 82/97 (85%) patients evaluated: complete remission (n = 1; 1%), very good partial remission (n = 32; 33%), and partial remission (n = 49; 51%). Three patients (3%) had stable disease, and 6 (6%) had disease progression (6 response failures). Forty-five (94%) of the 48 patients in arm A underwent planned ASCT. PCD was effective therapy after first relapse with RVD. After 4 cycles, the rate of partial remission or better was 85%, and 94% of planned ASCTs were performed. Toxicity was mostly hematologic and manageable. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02244125.

Description: Evaluation of MRD in multiple myeloma (MM) is becoming an important trial endpoint, especially in young patients. With current intensive approaches, the complete remission (CR) rates are up to 70%, making conventional evaluations of response quite useless. More sensitive tools are mandatory. Two techniques may help investigators to reach this goal, flow cytometry (FCM) and NGS. We applied both techniques to the IFM part of the IFM/DFCI 2009 trial. Briefly, this trial enrolled 700 patients under 66 years of age who were randomized to receive either 8 cycles of VRD (Velcade®-Revlimid®-Dexamethasone) (arm A), or 3 VRD cycles, high-dose melphalan, followed by two consolidation VRD cycles (arm B). All patients received a lenalidomide maintenance for 12 months. A bone marrow MRD evaluation was planned before and after maintenance for all patients achieving at least very good partial response (VGPR). A one-mL bone marrow aspirate was sent overnight to one of the central labs. The primary purpose was to assess MRD by FCM. When extra cells were available, they were frozen as a dry pellet for NGS analyses, using the LymphoSight® platform (Sequenta/Adaptive Inc.). A total of 246 patients have been evaluated by NGS before maintenance and 178 after maintenance. Patients were classified in 3 categories: negative (〈 10-6), low-positive (between 10-4 and 10-6), and positive (〉 10-4). At pre-maintenance, 87 patients were negative, 80 were low-positive, and 79 were positive. At post-maintenance, these numbers were respectively 86, 52, and 40. Using a cutoff at 10-6, patients below 10-6 at pre-maintenance presented a 3-year PFS at 83%, vs 53% for patients 〉 10-6. At post-maintenance, these % were 90% and 59% respectively. When restricted to patients in CR, the 3-year PFS was 87% and 63% at pre-maintenance, and 92% and 64% at post-maintenance (Figure). Finally, we compared the two MRD techniques. Using a 7-color FCM strategy, the sensitivity level was 10-4. Amongst the 163 patients negative with the FCM approach, 84 (51 %) patients were positive using NGS and among 72 patients positive with FCM, 67 (93%) were also positive using NGS. In the subgroup of patients with negative MRD using FCM, the 3 year PFS was 86% for NGS negative patients vs 66 % for NGS positive at pre-maintenance and 91% vs 65% at post maintenance. Looking at high-risk patients, 26 patients with t(4;14), and 16 with del(17p) were evaluated. Half of the t(4;14) patients achieved MRD negativity, versus only 1/16 patients with del(17p). Interestingly, 9/13 patients with t(4;14) who achieved MRD negativity, and 0/1 patients with del(17p) did not relapse, showing the importance of achieving deep response in these high-risk patients. In conclusion, this study clearly demonstrates that a sensitive technique like NGS is able to predict PFS in patients treated with modern approaches. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Avet-Loiseau: Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Hulin:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Arnulf:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Karlin:Sandoz: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. MACRO:millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Richardson:Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gentium S.p.A.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Faham:Adaptive Biotechnologies: Employment, Equity Ownership. Facon:Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Other: Adboard; Celgene: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Takeda: Honoraria, Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Amgen: Other: Adboard; Novartis: Other: Adboard. Attal:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Honoraria.

Description: Background: MDS with del 5q are characterized by profound anemia, which until the recent introduction of lenalidomide (N Engl J Med2005; 352: 549–57, J Clin Oncol2005;16S:5), was considered generally unresponsive to available treatments. In order to reevaluate the outcome of those patients in the pre-lenalidomide era, we analyzed response of anemia in MDS with del 5q treated with EPO ± G-CSF and thalidomide in previous GFM trials. Patients: MDS with del 5q included in 419 MDS treated with EPO or Darbepoetin (DAR) ± G-CSF by GFM centers (including 3 successive GFM trials: Blood2004; 104: 321–7; Blood2005;106 suppl 1: 712a; Br J Haematol2006;133: 513–9 and submitted to ASH 2006), and in 134 MDS treated with thalidomide in two successive GFM trials (Br J Haematol2005; 131: 609–18, and submitted to ASH 2006). Patients received at least 30,000 U/w of EPO or 300 mg/w of DAR and doses ranging from 50 to 800 mg/d of Thalidomide during at least 12 weeks. Results: 48 MDS with del 5q received EPO (or DAR) ± G-CSF, including 30 pts with del 5q alone, 9 with one and 9 with 〉1 additional cytogenetic abn; 21/48 had marrow blasts ≥5% (7 had 〉10%). 17 had the “5q- syndrome” according to WHO. Median pre-treatment EPO level was 287 UI/L (range 12–5,665), i.e. significantly more than in non del 5q cases (median 68, p1 additional cytogenetic abn, and marrow blasts ≥5%. Response duration was significantly shorter in MDS with del 5q than in other MDS (mean 12 vs. 24 months, p=0.019) and in pts with 5q- syndrome vs. other MDS with marrow blasts

