ALBERT

Description: BACKGROUND: Ivosidenib (AG-120) and enasidenib (AG-221) are oral inhibitors of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1) and mutant IDH2 (mIDH2), respectively, approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory IDH-mutant acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here we report updated results from a phase 1 study on the safety and efficacy of each of these agents when combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed AML, as well as data regarding the rate of measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete remissions (CRs), mutation clearance and molecular profiling. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study (NCT02632708), eligible patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1 or mIDH2 AML are treated with induction therapy (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day or idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day x 3 days with cytarabine 200 mg/m2/day x 7 days) in combination with either ivosidenib 500 mg once daily (for mIDH1) or enasidenib 100 mg once daily (for mIDH2). After induction, patients may receive ≤4 cycles of consolidation therapy while continuing the mIDH inhibitor. Patients who complete or are ineligible for consolidation may continue on maintenance ivosidenib or enasidenib until the end of study. For patients who proceed to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), mIDH inhibitor treatment is discontinued prior to transplant and is not resumed post-transplant. mIDH1/2 variant allele frequency (VAF) is assessed in bone marrow mononuclear cells using Digital PCR Technology (Sysmex-Inostics Inc). IDH1/2 mutation clearance (IDH-MC) is defined as a reduction in the mIDH1/2 VAF to a level below the limit of detection of this assay (0.02-0.04%) for ≥1 on-treatment time point on or after Day 28 of induction. MRD in bone marrow aspirates is analyzed using multi-parameter flow cytometry. Baseline co-occurring mutations are identified with a 95-gene next generation sequencing panel targeted to hematologic malignancies. RESULTS: As of May 1, 2018, 134 patients had been treated: 47 with ivosidenib (median age 63 years, range 24-76) and 87 with enasidenib (median age 63 years, range 27-77; Table 1). Secondary AML (sAML; arising after myelodysplastic syndrome or another antecedent hematologic disorder, or after exposure to genotoxic injury) was present in 33/87 (38%) patients with mIDH2 and in 16/47 (34%) patients with mIDH1. The most frequent co-occurring baseline mutations were DNMT3A, NPM1 and NRAS for patients with IDH1 mutations; and DNMT3A, SRSF2 and ASXL1 for patients with IDH2 mutations. Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with induction and consolidation was well tolerated, based on the frequency of grade ≥3 non-hematologic adverse events (Table 2) and hematologic recovery (Table 3). Times for ANC and platelet count recovery were nominally longer in patients with sAML. Among the 41 ivosidenib-treated patients evaluable for efficacy, a response of CR, CRi or CRp was achieved in 26/28 (93%) patients with de novo AML and 6/13 (46%) patients with sAML (Table 4). Twenty-one patients received ≥1 cycle of consolidation therapy and 11 patients received maintenance after consolidation. Seventeen patients proceeded to HSCT. Among the 77 enasidenib-treated patients evaluable for efficacy, a response of CR, CRi, or CRp was achieved in 33/45 (73%) patients with de novo AML and in 20/32 (63%) patients with sAML (Table 4). Thirty-seven patients received ≥1 cycle of consolidation therapy, 6 patients received maintenance directly after induction and 11 patients received maintenance after consolidation. Thirty-three patients proceeded to HSCT. Longitudinal VAF data are available for 31 ivosidenib-treated patients and 60 enasidenib-treated patients. In patients who achieved a CR, IDH-MC was observed in 41% (9/22) of those with mIDH1 (Table 5) and in 30% (11/37) of those with mIDH2 (Table 6). Flow cytometry assessments are available for 21 patients achieving a CR: MRD-negative CRs were observed in 89% (8/9) of those with mIDH1 and in 58% (7/12) of those with mIDH2. CONCLUSION: Ivosidenib or enasidenib in combination with induction and consolidation therapy has an acceptable safety profile with robust remission rates, MRD-negative CRs, and mutation clearance in a population of older, high-risk patients with mIDH AML. The clinical benefit of adding ivosidenib or enasidenib to induction, consolidation and maintenance therapy for patients with newly diagnosed mIDH AML will be further evaluated in a randomized phase 3 trial. Disclosures Stein: Celgene: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. DiNardo:Karyopharm: Other: Advisory role; Medimmune: Other: Advisory role; Celgene: Other: Advisory role; Bayer: Other: Advisory role; Agios: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role; AbbVie: Consultancy, Other: Advisory role. Fathi:Jazz: Honoraria; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boston Biomedical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Honoraria. Mims:Abbvie Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy. Pratz:Boston Scientific: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding. Savona:Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stein:Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Stone:AbbVie: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Argenx: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sumitomo: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Cornerstone: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Steering Committee; Otsuka: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Fujifilm: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ono: Consultancy; Orsenix: Consultancy. Döhner:Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; AROG Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sunesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celator: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding. Pollyea:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Argenx: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celyad: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Curis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McCloskey:Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Speakers Bureau; Celgene Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; COTA: Equity