ALBERT

Description: Key Points Weekly oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib appears generally well tolerated with manageable toxicity, limited grade 1/2 neuropathy. Data show that more than 25% of 30 evaluable relapsed/refractory myeloma patients who received the MTD had clinically meaningful responses.

Description: Introduction: Selinexor is a novel, first-in-class selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), which blocks XPO1, forcing the nuclear retention and activation of tumor suppressor proteins. Selinexor in combination with low dose dexamethasone (Sel-dex) was recently approved based on data from the STORM study, wherein Sel-dex induced an overall response rate (ORR) of 26.2% in patients with penta-exposed, triple-class refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of twice-weekly combination of selinexor, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (SKd) was selinexor 60 mg, carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 20 mg (NCT02199665). The ORR of this regimen in patients with MM refractory to carfilzomib in last line of therapy (n=13) was 62% and clinical benefit response was 77% (Jakubowiak et al. Br J Haematol 2019). This is consistent with data from the combination of selinexor, bortezomib and dexamethasone where a 43% ORR was observed in bortezomib refractory disease. We conducted the STOMP study to assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of SKd combination using once weekly (QW) dosing in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Methods: STOMP is a multicenter, open-label study. Patients with relapsed/refractory MM that was not refractory to carfilzomib, and who may have had prior proteasome inhibitor exposure were enrolled. Oral Selinexor was dosed QW at 80 or 100 mg. Carfilzomib was dosed QW (excluding day 22 of 28-day cycle) at 56 mg/m2 or 70 mg/m2. Dexamethasone was dosed at 40 mg QW. The primary objectives of the study are to assess the maximum tolerated dose, RP2D and evaluate the efficacy and safety of SKd in patients with relapsed/refractory MM. Results: As of July 01 2019, 12 patients were enrolled in the study. Of these, 5 were male and 7 were female. The median age was 70 years (range: 50-76 years). The median number of prior treatments was 4 (range: 2 - 8). Nine of 12 patients received prior autologous stem cell transplantation. All 12 patients were carfilzomib naïve. Nine of 12 patients had MM refractory to bortezomib; 11 patients had MM refractory to lenalidomide and/or pomalidomide including 5 patients with MM refractory to both; and 7 patients with MM refractory to daratumumab. Four dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed across 3 dose cohorts (Table 1). Common treatment related adverse events (Grade 1/2 , Grade ≥3) included anemia (42%, 17%), thrombocytopenia (17%, 58%), leukopenia (17%, 17%), nausea (67%, 0%), decreased appetite (33%, 0%), insomnia (33%, 0%), hyperglycemia (25%, 17%), fatigue (25%, 8%), vomiting (25%, 8%), and pneumonia (0%, 17%). The ORR was 75% including 3 complete responses, 5 very good partial responses and 1 partial response. Two patients had stable disease and 1 patient had minimal response. As of July 01, 8 patients remain on treatment. Conclusions: The once weekly SKd combination demonstrated encouraging preliminary activity with an ORR of 75% including complete responses and very good partial responses. Most DLTs were thrombocytopenia and all the DLT events occurred in patients with baseline Grade 1/2 thrombocytopenia. This activity and manageable side effect profile with QW selinexor in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone is promising. Disclosures Gasparetto: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed ; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, accommodations, or other expenses paid or reimbursed . Schiller:Gilead: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onconova: Research Funding; Pfizer Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership, Research Funding; Sangamo Therapeutics: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Eli Lilly and Company: Research Funding; FujiFilm: Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Other, Research Funding; Constellation Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Astellas: Research Funding; Biomed Valley Discoveries: Research Funding; Bristol Myer Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Lentzsch:Caelum Biosciences: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Proclara: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Clinical Care Options: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi: Consultancy, Research Funding; Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation: Honoraria; International Myeloma Foundation: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Columbia University: Patents & Royalties: 11-1F4mAb as anti-amyloid strategy. Tuchman:Roche: Research Funding; Alnylam: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Prothena: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Bahlis:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. White:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria. Chen:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Baljevic:Cardinal