Description: Introduction: The WHO defined overlapping MDS/MPN group includes two rare entities: BCR-ABL negative aCML and MDS/MPN-U, defined by at least 3 months persistent WBC 〉13G/l or platelets 〉450G/l with at least 1 cytopenia, significant dysplasia (〉10%) in at least 1 lineage, no circulating monocytosis (

Description: Background Bone marrow fibrosis is observed in 10-20% of MD, and is a poor prognostic factor, both in lower and higher risk MDS (Della Porta, JCO 2009). AZA, the current reference treatment for higher risk MDS, approved in EU for patients with up to 30% bone marrow blasts not candidates to intensive chemotherapy (IC) or allogeneic SCT, gives 50-60% responses and improves OS in higher-risk MDS but its role in MDS with myelofibrosis remains unknown. Methods Between 2004 and 2012, we treated at our center 172 consecutive MDS patients (pts) including FAB RAEB-T / WHO AML with 20-30% blasts, with AZA (75 mg/m2/d x7 d every 4 weeks, for a median of 6 cycles). We assessed in those patients the impact of myelofibrosis (MF), evaluated on bone marrow trephine biopsy and graded according to the European consensus on grading bone marrow fibrosis. Results Median age of the 172 pts was 73 years and 67% were males. According to WHO classification, 1 had del(5q) syndrome, 4 RARS/RCMD-RS, 24 RCMD, 37 RAEB-1, 54 RAEB-2, 29 AML (20-30% blasts), 17 CMML and 6 MDS unclassified. Median Hb level, WBC, platelet count and marrow blast count were 9.4 g/dl (range 3.5-15), 1.6 G/L (0-58), 75G/l (8-1080) and 12%(1-29), respectively. IPSS was low, Int-1, Int-2, High and a failure in 1(〉1%), 29(17%), 65 (38%), 59 (34%) and 18 (11%) patients, respectively. Twenty-three pts (13%) had grade 2-3 myelofibrosis (MF). Patients with MF were younger (median 68 vs. 74 years, p= 0.04), but had similar hematological characteristics: hemoglobin (median 9 vs. 9.45g/dl, p= 0.69); WBC (2.2 vs. 1.6 G/l, p= 0.48) Platelet (47 vs 77 G/l,p= 0.43) and bone marrow blast (10 vs. 12%, p=0.67). IPSS was int 1, int 2, high and a failure in 4, 7, 6 and 6 patients respectively without difference compared to patients without fibrosis. Cytogenetics was complex in 8, del(20q) +/- 1 additional abn in 5 patients, normal in 4 patients, failed in 6 patients (but with trisomy 8 and monosomy 7, resp, detected in 2 patients by FISH analysis). Overall, 73 (42%) patients achieved a response according to IWG2006 criteria, including 31 (18%) CR. The response rate and CR rate were 52% and 17% respectively in pts with MF, compared to 44% and 20% in pts without MF (p= 0.507 and p=1.00, respectively). With a median follow-up of 6.5 yr, median OS was 12 months in pts with MF, compared to 16 months in pts without MF (p=0.45). Conclusion In this MDS series, presence of MF was not associated with specific features (but blasts were often counted on marrow aspirates, with a possible underestimate in case of MF). Response to AZA and survival after AZA onset did not significantly differ based on the presence of MF. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: Background Induction therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma less than 66 years old. The quality of response to the induction treatment is an important prognostic factor and is predictive of progression free survival (PFS) following ASCT. The triplet combinations bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) and bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD) have demonstrated high response rates in prospective phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials, they are 2 of the most commonly used induction regimens prior to ASCT, and are both recommended in the International guidelines. To date, no comparative data from prospective randomized trials of the safety and efficacy of VTD vs VCD are available. This provided the rationale for the phase 3 investigation of VTD vs VCD prior to ASCT in patients with de novo MM in this randomized multicenter study (NCT01564537). Methods Patients with de novo symptomatic MM less than 66 years old were prospectively randomized to receive either 4 cycles of VTD (arm A) or 4 cycles of VCD (arm B) followed by ASCT. The VTD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, subcutaneously (SC) D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Thalidomide 100 mg/d, PO D1 to D21. The VCD regimen consisted of four 21-day cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m²/d, SC D1, 4, 8 and 11, Dexamethasone 40 mg/d, PO D1 to 4, D9 to 12 and Cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m²/d, PO D1, 8, 15. Patients were stratified according to ISS (1-2 versus 3) and cytogenetics (high-risk defined by 17p deletion and t(4;14) versus other).The primary endpoint was very good partial response (VGPR) rate following 4 cycles. Response was assessed in a central lab according to the IMWG criteria. Assuming a VGPR rate of 60% in the VTD arm versus 45% in the VCD arm (15% difference), the possibility to detect a statistically significant difference required the enrolment of 340 patients overall (170 per arm). Adverse events were graded using the NCI CTCAE catalogue, version 4.0. Results From 11/2013 to 02/2015, 358 patients were enrolled into the study. 