Ownership. Odenike:ABBVIE: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI/Baxalta: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncotherapy Science: Research Funding; Agios: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Lowenberg:Clear Creek Bio Ltd: Consultancy, Honoraria; Chairman Scientific Committee and Member Executive Committee, European School of Hematology (ESH, Paris, France): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Editorial Board "International Journal of Hematology": Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Editorial Board "The Netherlands Journal of Medicine": Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astex: Consultancy; "Up-to-Date", section editor leukemia: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Editorial Board "European Oncology & Haematology": Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Elected member, Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts, The Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Supervisory Board, National Comprehensive Cancer Center (IKNL), Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chairman, Leukemia Cooperative Trial Group HOVON (Netherlands): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; international Scientific Advisory Board, Institute Gustave Roussy, Paris: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Royal Academy of Sciences and Arts, The Netherlands: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Ossenkoppele:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Patel:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; France Foundation: Honoraria. Lersch:Celgene: Employment. Nabhan:Agios: Employment. Choe:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Wang:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Hua:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Almon:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cooper:Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Tallman:Cellerant: Research Funding; BioSight: Other: Advisory board; Daiichi-Sankyo: Other: Advisory board; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Orsenix: Other: Advisory board; AbbVie: Research Funding; AROG: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) is a critical enzyme in the citric acid cycle, catalyzing the oxidative decarboxylation of isocitrate to produce alpha-ketoglutarate (a-KG). The mutant IDH are not catalytically inactive enzymes, but rather possess novel enzymatic activities, catalyzing the reduction of α-KG to the oncometabolite' 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), which has been found to be elevated in patients with several tumor types, including acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). AG-221 is an oral, selective, first-in class, potent inhibitor of the IDH2 mutant protein. The compound has been demonstrated to reduce 2-HG levels by 〉90% and reverse histone and DNA hypermethylation in vitro, and to induce differentiation in leukemia cell models. In vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) studies in a U87MG IDH2 (R140Q) xenograft mouse model demonstrated robust plasma 2-HG lowering, and the correlation between PK (AG-221 exposure) and PD (the inhibition of 2-HG production) was used for human efficacious exposure projection. The PK/PD correlation was further confirmed in a primary human AML xenograft model in mice. These results are compared to early PK/PD results from the ongoing first-in-human Phase I study of AG-221 in patients with advanced IDH2 mutant positive hematologic malignancies [NCT01915498]. Methods: This first-in-man Phase I study of oral AG-221 was designed to evaluate the safety, PK, and PD, including 2-HG levels, as well as clinical activity. AG-221 was administered orally once (QD) or twice (BID) per day in continuous 28-day cycles. Sequential cohorts of patients were enrolled at higher dose levels. Patients included in this analysis were enrolled to doses of 30, 50, 75 mg BID and 100 mg QD (total N=21). Patients bearing the two dominant IDH2 mutations, R140Q (85.7%) or R172K (14.3%), were enrolled in the Phase I study. Blood was collected at multiple time points for determination of the PK and PD effects of AG-221. The concentrations of AG-221and 2-HG in plasma samples were determined using a qualified LC-MS/MS based method. PK and PK/PD analyses were performed using WinNonLin®. In addition, PK/PD relationships and efficacy of AG-221 was evaluated in a U87MG IDH2-R140Q xenograft mouse model and a primary human AML xenograft mouse model carrying the IDH2-R140Q mutation following oral doses. Results: Preliminary analysis of PK demonstrated excellent oral AG-221 exposure in humans. The mean plasma half-life is greater than 40 hours. Plasma 2-HG concentrations decreased rapidly; substantial and constant plasma 2-HG inhibition was achieved following multiple AG-221 doses in patients, and the inhibition was dose and drug exposure dependent. Based on exposure-response analyses with R140Q patients, the AG-221 AUC0-10hr value of 47.1 hrug/mL is estimated to result in sustained 90% plasma 2-HG inhibition in human (Figure1) which is associated with IC90 of 66 ng/mL. This is consistent with an in vivo IC90 in an AML xenograft model, U87MG IDH2-R140Q. In addition, up to 50% plasma 2-HG inhibition was observed in limited number of patients with R172K mutation. Figure 1. AG-221 plasma exposure and 2-HG inhibition correlation in patients with IDH2-R140Q mutation Figure 1. AG-221 plasma exposure and 2-HG inhibition correlation in patients with IDH2-R140Q mutation Conclusions: The pharmacokinetic profile for AG-221 supports QD dosing based on the high plasma exposure and long half-life observed in this study. AG 221 suppressed the production of 2-HG in plasma to the normal range found in healthy volunteers. 2-HG inhibition in R140Q mutation was translated well from mice to humans as well as from in vitro to in vivo. Disclosures Fan: Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Chen:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Wang:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Yen:Agios: Employment. Utley:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Almon:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Biller:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Agresta:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other. Yang:Agios Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Stockholder Other.