Health Specialty Solutions: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Other: Internal Review Committee participant. Kotb:Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Equity Ownership. Leblanc:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Sebag:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Venner:Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Bensinger:Amgen, Celgene: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Karyopharm: Other: Grant. Sheehan:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Chai:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kai:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shah:Karyopharm Therapeutics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shacham:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Patents & Royalties. Kauffman:Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lipe:Celgene: Consultancy; amgen: Consultancy; amgen: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 4519 Background: Despite advances in our understanding of clinical, genetic, and molecular aspects of multiple myeloma (MM) coupled with availability of more effective therapies, it remains an incurable disease. Combining cytoreduction from high-dose (chemo- or chemoradio-) therapy with adoptive immunotherapy forms the basis of an autologous-allogeneic (auto-allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) strategy. However, when an auto-allo HCT approach is compared to tandem autologous (auto-auto) HCT, conflicting results have been reported. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review of published studies comparing auto-auto HCT with auto-allo HCT in patients with newly diagnosed MM. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE thru Nov 5, 2011, and pertinent conference proceedings, was conducted. Included studies allocated newly diagnosed MM patients to auto-allo HCT if an HLA-matched sibling donor was available versus auto-auto if sibling donor was not available (biologic randomization). Independent, dual data extraction was performed. Pooling of data from similar outcomes was done using the random-effects model. Results: Our search identified 152 publications, of which five (manuscript=four, abstract=one) met inclusion criteria. The five included trials enrolled 1538 patients (auto-allo=565, auto-auto=973). At least a very good partial response was assessed in one study (522 patients) and did not differ among the treatment arms [risk ratio (RR) (95% CI) = 0.97 (0.87–1.09), p=0.66]; but complete remission, assessed in five studies (1130 patients), was higher in the auto-allo HCT arm [RR(95% CI) =1.65 (1.25–2.19), p=0.0005]. Event-free survival did not differ among auto-allo HCT group versus auto-auto HCT group on per-protocol analysis [hazard ratio (HR) (95% CI) = 0.78 (0.58–1.05)), p=0.11] of three trials (409 patients), or ITT analysis [HR(95% CI) = 0.83 (0.60–1.15), p=0.26] in three trials (1229 patients). Overall survival (OS) did not differ among these treatment arms whether analyzed on per-protocol [HR(95% CI) = 0.88 (0.33–2.35), p=0.79] in two trials (214 patients), or by ITT [HR(95% CI) = 0.80 (0.48–1.32), p=0.39] analysis in three trials (1229 patients). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was worse with auto-allo HCT [RR(95%CI) = 3.55 (2.17–5.80), p

Description: Toxicities have limited the use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) to younger, medically fit patients. In a canine HCT model, a combination of postgrafting mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine (CSP) allowed stable allogeneic engraftment after minimally toxic conditioning with low-dose (200 cGy) total-body irradiation (TBI). These findings, together with the known antitumor effects of donor leukocyte infusions (DLIs), led to the design of this trial. Forty-five patients (median age 56 years) with hematologic malignancies, HLA-identical sibling donors, and relative contraindications to conventional HCT were treated. Immunosuppression involved TBI of 200 cGy before and CSP/MMF after HCT. DLIs were given after HCT for persistent malignancy, mixed chimerism, or both. Regimen toxicities and myelosuppression were mild, allowing 53% of eligible patients to have entirely outpatient transplantations. Nonfatal graft rejection occurred in 20% of patients. Grades II to III acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) occurred in 47% of patients with sustained engraftment. With median follow-up of 417 days, survival was 66.7%, nonrelapse mortality 6.7%, and relapse mortality 26.7%. Fifty-three percent of patients with sustained engraftment were in complete remission, including 8 with molecular remissions. This novel allografting approach, based on the use of postgrafting immunosuppression to control graft rejection and GVHD, has dramatically reduced the acute toxicities of allografting. HCT with the induction of potent graft-versus-tumor effects can be performed in previously ineligible patients, largely in an outpatient setting. Future protocol modifications should reduce rejection and GVHD, thereby facilitating studies of allogeneic immunotherapy for a variety of malignancies.