18 were screening failures, and 170 were randomized each to arm A (VTD) and arm B (VCD). The median age was 60 years (range, 26-65), 62% of the patients were male, and overall, the patient characteristics were well-balanced across the 2 arms of the study. The median number of induction cycles administered in both arms was 4 (1-4). On an intent-to-treat basis, the overall response rate (〉 partial response [PR]) was 92.3% in arm A, including a 10.7% complete response (CR) rate and a VGPR rate of 66.7%, while in arm B the overall response rate was 84%, with a 9.5% CR and a 56.2% VGPR rate. VGPR and PR rates were significantly higher in the VTD arm with p-values of 0.04 and 0.02, respectively. Seven patients died during induction therapy (2%), 3 in arm A from infections (2) and pulmonary embolism (1), and 4 in arm B from progression to extramedullary myeloma (2) and infections (2). Grades 3 / 4 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 4% and 2.2% in Arm A and B, respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in 11.9% vs 22.5% in Arm A and B, respectively. Conclusion This trial is the first prospective randomized comparison of 4 cycles of VTD versus 4 cycles of VCD administered as induction therapy prior to ASCT. VTD was shown to be significantly superior to VCD in terms of VGPR and PR rates. Neuropathy rates low in both arms, while neutropenia was more frequent with VCD. Disclosures Moreau: Millennium: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Hulin:Celgene Corporation: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. MACRO:celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Garderet:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Stoppa:Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Facon:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pierre Fabre: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Laribi:Hospira SAS: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; millenium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; jansen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Attal:jansen: Honoraria; celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Background. Protein electrophoresis and immunofixation in the serum (SPEP - SIF) and urine (UPEP – UIF) have been routinely used for decades for characterizing and quantifying the M protein in Multiple Myeloma (MM). However, these techniques are notoriously tarnished with inaccuracy, despite improvements in recent years. The most important breakthrough in the field in recent years was the discovery of the Serum Free Light Chain Assay (sFLC), a routine quantitative and automated assay that measures kappa and lambda sFLC, however this was added to / rather than replaced traditional tests in the diagnostic armamentarium of MM. Recently, a new test quantifying paired clonal and non-clonal immunoglobulins (heavy/light chains HLC i.e. IgGκ/IgGλ) in serum was developed. Here we aim to assess the new HLC assays as tools to replace SPEP / IFE during MM patient monitoring Materials and methods. 110 Myeloma treated with pomalidomide and dexamethasone in two IFM studies (IFM 2009-02 in end stage RRMM and IFM 2010-02 in del17p and t(4;14) RRMM ) were included. The criteria for selection were that patients had measurable intact immunoglobulin myeloma according to IMWG criteria (M spike ≥10g/L), using serum and/or urine protein electrophoresis, with exclusion of patients solely measurable on UPEP and sFLC. All sera were collected centrally before initiation of treatment and sequentially every cycle until progression. Hevylite® (HLC) was measured in the biology laboratory of CHRU of Lille, France and results compared to traditional measurements. Along with SPEP, SIF, UPEP, UIF, and sFLC, we have also measured IgA HLC (IgA k and IgA l) and IgG (IgG k and IgG l) and the corresponding difference (clonal - non clonal) and ratio (clonal/non clonal). Results. Overall, 80% were measurable on SPEP with a median serum level of 31g/L (CI95% 19;42), and the remaining also had UPEP measurable myeloma with a median serum level of 0.66g/24h (CI95% 0.4;1.3). The median involved HLC level was 29.7g/L (CI95% 17.6;43.3), the median involved HLC difference clonal - non clonal was 28.8g/L (CI95% 15.6;42.7), the median involved HLC ratio clonal / non clonal was 51.9 (CI95% 18.3;203.9). Since all patients had a measurable intact immunoglobulin-based disease according to IMWG criteria, we have first confirmed that patients had also a measurable disease by HLC. All patients had an abnormal HLC ratio but one patient, who was measurable with an abnormal IgG L involved HLC test. Approximately 32% of patients had an M-spike below 20g/L and/or an electrophoretic migration in beta region meaning in the range of lack of sensitivity of the techniques used, all of whom had a measurable disease using involved HLC level and/or a measurable HLC ratio. We then sought to study the response rate according to HLC, and for that purpose we applied the exact same criteria as to the sFLC-based response criteria recommended by IMWG (e.g. normal ratio is CR and if abnormal ratio, then

Description: Key PointsSerum FLC analysis is a more sensitive indicator of disease than urinalysis. Improved sensitivity of serum over urine measurements during monitoring translates into valuable prognostic information.