ALBERT

Notizen: Synopsis Raja erinacea and R. ocellata are sibling species which are positively correlated with each other by occurrence and numerical abundance. In sympatry the species undergo interactive segregation; R. erinacea feeds on a higher percentage of epifauna and R. ocellata feeds on a higher percentage of infauna. An isolated allopatric population of R. ocellata occurs in the Gulf of St. Lawrence which is phenotypically intermediate between the sympatric populations of R. erinacea and R. ocellata in characters related to feeding e.g. size, number of tooth rows in the upper jaw, and shape of the upper jaw. It appears probable that the allopatric population represents the morphological state of R. ocellata before it became sympatric with R. erinacea; divergence in size, number of tooth rows, and shape of the upper jaw between the two species developed after establishment of sympatry. These divergences in character traits, related to feeding, reduced competition between the two sympatric species and permitted the present wide overlap in their ranges. Character displacement is evidently rare in demersal fishes inhabiting the flat and soft bottoms of the northwestern Atlantic because the three other pairs of sibling species that occur there are parapatrically distributed and thus would not compete for resources. Raja erinacea and R. ocellata may have been restrained from establishing parapatry by another species pair of skates (R. senta and R. radiata) which have a complementary distribution and similar feeding habits of R. erinacea and R. ocellata but which occur in deeper water.

Notizen: Abstract Galeus arae is currently classified as a complex of three subspecies (Galeus arae arae, Galeus arae antillensis, and Galeus arae cadenati). Morphometric and meristic analyses, size at maturity, and variation in color patterns, support the recognition of these taxa as distinct species. All species have well-developed nidamental glands and are oviparous. Galeus arae comprises two geographically disjunct populations that are not distinguishable by the characters we examined. A northern population occurs along the east and Gulf coasts of North America from South Carolina to the Mississippi delta, and the northern coast of Cuba to the north-eastern tip of the Yucatan. A southern population occurs along the Caribbean coasts of Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica, and some neighboring islands. Galeus antillensis occurs on the northern coasts of Hispaniola and Puerto Rico, and off many of the Leeward Islands. Galeus cadenati occurs off the Caribbean coasts of Panama and Colombia. Distributional data suggest that the three species are distributed allopatrically.

Notizen: A series of studies by Edgeworth demonstrated that cranial muscles of gnathostome fishes are embryologically of somitic origin, originating from the mandibular, hyoid, branchial, epibranchial, and hypobranchial muscle plates. Recent experimental studies using quail-chick chimeras support Edgeworth's view on the developmental origin of cranial muscles. One of his findings, the existence of the premyogenic condensation constrictor dorsalis in teleost fishes, has also been confirmed by molecular developmental studies. Therefore, developmental mechanisms for patterning of cranial muscles, as described and implicated by Edgeworth, may serve as structural entities or regulatory phenomena responsible for developmental and evolutionary changes. With Edgeworth's and other studies as background, muscles in the ventral gill arch region of batoid fishes are analyzed and compared with those of other gnathostome fishes. The spiracularis is regarded as homologous at least within batoid fishes, but its status within elasmobranchs remains unclear; developmental modifications of the spiracularis proper are evident in some batoid fishes and in several shark groups. The peculiar ventral extension of the spiracularis in electric rays and some stingrays may represent convergence, probably facilitating ventilation and/or feeding in both groups. The evolutionary origin of the “internus” and “externus” remains uncertain, despite the fact that a variety of forms of the constrictor superficiales ventrales in batoid fishes indicates an actual medio-ventral extension of the “externus.” The intermandibularis is probably present only in electric rays. The “X” muscle occurs only in electric rays and is considered to be Edgeworth's intermandibularis profundus. Its association with the adductor mandibular complex in narkinidid and narcinidid electric rays may relate to its functional role in lower jaw movement. Contrary to common belief, in most batoid fishes as well as some sharks, muscles that originate from the branchial muscle plate and extend medially in the ventral gill arches do exist: the medial extension of the interbranchiales in most batoid fishes and some sharks and the “Y” muscle in the pelagic stingrays Myliobatos and Rhinoptera. The latter is another example of the medial extension of the “internus.” Whether the interbranchiales and “Y” muscle are homologous within elasmobranchs and whether homologous with the obliques ventrales and/or transversi ventrales of osteichthyan fishes await further research. Four hypobranchial muscles are recognized in batoid fishes: the coracomandibularis, coracohyoideus, coracoarcualis, and coracohyomandibularis. The coracohyoideus is discrete from the coracoarcualis; its complete structural separation from the latter occurs in several groups of batoid fishes. The sternohyoideus of osteichthyan fishes is regarded as a partially developed, continuous bundle of muscle whose counterpart in chondrichthyan fishes appears to be the fully developed rectus cervicus in holocephalans and the squaloid shark Isistius. The coracoarculais is, therefore, present structurally and possibly functionally as a discrete muscle only in elasmobranchs. Although the coracohyomandibularis has been regarded as unique in batoid fishes, the first coracobranchialis in the sawshark Pristiophorus may represent the coracohyomandibularis. The conceptual frameworks and results of the development and evolution of cranial muscles presented here emphasize the importance of molecular and experimental embryological studies and integration of these areas with comparative anatomical and functional studies. Edgeworth's contributions remain as a remarkable achievement in muscle biology. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Notizen: A total of 63 species of skates (Chondrichthyes: Rajoidei) were surveyed, along with three species of the outgroup (Chondrichtyes: Rhinobatoidei) for electric organs along the sides of the tail. All skate specimens examined possessed what appeared to be functional electric organs, and the three species of the outgroup lacked evidence of electric organs. The electric organs were tail-positive and arranged into horizontal columns divided by transverse septa. The electrocytes varied considerably within and among supraspecific taxa (subgenera and genera), but they could be broadly classified into cup-shape, modified cup-shape, intermediate-shape, and disc-shape cells, provided that the distinction was partially based on position of the electrocytes within their connective tissue chambers. The survey, in part, corroborates a phylogenetic hypothesis of skates and in some respects further resolves the hypothesis. The supraspecific taxa Atlantoraja and Rioraja have similar derived-type electrocytes, as do the five supraspecific taxa of Rajini, and Cruriraja and Anacanthobatis, and to a lesser extent the supraspecific taxa Arhynchobatis, Psammobatis, and Sympterygia, and the supraspecific taxa Notoraja, Pavoraja, and Pseudoraja, corroborating the hypothesis. The supraspecific taxa Amblyraja, Rajella, Leucoraja, Breviraja, and Dactylobatus were unresolved in the phylogenetic hypothesis, but the electrocyte survey suggested that Leucoraja, Breviraja, and Dactylobatus were derived with respect to Amblyraja and Rajella. © 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.