Description: This multicenter, first-in-human study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the anti-CS1 monoclonal antibody elotuzumab. A standard 3 + 3 design was used to determine maximum tolerated dose; dose-limiting toxicities were assessed during cycle 1. Thirty-five patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were treated with intravenous elotuzumab at doses ranging from 0.5 to 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Patients who achieved at least stable disease after 4 treatments could receive another 4 treatments. No maximum tolerated dose was identified up to the maximum planned dose of 20 mg/kg. The most common adverse events, regardless of attribution, were cough, headache, back pain, fever, and chills. Adverse events were generally mild to moderate in severity, and adverse events attributed to study medication were primarily infusion-related. Plasma elotuzumab levels and terminal half-life increased with dose whereas clearance decreased, suggesting target-mediated clearance. CS1 on bone marrow–derived plasma cells was reliably saturated (≥ 95%) at the 10-mg/kg and 20-mg/kg dose levels. Using the European Group for Bone and Marrow Transplantation myeloma response criteria, 9 patients (26.5%) had stable disease. In summary, elotuzumab was generally well tolerated in this population, justifying further exploration of this agent in combination regimens.

Description: Introduction: BCMA is a tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor superfamily transmembrane glycoprotein essential for the maturation and survival of plasma cells. CC-93269 is an asymmetric 2-arm humanized IgG TCE that binds bivalently to BCMA and monovalently to CD3ε in a 2+1 format (Seckinger A, et al. Cancer Cell. 2017;31:396-410). The CC-93269-mediated interaction between T cells and BCMA-expressing myeloma cells induces T cell receptor/CD3 crosslinking leading to T cell activation, and release of proinflammatory cytokines and cytolytic enzymes, resulting in myeloma cell death. In preclinical studies with CC-93269 and related molecules, 2+1 BCMA TCEs induced tumor regression in animal models and promoted myeloma cell death in primary pt myeloma cells. Here we report interim results from a phase 1 dose-finding study (CC-93269-MM-001; NCT03486067) evaluating CC-93269 in pts with RRMM. Methods: Eligible pts had RRMM and had received ≥ 3 prior regimens without prior BCMA-directed therapy. In dose escalation, CC-93269 was administered intravenously over 2 hours on Days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for Cycles 1-3; Days 1 and 15 for Cycles 4-6; and on Day 1 for Cycle 7 and beyond, all in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation involved 2 stages: in stage 1, CC-93269 was given in fixed doses; in stage 2, pts received a fixed first dose on Cycle 1 Day 1, followed by intrapatient dose escalation on Cycle 1 Day 8. Primary objectives were to assess the safety and tolerability of CC-93269 and define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), non-tolerated dose (NTD), and/or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed after clinical response in pt bone marrow aspirate samples by Next Generation Flow using the EuroFlow panel. MRD negativity was reported only if a minimum sensitivity of 〈 1 tumor cell in 105 nucleated cells was achieved. Results: As of May 24, 2019, 19 pts had received CC-93269. Median age was 64 years (range 51-78), with a median of 6.2 years (range 1.4-13.9) since initial diagnosis. The median number of prior regimens was 6 (range 3-12) and included treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation (73.7%), allogenic stem cell transplantation (10.5%), lenalidomide (100%), pomalidomide (84.2%), bortezomib (100%), carfilzomib (84.2%), and daratumumab (DARA; 94.7%). All pts had MM refractory to their last line of therapy, with 16 (88.9%) refractory to DARA, 17 (89.5%) to their last proteasome inhibitor, and 16 (84.2%) to their last immunomodulatory agent. CC-93269 doses ranged from 0.15 to 10 mg; median duration of treatment was 14.6 weeks (range 1.6-32.0) with pts receiving a median of 4 cycles (range 1-8). Grade 3-4 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 15 (78.9%) pts and included 10 (52.6%) pts with neutropenia, 8 (42.1%) with anemia, 5 (26.3%) with infections, and 4 (21.1%) with thrombocytopenia. No pt required dose modifications. