ALBERT

Description: Background: PTCL is a heterogeneous group of hematologic malignancies associated with a poor prognosis for most subtypes. In the relapsed setting, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only potentially curative option for patients with PTCL. However, many patients are not able to achieve an adequate response to allow for HSCT. Belinostat (Beleodaq) is a potent pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor that was recently approved in the US for the treatment of patients with R/R PTCL. Approval was based on data from the pivotal Phase 2 BELIEF study that enrolled 129 patients with R/R PTCL (N = 120 evaluable), and demonstrated durable clinical benefit and tolerability. This analysis presents data for 12 of the enrolled patients (9 evaluable) who proceeded to HSCT following belinostat treatment. Methods: Patients with R/R PTCL received belinostat as a 1000 mg/m2IV infusion on Days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was Objective Response Rate (ORR; Complete Response [CR] + Partial Response [PR]) determined by an Independent Review Committee (IRC). We present efficacy and safety data for the subset of 12 patients who subsequently went on to HSCT. Results: Among 12 patients who subsequently proceeded to HSCT, 4 went on to receive an autologous HSCT and 8 received an allogeneic HSCT; 8 patients (67%) were female and 4 (33%) were male, and the median age was 54.5 (range 31-71) years. The median number of prior anticancer therapies was 2 (range 1-8), including 3 patients with prior autologous HSCT. The median number of belinostat treatment cycles was 2.5 (range 1-14) compared to the median of 2.0 (range 1-8) in the overall study population. Most patients in this subgroup had PTCL-Not Otherwise Specified (58.3%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (16.7%), or anaplastic large cell lymphoma (16.7%); 41.7% of patients had Stage IV disease. Three of the 12 patients were not evaluable for response due to insufficient histological material for confirmation by central pathologic analysis. The IRC-confirmed ORR for the 9 evaluable patients was 33.3% vs 25.8% in the study overall, and included 2 CRs, 1 PR, 2 patients with stable disease (SD) and 3 patients with progressive disease (PD). Duration of Response after transplant ranged from 41-261 days for the 3 belinostat responders. At last study contact, 2 patients had died from cardiac events (unrelated to belinostat) and 10 remained alive, with Overall Survival (OS) ranging from 8-23+ months. Most adverse events (AEs) were Grade 1-2, with two treatment-related Grade ≥3 AEs (neutropenia and prolonged QT interval); 3 serious AEs (arthralgia, lower limb fracture, and pyrexia) were reported in this subgroup. Conclusions: Belinostat was well tolerated in previously treated patients with R/R PTCL and enabled some patients to proceed to HSCT. Three patients responded and went on to HSCT following belinostat; the remaining patients had HSCT following SD (2), PD (4) or were not evaluable (3). OS was prolonged when compared to historical controls. Summary of Patients Treated with Belinostat Who Subsequently Went on to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Sorted by Subtype and Response Table 1PatientSubtype(Stage)Prior RegimensECOGPSBelinostat CyclesIRC ResponseOS(months)DoR(days) Evaluable Patients931-003^PTCL-NOS (IIIB)3114CR11.56261907-006PTCL-NOS (IIA)5 + auto SCT02SD13.93-907-007^PTCL-NOS (IVA)402SD12.09-907-005^PTCL-NOS (IIIA)202PD13.63-140-002PTCL-NOS (IVA)817PD17.64-914-006PTCL-NOS (IIIA)4 + auto SCT02NE13.73-245-001AITL (UNK)106PR19.9141221-003ALCL ALK– (IA)2 + auto SCT011CR20.4173907-001ALCL ALK– (IVA)204PD22.87- Non-Evaluable Patients*914-002PTCL-NOS (IVB)102PD7.75-147-002^AITL (IIIB)221NE9.43-147-001Hepatosplenic TCL (IVA)103NE10.22- AITL = angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma; ALCL = anaplastic large cell lymphoma; ALK = alkaline phosphatase; auto = autologous; CR = complete response; DoR = duration of response; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IRC = independent review committee; NE = not evaluable; NOS = not otherwise specified; OS = overall survival; PD = progressive disease; PR = partial response; PS = performance status; PTCL = peripheral T-cell lymphoma; SCT = stem cell transplantation; SD = stable disease; TCL = T-cell lymphoma *Lack of central pathologic confirmation resulted in exclusion from the evaluable population ^Autologous hematopoietic SCT Disclosures Al-Ali: Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hsu:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Choi:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Allen:Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Visser:Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Horwitz:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Research Funding; Infinity: Research Funding; Kiowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jannsen: Consultancy.