Description: Background: Ivosidenib (Ivo) and enasidenib (Ena) are potent, mutant-specific oral inhibitors of the IDH1 and IDH2 proteins, respectively, and are approved as single agents for the treatment of newly diagnosed (Ivo) and/or relapsed/refractory (Ivo and Ena) AML. When used as single agents, these inhibitors induce differentiation of leukemic blasts, often without a period of bone marrow (BM) aplasia (PMID 28588020, 29860938). A phase 1 study (NCT02632708) examining the safety and efficacy of Ivo or Ena in combination with intensive induction chemotherapy (IDHi/7+3) in newly diagnosed AML with mutant IDH1 or IDH2 (mIDH) has yielded encouraging response rates in preliminary reports (Stein et al. ASH 2018; Abstract 560). The effect of IDHi/7+3 on BM morphology and whether features of differentiation are seen in this context is unknown. Here, we report the clinicopathologic findings in a cohort of patients treated with IDHi/7+3 and describe a distinct pattern of BM response with implications for post-therapy disease monitoring. Methods: Investigators from participating sites for NCT02632708 were invited to contribute cases. 36 patients from 4 sites were included with IRB approval at all sites. For each patient, the diagnostic BM biopsy and aspirate smear (BMBx) and all subsequent BMBx performed until end of induction (EOI) or removal from study were reviewed at individual sites based on consensus criteria. A subset of cases was re-reviewed by all pathologists via photomicrographs and digital whole slide images. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on their Day 14 (D14) BMBx: 1) Aplasia (D14A = 5% blasts at D14; with morphologic or flow cytometric evidence of blast differentiation at D14 or D21); or 3) Persistent AML (D14P = 〉10% cellular; and 〉5% blasts; and no differentiation or clearance of blasts at D14 or later time points). Clinicopathologic data was collected from the electronic medical record and from the study database. IDH mutation clearance (MC) was defined as a reduction in the mIDH variant allele frequency in BM mononuclear cells to a level below the limit of detection of the assay (0.02-0.04%) for ≥1 on-treatment time point on or after D28 of induction. Results: The cohort included 17 mIDH1 patients who received Ivo and 19 mIDH2 patients who received Ena (Table 1, Fig 1); 1 patient in each treatment group had mIDH1 and mIDH2. In the 31 patients evaluable for response at EOI, 27 achieved CR or CRi/p; 2 MLFS; and 2 SD. Of 29 patients with a morphologic response (CR, CRi/p, MLFS), 19 (66%) were classified as D14A (median 5% cellularity; median

Description: Ivosidenib (AG-120) and enasidenib (AG-221) are targeted, oral inhibitors of the mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH) 1 and 2 enzymes, respectively. Given their effectiveness as single agents in mIDH1/2 relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), this phase 1 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with intensive chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1/2 AML. Ivosidenib 500 mg once daily and enasidenib 100 mg once daily were well tolerated in this setting, with safety profiles generally consistent with those of induction and consolidation chemotherapy alone. The frequency of IDH differentiation syndrome was low, as expected given the concurrent administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy. In patients receiving ivosidenib, the frequency and grades of QT interval prolongation were similar to those observed with ivosidenib monotherapy. Increases in total bilirubin were more frequently observed in patients treated with enasidenib, consistent with this inhibitor's known potential to inhibit UGT1A1, but did not appear to have significant clinical consequences. In patients receiving ivosidenib (n = 60) or enasidenib (n = 91), end-of-induction complete remission (CR) rates were 55% and 47%, respectively, and CR/CR with incomplete neutrophil or platelet recovery (CR/CRi/CRp) rates were 72% and 63%, respectively. In patients with a best overall response of CR/CRi/CRp, 16/41 (39%) receiving ivosidenib had IDH1 mutation clearance and 15/64 (23%) receiving enasidenib had IDH2 mutation clearance by digital polymerase chain reaction; furthermore, 16/20 (80%) and 10/16 (63%), respectively, became negative for measurable residual disease by multiparameter flow cytometry. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02632708.