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was reported in 17 (89.5%) pts, the majority of whom reported a maximum grade 1 (n = 11 [57.9%]) or grade 2 (n = 5 [26.3%]), and occurred most frequently with the first or second dose (n = 22 of 27 events [81.5%]). CRS prophylaxis was implemented with dexamethasone for first dose and dose increases in pts receiving ≥ 6 mg. Of 27 CRS events, 8 (29.6%) were managed with dexamethasone and 10 (37.0%) with tocilizumab. One pt receiving 6 mg CC-93269 as first dose and 10 mg on Cycle 1 Day 8 died on study in the setting of CRS, with a potential infection as a contributing factor. Dose-related pharmacodynamic activity, including peripheral blood immune cell redistribution and transient release of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, was observed in pts. Of the 12 pts treated with ≥ 6 mg CC-93269 in Cycle 1, 10 pts achieved a partial response (PR) or better (overall response rate; 83.3%), including 7 (58.3%) with a very good partial response (VGPR) or better and 4 (33.3%) with a stringent complete response (sCR) (Table); 9 (75.0%) pts achieved MRD negativity. The median time to response was 4.2 weeks (range 4.0-13.1), and 10 of 10 responses were ongoing with follow-up ranging from 2.1 to 4.7 months. The NTD, MTD, and RP2D have not yet been reached. Conclusions: CC-93269, a 2+1 BCMA TCE, shows a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy, including MRD-negative sCRs, in pts with heavily pretreated RRMM. The study continues to enroll in the dose escalation phase. Updated safety and efficacy data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures Costa: Fujimoto Pharmaceutical Corporation Japan: Other: Advisor; Karyopharm: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Wong:Genentech: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Fortis: Research Funding; Juno: Research Funding. Bermúdez:MSD: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Fresenius: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. de la Rubia:AMGEN: Consultancy; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Mateos:Pharmamar: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive: Honoraria; EDO: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ocio:BMS: Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Rodríguez-Otero:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy; BMS: Honoraria; Kite Pharma: Consultancy. San-Miguel:Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. Li:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sarmiento:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Lardelli:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gaudy:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Boss:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kelly:Celgene Corporation: Employment. Burgess:University of California: Other: Volunteer clinical faculty, without salary, Patents & Royalties: Patent - T315A and F317I mutations of BCR-ABL kinase domain; Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties: Patent - CD47 antibodies and methods of use thereof. Hege:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties; Arcus Biosciences: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Mersana Therapuetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Amgen, Celgene: Other: Personal Fees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda, Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Merck, Karyopharm: Other: Grant.