Description: Abstract 2099 Background: While oral iron is the preferred first-line treatment for patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA), there are patients who cannot take oral iron, do not tolerate it or do not adequately respond to oral iron. In the US and Canada, the only approved treatment options for these patients are the iron dextrans, which have boxed safety warnings and inconvenient dosing regimens. Therefore, many of these anemic patients do not receive IV iron, and remain inadequately treated and symptomatic. In the EU, several IV irons, including iron sucrose (IS), are approved for second line use. Few studies have evaluated the IV irons in head-to-head studies. Ferumoxytol (FER) is a new IV iron approved for the treatment of IDA in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) that is formulated to allow for bolus IV injection. This randomized, controlled trial was designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of FER compared to IS for the treatment of IDA in patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron could not be used. Methods: The study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority and consisted of a 14 day screening period, treatment and a 5 week follow-up period. Key inclusion criteria included a Baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 10 g/dL and 〉7 g/dL, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) 〈 20%. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either FER, administered as 2 injections of 510 mg 5±3 days apart, or IS, administered as 5 infusions or injections of 200 mg on 5 non-consecutive days over a 14 day period. Results: A total of 605 subjects were randomized to the 2 treatment arms (FER, n= 406; IS, n=199). FER demonstrated non-inferiority to IS in the proportion of subjects with a 〉2.0 g/dL increase in Hgb at any time from Baseline to Week 5 (the primary efficacy endpoint), compared to those treated with IS, (FER, 84%; IS 81%) with the lower bound of the 95% CI [-3.89%] above the predefined non inferiority margin [-15%]. In addition at each post-treatment time point, a higher percentage of FER-treated subjects achieved a 〉2.0 g/dL increase in Hgb compared to those treated with IS. FER also achieved non-inferiority to IS in the mean change in Hgb from Baseline to Week 5 with a robust 2.7g/dL increase in Hgb compared to 2.4g/dL with IS (the lower bound of the 95% CI [0.06g/dL] was above the predefined non-inferiority margin [-0.5g/dL]); this treatment difference (0.3 g/dL) was statistically significant (p=0.0124), and FER actually achieved superiority over IS. The overall rates of adverse events (AEs) and related AEs were lower in the FER group compared to IS-treated subjects. The serious adverse event (SAE) rate was higher in FER-treated subjects (FER, 4.2%; IS, 2.5%), but no pattern or safety trend was observed to suggest a specific safety signal; treatment-related SAEs were reported in 2 (0.5%) FER-treated subjects (1 anaphylactoid reaction and 1 hypertension). Protocol-defined AEs of Special Interest (signs/symptoms of hypotension or hypersensitivity associated with IV iron use) were reported at a higher rate in IS-treated subjects compared to the FER treatment group (IS, 5.0%; FER, 2.7%). Cardiovascular AE rates were comparable in the 2 treatment groups (1.0%). Overall, the safety profile of FER was comparable to that of IS and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusion: In this randomized, controlled trial, the efficacy and safety of 2 doses of FER were shown to be comparable to IS in treating IDA patients with a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron could not be used. For this IDA patient population, which has limited treatment options in the US and Canada, FER may offer an important, new treatment option with a convenient 2 dose regimen. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Feraheme (ferumoxytol) injection. For treatment of iron deficiency anemia in non-CKD patients. Bernard:AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Strauss:AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Cressman:AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Li:AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Allen:AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment.

Description: Background: Avatrombopag (AVA) is a novel, oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) recently FDA approved for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in patients who have not responded to prior therapies. Additionally, AVA is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease patients undergoing a procedure. AVA is unique in that it does not have a boxed safety warning for hepatoxicity, is administered with food, and does not have any dietary restrictions. Further, it does not interact with polyvalent cations (calcium, magnesium, iron, selenium, zinc, etc.) in foods, mineral supplements, or antacids that could reduce systemic exposure and efficacy. Methods and Aims: A 6-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study (Core Study) enrolled 32 AVA- and 17 placebo (PBO)-treated patients with ITP. The mean platelet count at Baseline was 13,600/µL for the study population. The starting dose for AVA was 20 mg QD, with subsequent dose titration (5 to 40 mg) to maintain platelet counts between 50,000 to 150,000/µL. The primary endpoint was the median cumulative number of weeks achieving a platelet count ≥50,000/µL, and AVA was shown to be superior to PBO (12.4 vs. 0.0 weeks, p

Description: Abstract 478 Introduction: Iron is essential for the function of many key proteins including hemoglobin (Hgb) and myoglobin (involved in oxygen transport/exchange), cytochromes (involved in energy generation), various enzymes (involved in cell proliferation and neurotransmission), and immune function. Iron deficiency can, therefore, negatively impact patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL) and requires treatment to replete iron stores. Although oral iron is a common initial treatment, some patients do not tolerate it or fail to adequately respond; many of these patients, therefore, live with chronic anemia and the related negative effects on their overall HRQL. Ferumoxytol (FER) is a new IV iron indicated for the treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia (IDA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). FER is being investigated to treat IDA patients without CKD who have a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron cannot be used. To prospectively explore the impact of FER treatment on patient reported outcomes (PROs), the Phase 3 clinical trials included: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-Fatigue); the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36); and the Linear Analogue Scale Assessment (LASA) of Energy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and HRQL. Methods: IDA patients with Hgb 7 g/dL, and transferrin saturation (TSAT)