Description: BACKGROUND: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 or IDH2 are seen in ~15-20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Mutant IDH (mIDH) reduces α-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), leading to histone hypermethylation and a block in myeloid differentiation, and may also exert leukemogenic effects by inducing dependence on BCL2 and inhibiting homologous recombination. Ivosidenib (AG-120) and enasidenib (AG-221) are oral inhibitors of mIDH1 and mIDH2, respectively, that as monotherapy are associated with robust overall response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory AML. We are assessing the safety and preliminary efficacy of ivosidenib or enasidenib in combination with standard induction chemotherapy. METHODS: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1 study (NCT02632708), eligible patients with newly diagnosed mIDH1 or mIDH2 AML are treated with standard induction chemotherapy (daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/day or idarubicin 12 mg/m2/day x 3 days with cytarabine 200 mg/m2/day x 7 days) in combination with either ivosidenib 500 mg once daily (for mIDH1) or enasidenib 100 mg once daily (for mIDH2). After induction, patients may receive ≤4 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy while continuing the mIDH inhibitor. Patients who either complete or are ineligible for consolidation may continue on maintenance ivosidenib or enasidenib for ≤2 years from the start of induction. Patients may be removed from the study at any point for an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT); these patients do not receive maintenance therapy post-transplant. RESULTS: As of Apr 18, 2017, 65 patients had been treated: 27 with ivosidenib (median age 60 years, range 24-76) and 38 with enasidenib (median age 63 years, range 32-76, Table 1). Of the 38 patients with mIDH2, 19 (50%) had secondary AML (sAML; arising after myelodysplastic syndrome or another antecedent hematologic disorder, or after exposure to genotoxic injury) compared with 9/27 (33%) with mIDH1. Ivosidenib or enasidenib combined with induction chemotherapy was generally well tolerated. One dose-limiting toxicity was observed (persistent grade 4 thrombocytopenia without leukemia on Day 42 in an enasidenib- and daunorubicin/cytarabine-treated patient). The most frequent grade ≥3 nonhematologic treatment-emergent adverse events during induction therapy, regardless of attribution, in ivosidenib-treated patients were febrile neutropenia (56%), alanine aminotransferase increased (11%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (11%), and colitis (11%); and in enasidenib-treated patients were febrile neutropenia (63%), hypertension (11%), colitis (8%), and maculopapular rash (8%; Table 2). Thirty- and 60-day mortality rates were both 7% in ivosidenib-treated patients, and were 5% and 8%, respectively, in enasidenib-treated patients. Median times for ANC recovery to ≥500/µL were 28 and 34 days for ivosidenib- and enasidenib-treated patients, respectively, and for platelet recovery to 〉50,000/µL were 28 and 33 days for ivosidenib- and enasidenib-treated patients, respectively. In enasidenib-treated patients with sAML there was an increased time to platelet count recovery (median 50 days). Among 23 efficacy-evaluable ivosidenib-treated patients, a response of CR, CRi, or CRp was achieved in 12/14 (86%) patients with de novo AML and 4/9 (44%) patients with sAML. Among 37 efficacy-evaluable enasidenib-treated patients, a response of CR, CRi, or CRp was achieved in 12/18 (67%) patients with de novo AML and 11/19 (58%) patients with sAML (Table 3). Seven ivosidenib-treated and 14 enasidenib-treated patients received ≥1 cycle of consolidation therapy; 6 ivosidenib-treated and 8 enasidenib-treated patients proceeded to HSCT. CONCLUSION: Ivosidenib or enasidenib in combination with standard AML induction therapy is generally well tolerated. The slower platelet recovery observed in patients with mIDH2 sAML may reflect the reduced normal hematopoietic reserve in sAML patients; nevertheless, alternative dosing schedules for enasidenib with induction chemotherapy are being explored to see if delayed platelet recovery can be mitigated. Response rates thus far are encouraging, especially in patients with sAML, many of whom had received hypomethylating agent therapy. To further understand the quality of responses, analyses of minimal residual disease by mutational clearance are underway. Disclosures Stein: Pfizer: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses; GSK: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Agios Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Constellation Pharma: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Other: Travel expenses, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. DiNardo: AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi-Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding. Mims: Novartis: Honoraria. Savona: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sunesis: Research Funding; Astex: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Stein: Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Stemline: Consultancy. Fathi: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Medimmune: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria. Stone: Amgen: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Ono: Consultancy; Astellas: Consultancy; Arog: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Fuji Film: Consultancy; Sumitomo: Consultancy. Pollyea: Agios, Pfizer: Research Funding; Takeda, Ariad, Alexion, Celgene, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Gilead, Jazz, Servier, Curis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Odenike: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CTI/Baxalta: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Döhner: Agios: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Arog Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celator: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding; Sunesis: Honoraria; Pfizer: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Astex Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Schiller: Celator/Jazz: Research Funding. Gupta: Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Nabhan: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zhang: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Almon: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cooper: Agios: Employment, Equity Ownership.