Description: Background: The selective HDAC6 inhibitor ACY-241, a tablet, is structurally related to ricolinostat (ACY-1215), the first agent in this class in the clinic.Ricolinostat, an oral liquid, demonstrated clinical efficacy in a Phase 2 combination with pomalidomide (Pom) and dexamethasone (Dex) in patients (pts) with relapsed or relapsed-and-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) without toxicities greater than those reported with Pom and Dex alone (Raje et al., EHA 2016, S813). Preclinical data demonstrate synergistic activity of ACY-241 with Pom and lenalidomide (Len) in induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in MM cells as well as significant extension of survival in a mouse xenograft model (Niesvizky et al., Blood 2015, 126: 3040). We present updated data on safety and efficacy of the ACY-241/Pom/Dex combination in pts with relapsed or RRMM (ACE-MM-200, NCT02400242). Aims:Determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of ACY-241 monotherapy and combination with Pom and Dex and the recommended dose for further development. Methods:Based on clinical experience with ricolinostat and non-clinical pharmacokinetics (PK) of ACY-241, we designed a first-in-human phase 1a/1b clinical trial of a single-cycle of ACY-241 monotherapy followed by ACY-241 in combination with Pom (4mg) and low-dose Dex in pts with relapsed or RRMM. The starting dose of ACY-241 was chosen to give similar exposure to the therapeutic dose of ricolinostat (160 mg QD). The trial design was chosen to grant pts access to combination therapy with an active regimen while exploring the safety, PK, and pharmacodynamic profile of ACY-241 alone and in combination with Pom/Dex. The PK of Pom and Dex was also assessed. Pts with relapsed or RRMM previously treated with ≥ 2 cycles of Len and a proteasome inhibitor were eligible. Cohorts of 3 pts had ACY-241 PO QD as monotherapy (180, 360 and 480 mg) on days 1-21 of a 28 day cycle. If no DLT was noted in cycle 1 with ACY-241, pts continued to cycle 2 of combo therapy with ACY-241/Pom/Dex. Pharmacodynamic assessments were acetylated tubulin (HDAC6 marker) and acetylated histones (Class 1 HDAC marker) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Results: Since June 2015, 40 pts have enrolled (34 safety-evaluable, 6 had no dosing information in the database). Median age was 62 (34-84) years and median number of prior regimens was 3 (1-7). 90% of pts were refractory to last treatment. 83% were refractory to Len and 50% to both bortezomib and Len. 20% of pts had high risk cytogenetics. No monotherapy DLTs were observed at the highest dose explored (480 mg). Common toxicities in the monotherapy safety population (N=15) were all grade 1/2, except 1 pt with grade 3 anemia at the 480 mg dose level. Toxicities included nausea (4 pts, 27%), anemia (3 pts, 20%), dizziness, fatigue, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (2 pts each, 13%). Doses of 180 mg and 360 mg were explored in combination; one DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) occurred at 360 mg. Common toxicities in the combination therapy safety population (N=33) included neutropenia (13 pts, 40%), fatigue (9 pts, 27%), anemia, leukopenia (6 pts each, 18%), cough, insomnia, rash (4 pts each, 12%), and hyperglycemia (3 pts, 9%). Grade 3/4 toxicities included neutropenia (10 pts, 30%), leukopenia (3 pts, 9%) and anemia (2 pts, 6%). PK results showed a dose-linear increase in exposure with increasing dose, no accumulation and no drug-drug interaction with Pom and Dex. Selective increase in acetylated tubulin was seen at 180 mg with increasing levels of acetylated tubulin and histones at higher doses. Confirmed efficacy data (median follow-up 3.5 months) for combination treatment (N=22, all refractory to last treatment regimen) shows 1 VGPR, 10 PR, 2 MR and 8 SD and 1 PD. Median PFS and duration of response were not reached at time of the data cut. Given the safety profile, PK exposure (Cmax~6 µM) and PD profile, the 360 mg QD dose level was recommended for further clinical exploration of ACY-241 in combination with Pom/Dex. Summary/Conclusion:ACY-241 is well tolerated in combination with Pom/Dex with dose proportional increase in drug exposure. Early response data to combination treatment parallel those observed with ricolinostat/Pom/Dex and compare favorably to historic controls of Pom/Dex. Cohort expansion at 360 mg ACY-241 with Pom/Dex is ongoing to confirm the dose and schedule for a planned pivotal trial of Pom/Dex +/- ACY-241 and to explore selected biomarkers. Disclosures Richardson: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Nooka:Amgen: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Raab:Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Shain:Takeda/Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Amgen/Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Signal Genetics: Research Funding. Matous:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Speakers Bureau; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Agarwal:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding. Madan:Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Moreau:Novartis: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria. Facon:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Tamang:Acetylon Pharmaceutical Inc.: Employment. Jones:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Markelewicz:Acetylon Pharmaceutical Inc.: Employment. Wheeler:Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Employment. Trede:Acetylon Pharmaceutials Inc: Employment. Raje:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BMS: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding. Terpos:Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bensinger:Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc: Research Funding; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy.