Description: Background: Patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) often have severe thrombocytopenia (platelet counts

Description: Background: Avatrombopag (AVA) is an oral, thrombopoietin receptor agonist approved by FDA for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic liver disease scheduled to undergo a procedure. AVA is also being developed for other indications including chronic immune thrombocytopenia (cITP) (Bussel et al, Blood, 2014; Wojciech et al, Br J Haematol, in press 2018). In repeated-dose studies in mice, rats and cynomolgus monkeys, there were AVA dose, concentration, and duration-dependent histologic changes in gastric fundic glands that reversed by 4 weeks after dosing was stopped. This was associated with decreased gastric acid production, hypergastrinemia, and increased intragastric pH in all species. The NOAEL in 2-year toxicology studies was defined at exposures 4 to 21-fold the recommended human AVA dose. Hypergastrinemia and parietal cell hyperplasia have also been reported with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA). These findings may be secondary to suppression of gastric acid production, and, in rodents, may lead to gastric carcinoids. Findings of hypergastrinemia-related gastric hyperplasia in rodents have a low risk/relevance to humans. To further evaluate the preclinical findings and screen for atrophic gastritis, gastric biomarkers (gastrin, gastrin-17, and pepsinogen I/II [PG-I/PG-II]) were measured in 2 Phase 3 trials with chronic AVA dosing. These multicenter, randomized, controlled Phase 3 trials were conducted in patients with cITP, and assessed clinical safety and efficacy of AVA versus placebo (PBO) (Study 1- NCT01438840) or eltrombopag (ELT) (Study 2- NCT01433978); Study 2 was terminated early due to enrollment challenges. Methods: Both Phase 3 trials enrolled adults (≥18 years) with chronic ITP (Baseline platelet count (PC) 1.5 times the ULN. Safety analyses included adverse event (AE) monitoring and laboratory testing, including fasting gastric biomarkers. Patients who developed 2 consecutive fasting gastrin-17 levels 〉2.5 times the ULN or low serum PG-I levels or low PG-I/PG-II ratio (with low fasting gastrin-17 levels) were to be discontinued from the trials. Patients with elevations 〉5 times the ULN were to undergo endoscopy to assess the gastric mucosa. Results: A total of 64 patients were treated with AVA across the two trials (Study 1 n=47; Study 2 n=17); the majority were white (92.2%) and female (64.1%), with a mean age of 46.6 years. The median duration of exposure to AVA was 35.1 weeks, with a mean daily dose of 24.6 mg; 75% of subjects received AVA doses between 5 and 40 mg for ≥20 weeks. AVA was shown to be superior to PBO in the median cumulative number of weeks of platelet response (PC ≥50×109/L in the absence of rescue therapy) in Study 1 (12.4 vs. 0.0 weeks, respectively; p

Description: Abstract 2098 Background: Although oral iron therapy is often the initial approach to the treatment of iron deficiency anemia (IDA), many patients fail to adequately respond or do not tolerate oral iron. Unfortunately for these patients, approved treatment options are limited in the US and Canada to only the IV iron dextrans, which have boxed safety warnings and inconvenient dosing regimens. Many of these patients, therefore, do not get IV iron, and remain inadequately treated and symptomatic. Ferumoxytol (FER), a new IV iron approved for the treatment of IDA in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), is being investigated to treat IDA patients without CKD who have a history of unsatisfactory oral iron therapy or in whom oral iron cannot be used. This randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind trial was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of FER for the treatment of these IDA patients. Methods: Key inclusion criteria included a Baseline hemoglobin (Hgb) less than 10 g/dL and 〉7 g/dL, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) 2.0 g/dL from Baseline to Week 5 compared to only 5.5% in the placebo group (treatment difference: 75.6%, p2.0 g/dL increase in Hgb compared with those treated with placebo. The superiority of FER was also demonstrated for the mean change in Hgb from Baseline to Week 5 with a robust 2.7 g/dL increase compared to only 0.1 g/dL in the placebo group (treatment difference: 2.54 g/dL, p

Description: Background: Avatrombopag (AVA) is a novel, oral thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) recently FDA approved for the treatment of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in patients not responding to prior therapies. Additionally, AVA is approved for the treatment of thrombocytopenia in chronic liver disease patients undergoing a procedure. Unlike eltrombopag, AVA absorption is not affected by dietary fat or polyvalent cations (e.g., calcium, magnesium, iron, etc.) facilitating ease of use by patients and it also has not been associated with hepatotoxicity. A randomized, controlled, double-blind phase 3 study including 32 ITP patients treated with AVA and 17 treated with placebo (PBO) for 6 months was previously published (Jurczak et al., 2018), demonstrating the superiority of AVA to PBO in median cumulative weeks achieving platelet counts (Plt) ≥50,000/µL (12.4 vs. 0.0 weeks, p