Description: Abstract 74 Background: Carfilzomib, a novel proteasome inhibitor (PI), and pomalidomide, an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), have both demonstrated promising activity as single agents or in combination with dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. IMiD+PI combinations including lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone and lenalidomide, carfilzomib, dexamethasone have had high response rates and good tolerability. We aimed to combine carfilzomib and pomalidomide with dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) for the first time and hypothesized that this regimen would be highly active in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Here, we report the first findings from the Phase I dose-escalation and expansion portions of the first phase I/II trial of Car-Pom-d in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (NCT01464034). Methods: The primary objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the safety/tolerability of Car-Pom-d. Secondary objectives included determination of overall response rate, time to progression, progression free survival, and time to next therapy. All patients had to be refractory to prior lenalidomide, and must have been relapsed/refractory to their most recent therapy. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of oral pomalidomide once daily on days 1–21, intravenous (IV) carfilzomib over 30 minutes on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16, and oral or IV dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22. Dose-escalation of carfilzomib started with 27mg/m2 carfilzomib/4mg pomalidomide/40 mg dexamethasone using a standard 3+3 schema based on dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring in cycle 1. Carfilzomib was initiated at 20 mg/m2for Cycle 1, days 1–2 at all dose levels. Investigators were permitted to adjust the dose of dexamethasone at any point based on their discretion. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI-CTCAE v4. Response was assessed by the modified International Uniform Response Criteria. Results: In the Phase I dose-escalation portion of the trial, a total of 12 patients were enrolled from 6 centers. The median age was 61 years (range 44–78), 67% were male. The median number of prior regimens was 6 (range 2–15), and median time from diagnosis was 5.1 years. Four (33%) patients had prior stem cell transplant, 11 (92%) had prior bortezomib, and all were lenalidomide-refractory. Cytogenetic abnormalities included 5 patients with del(17p), 2 patients with t(4;14), and 1 patient each with del(13), t(11;14), and t(14;16). In these first 12 patients, drug-related AEs occurring in 〉20% of patients included fatigue (42%), anemia (33%), pneumonia (33%), dyspnea (25%), and thrombocytopenia (25%). Six (50%) patients experienced grade ≥3 AEs including 2 incidence each of neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. The MTD was established as the starting dose level (carfilzomib 20/27 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4mg, dexamethasone 40 mg). At this dose, 1 of 6 patients experienced a protocol-defined DLT of febrile neutropenia. At dose level 2 (carfilzomib 20/36 mg/m2, pomalidomide 4 mg, dexamethasone 40 mg), 2 of 6 patients experienced DLTs, consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 3 rash. All 12 patients were response evaluable with 2 very good partial response (VGPR), 4 partial response (PR), 2 minor response (MR), 2 stable disease (SD), and 2 progressive disease (PD) for a ≥ MR rate of 67%. The 6 month progression free survival was 70% (95% CI: 37 to 90%). Of the 5 patients with del(17p), 1 achieved VGPR, 2 achieved PR, 1 achieved SD. We then enrolled an expansion cohort of 20 patients from 8 centers resulting in a total study population of 32 patients, with 25 still receiving treatment. Three patients have died, all from progressive multiple myeloma. Early response assessments in 27 out of 32 patients show 2 VGPR, 7 PR, 6 MR, 8 SD, and 4 PD for a ≥MR rate of 56%. Conclusions: The Car-Pom-d regimen is well tolerated and achieves a high response rate in a heavily pre-treated, lenalidomide-refractory population with prior bortezomib exposure. Importantly, we have seen responses in patients with poor risk cytogenetics, specifically del (17p). We are beginning enrollment in a larger phase 2 cohort, and updated safety and efficacy data for all patients will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shah: Celgene: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Array: Consultancy. Stadtmauer:Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Abonour:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millenium: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Cohen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Bensinger:Onyx: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Gasparetto:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Kaufman:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy. Lentzsch:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Vogl:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy; Acetylon: Research Funding. Orlowski:Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Durie:Onyx: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Millenium: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy.

Description: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is likely caused by donor T lymphocytes. Because unmodified blood stem cell grafts contain one log more T lymphocytes than unmodified marrow grafts, we evaluated the incidence of chronic GVHD in previously reported 37 blood stem cell recipients and 37 computer-matched historical control marrow recipients (Bensinger et al, Blood 88:2794, 1996). All patients have been followed until death, relapse, or occurrence of chronic GVHD or for a minimum of 2 years. In a univariable proportional hazards regression model, the relative risk of developing clinical chronic GVHD (includes clinical limited and clinical extensive disease) by 2 years posttransplant among the peripheral blood stem cell recipients compared with the marrow recipients was 2.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 4.74; P = .039). For clinical extensive chronic GVHD, the relative risk was 2.37 (95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 5.29; P = .035). In multivariable analyses, considering also the covariables of patient age, patient cytomegalovirus serostatus, and donor cytomegalovirus serostatus, the relative risks of clinical chronic GVHD and clinical extensive chronic GVHD were also greater than 2 (P 〈 .05). We conclude that the transplantation of unmanipulated filgrastim-mobilized blood stem cells may result in a relatively high incidence of chronic GVHD.

Description: We conducted an IPDMA using data from 9 randomized trials comparing allogeneic PBSC transplants to bone marrow (BM), focusing specifically on the issue of the administration of 3 vs. 4 doses (day 11) of MTX as part of a regimen for GVHD prophylaxis which included cyclosporine. The administration of day 11 MTX was trial specific and data were analysed by intention to treat, irrespective of whether the 4th dose of MTX was actually given. Six trials containing 573 patients prescribed 4 doses of MTX while 3 trials containing 508 patients prescribed 3 doses of MTX. Four doses of MTX conferred a statistically significant survival advantage, death odds ratio (OR) 0.67 (CI 0.52–0.88) (p=0.0036) for recipients of PBSC compared to BM, while with 3 doses, there was no statistically significant difference. The difference between the two subgroups was significant (test of interaction chi2=7.9;p=0.005). Disease-free survival was also significantly better among recipients of PBSC in the 4 dose studies OR 0.62 (CI 0.48–0.80) while no difference was seen in the 3 dose studies. Test of interaction between the two subgroups was significant, chi2=9.7;p=0.002. The effect on survival and DFS appeared to be due primarily to the rates of relapse. In the 4-dose studies relapse rates were 36.6% at 6 years among recipients of BM compared to 19.2% among recipients of PBSC (p=0.0015). The rates of relapse in the 3 dose studies were 26% for both recipients of PBSC and BM. Test of interaction between the two subgroups was again significant (chi2=4.3; p=0.04). Thus the administration of 4 doses of MTX had a negative impact among recipients of BM which resulted in higher relapse rates. The effect on relapse-related mortality was also significant, 23.6% BM v. 14.2 % PBSC (p=0.018) in the 4 dose studies but not significant in 3 dose subgroup (14 vs. 23%, p=0.42). Test of interaction between the two subgroups was not significant (chi2=0.7;p=0.4). The effect was not due to non-relapse mortality which was not statistically different among patients in the 4-dose MTX studies and the 3 dose MTX studies. The rates of acute GVHD grades 2–4 were the same among recipients of PBSC or BM in both the 4 dose and 3 dose studies. Chronic extensive GVHD was higher among recipients of PBSC irrespective of whether patients received 3 or 4 doses of MTX; at 5 years 57.3% PBSC v. 47.3% BM, (p=0.0037) for 4 dose, 49.2% PBSC v. 26.1% BM, (p=0.00004). Both platelet and neutrophil engraftment was faster in PBSC arm (p